Houston - our 2nd first round pick
-
Yeah best player available wither the second pick imo. Everyone is leaning receiver but idk about that.
-
Yeah best player available wither the second pick imo. Everyone is leaning receiver but idk about that.
Yeah best player available wither the second pick imo. Everyone is leaning receiver but idk about that.
In a perfect world, I'd love a receiver to go with the QB taken with the first pick.
But don't force it. If there's someone else sitting there that is a superior talent, take him. There's holes all over the roster.
-
Yeah best player available wither the second pick imo. Everyone is leaning receiver but idk about that.
In a perfect world, I'd love a receiver to go with the QB taken with the first pick.
But don't force it. If there's someone else sitting there that is a superior talent, take him. There's holes all over the roster.
In a perfect world, I'd love a receiver to go with the QB taken with the first pick.
But don't force it. If there's someone else sitting there that is a superior talent, take him. There's holes all over the roster.
If we want a KO/PR/WR then take Kirk, but if we want a pure WR Ridley's the man IMO.
-
Yeah best player available wither the second pick imo. Everyone is leaning receiver but idk about that.
Yeah best player available wither the second pick imo. Everyone is leaning receiver but idk about that. and
If we use our first 1st and the HOU 1st is a top ten pick, then I will not be surprised to see another twofer deal, as in a 2018 + 2019 1st-rounder, go down...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
If we use our first 1st and the HOU 1st is a top ten pick, then I will not be surprised to see another twofer deal, as in a 2018 + 2019 1st-rounder, go down...
I wouldn't be surprised either if sashi traded down again.
-
I wouldn't be surprised either if sashi traded down again.
Well, if you already have drafted your QB, and there is a good offer for your pick while you don't get to lose the player in the top of your list... I'd trade down, even if that keeps fans desperate.
-
One downside of Houston continuing to lose and look like crap on offense is that it just sort of reinforces how badly we messed up by not selecting watson
-
One downside of Houston continuing to lose and look like crap on offense is that it just sort of reinforces how badly we messed up by not selecting watson
One downside of Houston continuing to lose and look like crap on offense is that it just sort of reinforces how badly we messed up by not selecting watson
Well, we can agree that he looked great on the field. But also, no one can guarantee that a player who has already had ankle* problems will not have more in the future. Judging if we did well or not drafting him by only 4 games it's quite hasty. If he gets injured every season I guess we won't miss him that much.
It's not the same as comparising passing on Wentz.
EDIT: knee
-
One downside of Houston continuing to lose and look like crap on offense is that it just sort of reinforces how badly we messed up by not selecting watson
Well, we can agree that he looked great on the field. But also, no one can guarantee that a player who has already had ankle* problems will not have more in the future. Judging if we did well or not drafting him by only 4 games it's quite hasty. If he gets injured every season I guess we won't miss him that much.
It's not the same as comparising passing on Wentz.
EDIT: knee
Well, we can agree that he looked great on the field. But also, no one can guarantee that a player who has already had ankle problems will not have more in the future. Judging if we did well or not drafting him by only 4 games it's quite hasty. If he gets injured every season I guess we won't miss him that much.
Careful there Nero. You're now flirting with Garrett territory on the ankles thing.
-
Well, we can agree that he looked great on the field. But also, no one can guarantee that a player who has already had ankle problems will not have more in the future. Judging if we did well or not drafting him by only 4 games it's quite hasty. If he gets injured every season I guess we won't miss him that much.
Careful there Nero. You're now flirting with Garrett territory on the ankles thing.
Careful there Nero. You're now flirting with Garrett territory on the ankles thing.
Of course. Garrett showed some promise but if he keeps having ankle problems, he won't be a good draft choice. BUT, everyone would have chosen him, and you cannot guess that kind of things. Drafts can be evaluated after some years have passed, but I understand that meanwhile opinions can be throught out there too.
-
Houston is going to get a freaking win this weekend and it's so annoying. They're playing the Cardinals who obviously don't have Carson Palmer, and NOW it appears they won't have their backup either (Stanton). I literally have no clue who will be playing QB for them, but suffice to say that they probably won't be winning a game in Houston this weekend. I could be mistaken, but I doubt it. Houston defense will show up and I'd be completely surprised if the Texans don't win like 16-3 in a total snooze-fest.
-
Careful there Nero. You're now flirting with Garrett territory on the ankles thing.
Of course. Garrett showed some promise but if he keeps having ankle problems, he won't be a good draft choice. BUT, everyone would have chosen him, and you cannot guess that kind of things. Drafts can be evaluated after some years have passed, but I understand that meanwhile opinions can be throught out there too.
Of course. Garrett showed some promise but if he keeps having ankle problems, he won't be a good draft choice. BUT, everyone would have chosen him, and you cannot guess that kind of thing. Drafts can be evaluated after some years have passed, but I understand that meanwhile opinions can be thrown out there too.
As the people of Spain were nice enough to correct my flaws in Spanish, I now return the favor. FIFY
-
Of course. Garrett showed some promise but if he keeps having ankle problems, he won't be a good draft choice. BUT, everyone would have chosen him, and you cannot guess that kind of thing. Drafts can be evaluated after some years have passed, but I understand that meanwhile opinions can be thrown out there too.
As the people of Spain were nice enough to correct my flaws in Spanish, I now return the favor. FIFY
As the people of Spain were nice enough to correct my flaws in Spanish, I now return the favor. FIFY
thing
sand thrown were the corrections? if you don't mark them it is difficult for me to see them! Thanks, lol. -
As the people of Spain were nice enough to correct my flaws in Spanish, I now return the favor. FIFY
thing
sand thrown were the corrections? if you don't mark them it is difficult for me to see them! Thanks, lol.thing
sand thrown were the corrections? if you don't mark them it is difficult for me to see them! Thanks, lol.Forgive him, Nero... Ag's married to a grammer Nazi...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
-
Houston is going to get a freaking win this weekend and it's so annoying. They're playing the Cardinals who obviously don't have Carson Palmer, and NOW it appears they won't have their backup either (Stanton). I literally have no clue who will be playing QB for them, but suffice to say that they probably won't be winning a game in Houston this weekend. I could be mistaken, but I doubt it. Houston defense will show up and I'd be completely surprised if the Texans don't win like 16-3 in a total snooze-fest.
Houston is going to get a freaking win this weekend and it's so annoying. They're playing the Cardinals who obviously don't have Carson Palmer, and NOW it appears they won't have their backup either (Stanton). I literally have no clue who will be playing QB for them, but suffice to say that they probably won't be winning a game in Houston this weekend. I could be mistaken, but I doubt it. Houston defense will show up and I'd be completely surprised if the Texans don't win like 16-3 in a total snooze-fest.
Going into the season, I was hoping that the Texans wouldn't qualify for the playoffs and their pick would be in the #15-20 range.
They aren't going to lose out the rest of the season, but I can't see them being any better than 6-10 tops. I'll take it gladly.
-
Houston is going to get a freaking win this weekend and it's so annoying. They're playing the Cardinals who obviously don't have Carson Palmer, and NOW it appears they won't have their backup either (Stanton). I literally have no clue who will be playing QB for them, but suffice to say that they probably won't be winning a game in Houston this weekend. I could be mistaken, but I doubt it. Houston defense will show up and I'd be completely surprised if the Texans don't win like 16-3 in a total snooze-fest.
Going into the season, I was hoping that the Texans wouldn't qualify for the playoffs and their pick would be in the #15-20 range.
They aren't going to lose out the rest of the season, but I can't see them being any better than 6-10 tops. I'll take it gladly.
Going into the season, I was hoping that the Texans wouldn't qualify for the playoffs and their pick would be in the #15-20 range.
They aren't going to lose out the rest of the season, but I can't see them being any better than 6-10 tops. I'll take it gladly.
What a Shmucking noob.
-
Going into the season, I was hoping that the Texans wouldn't qualify for the playoffs and their pick would be in the #15-20 range.
They aren't going to lose out the rest of the season, but I can't see them being any better than 6-10 tops. I'll take it gladly.
What a Shmucking noob.
What a Shmucking noob.
Morons Are Getting Angry, huh?
-
Houston is going to get a freaking win this weekend and it's so annoying. They're playing the Cardinals who obviously don't have Carson Palmer, and NOW it appears they won't have their backup either (Stanton). I literally have no clue who will be playing QB for them, but suffice to say that they probably won't be winning a game in Houston this weekend. I could be mistaken, but I doubt it. Houston defense will show up and I'd be completely surprised if the Texans don't win like 16-3 in a total snooze-fest.
Houston is going to get a freaking win this weekend and it's so annoying. They're playing the Cardinals who obviously don't have Carson Palmer, and NOW it appears they won't have their backup either (Stanton). I literally have no clue who will be playing QB for them, but suffice to say that they probably won't be winning a game in Houston this weekend. I could be mistaken, but I doubt it. Houston defense will show up and I'd be completely surprised if the Texans don't win like 16-3 in a total snooze-fest.
You may end up being correct, but look at the standings. The Texans have given up a ton of points.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login