Skip to content

tommorrow we WIN or it's hard to see how hue is back in 2018....

The Browns Board
85 24 2.2k
  • Please don't watch games if you can't come away from them not wanting to complete destroy the entire organization.

  • Please don't watch games if you can't come away from them not wanting to complete destroy the entire organization.

    @wargograw said:

    Please don't watch games if you can't come away from them not wanting to complete destroy the entire organization.

    Quit telling people what to do you little Homo!

  • @nickers said:

    What has he done to merit staying?

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

    @wargograw said:

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

  • The same stupid people have been saying the same stupid Sheet for 30 years 

  • @wargograw said:

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    @tacosman said:

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    I don't need any more games..... Maybe if he hired a real OC and simply focused on being a Tomlinlike raw-raw team organizer, then maybe he could be successful, but right now he is in over his head and is a dead man crawling. 

    He's a good dude, but a horrible game day coach. 

  • @wargograw said:

    Been named head coach after we've cycled through so many that no one wants to come. 

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    @tacosman said:

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    If he goes 3-29 he will have won 3 more games than the talent level of this team would dictate.

  • @tacosman said:

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    I don't need any more games..... Maybe if he hired a real OC and simply focused on being a Tomlinlike raw-raw team organizer, then maybe he could be successful, but right now he is in over his head and is a dead man crawling. 

    He's a good dude, but a horrible game day coach. 

    @d-bone said:

    I don't need any more games..... Maybe if he hired a real OC and simply focused on being a Tomlinlike raw-raw team organizer, then maybe he could be successful, but right now he is in over his head and is a dead man crawling. 

    He's a good dude, but a horrible game day coach. 

    dont see the point of firing him mid season though and going with an interim.  Barring hue going something like 5-6 the rest of the way he's probably gone, and thats ok.  There will be lots  f options out there.

    I dont think hue is a part of why we suck now.  We were going to suck now if we had saban or bellichek out there probably.  But 1-20 is 1-20.  thats historically bad.  even with a paucity of talent teams in the nfl dont go 1-20

  • @tacosman said:

    yes he was named head coach.  And if he goes 3-29 he will have had 32 whole games to have shown he isn't the future at hc.

    If he goes 3-29 he will have won 3 more games than the talent level of this team would dictate.

    @wargograw said:

    If he goes 3-29 he will have won 3 more games than the talent level of this team would dictate.

    BULLSHITE.  Even if we are the least talented team in the nfl(I'd say we are tied with about 3-4 other teams), 1-20 is atypical in the modern nfl.  You would expect such a team to win 4 or so games.  You don't seem to understand concepts like regression to the mean.  

  • "Lots of options, I just can't name any of them, because then it'd be revealed they have no better a resume than Hue Jackson."

  • @wargograw said:

    If he goes 3-29 he will have won 3 more games than the talent level of this team would dictate.

    BULLSHITE.  Even if we are the least talented team in the nfl(I'd say we are tied with about 3-4 other teams), 1-20 is atypical in the modern nfl.  You would expect such a team to win 4 or so games.  You don't seem to understand concepts like regression to the mean.  

    @tacosman said:

    BULLSHITE.  Even if we are the least talented team in the nfl(I'd say we are tied with about 3-4 other teams), 1-20 is atypical in the modern nfl.  You would expect such a team to win 4 or so games.  You don't seem to understand concepts like regression to the mean.  

    We are most definitely not tied with 3-4 other teams. Pure delusion.

  • @tacosman said:

    BULLSHITE.  Even if we are the least talented team in the nfl(I'd say we are tied with about 3-4 other teams), 1-20 is atypical in the modern nfl.  You would expect such a team to win 4 or so games.  You don't seem to understand concepts like regression to the mean.  

    We are most definitely not tied with 3-4 other teams. Pure delusion.

    @wargograw said:

    We are most definitely not tied with 3-4 other teams. Pure delusion.

    our roster is similarly shitty to the jets and 49ers and colts(without luck)...sure.  I think we have a better roster than the jets probably(today we outgained them 2 to 1)....

    the consensus out there is that our roster is terrible, extremely terrible, but no worse than the typical bottom 3-4 teams in the nfl in any given year.  

  • Yeah, that's a really stupid assessment. 

  • Today, I saw a head coach / offensive coordinator get the ball on the 6ish yard line for 1st and goal. Then I saw that coach not put his best offensive player (Duke) on the field for any of the upcoming 3 plays, and rather than try to slam the thing in with his 2nd best RB (Crow), he elected to go with an oh-so-tricky, high school like QB option which of course turned into a fumble.

    So instead of putting your team's chances on your best players' backs ("elite" Oline <LMAO> and Duke), you instead put it on a 21yr old QB (who has played like whoreshit all year) and a half blind RB who needs a hole the size of an elephant to be productive.

    Then repeat the above a couple of more times..... today the HC/OC snatched defeat from the jaws of victory............ in over his head. 

  • "Lots of options, I just can't name any of them, because then it'd be revealed they have no better a resume than Hue Jackson."

    @wargograw said:

    "Lots of options, I just can't name any of them, because then it'd be revealed they have no better a resume than Hue Jackson."

    wtf?  guys like jim bob cooter,  spagnuolo, chris richard, patricia, and plenty of other guys would be decent candidates.  

    Hue was a decent choice as well.  But now, if after 32 games he has a historically bad record even relative to other bottom feeder teams, we know he isn't the guy.  It's not complicated.

  • werent we just predicting a 4-6 win season based upon all that new talent?????.....I do belive that was the consensus........now///suddenly....our roster is worse than the Jets and 49'ers and this is whats expected?......in year 2 of the build?.....

    Hell, I was predicting one or 2 wins last year and taking grief for my negativity....told "no way".....then it changed to "of course they're gonna lose, its the plan".....NEXT year we'll start the climb.....and now?.....after 2 record setting drafts(in terms of picks) we still suck so bad we cant beat the worst teams out there?.....

    Hahahahaha///////fire em all

  • We're only one loss away from dropping under .300 since our 1999 "return".

    Our record since 1999 is 88-205 (88-206 if you count playoffs) with just one double digit win season. In the same period the last head coach that won a playoff game with the Browns went 212-81 (237-90 if you count playoffs) with just one double digit loss season.

  • We're only one loss away from dropping under .300 since our 1999 "return".

    Our record since 1999 is 88-205 (88-206 if you count playoffs) with just one double digit win season. In the same period the last head coach that won a playoff game with the Browns went 212-81 (237-90 if you count playoffs) with just one double digit loss season.

    No excuse for the loss today. 

    @marc1971 said:

    We're only one loss away from dropping under .300 since our 1999 "return".

    Our record since 1999 is 88-205 (88-206 if you count playoffs) with just one double digit win season. In the same period the last head coach that won a playoff game with the Browns went 212-81 (237-90 if you count playoffs) with just one double digit loss season.

    Holy hell....... keep that kind of s hit to yourself! 

  • werent we just predicting a 4-6 win season based upon all that new talent?????.....I do belive that was the consensus........now///suddenly....our roster is worse than the Jets and 49'ers and this is whats expected?......in year 2 of the build?.....

    Hell, I was predicting one or 2 wins last year and taking grief for my negativity....told "no way".....then it changed to "of course they're gonna lose, its the plan".....NEXT year we'll start the climb.....and now?.....after 2 record setting drafts(in terms of picks) we still suck so bad we cant beat the worst teams out there?.....

    Hahahahaha///////fire em all

    @mudfly said:

    Hahahahaha///////fire em all

    Yeah that'll make us good for sure.

  • it might stop the extreme suckage we are seeing......plodding ahead with a proven loser has never been a formula for success

  • So we have two options, both of which mean failure and one of which we have tried for the last 20 years.