Skip to content

Team grades

The Browns Board
25 11 1.2k
  • Interesting that the Steelers grade was lower than ours. Would seem to say they were "off".

    I wonder how many match ups produced that result? Maybe later I'll look...

  • Interesting that the Steelers grade was lower than ours. Would seem to say they were "off".

    I wonder how many match ups produced that result? Maybe later I'll look...

    @tour2ma said:

    Interesting that the Steelers grade was lower than ours. Would seem to say they were "off".

    I wonder how many match ups produced that result? Maybe later I'll look...

    The Steelers grade may have been lower than the Browns because except for a few positions the Browns are actually the more talented team....ergo their grade should have been lower.

    Late last season with BR and AB playing (or Bell either)....the Browns manhandled the Steelers fairly well. It was only their stupid mistakes that cost them the game.  This week the Steelers had BR, Brown and Bell....and while I think it is fair to say that BR and Brown beat us, it was also one stupid mistake that may have made the difference in the game. 

    So, go look at the grade from that last game last year as well...and then this game.  And see if some kind of trend can be discerned.

  • Your argument... you go look if you want to support it. I've already supported mine.

  • Your argument... you go look if you want to support it. I've already supported mine.

    @tour2ma said:

    Your argument... you go look if you want to support it. I've already supported mine.

    Supported it with what?  Your opinion?  I see no where on this thread that you put any data

  • Interesting that the Steelers grade was lower than ours. Would seem to say they were "off".

    I wonder how many match ups produced that result? Maybe later I'll look...

    @tour2ma said:

    Interesting that the Steelers grade was lower than ours. Would seem to say they were "off".

    I wonder how many match ups produced that result? Maybe later I'll look...

    It may also say they just aren't as good as projected while perhaps we are better. 

  • Leveon who?

  • ......"Like the Chicago Bears, the Browns did well. Even in defeat."......

    This is true however can not go on forever, they can and must steal a few wins as the season goes on. Still dammit 1-0 sure would have been sweet.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Interesting that the Steelers grade was lower than ours. Would seem to say they were "off".

    I wonder how many match ups produced that result? Maybe later I'll look...

    It may also say they just aren't as good as projected while perhaps we are better. 

    @jcam222 said:

    It may also say they just aren't as good as projected while perhaps we are better. 

    That's possible... and at least you were able to follow a discussion...

    @the-gipper said:

    Supported it with what?  Your opinion?  I see no where on this thread that you put any data

    Time to say goodbye to you for a while... again. So back to the Ghoolie-zone with you.

  • @westside-steve said:

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2732294-nfl-team-grades-for-week-1

    WSS

    SIGH.......................... Like the Ghoolie said from before draft day.................... Kizer holds the ball too fucking long. That is not something that can be fixed, taught or conditioned out. Reflexes are reflexes. There are no drills that will speed this dullards synapses up. HE IS DIM WITTED with his release.

    That is the only part of the story that matters. Browns defense played well? No Fuck? Did they ah, play well when they had Ben pinned in the dawg pound down only by 3? OOOOPS  OOOOOPS  OOOOOPS  No, they didn't make a play.

    All this circle jerking about "what e did good?" They lost the fucking game, they got 155 yards gifted on penalties, and still could not score. This team blows. Kizer blows. He is going to get fucked up in the NFL. Big Big hits are on their way.

  • Ghoolie you have posted in multiple threads that Kizer is a dim wit worthless fuck because he was sacked 7 times in his first rookie start. FYI Roethlisberger was sacked 7 his rookie season in week 11. http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004

  • Ghoolie you have posted in multiple threads that Kizer is a dim wit worthless fuck because he was sacked 7 times in his first rookie start. FYI Roethlisberger was sacked 7 his rookie season in week 11. http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004

    @jcam222 said:

    Ghoolie you have posted in multiple threads that Kizer is a dim wit worthless fuck because he was sacked 7 times in his first rookie start. FYI Roethlisberger was sacked 7 his rookie season in week 11. http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004

    Don't try and bring up facts with the blowhard attention whore.  He'll just ignore it anyways.   No sense even trying.

  • Personally I go "C" due to our major ST error plus we caught Pittsburgh on an "off day"...

    And, no, Ag... I'm not drafting a RB on Day One... wouldn't be prudent...

    @tour2ma said:

    Personally I go "C" due to our major ST error plus we caught Pittsburgh on an "off day"...

    And, no, Ag... I'm not drafting a RB on Day One... wouldn't be prudent...

    Tell that to Dallas and now Jax. Bet they aren't crying much now that they have someone to take pressure off young QBs. You know me my now. Normally I'm D first. But at this moment we could use a real RB and not one with near zero vision.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Personally I go "C" due to our major ST error plus we caught Pittsburgh on an "off day"...

    And, no, Ag... I'm not drafting a RB on Day One... wouldn't be prudent...

    Tell that to Dallas and now Jax. Bet they aren't crying much now that they have someone to take pressure off young QBs. You know me my now. Normally I'm D first. But at this moment we could use a real RB and not one with near zero vision.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Tell that to Dallas and now Jax. Bet they aren't crying much now that they have someone to take pressure off young QBs. You know me my now. Normally I'm D first. But at this moment we could use a real RB and not one with near zero vision.

    No argument, but it doesn't take a Day One pick to land a "real RB."

  • Ghoolie you have posted in multiple threads that Kizer is a dim wit worthless fuck because he was sacked 7 times in his first rookie start. FYI Roethlisberger was sacked 7 his rookie season in week 11. http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004

    @jcam222 said:

    Ghoolie you have posted in multiple threads that Kizer is a dim wit worthless fuck because he was sacked 7 times in his first rookie start. FYI Roethlisberger was sacked 7 his rookie season in week 11. http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004

    Kizer could be the QB under center all season long and help lead us to a Super Bowl win, and Duhoolie would spew his shit in multiple threads that we won in spite of Black Tarkenton.......

    Tubby is like a 14yr old girl posting bikini pics online, he's just looking for attention to mask his insecurity for always being picked last in PE, which forced him to play the harmonica. 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Tell that to Dallas and now Jax. Bet they aren't crying much now that they have someone to take pressure off young QBs. You know me my now. Normally I'm D first. But at this moment we could use a real RB and not one with near zero vision.

    No argument, but it doesn't take a Day One pick to land a "real RB."

    @tour2ma said:

    No argument, but it doesn't take a Day One pick to land a "real RB."

    I'd rather have some real franchise OL. 😉

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Tell that to Dallas and now Jax. Bet they aren't crying much now that they have someone to take pressure off young QBs. You know me my now. Normally I'm D first. But at this moment we could use a real RB and not one with near zero vision.

    No argument, but it doesn't take a Day One pick to land a "real RB."

    @tour2ma said:

    No argument, but it doesn't take a Day One pick to land a "real RB."

    Will will agree to disagree on that, especially when it appears to be our greatest weakness. By season's end we'll know for sure whether I have got that right or not.

    https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/news/129986/isaiah-crowell-bottled-up-week-1.php

  • Again with the Fantasypros? 🙂

    Not our first disagreement, won't be our last... besides we can always trade for Derrick Henry... LOW BLOW! 😛

  • Again with the Fantasypros? 🙂

    Not our first disagreement, won't be our last... besides we can always trade for Derrick Henry... LOW BLOW! 😛

    @tour2ma said:

    Again with the Fantasypros? 🙂

    Not our first disagreement, won't be our last... besides we can always trade for Derrick Henry... LOW BLOW! 😛

    Finally-agreement-we can get him for a 5th (round or Wild Turkey whichever they want) cause the Titans aren't using him anyway.😛

  • @jcam222 said:

    It may also say they just aren't as good as projected while perhaps we are better. 

    That's possible... and at least you were able to follow a discussion...

    @the-gipper said:

    Supported it with what?  Your opinion?  I see no where on this thread that you put any data

    Time to say goodbye to you for a while... again. So back to the Ghoolie-zone with you.

    @tour2ma said:

    That's possible... and at least you were able to follow a discussion...

    Time to say goodbye to you for a while... again. So back to the Ghoolie-zone with you.

    YOU claimed that the Steelers were "off"...and then you said that you had proved your claim that they were "off". Yet you provided not one iota of data to even slightly evidence your claim....so much as prove it. And I call you on that...and yet you still fail to produce any data beyond your personal opinion.  So you cannot substantiate your opinion.....and you have a hissy fit (because you know I was right)....and you go all teenage chick drama queen on us?  What a tough Texan you aren't. 

  • B is accurate.