Skip to content

If you hate the Cleveland Browns rebuild, ignore this: Podcast

The Browns Board
86 23 2.1k
  • @tacosman said:

    no relevance at all to the nfl.  

    When Billy Beane is brought into the convo, Theo Epstein can be used as a counter to the argument.

    @dutch-oven said:

    When Billy Beane is brought into the convo, Theo Epstein can be used as a counter to the argument.

    two wrongs dont make a right.

  • @dutch-oven said:

    When Billy Beane is brought into the convo, Theo Epstein can be used as a counter to the argument.

    two wrongs dont make a right.

    @tacosman said:

    two wrongs dont make a right.

    Yeah, whatever buddy.

  • @orion said:

    Sashi has final say.  Sashi gave the Eagles Wentz.  Sashi gave the Texans Watson.

    If that's your take, then I wasted my time searching for my old posts, let alone writing them.

    And you wasted whatever time you spent on them.

    @tacosman said:

    1. this is a very naive and misguided take.
    2. Additionally, you seem very confused on what the nfl is.
    3. The sam hinkie approach ...
    4. I do kind of disagree with calling this a 'tear down' though...
    1. How do you really feel?
    2. Pretty sure I'm not.
    3. No idea who he is.
    4. Did I call 2017 a tear down?If I did, then my bad... to my mind it's the first year of the rebuild.

    You seem to be adept at picking apart an argument... or at least constructing a counter. Care to illuminate the better way?

    @tour2ma said:

    1. Did I call 2017 a tear down?If I did, then my bad... to my mind it's the first year of the rebuild.

    Wait a cotton pickin second there.....are you now giving them a complete flyer on 2016??? and their 14 picks???

    No allowed....sorry

  • @wargograw said:

    I think he’s wrong on that. We did need to strip them bare...... it was certainly the best plan...Makes for more long term success. 

    @mudfly said:

    Can somebody name one team that has stripped down(like the Browns have) then gone on to win a championship OR have "sustained" success....????......I already know the answer, which is no.....

    @wargograw said:

    It’s never been tried. So while we can’t provide you a stripped down team that has had success, you also can’t provide a team that’s stripped their team down and NOT had success. 

    Brilliant.....its never been done, but we needed to do it cause it leads to long term success....???

    Anyone else wanna try?.....

    @mudfly said:

    Brilliant.....its never been done, but we needed to do it cause it leads to long term success....???

    Anyone else wanna try?.....

    Nah, nah, let's try it your way! That worked out so well for us before!!

  • @tour2ma said:

    1. Did I call 2017 a tear down?If I did, then my bad... to my mind it's the first year of the rebuild.

    Wait a cotton pickin second there.....are you now giving them a complete flyer on 2016??? and their 14 picks???

    No allowed....sorry

    @mudfly said:

    Wait a cotton pickin second there.....are you now giving them a complete flyer on 2016??? and their 14 picks???

    No allowed....sorry

    true good point....I think this goes to a point some of you don't fully grasp:  in the nfl, there  is rarely a well demarcated point between 'rebuilding' starts and stops....the rosters are in such a constant state of turnover and fortunes change so quickly that it's silly to look at it like this.  

    I get why it's tempting for fans of bad teams like we are to think like that.  But it's a fake construct.  

    We want to say "oh we suck now but this is neccessary to be good again.  We'll suck this year, and then get a little better in 2018 and go 4-12.  and then improve to 7-9 in 2019.  And keep getting better and move to 9 or 10 wins in 2020.  And then by 2021 we'll be an 11-12 win team and playing for it all".  Things don't work that way.  As if tere is some natural and linear progression with these things....

    look at 2014.  That was a 7 win year after two crappier years before that.  Did it represent a linear uptick?  heck no....and we shouldn't have expected it to.  Instead the year afteir that we were worse, and shitcanned our coach, and now we are supposedly in another 'rebuild'......and honestly it's not even really clear what year of the 'rebuild' this is because things dont work like that in the nfl...as I think some of you guys are hopefully seeing.

  • @tacosman said:

    no relevance at all to the nfl.  

    When Billy Beane is brought into the convo, Theo Epstein can be used as a counter to the argument.

    @dutch-oven said:

    When Billy Beane is brought into the convo, Theo Epstein can be used as a counter to the argument.

    Baseball doesn't have salary cap issues like the NFL. Boston and Chicago aren't exactly media market wastelands. 

    In the NFL, due to salary cap restrictions,  all teams have an equal amount of capital to build a roster......if they choose to and DO SO CORRECTLY.

    To support and defend a total and complete roster purge = 0 wins 5 losses

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

  • @dutch-oven said:

    When Billy Beane is brought into the convo, Theo Epstein can be used as a counter to the argument.

    Baseball doesn't have salary cap issues like the NFL. Boston and Chicago aren't exactly media market wastelands. 

    In the NFL, due to salary cap restrictions,  all teams have an equal amount of capital to build a roster......if they choose to and DO SO CORRECTLY.

    To support and defend a total and complete roster purge = 0 wins 5 losses

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

    @furious-styles said:

    Baseball doesn't have salary cap issues like the NFL Boston and Chicago aren't exactly media market wastelands. 

    In the NFL, due to salary caps,  all teams have an equal amount of capital to build a roster.

    To support and defend a total and complete roster purge = 0 wins 5 losses

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

    Haha. For the love of dog.

    Someone, I don't even know who and I don't care enough to look it up, said that for all the pub Billy Beane got for the brilliance of "Money Ball", he never won a title in Oakland. I responded that Epstein has used the same approach and has won multiple titles.

    I'm well aware that MLB is different than the NFL, but since someone decided to bring up Beane, I countered with Epstein.

  • Shmuck money ball....it never proved to be a winning formula...and, right now, the Browns are easily the worst they've ever been and going on 2 years of it...soon to challenge for the worst ANY team has ever been......

    There is ZERO TANGIBLE evidence that this FO has done anything to improve this team.....and all indicators(that matter) are that it is much worse.....including the Coaching staff......

  • @dutch-oven said:

    When Billy Beane is brought into the convo, Theo Epstein can be used as a counter to the argument.

    two wrongs dont make a right.

    @tacosman said:

    two wrongs dont make a right.

    ah... but three lefts do...

    @mudfly said:

    Wait a cotton pickin second there.....are you now giving them a complete flyer on 2016??? and their 14 picks??? No allowed....sorry

    I do not acknowledge your rules...

    I give a partial pass on the 2016 draft. Dredged up the very insightful comment I made months ago... that Farmer punted on his first draft, but besides having no more time and no better assessment of the inherited roster Sashi & Co. did not. And turns out we got some good players out of the effort.

    As you've pointed out ever more frequently we bumped a lot of Browns out of the way so we could see what we had... that's not building... that's at best probing.

    So the rebuild began with this draft.

  • @tacosman said:

    two wrongs dont make a right.

    ah... but three lefts do...

    @mudfly said:

    Wait a cotton pickin second there.....are you now giving them a complete flyer on 2016??? and their 14 picks??? No allowed....sorry

    I do not acknowledge your rules...

    I give a partial pass on the 2016 draft. Dredged up the very insightful comment I made months ago... that Farmer punted on his first draft, but besides having no more time and no better assessment of the inherited roster Sashi & Co. did not. And turns out we got some good players out of the effort.

    As you've pointed out ever more frequently we bumped a lot of Browns out of the way so we could see what we had... that's not building... that's at best probing.

    So the rebuild began with this draft.

    @tour2ma said:

    ah... but three lefts do...

    I do not acknowledge your rules...

    I give a partial pass on the 2016 draft. Dredged up the very insightful comment I made months ago... that Farmer punted on his first draft, but besides having no more time and no better assessment of the inherited roster Sashi & Co. did not. And turns out we got some good players out of the effort.

    As you've pointed out ever more frequently we bumped a lot of Browns out of the way so we could see what we had... that's not building... that's at best probing.

    So the rebuild began with this draft.

    there is no "rebuild begins x" or "rebuild began y".....it doesnt work that way.  it's always a running clock, and performance is always measured as time moves along....

    the results for sashi and co to this point have been piss poor.  And I dont mean in terms of wins and losses(although thats part of it).  I mean in terms of what they have developed so far in two years and the progress that has been made over that time.  But hey, like I said, their tenure isn't up yet.  Still time to turn it around and do better.  We'll see.....what isn't up for debate though is that so far the results havent been good.

  • @mudfly said:

    Wait a cotton pickin second there.....are you now giving them a complete flyer on 2016??? and their 14 picks???

    No allowed....sorry

    true good point....I think this goes to a point some of you don't fully grasp:  in the nfl, there  is rarely a well demarcated point between 'rebuilding' starts and stops....the rosters are in such a constant state of turnover and fortunes change so quickly that it's silly to look at it like this.  

    I get why it's tempting for fans of bad teams like we are to think like that.  But it's a fake construct.  

    We want to say "oh we suck now but this is neccessary to be good again.  We'll suck this year, and then get a little better in 2018 and go 4-12.  and then improve to 7-9 in 2019.  And keep getting better and move to 9 or 10 wins in 2020.  And then by 2021 we'll be an 11-12 win team and playing for it all".  Things don't work that way.  As if tere is some natural and linear progression with these things....

    look at 2014.  That was a 7 win year after two crappier years before that.  Did it represent a linear uptick?  heck no....and we shouldn't have expected it to.  Instead the year afteir that we were worse, and shitcanned our coach, and now we are supposedly in another 'rebuild'......and honestly it's not even really clear what year of the 'rebuild' this is because things dont work like that in the nfl...as I think some of you guys are hopefully seeing.

    @tacosman said:

    Things don't work that way.  As if tere is some natural and linear progression with these things....

    I disagree on starts being unidentifiable. I do agree that the anticipated progression is non-linear. It is more likely geometric.

    @mudfly said:

    Shmuck money ball....it never proved to be a winning formula...and, right now, the Browns are easily the worst they've ever been and going on 2 years of it...soon to challenge for the worst ANY team has ever been......

    There is ZERO TANGIBLE evidence that this FO has done anything to improve this team.....and all indicators(that matter) are that it is much worse.....including the Coaching staff......

    Tell that to a Red Sox fan. Tell that to an Astros fan. Tell that to an Indians fan.

    Refusing to see any evidence is not the same as it not existing.

  • @tour2ma said:

    ah... but three lefts do...

    I do not acknowledge your rules...

    I give a partial pass on the 2016 draft. Dredged up the very insightful comment I made months ago... that Farmer punted on his first draft, but besides having no more time and no better assessment of the inherited roster Sashi & Co. did not. And turns out we got some good players out of the effort.

    As you've pointed out ever more frequently we bumped a lot of Browns out of the way so we could see what we had... that's not building... that's at best probing.

    So the rebuild began with this draft.

    there is no "rebuild begins x" or "rebuild began y".....it doesnt work that way.  it's always a running clock, and performance is always measured as time moves along....

    the results for sashi and co to this point have been piss poor.  And I dont mean in terms of wins and losses(although thats part of it).  I mean in terms of what they have developed so far in two years and the progress that has been made over that time.  But hey, like I said, their tenure isn't up yet.  Still time to turn it around and do better.  We'll see.....what isn't up for debate though is that so far the results havent been good.

    @tacosman said:

    there is no "rebuild begins x" or "rebuild began y".....it doesnt work that way

    Disagree.

  • IMO, if the front office picked the player, that player is forever linked to that FO. I get the scouting thing, but at the end of the day, this FO wrote the name down and turned in the card. 

  • @mudfly said:

    Wait a cotton pickin second there.....are you now giving them a complete flyer on 2016??? and their 14 picks???

    No allowed....sorry

    true good point....I think this goes to a point some of you don't fully grasp:  in the nfl, there  is rarely a well demarcated point between 'rebuilding' starts and stops....the rosters are in such a constant state of turnover and fortunes change so quickly that it's silly to look at it like this.  

    I get why it's tempting for fans of bad teams like we are to think like that.  But it's a fake construct.  

    We want to say "oh we suck now but this is neccessary to be good again.  We'll suck this year, and then get a little better in 2018 and go 4-12.  and then improve to 7-9 in 2019.  And keep getting better and move to 9 or 10 wins in 2020.  And then by 2021 we'll be an 11-12 win team and playing for it all".  Things don't work that way.  As if tere is some natural and linear progression with these things....

    look at 2014.  That was a 7 win year after two crappier years before that.  Did it represent a linear uptick?  heck no....and we shouldn't have expected it to.  Instead the year afteir that we were worse, and shitcanned our coach, and now we are supposedly in another 'rebuild'......and honestly it's not even really clear what year of the 'rebuild' this is because things dont work like that in the nfl...as I think some of you guys are hopefully seeing.

    @tacosman said:

     in the nfl, there  is rarely a well demarcated point between 'rebuilding' starts and stops....the rosters are in such a constant state of turnover and fortunes change so quickly that it's silly to look at it like this.  - well said.  teams are always chasing the roster

    I get why it's tempting for fans of bad teams like we are to think like that.  But it's a fake construct.  

    We want to say "oh we suck now but this is neccessary to be good again.  We'll suck this year, and then get a little better in 2018 and go 4-12.  and then improve to 7-9 in 2019.  And keep getting better and move to 9 or 10 wins in 2020.  And then by 2021 we'll be an 11-12 win team and playing for it all".  Things don't work that way.  As if tere is some natural and linear progression with these things....

    look at 2014.  That was a 7 win year after two crappier years before that.  Did it represent a linear uptick?  heck no....and we shouldn't have expected it to.  Instead the year afteir that we were worse, and shitcanned our coach, and now we are supposedly in another 'rebuild'......and honestly it's not even really clear what year of the 'rebuild' this is because things dont work like that in the nfl...as I think some of you guys are hopefully seeing.

    The bottom line here is that Sashi and his pompous Harvard mates stripped the roster beyond what was needed.  They CREATED holes in our team where there were none.  This made the 'rebuild' MUCH harder and made the team worse.  Instead of just trying to upgrade the holes that we HAD, they had to ALSO upgrade the holes that they CREATED.  I'm sorry but I just cannot be convinced that THAT is the wicked smaaat way to do it.  It does not pass the logic test.

    Now, of course, it's too late.  We've no choice BUT to draft young players and try to coach them up to be good veterans.  (in which case the team will 'get old' together, which will lead them to strip it all down again, I suppose)

  • @tacosman said:

     in the nfl, there  is rarely a well demarcated point between 'rebuilding' starts and stops....the rosters are in such a constant state of turnover and fortunes change so quickly that it's silly to look at it like this.  - well said.  teams are always chasing the roster

    I get why it's tempting for fans of bad teams like we are to think like that.  But it's a fake construct.  

    We want to say "oh we suck now but this is neccessary to be good again.  We'll suck this year, and then get a little better in 2018 and go 4-12.  and then improve to 7-9 in 2019.  And keep getting better and move to 9 or 10 wins in 2020.  And then by 2021 we'll be an 11-12 win team and playing for it all".  Things don't work that way.  As if tere is some natural and linear progression with these things....

    look at 2014.  That was a 7 win year after two crappier years before that.  Did it represent a linear uptick?  heck no....and we shouldn't have expected it to.  Instead the year afteir that we were worse, and shitcanned our coach, and now we are supposedly in another 'rebuild'......and honestly it's not even really clear what year of the 'rebuild' this is because things dont work like that in the nfl...as I think some of you guys are hopefully seeing.

    The bottom line here is that Sashi and his pompous Harvard mates stripped the roster beyond what was needed.  They CREATED holes in our team where there were none.  This made the 'rebuild' MUCH harder and made the team worse.  Instead of just trying to upgrade the holes that we HAD, they had to ALSO upgrade the holes that they CREATED.  I'm sorry but I just cannot be convinced that THAT is the wicked smaaat way to do it.  It does not pass the logic test.

    Now, of course, it's too late.  We've no choice BUT to draft young players and try to coach them up to be good veterans.  (in which case the team will 'get old' together, which will lead them to strip it all down again, I suppose)

    @orion said:

    The bottom line here is that Sashi and his pompous Harvard mates stripped the roster beyond what was needed.  They CREATED holes in our team where there were none.  This made the 'rebuild' MUCH harder and made the team worse.  Instead of just trying to upgrade the holes that we HAD, they had to ALSO upgrade the holes that they CREATED.  I'm sorry but I just cannot be convinced that THAT is the wicked smaaat way to do it.  It does not pass the logic test.

    Now, of course, it's too late.  We've no choice BUT to draft young players and try to coach them up to be good veterans.  (in which case the team will 'get old' together, which will lead them to strip it all down again, I suppose)

    The ultimate irony would be if they had no plan, and were just kinda guessing and winging it.

  • @tacosman said:

     in the nfl, there  is rarely a well demarcated point between 'rebuilding' starts and stops....the rosters are in such a constant state of turnover and fortunes change so quickly that it's silly to look at it like this.  - well said.  teams are always chasing the roster

    I get why it's tempting for fans of bad teams like we are to think like that.  But it's a fake construct.  

    We want to say "oh we suck now but this is neccessary to be good again.  We'll suck this year, and then get a little better in 2018 and go 4-12.  and then improve to 7-9 in 2019.  And keep getting better and move to 9 or 10 wins in 2020.  And then by 2021 we'll be an 11-12 win team and playing for it all".  Things don't work that way.  As if tere is some natural and linear progression with these things....

    look at 2014.  That was a 7 win year after two crappier years before that.  Did it represent a linear uptick?  heck no....and we shouldn't have expected it to.  Instead the year afteir that we were worse, and shitcanned our coach, and now we are supposedly in another 'rebuild'......and honestly it's not even really clear what year of the 'rebuild' this is because things dont work like that in the nfl...as I think some of you guys are hopefully seeing.

    The bottom line here is that Sashi and his pompous Harvard mates stripped the roster beyond what was needed.  They CREATED holes in our team where there were none.  This made the 'rebuild' MUCH harder and made the team worse.  Instead of just trying to upgrade the holes that we HAD, they had to ALSO upgrade the holes that they CREATED.  I'm sorry but I just cannot be convinced that THAT is the wicked smaaat way to do it.  It does not pass the logic test.

    Now, of course, it's too late.  We've no choice BUT to draft young players and try to coach them up to be good veterans.  (in which case the team will 'get old' together, which will lead them to strip it all down again, I suppose)

    @orion said:

    The bottom line here is that Sashi and his pompous Harvard mates stripped the roster beyond what was needed.  They CREATED holes in our team where there were none.  This made the 'rebuild' MUCH harder and made the team worse.  Instead of just trying to upgrade the holes that we HAD, they had to ALSO upgrade the holes that they CREATED.  I'm sorry but I just cannot be convinced that THAT is the wicked smaaat way to do it.  It does not pass the logic test.

    Now, of course, it's too late.  We've no choice BUT to draft young players and try to coach them up to be good veterans.  (in which case the team will 'get old' together, which will lead them to strip it all down again, I suppose)

    Well said Orion....my main bitch since day one of this tear down......they went too far and created an impossible hole to fill......does not pass my logic, thats for sure.....and amazing to me that people insist it's the way to go, yet none can explain why.....other than its "different"....logic-less

    @stillmotion said:

    The ultimate irony would be if they had no plan, and were just kinda guessing and winging it.

    Ha!...I think they have to be winging it....ones a lawyer and the other is a baseball guy.....neither has ever done this....how could they not be winging it???

  • I too agree with the questionable need to eliminate every veteran on the team sans Joe Thomas, especially considering the insane amount of cap space. This isn't baseball, you aren't trading most players for draft picks. Why the Browns couldn't have kept the vets they had AND add young players, slowly integrating them into the NFL with the idea of eventually replacing the older players is beyond me, in an environment that is not a complete disaster. Its what that team 100 miles southeast of Cleveland has been doing for decades.

    Instead, the Browns just strip the team down to the studs and throw a ton of young kids out there to do their impression of monkeys Shmucking a football, with little veteran guidance.

  • Maybe we are being too hard on this FO? I mean it's not like they waived a WR that has gone on to be an absolute studd.......... Oh, sorry Taylor Gabriel, I didn't see you there.

    Never mind, carry on bashing them. 

  • I am happy we're doing the rebuild. Starting over every year or two was never going to work, and it never will.

    Our roster is younger and more talented than rosters in recent history. Plus we  still have a lot of capital (cap space, picks) moving forward. 

    Yes, losing sucks, but of  course we were going to lose more. If we have another offseason like we had this  past year, and continue to add more young talent, I think we'll be moving in the right direction. 

  • Well if sucking on a historic magnitude is what the rebuild requires, Hue’s play calling makes total sense.