Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin

Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
104 Posts 10 Posters 1.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

    @clevfan4life said:

    Maybe because the gop understands PP and what they do more than the oversimplified narratives fed to the simpletons that vote for republucans. So if they defund PP overnight you potentially fuck with their own voter base.

    Baloney. Planned Parenthood claims they do alot of services for women they don't like mammograms and prenatal care. The money PP gets can be better used for organizations that actually do mammograms and prenatal care for women. If republicans are going to make campaign promises such as de-funding PP then they should have their feet held to the fire when they don't deliver on it.

    And btw it is the democrats who have a stranglehold on the low information voters.By far.

    Yes, Planned Parenthood claims to do prenatal care, and yes, it’s a lie

    https://www.liveaction.org/news/yes-planned-parenthood-claims-prenatal-care-yes-lie/

    Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
    • 24k Posts
    • 1k Reputation
    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Baloney. Planned Parenthood claims they do alot of services for women they don't like mammograms and prenatal care. The money PP gets can be better used for organizations that actually do mammograms and prenatal care for women. If republicans are going to make campaign promises such as de-funding PP then they should have their feet held to the fire when they don't deliver on it.

    And btw it is the democrats who have a stranglehold on the low information voters.By far.

    1) im in agreement that perhsps the abortion services should be defunded given that half the country foesnt want to subsidize abortions and frankly, im still not sure whats going on at pp with selling fetus's. I dupport womens right to choose but not the right to get pregnant and monetize their fetus's.

    2) but claiming pp doesnt do any of those other services really shows the low information we're desling with. All humans in our society have fallen susceptible to having their narratives boiler plated for them, but you conservstives beleive "easily" disproveable falsehoods.

    If a theoretical physicist wirking on cutting edge unified theory research bullshits me about something he's working on, would be tough for anyone on the planet save for his colleagues to csll him on it. But you conservatives buy shit hook line and sinker that can be refuted with a sub 10 second google query. That is inforgiveable. The voncept of "alternative facts" has been brewing on ur side for years now. Because too many of u are profoundly ignorant of how too many thongs in this universe actually work.

    I know what this is about, im not fooled for a moment. You all want to go back to the days when ur church leaders were the only sources of answers. When men could be executed for saying the world isnt flat and we actually revolve around the sun. Those days are never coming back. Its that loss of control that boils people on ur side.

    OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • tiamat63T tiamat63

      @oldbrownsfan said:

      And btw it is the democrats who have a stranglehold on the low information voters.By far.

      Two sides of the same coin.

      If you don't believe the majority of voters from either side are complete idiots, then you haven't taken an honest look around lately.

      OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
      • 11k Posts
      • 3k Reputation
      OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
      #30

      @tiamat63 said:

      Two sides of the same coin.

      If you don't believe the majority of voters from either side are complete idiots, then you haven't taken an honest look around lately.

      Winston Churchill had some great quotes. Here is one:

      winstonchurchill1.jpg

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • C Clevfan4life

        @oldbrownsfan said:

        Baloney. Planned Parenthood claims they do alot of services for women they don't like mammograms and prenatal care. The money PP gets can be better used for organizations that actually do mammograms and prenatal care for women. If republicans are going to make campaign promises such as de-funding PP then they should have their feet held to the fire when they don't deliver on it.

        And btw it is the democrats who have a stranglehold on the low information voters.By far.

        1) im in agreement that perhsps the abortion services should be defunded given that half the country foesnt want to subsidize abortions and frankly, im still not sure whats going on at pp with selling fetus's. I dupport womens right to choose but not the right to get pregnant and monetize their fetus's.

        2) but claiming pp doesnt do any of those other services really shows the low information we're desling with. All humans in our society have fallen susceptible to having their narratives boiler plated for them, but you conservstives beleive "easily" disproveable falsehoods.

        If a theoretical physicist wirking on cutting edge unified theory research bullshits me about something he's working on, would be tough for anyone on the planet save for his colleagues to csll him on it. But you conservatives buy shit hook line and sinker that can be refuted with a sub 10 second google query. That is inforgiveable. The voncept of "alternative facts" has been brewing on ur side for years now. Because too many of u are profoundly ignorant of how too many thongs in this universe actually work.

        I know what this is about, im not fooled for a moment. You all want to go back to the days when ur church leaders were the only sources of answers. When men could be executed for saying the world isnt flat and we actually revolve around the sun. Those days are never coming back. Its that loss of control that boils people on ur side.

        OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
        • 11k Posts
        • 3k Reputation
        OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
        #31

        @clevfan4life said:

        1) im in agreement that perhsps the abortion services should be defunded given that half the country foesnt want to subsidize abortions and frankly, im still not sure whats going on at pp with selling fetus's. I dupport womens right to choose but not the right to get pregnant and monetize their fetus's.

        2) but claiming pp doesnt do any of those other services really shows the low information we're desling with. All humans in our society have fallen susceptible to having their narratives boiler plated for them, but you conservstives beleive "easily" disproveable falsehoods.

        If a theoretical physicist wirking on cutting edge unified theory research bullshits me about something he's working on, would be tough for anyone on the planet save for his colleagues to csll him on it. But you conservatives buy shit hook line and sinker that can be refuted with a sub 10 second google query. That is inforgiveable. The voncept of "alternative facts" has been brewing on ur side for years now. Because too many of u are profoundly ignorant of how too many thongs in this universe actually work.

        I know what this is about, im not fooled for a moment. You all want to go back to the days when ur church leaders were the only sources of answers. When men could be executed for saying the world isnt flat and we actually revolve around the sun. Those days are never coming back. Its that loss of control that boils people on ur side.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

          @mld-woody said:

          No no no. Forget the MSM bullshit.

          The script is just flipped. Conservatives wanted to do everything they could to get Obama out of office just you're claiming Liberals are doing with Trump now.

          It is amazing to me that a group if you on here are just doing the exact polar opposite of what you were doing the last 8 years (reactions flipped, etc etc) and none of you seem to realize it.

          The MSM thing is only BS to you because your side benefits from it.

          Study: How Biased is the Media Against Trump? EXTREMELY Biased.

          http://www.dailywire.com/news/14035/report-how-biased-media-against-trump-88-coverage-james-barrett

          MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
          • 33k Posts
          • 3k Reputation
          MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
          #32

          @oldbrownsfan said:

          The MSM thing is only BS to you because your side benefits from it.

          Study: How Biased is the Media Against Trump? EXTREMELY Biased.

          http://www.dailywire.com/news/14035/report-how-biased-media-against-trump-88-coverage-james-barrett

          1) No, it is BS in this case because it's used as a distraction. I wasn't discussing the media at all but "the liberal MSM!" is the answer to every post.

          2) That article refers to the same report you've posted on here before. It's done by a self proclaimed right wing group. Clearly that is a biased source.

          Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
          OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

            @oldbrownsfan said:

            The MSM thing is only BS to you because your side benefits from it.

            Study: How Biased is the Media Against Trump? EXTREMELY Biased.

            http://www.dailywire.com/news/14035/report-how-biased-media-against-trump-88-coverage-james-barrett

            1) No, it is BS in this case because it's used as a distraction. I wasn't discussing the media at all but "the liberal MSM!" is the answer to every post.

            2) That article refers to the same report you've posted on here before. It's done by a self proclaimed right wing group. Clearly that is a biased source.

            OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
            • 11k Posts
            • 3k Reputation
            OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by OldBrownsFan
            #33

            @mld-woody said:

            1) No, it is BS in this case because it's used as a distraction. I wasn't discussing the media at all but "the liberal MSM!" is the answer to every post.

            2) That article refers to the same report you've posted on here before. It's done by a self proclaimed right wing group. Clearly that is a biased source.

            Study done by Harvard Woody...a very liberal institution :

            Harvard Study Agrees With MRC: Media Biased Against Trump

            http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/jackson-richman/2017/05/19/harvard-study-agrees-mrc-media-biased-against-trump

            MLD WoodyM 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
              • 11k Posts
              • 3k Reputation
              OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
              #34

              Now to your other point of course you see it on both sides. I am just pointing out the huge advantage the left has with their control of the MSM.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                @mld-woody said:

                1) No, it is BS in this case because it's used as a distraction. I wasn't discussing the media at all but "the liberal MSM!" is the answer to every post.

                2) That article refers to the same report you've posted on here before. It's done by a self proclaimed right wing group. Clearly that is a biased source.

                Study done by Harvard Woody...a very liberal institution :

                Harvard Study Agrees With MRC: Media Biased Against Trump

                http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/jackson-richman/2017/05/19/harvard-study-agrees-mrc-media-biased-against-trump

                MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                • 33k Posts
                • 3k Reputation
                MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                #35

                @oldbrownsfan said:

                Study done by Harvard Woody...a very liberal institution :

                Harvard Study Agrees With MRC: Media Biased Against Trump

                http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/jackson-richman/2017/05/19/harvard-study-agrees-mrc-media-biased-against-trump

                Lead with the reputable sources, cut out the biased ones, it'll help you make your point.

                Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                  • 28k Posts
                  • 6k Reputation
                  DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                  #36

                  "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • MLD WoodyM MLD Woody

                    @oldbrownsfan said:

                    Study done by Harvard Woody...a very liberal institution :

                    Harvard Study Agrees With MRC: Media Biased Against Trump

                    http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/jackson-richman/2017/05/19/harvard-study-agrees-mrc-media-biased-against-trump

                    Lead with the reputable sources, cut out the biased ones, it'll help you make your point.

                    OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                    • 11k Posts
                    • 3k Reputation
                    OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                    #37

                    @mld-woody said:

                    Lead with the reputable sources, cut out the biased ones, it'll help you make your point.

                    Reputable sources are in the eye of the beholder.

                    MLD WoodyM C 3 Replies Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                      @mld-woody said:

                      Lead with the reputable sources, cut out the biased ones, it'll help you make your point.

                      Reputable sources are in the eye of the beholder.

                      MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                      • 33k Posts
                      • 3k Reputation
                      MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                      #38

                      @oldbrownsfan said:

                      Reputable sources are in the eye of the beholder.

                      No, no they really aren't.

                      Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                        @mld-woody said:

                        Lead with the reputable sources, cut out the biased ones, it'll help you make your point.

                        Reputable sources are in the eye of the beholder.

                        Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                        • 24k Posts
                        • 1k Reputation
                        C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by Clevfan4life
                        #39

                        @oldbrownsfan said:

                        Reputable sources are in the eye of the beholder.

                        Reputable sources are open and forthcoming with thrir data. Methodologies etc, etc. And they are open yo peer reviews....and if a peer review finds inconsistincys they withdraw the paper. Now.....do u think any of ur sources confine themselves to those parameters?
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                          • 24k Posts
                          • 1k Reputation
                          C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                          #40

                          Obf u talked earlier of liberals having the lock on "low information"..,yet most of the center and left leaning people here at least, got the basics down pat

                          OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • C Clevfan4life

                            Obf u talked earlier of liberals having the lock on "low information"..,yet most of the center and left leaning people here at least, got the basics down pat

                            OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                            • 11k Posts
                            • 3k Reputation
                            OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by OldBrownsFan
                            #41

                            @clevfan4life said:

                            Obf u talked earlier of liberals having the lock on "low information"..,yet most of the center and left leaning people here at least, got the basics down pat

                            Really Cleve? When one of the main leaders in the democrat party says this (and she gets voted back in office every 2 years by high information liberal voters?):

                            The stupidest thing Nancy Pelosi has ever said?

                            http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/05/the_stupidest_thing_nancy_pelosi_has_ever_said.html

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                              • 24k Posts
                              • 1k Reputation
                              C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by Clevfan4life
                              #42

                              Except m not judging either party by the political operatives they manage to keep in power for decades. I could go tit for tat with u for 10 pages about the stupid shit republicand say. Im judging based on the people i run into daily.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                                • 24k Posts
                                • 1k Reputation
                                C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by Clevfan4life
                                #43

                                Infact if repiblicans were on avg smarter abd more analytical, i could see myself voting republicsn for a candidate like that. But ur all right wing nutjobs who base everything off a 3000 year piece of rubbish that gas no place in modern civics.

                                For insyance I can make an argument against gay marriage that has nothing to do with what jeebus supposedly said on the issue, which wasnt much anywsy. But u people cant. Everything is about ur sky wizard.

                                I see a people in a certain area of the world also similiarly afflicted with their own sky wizard stories. And i want no part of that here

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                                  • 28k Posts
                                  • 6k Reputation
                                  DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by DieHardBrownsFan
                                  #44

                                  LMFAO! So I type 'Clevefan4life, and well, here is is?

                                  https://mingle2.com/user/view/11879943

                                  "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • tiamat63 tiamat63T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Month Later One Year In Very Popular
                                    • 13k Posts
                                    • 5k Reputation
                                    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by tiamat63
                                    #45

                                    Usually you don't see trolls make their own accounts to troll with. That's....creepy. Not even good trolling.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                                      • 28k Posts
                                      • 6k Reputation
                                      DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                      #46

                                      Dude, I didn't make up anything. I typed his name in google and this came up. Believe it or not. Not surprising to me.

                                      "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                                        • 24k Posts
                                        • 1k Reputation
                                        C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                                        #47

                                        Except u were too stupid to spell my name right. Theres actually a "clevefan4life" here at the brownsboard but that dudes been inactive for years. When i first came here people were asking me if i was that guy. I didnt know when i signed up that there was a virtually identical handle already here....otherwise i would have chosen a diff name

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                                          @mld-woody said:

                                          Lead with the reputable sources, cut out the biased ones, it'll help you make your point.

                                          Reputable sources are in the eye of the beholder.

                                          MLD Woody MLD WoodyM Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular First Post Collaborator Posting Machine Reacting Well One Month Later One Year In Week One Done
                                          • 33k Posts
                                          • 3k Reputation
                                          MLD WoodyM MLD Woody wrote on last edited by
                                          #48

                                          @oldbrownsfan said:

                                          Reputable sources are in the eye of the beholder.

                                          Now that I think about it, this post I've quoted right here, this would explain 99% of all of the BS we see on here. This belief.

                                          Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
                                          OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better πŸ’—

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate