Skip to content

Kyle Sloter is our QB target

The Browns Board
62 20 2.0k
  • Thanks for a "football" answer to a football question Ghoolie. That's all I was really asking for.

    @marcus said:

    Thanks for a "football" answer to a football question Ghoolie. That's all I was really asking for.

    That answer has been given by me and others many, many times over. Did you miss those massive numbers of posts while you were only worried about his race?

  • So when limp biscuit gets pummeled in the pros because you think he can handle it from day one I will laugh. If you say we should pick him because of his raw potential talent that he will be good once properly couched. I will laugh at you. If you neglect the browns are like a block of Swiss cheese and getting a rookie QB this will fix shit. I will laugh at you.

    @lbc-mike said:

    So when limp biscuit gets pummeled in the pros because you think he can handle it from day one I will laugh. If you say we should pick him because of his raw potential talent that he will be good once properly couched. I will laugh at you. If you neglect the browns are like a block of Swiss cheese and getting a rookie QB this will fix shit. I will laugh at you.

    No....a rookie QB won't fix shit, Sherlock. Beyond QB this team has a lot of work to do. But that QB could be the answer for the next decade when he has experience and is not a rookie.

    Why are you so short sighted. Even if we take the DE #1....I don't think he makes much of a splash...if ever, until a couple of years into his career. He will initially get manhandled by NFL offensive linemen. Then, perhaps, he will learn some lessons that he can use in the long run.

    One lesson he will learn right off is he ain't playing Prairie View any more.

  • @hoorta said:

    You're allowed to hate Mitch all you want. BTW, I don't think I know which qb you like- if any. Garrett isn't going to turn this D into the 1986 Chicago Bears by himself. So we only need around 5 other pro bowl guys on that side of the ball.

    Just add 3 including Garrett and two or three of our current players get the support they need to rise to pro bowl level play.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Just add 3 including Garrett and two or three of our current players get the support they need to rise to pro bowl level play.

    How about 3 plus Garrett. Need 2 pro bowl DBs....and either a pro bowl DT or OLB.

    On the other hand...it seems to me the offense is in much better shape. We have a pretty set OL, and competent RBs.

    Need really, in addition to that QB: another TE, and maybe another WR (and these could be Coleman/Britt...or one of the other rookies from last year if they step up).

    We need 5 guys on defense...and only 1 or 2 others on offense (in addition to QB)

  • @lbc-mike said:

    So when limp biscuit gets pummeled in the pros because you think he can handle it from day one I will laugh. If you say we should pick him because of his raw potential talent that he will be good once properly couched. I will laugh at you. If you neglect the browns are like a block of Swiss cheese and getting a rookie QB this will fix shit. I will laugh at you.

    No....a rookie QB won't fix shit, Sherlock. Beyond QB this team has a lot of work to do. But that QB could be the answer for the next decade when he has experience and is not a rookie.

    Why are you so short sighted. Even if we take the DE #1....I don't think he makes much of a splash...if ever, until a couple of years into his career. He will initially get manhandled by NFL offensive linemen. Then, perhaps, he will learn some lessons that he can use in the long run.

    One lesson he will learn right off is he ain't playing Prairie View any more.

    @the-gipper said:

    No....a rookie QB won't fix shit, Sherlock. Beyond QB this team has a lot of work to do. But that QB could be the answer for the next decade when he has experience and is not a rookie.

    Why are you so short sighted. Even if we take the DE #1....I don't think he makes much of a splash...if ever, until a couple of years into his career. He will initially get manhandled by NFL offensive linemen. Then, perhaps, he will learn some lessons that he can use in the long run.

    One lesson he will learn right off is he ain't playing Prairie View any more.

    Gip

    I know it takes a couple years for the average QB which he is. I don't want to waste a 1st round pick in one this year. We don't have the luxury like new England or the farve/Rogers situation.

    We can have players this year that can play from opening day for the next few years.

    I am okay with not picking a QB. Kessler is servicible and so is Ox. Trubinsky reminds me of Quinn. Quinn was a bust and had way more upside than limp biscuit

  • @the-gipper said:

    No....a rookie QB won't fix shit, Sherlock. Beyond QB this team has a lot of work to do. But that QB could be the answer for the next decade when he has experience and is not a rookie.

    Why are you so short sighted. Even if we take the DE #1....I don't think he makes much of a splash...if ever, until a couple of years into his career. He will initially get manhandled by NFL offensive linemen. Then, perhaps, he will learn some lessons that he can use in the long run.

    One lesson he will learn right off is he ain't playing Prairie View any more.

    Gip

    I know it takes a couple years for the average QB which he is. I don't want to waste a 1st round pick in one this year. We don't have the luxury like new England or the farve/Rogers situation.

    We can have players this year that can play from opening day for the next few years.

    I am okay with not picking a QB. Kessler is servicible and so is Ox. Trubinsky reminds me of Quinn. Quinn was a bust and had way more upside than limp biscuit

    @lbc-mike said:

    Gip

    I know it takes a couple years for the average QB which he is. I don't want to waste a 1st round pick in one this year. We don't have the luxury like new England or the farve/Rogers situation.

    WTF? Of course we have "the luxury". If this team were ready to contend, then perhaps we would not have the luxury. Where did you get the idea that this team was ready to compete for the playoffs THIS year?

    The Browns are not like the 2003 Steelers, where they had a great defense in place, but all they needed was a QB to complete the package. If we were just a single defender...or even just a QB away from completing the package, that would be another matter. But the Browns are not there. So we are drafting a player for 2-3-4-5 years in the future.

    We can have players this year that can play from opening day for the next few years.

    Yes, for the next FEW years. But this year? It is NOT essential.

    I am okay with not picking a QB. Kessler is servicible and so is Ox. Trubinsky reminds me of Quinn. Quinn was a bust and had way more upside than limp biscuit

    Trubisky reminds me of Aaron Rodgers.

    i just think you have no clue what you are looking at.

  • marcus.... if it's any comfort, it's not just you.

  • @nickers said:

    If the Browns wind up drafting Sloter... then this administration can pack it's bags now...

    I see the complete opposite. First of all he's 6th round to UDFA. Zero downside and if he is even a good backup it's a coup. Starter makes the staff geniuses.

    @jcam222 said:

    I see the complete opposite. First of all he's 6th round to UDFA. Zero downside and if he is even a good backup it's a coup. Starter makes the staff geniuses.

    [/quote

    I'm tired of 3rd rnd, 4th rnd projects

  • @marcus said:

    Again might be the best QB since Brady. I'd be more LIKELY to believe that with a larger sample size. However, I'll concede that what I did see are what you all are pounding the table over. As far as seeing all of your other posts regarding skillset

    Here's another question for you why cut the part of my post where I said if the Browns pick him I'm automatically a fan of his win, lose, or draw? Is it really that serious to discredit or demonize someone that doesn't agree with you?

    Because that part of the post was not something I was responding to. Simple as that. I only quoted the parts I was replying to. Why would I need to paste it if I am not going to reply to it. That statement spoke for itself.

  • marcus.... if it's any comfort, it's not just you.

    @tour2ma said:

    marcus.... if it's any comfort, it's not just you.

    Right. Its not just you. I don't quote any post that I don't have a reply to. Should I waste my time and yours doing so?

    Should every statement you make that I agree with or have no opinion on be quoted by me?

  • @jcam222 said:

    I see the complete opposite. First of all he's 6th round to UDFA. Zero downside and if he is even a good backup it's a coup. Starter makes the staff geniuses.

    [/quote

    I'm tired of 3rd rnd, 4th rnd projects

    @nickers said:

    I'm tired of 3rd rnd, 4th rnd projects

    I agree with this. (How superfluous of me to say so)

  • @jcam222 said:

    I see the complete opposite. First of all he's 6th round to UDFA. Zero downside and if he is even a good backup it's a coup. Starter makes the staff geniuses.

    [/quote

    I'm tired of 3rd rnd, 4th rnd projects

    @nickers said:

    I'm tired of 3rd rnd, 4th rnd projects

    What?

    Remind me again what round Billy, weeden, Quinn, couch we're taken in?

  • Seems like it's time to try a 5th-rounder...

    Chad Kelly..... c'mon down! 🙂