Skip to content

Browns Trade For NYJ S Calvin Pryor

The Browns Board
89 35 4.1k
  • There seems to very much be a difference in the safeties in Williams' D, as it has been described.

    Peppers was rarely asked to play deep coverage. Not to say he couldn't, I'd bet that he eventually could be great, but the fact is he's rarely done it so far. It would take some experience and some mistakes.

    @mld-woody said:

    There seems to very much be a difference in the safeties in Williams' D, as it has been described.

    Peppers was rarely asked to play deep coverage. Not to say he couldn't, I'd bet that he eventually could be great, but the fact is he's rarely done it so far. It would take some experience and some mistakes.

    And a lot of serious game tape study every week to recognize what the receivers/QB are doing. That's where serious coaching comes into play.

  • @vikingdawg said:

    You failed, again. Course we both know you are used to failure as it seems to be the only thing you know anything about. Tim Couch may have pulled out but someone should punch your punkass daddy for not pulling out when he was fucking that prostitute that gave birth to your sorry fucking ass.

    No go cry to your boyfriend to ban me some more, snowflake.

    You tried entirely too hard on that one, champ.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    You tried entirely too hard on that one, champ.

    Some serious grade school shit there...?
  • http://disq.us/t/2pfrw9g A pretty fair read at the Big Nickle D & 3 tech..

  • I'm curious as to why all this 42big discussion now with Pryor?

    I mentioned Tyvis as the big5 spot a while back when he was signed. Picking up Calvin changes nothing. We still have a log jam of players for early down nickel. Kindred, Tyvis and Pryor. With Ed at the other spot. This means camp battle on who will be cut really comes down to Pryor and Kindred. As Ty is the likely slide in for Ed (god forbid he goes down)

  • I'm curious as to why all this 42big discussion now with Pryor?

    I mentioned Tyvis as the big5 spot a while back when he was signed. Picking up Calvin changes nothing. We still have a log jam of players for early down nickel. Kindred, Tyvis and Pryor. With Ed at the other spot. This means camp battle on who will be cut really comes down to Pryor and Kindred. As Ty is the likely slide in for Ed (god forbid he goes down)

    @tiamat63 said:

    I'm curious as to why all this 42big discussion now with Pryor?

    I mentioned Tyvis as the big5 spot a while back when he was signed. Picking up Calvin changes nothing. We still have a log jam of players for early down nickel. Kindred, Tyvis and Pryor. With Ed at the other spot. This means camp battle on who will be cut really comes down to Pryor and Kindred. As Ty is the likely slide in for Ed (god forbid he goes down)

    Peppers will be $. Calvin will probably be every down SS.

    Tyvis will likely compete for FS with Ed, he's not a box safety.

    Kindred will likely be backup SS.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    I'm curious as to why all this 42big discussion now with Pryor?

    I mentioned Tyvis as the big5 spot a while back when he was signed. Picking up Calvin changes nothing. We still have a log jam of players for early down nickel. Kindred, Tyvis and Pryor. With Ed at the other spot. This means camp battle on who will be cut really comes down to Pryor and Kindred. As Ty is the likely slide in for Ed (god forbid he goes down)

    Peppers will be $. Calvin will probably be every down SS.

    Tyvis will likely compete for FS with Ed, he's not a box safety.

    Kindred will likely be backup SS.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Peppers will be $.

    My 3 hopes of week 1. 1.Watching Garrett egg-planting Ben at least twice.2.Let Pepper's roll his 1st coverage assignment to a S or LB than go ring that L.Bell on a screen/dump-off that has killed us for years.3.just simply compete in Week 1(man we have been bad in openers, mainly just running any kind of offensive play)

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Peppers will be $.

    My 3 hopes of week 1. 1.Watching Garrett egg-planting Ben at least twice.2.Let Pepper's roll his 1st coverage assignment to a S or LB than go ring that L.Bell on a screen/dump-off that has killed us for years.3.just simply compete in Week 1(man we have been bad in openers, mainly just running any kind of offensive play)

    @gumby73 said:

    .. man we have been bad in openers..

    And the 15 games that follow the opener

  • @tiamat63 said:

    I'm curious as to why all this 42big discussion now with Pryor?

    I mentioned Tyvis as the big5 spot a while back when he was signed. Picking up Calvin changes nothing. We still have a log jam of players for early down nickel. Kindred, Tyvis and Pryor. With Ed at the other spot. This means camp battle on who will be cut really comes down to Pryor and Kindred. As Ty is the likely slide in for Ed (god forbid he goes down)

    Peppers will be $. Calvin will probably be every down SS.

    Tyvis will likely compete for FS with Ed, he's not a box safety.

    Kindred will likely be backup SS.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Peppers will be $. Calvin will probably be every down SS.

    Tyvis will likely compete for FS with Ed, he's not a box safety.

    Kindred will likely be backup SS.

    Tyvus was just cut today. So theres that.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Peppers will be $. Calvin will probably be every down SS.

    Tyvis will likely compete for FS with Ed, he's not a box safety.

    Kindred will likely be backup SS.

    Tyvus was just cut today. So theres that.

    @cambridgeho said:

    Tyvus was just cut today. So theres that.

    Next man up.

    Ed and Nacua, I guess.

  • Nacua will make the team

  • Nacua will make the team

    @londonbrown said:

    Nacua will make the team

    Disturbing, to be sure..

    progress?....not really..

  • Nacua, please.

  • Nacua, please.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Nacua, please.

    Is Nacua this years "Scooby Wright"?.. Just because they have cool names doesnt guarantee a spot on the roster

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Nacua, please.

    Is Nacua this years "Scooby Wright"?.. Just because they have cool names doesnt guarantee a spot on the roster

    @nickers said:

    Is Nacua this years "Scooby Wright"?.. Just because they have cool names doesnt guarantee a spot on the roster

    Not gonna bitch or say Scooby woulda been great....cause he is limited.....BUT, he should have been retained and was definitely better than some of the 53 we kept.....time will prove that out and he WILL have a career in the NFL, whilst many that we kept ahead of him wont......