Gut feeling Bortles to Browns
-
-
Why do we keep talking about trading out of the #1? There should be a board gag order about this. Mental masturbations about subsequent picks are fone, but that's it
-
Still on caffeine?
Struggling to find a gentler way of saying this, but I can't so.... Dude, with all due respect.... please tell your gut to STFU!
Myles Garrett and Brock and $10mm for the #4 and Bortles? Cannot see it... don't want to see it... won't see it.
I just don't think Borltes has a head for the game. Physical talent? Enough to burn, but something is just not there, and I'm afraid it's some combination of desire and aptitude.
At least I said "please"...
Still on caffeine?
Struggling to find a gentler way of saying this, but I can't so.... Dude, with all due respect.... please tell your gut to STFU!
Myles Garrett and Brock and $10mm for the #4 and Bortles? Cannot see it... don't want to see it... won't see it.
I just don't think Borltes has a head for the game. Physical talent? Enough to burn, but something is just not there, and I'm afraid it's some combination of desire and aptitude.
At least I said "please"...
Every time I watch him make a decision at crunch time, it looks like that container of Gatorade he chugged during time out was full of Bartles & James, which I now have to rename in his honor.
Therefore, I'm going to join you in the no thanks to Bortles & James...
I do appreciate the thinking outside the box from the OP though. Daniel Jeremiah said something that made a lot of sense. As WELL DUH as it sounds - the way he articulated it really hit home. He said every time another Cleveland FO gets bullied into drafting a QB in round 1 because that's what they're supposed to do - they're turning away first round talent that can help them for just a Brady Quinn, Brandon Weeden and Manziel. In 2 of those drafts, Russell Wilson and Derek Carr went 1-2 rounds later.
As we've all discussed for months now, the difference between the top QBs in this draft and mid-later round prospects isn't as big as it is in other years so why not stick with BPA in lieu of forcing something at QB too early?
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
-
Still on caffeine?
Struggling to find a gentler way of saying this, but I can't so.... Dude, with all due respect.... please tell your gut to STFU!
Myles Garrett and Brock and $10mm for the #4 and Bortles? Cannot see it... don't want to see it... won't see it.
I just don't think Borltes has a head for the game. Physical talent? Enough to burn, but something is just not there, and I'm afraid it's some combination of desire and aptitude.
At least I said "please"...
Every time I watch him make a decision at crunch time, it looks like that container of Gatorade he chugged during time out was full of Bartles & James, which I now have to rename in his honor.
Therefore, I'm going to join you in the no thanks to Bortles & James...
I do appreciate the thinking outside the box from the OP though. Daniel Jeremiah said something that made a lot of sense. As WELL DUH as it sounds - the way he articulated it really hit home. He said every time another Cleveland FO gets bullied into drafting a QB in round 1 because that's what they're supposed to do - they're turning away first round talent that can help them for just a Brady Quinn, Brandon Weeden and Manziel. In 2 of those drafts, Russell Wilson and Derek Carr went 1-2 rounds later.
As we've all discussed for months now, the difference between the top QBs in this draft and mid-later round prospects isn't as big as it is in other years so why not stick with BPA in lieu of forcing something at QB too early?
Every time I watch him make a decision at crunch time, it looks like that container of Gatorade he chugged during time out was full of Bartles & James, which I now have to rename in his honor.
Therefore, I'm going to join you in the no thanks to Bortles & James...
I do appreciate the thinking outside the box from the OP though. Daniel Jeremiah said something that made a lot of sense. As WELL DUH as it sounds - the way he articulated it really hit home. He said every time another Cleveland FO gets bullied into drafting a QB in round 1 because that's what they're supposed to do - they're turning away first round talent that can help them for just a Brady Quinn, Brandon Weeden and Manziel. In 2 of those drafts, Russell Wilson and Derek Carr went 1-2 rounds later.
As we've all discussed for months now, the difference between the top QBs in this draft and mid-later round prospects isn't as big as it is in other years so why not stick with BPA in lieu of forcing something at QB too early?
There is thinking out of the box, and then there's just silliness. Bortles just doesn't see the field.
From Foxports:
"The biggest issue with this trade isnβt Bortles, however. If Tom Coughlin expects to get a first-round pick out of a quarterback thatβs completed just 58.8 percent of his career passes while throwing 51 interceptions to just 69 touchdowns, then he has completely lost his mind."
-
sorry, but I think that gut feeling is a touch of malaria.
-
Flugs, why don't your PMs work?
I don't know. I send/receive them so infrequently I should have plenty of room left to get these and I don't have anyone on ignore. I'll look into it. Thanks for letting me know about it War!
-
Honestly....Cody Kesslers rookie season was as good or better than ANY season Bortles has had.....
So, why would we pay 2 draft picks and burn another season on a retread who has played worse than the guy we just drafted?.....
....all while stopping the progression of the potential developing QB we just picked last year?
Not seeing where it makes sense to do that.....???....
Can someone.....seriously.....articulate how burning picks on Bortles and benching Kessler is the better option?
-
2016 Kessler
65.6% comp
7.1 ypa
92.3 rating
49.6 qbr
2016 Bortles
58.9% comp
6.2 ypa
78.8 rating
49.2 qbr
Ya... dont see any reason to get this guy
-
Like Madonna told Wayne and Garth, "And monkeys MIGHT fly out of my ass,"
WSS
Steve that seems as though it would hurt a LOT lol
-
Not as bad as getting inside the butt in the first place. But now the conversation is taken a decided downward turn
?
WSS
Well now that we're here....would the flying monkeys be throwing their poop or yours?
-
Still on caffeine?
Struggling to find a gentler way of saying this, but I can't so.... Dude, with all due respect.... please tell your gut to STFU!
Myles Garrett and Brock and $10mm for the #4 and Bortles? Cannot see it... don't want to see it... won't see it.
I just don't think Borltes has a head for the game. Physical talent? Enough to burn, but something is just not there, and I'm afraid it's some combination of desire and aptitude.
At least I said "please"...
Every time I watch him make a decision at crunch time, it looks like that container of Gatorade he chugged during time out was full of Bartles & James, which I now have to rename in his honor.
Therefore, I'm going to join you in the no thanks to Bortles & James...
I do appreciate the thinking outside the box from the OP though. Daniel Jeremiah said something that made a lot of sense. As WELL DUH as it sounds - the way he articulated it really hit home. He said every time another Cleveland FO gets bullied into drafting a QB in round 1 because that's what they're supposed to do - they're turning away first round talent that can help them for just a Brady Quinn, Brandon Weeden and Manziel. In 2 of those drafts, Russell Wilson and Derek Carr went 1-2 rounds later.
As we've all discussed for months now, the difference between the top QBs in this draft and mid-later round prospects isn't as big as it is in other years so why not stick with BPA in lieu of forcing something at QB too early?
My initial reply notwithstanding, I love the outside the box stuff.
If not for this and couple other diversionary threads, we'd have been hip deep (at minimum) in the second round of the FO-Staff-split-on-#1/still-a-great-chance-we'll-take-Trubs-at-#1 and/or still-a-great-chance-we'll-trade-the-#1 rumor swamp all week. Been there... done that...
My last thought on that will be: the NFL wants drama around it's #1 overall pick. It would not surprise me at all to find out that some of the topic's "sources" are league sources... as in "we're hearing from people that the Browns are..."
Therefore, I'm going to join you in the no thanks to Bortles & James...
... or maybe Benson & Hedges?
-
Based on close to nothing more than a bit I have this strange feeling the Browns are going to deal with Jacksonville for Bortles. The GM there is very hesitant to downright unwilling to pick up his fifth year option. His play was down last year on what I think is a pretty bad team. There is still a lot of undercurrent that the Browns are pushing for a trade. So, regardless of whether or not I am full of shit how would you view bringing Bortles here and what would you give to do it? The Jags pick at 4 currently and would need to pick up their new QB. As a start to what it would take I will speculate the Browns would have to give #1 and Osweiler plus pay $10MM of his contract to get #4 and Bortles.
Based on close to nothing more than a bit I have this strange feeling the Browns are going to deal with Jacksonville for Bortles. The GM there is very hesitant to downright unwilling to pick up his fifth year option. His play was down last year on what I think is a pretty bad team. There is still a lot of undercurrent that the Browns are pushing for a trade. So, regardless of whether or not I am full of shit how would you view bringing Bortles here and what would you give to do it? The Jags pick at 4 currently and would need to pick up their new QB. As a start to what it would take I will speculate the Browns would have to give #1 and Osweiler plus pay $10MM of his contract to get #4 and Bortles.
Well unless Sashi is flat-out lying your gut is having a bad gas attack. His last two responses to MKC also apply to Bortles, not just Garropolo. What I remember it goes like this- "I can't envision trading for an established QB draft weekend."
Lets bottom line the replies, What pick(s) would you give for Bortles. Assume they take a QB at 4 and no longer need his services.
If the Jags take a qb @ #4, what would I give for him? Nada. No interest. More pre draft speculation that isn't worth crap.
-
Not as bad as getting inside the butt in the first place. But now the conversation is taken a decided downward turn
?
WSS
Well now that we're here....would the flying monkeys be throwing their poop or yours?
Well now that we're here....would the flying monkeys be throwing their poop or yours?
Well I don't really love poop but if I had to clean off 1 of the other I guess I'd rather clean off my own. Which i've actually done at times in my life. To be honest i've never had to clean off monkey poop.
WSS
-
Well now that we're here....would the flying monkeys be throwing their poop or yours?
Well I don't really love poop but if I had to clean off 1 of the other I guess I'd rather clean off my own. Which i've actually done at times in my life. To be honest i've never had to clean off monkey poop.
WSS
Well I don't really love poop but if I had to clean off 1 of the other I guess I'd rather clean off my own. Which i've actually done at times in my life. To be honest i've never had to clean off monkey poop.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login