Skip to content

tommorrow we WIN or it's hard to see how hue is back in 2018....

The Browns Board
85 24 2.2k
  • coaching shouldn't be a hindrance on the team and im getting that vibe with hue. Terrible game manager and terrible play caller 

  • And like we said Hogan not being the starter for the beginning of the year says all you need 

  • @wargograw said:

    Stop talking about firing him.

    What has he done to merit staying?

    @nickers said:

    What has he done to merit staying?

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

  • @nickers said:

    What has he done to merit staying?

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

    @wargograw said:

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

    Hue is done. He is the worst game day head coach the Browns have had..... and that's saying a mouth full. 

    If you're a dude who has lost 20 of his last 21 under Hue, you honestly can't tell me that you'd still be buying in..... He's done, and today was painfully obvious of that. 

  • Please don't watch games if you can't come away from them not wanting to complete destroy the entire organization.

  • Please don't watch games if you can't come away from them not wanting to complete destroy the entire organization.

    @wargograw said:

    Please don't watch games if you can't come away from them not wanting to complete destroy the entire organization.

    Quit telling people what to do you little Homo!

  • @nickers said:

    What has he done to merit staying?

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

    @wargograw said:

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

  • The same stupid people have been saying the same stupid Sheet for 30 years 

  • @wargograw said:

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    @tacosman said:

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    I don't need any more games..... Maybe if he hired a real OC and simply focused on being a Tomlinlike raw-raw team organizer, then maybe he could be successful, but right now he is in over his head and is a dead man crawling. 

    He's a good dude, but a horrible game day coach. 

  • @wargograw said:

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    @tacosman said:

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    If he goes 3-29 he will have won 3 more games than the talent level of this team would dictate.

  • @tacosman said:

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    I don't need any more games..... Maybe if he hired a real OC and simply focused on being a Tomlinlike raw-raw team organizer, then maybe he could be successful, but right now he is in over his head and is a dead man crawling. 

    He's a good dude, but a horrible game day coach. 

    @d-bone said:

    I don't need any more games..... Maybe if he hired a real OC and simply focused on being a Tomlinlike raw-raw team organizer, then maybe he could be successful, but right now he is in over his head and is a dead man crawling. 

    He's a good dude, but a horrible game day coach. 

    dont see the point of firing him mid season though and going with an interim.  Barring hue going something like 5-6 the rest of the way he's probably gone, and thats ok.  There will be lots  f options out there.

    I dont think hue is a part of why we suck now.  We were going to suck now if we had saban or bellichek out there probably.  But 1-20 is 1-20.  thats historically bad.  even with a paucity of talent teams in the nfl dont go 1-20

  • @tacosman said:

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    If he goes 3-29 he will have won 3 more games than the talent level of this team would dictate.

    @wargograw said:

    If he goes 3-29 he will have won 3 more games than the talent level of this team would dictate.

    BULLSHITE.  Even if we are the least talented team in the nfl(I'd say we are tied with about 3-4 other teams), 1-20 is atypical in the modern nfl.  You would expect such a team to win 4 or so games.  You don't seem to understand concepts like regression to the mean.  

  • "Lots of options, I just can't name any of them, because then it'd be revealed they have no better a resume than Hue Jackson."

  • @wargograw said:

    If he goes 3-29 he will have won 3 more games than the talent level of this team would dictate.

    BULLSHITE.  Even if we are the least talented team in the nfl(I'd say we are tied with about 3-4 other teams), 1-20 is atypical in the modern nfl.  You would expect such a team to win 4 or so games.  You don't seem to understand concepts like regression to the mean.  

    @tacosman said:

    BULLSHITE.  Even if we are the least talented team in the nfl(I'd say we are tied with about 3-4 other teams), 1-20 is atypical in the modern nfl.  You would expect such a team to win 4 or so games.  You don't seem to understand concepts like regression to the mean.  

    We are most definitely not tied with 3-4 other teams. Pure delusion.

  • @tacosman said:

    BULLSHITE.  Even if we are the least talented team in the nfl(I'd say we are tied with about 3-4 other teams), 1-20 is atypical in the modern nfl.  You would expect such a team to win 4 or so games.  You don't seem to understand concepts like regression to the mean.  

    We are most definitely not tied with 3-4 other teams. Pure delusion.

    @wargograw said:

    We are most definitely not tied with 3-4 other teams. Pure delusion.

    our roster is similarly shitty to the jets and 49ers and colts(without luck)...sure.  I think we have a better roster than the jets probably(today we outgained them 2 to 1)....

    the consensus out there is that our roster is terrible, extremely terrible, but no worse than the typical bottom 3-4 teams in the nfl in any given year.  

  • Yeah, that's a really stupid assessment. 

  • Today, I saw a head coach / offensive coordinator get the ball on the 6ish yard line for 1st and goal. Then I saw that coach not put his best offensive player (Duke) on the field for any of the upcoming 3 plays, and rather than try to slam the thing in with his 2nd best RB (Crow), he elected to go with an oh-so-tricky, high school like QB option which of course turned into a fumble.

    So instead of putting your team's chances on your best players' backs ("elite" Oline <LMAO> and Duke), you instead put it on a 21yr old QB (who has played like whoreshit all year) and a half blind RB who needs a hole the size of an elephant to be productive.

    Then repeat the above a couple of more times..... today the HC/OC snatched defeat from the jaws of victory............ in over his head. 

  • "Lots of options, I just can't name any of them, because then it'd be revealed they have no better a resume than Hue Jackson."

    @wargograw said:

    "Lots of options, I just can't name any of them, because then it'd be revealed they have no better a resume than Hue Jackson."

    wtf?  guys like jim bob cooter,  spagnuolo, chris richard, patricia, and plenty of other guys would be decent candidates.  

    Hue was a decent choice as well.  But now, if after 32 games he has a historically bad record even relative to other bottom feeder teams, we know he isn't the guy.  It's not complicated.

  • werent we just predicting a 4-6 win season based upon all that new talent?????.....I do belive that was the consensus........now///suddenly....our roster is worse than the Jets and 49'ers and this is whats expected?......in year 2 of the build?.....

    Hell, I was predicting one or 2 wins last year and taking grief for my negativity....told "no way".....then it changed to "of course they're gonna lose, its the plan".....NEXT year we'll start the climb.....and now?.....after 2 record setting drafts(in terms of picks) we still suck so bad we cant beat the worst teams out there?.....

    Hahahahaha///////fire em all

  • We're only one loss away from dropping under .300 since our 1999 "return".

    Our record since 1999 is 88-205 (88-206 if you count playoffs) with just one double digit win season. In the same period the last head coach that won a playoff game with the Browns went 212-81 (237-90 if you count playoffs) with just one double digit loss season.