Team of losers
-
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
2. If the Browns/Peppers hadn't gotten a penalty on that play, and it was deemed just an incomplete pass, it would have been the Bengals who would have been screwed on that play because of the obvious pass interference that the refs missed. He caught the ball one-handed because our corner had hold of the Bengals receivers other arm.
-
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
2. If the Browns/Peppers hadn't gotten a penalty on that play, and it was deemed just an incomplete pass, it would have been the Bengals who would have been screwed on that play because of the obvious pass interference that the refs missed. He caught the ball one-handed because our corner had hold of the Bengals receivers other arm.
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
I saw this as well...and saw it in the pics that Tour posted. That makes my issue with what penalty was called. It wasn't for a hit to the head...it was for a defenseless receiver, which begs the question, how many steps after a catch does a player have to make before he's not defenseless anymore?
-
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
I saw this as well...and saw it in the pics that Tour posted. That makes my issue with what penalty was called. It wasn't for a hit to the head...it was for a defenseless receiver, which begs the question, how many steps after a catch does a player have to make before he's not defenseless anymore?
I saw this as well...and saw it in the pics that Tour posted. That makes my issue with what penalty was called. It wasn't for a hit to the head...it was for a defenseless receiver, which begs the question, how many steps after a catch does a player have to make before he's not defenseless anymore?
My question is, if the NFL is so concerned about hits to the helmet, why are RB’s & WR’s permitted to drop their head and lead with their helmet? The rules seem one sided.
-
You want to eliminate people leading with their helmets?
Take the facemasks off.
-
You want to eliminate people leading with their helmets?
Take the facemasks off.
You want to eliminate people leading with their helmets?
Take the facemasks off.
Typical solution for a typical mind.
-
You want to eliminate people leading with their helmets?
Take the facemasks off.
Typical solution for a typical mind.
-
The crown of his helmet hit the guys chin. Peppers gonna get a fine.
The crown of his helmet hit the guys chin. Peppers gonna get a fine.
Perhaps there were to many words in Tours explanation for you to comprehend? Hell man he even gave you pictures!! SMH , It was a good CLEAN. hard hit.
-
The crown of his helmet hit the guys chin. Peppers gonna get a fine.
Perhaps there were to many words in Tours explanation for you to comprehend? Hell man he even gave you pictures!! SMH , It was a good CLEAN. hard hit.
Perhaps there were to many words in Tours explanation for you to comprehend? Hell man he even gave you pictures!! SMH , It was a good CLEAN. hard hit.
You could be right but the leagues saw it otherwise. They fined him $24,000 for that clean hit to the head. I don't agree with it but I did read the rule and those pics just enforce it. And they fined the guy.
-
The crown of his helmet hit the guys chin. Peppers gonna get a fine.
Perhaps there were to many words in Tours explanation for you to comprehend? Hell man he even gave you pictures!! SMH , It was a good CLEAN. hard hit.
-
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
I saw this as well...and saw it in the pics that Tour posted. That makes my issue with what penalty was called. It wasn't for a hit to the head...it was for a defenseless receiver, which begs the question, how many steps after a catch does a player have to make before he's not defenseless anymore?
I saw this as well...and saw it in the pics that Tour posted. That makes my issue with what penalty was called. It wasn't for a hit to the head...it was for a defenseless receiver, which begs the question, how many steps after a catch does a player have to make before he's not defenseless anymore?
It really doesn't matter if a penalty is called or not. The league levels these fines all the time....with or without a penalty called. But the fact that the crown of peppers helmet hit the other guys chin, the NFL fines it. That's the rule.
-
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
2. If the Browns/Peppers hadn't gotten a penalty on that play, and it was deemed just an incomplete pass, it would have been the Bengals who would have been screwed on that play because of the obvious pass interference that the refs missed. He caught the ball one-handed because our corner had hold of the Bengals receivers other arm.
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
2. If the Browns/Peppers hadn't gotten a penalty on that play, and it was deemed just an incomplete pass, it would have been the Bengals who would have been screwed on that play because of the obvious pass interference that the refs missed. He caught the ball one-handed because our corner had hold of the Bengals receivers other arm.
Even without a penalty called at all or on the other team, Peppers gets fined. They do it all the time regardless of penalty being issued or not. It's the rule now.
-
Most are still ignoring Note 1... including the league. I still see the force of the blow being delivered shoulder to ribs with glancing incidental contact to the bottom of the facemask.
But Peppers got a fine, not an apology, so I was wrong. And Peppers' weird appeal while saying the call was correct(?) yet should be reviewed for targeting at the time as it is in college, is just... well... weird.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
This team did not quit yesterday.If it was not for a bullsjit call things mite have ended different. They would never call that bs on Pisspuke..
This team did not quit yesterday.If it was not for a bullsjit call things mite have ended different. They would never call that bs on Pisspuke..
If the best thing we can say about a bunch of millionaires is they didn't "quit"..well we got problems.
Every team tries to win. I'm sure the coaches and front office want to win. They're just an awful organization from top to bottom. The players aren't good enough.
-
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
2. If the Browns/Peppers hadn't gotten a penalty on that play, and it was deemed just an incomplete pass, it would have been the Bengals who would have been screwed on that play because of the obvious pass interference that the refs missed. He caught the ball one-handed because our corner had hold of the Bengals receivers other arm.
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
2. If the Browns/Peppers hadn't gotten a penalty on that play, and it was deemed just an incomplete pass, it would have been the Bengals who would have been screwed on that play because of the obvious pass interference that the refs missed. He caught the ball one-handed because our corner had hold of the Bengals receivers other arm.
If my aunt had nuts she'd be my uncle.
-
You want to eliminate people leading with their helmets?
Take the facemasks off.
You want to eliminate people leading with their helmets?
Take the facemasks off.
That might not work for the hits with the crown.
Better yet: do like rugby: take the helmets off.
-
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
2. If the Browns/Peppers hadn't gotten a penalty on that play, and it was deemed just an incomplete pass, it would have been the Bengals who would have been screwed on that play because of the obvious pass interference that the refs missed. He caught the ball one-handed because our corner had hold of the Bengals receivers other arm.
If my aunt had nuts she'd be my uncle.
-
Most are still ignoring Note 1... including the league. I still see the force of the blow being delivered shoulder to ribs with glancing incidental contact to the bottom of the facemask.
But Peppers got a fine, not an apology, so I was wrong. And Peppers' weird appeal while saying the call was correct(?) yet should be reviewed for targeting at the time as it is in college, is just... well... weird.
Most are still ignoring Note 1... including the league. I still see the force of the blow being delivered shoulder to ribs with glancing incidental contact to the bottom of the facemask.
But Peppers got a fine, not an apology, so I was wrong. And Peppers' weird appeal while saying the call was correct(?) yet should be reviewed for targeting at the time as it is in college, is just... well... weird.
That's the thing though. Incidental is bad now. It's pretty much any helmet to helmet contact and you're looking at a fine. Gooddell's way of gaying things up I guess.
-
Greg Williams' take from his weekly conference call:
On DB Jabrill Peppers
’ unnecessary roughness penalty and fine from the NFL:
“You want the published take or you want the unpublished take? Ah, there we go. I know you guys have my back. I know, I know (laughter). Here is the deal: when you break the film down and you take it in slow motion, I am very proud of Jabrill paying attention to what we coach on strike zone. He is doing everything he can, just like Major League Baseball, to make sure it is from the tip of the shoulders to the top of the knees. He is actually ducking down to make sure he is underneath the shoulder/collarbone to make sure that when he hits him if the head comes down, the head will come down and that will strike maybe a part of his body, but he is leading with his shoulder; he is not even leading with his helmet.
It is unfortunate, but one of the things that I really want you to take a look at – again for people wondering why I play him in the post and his instincts right now as we are growing as a team – he broke on the ball and made that play when the ball was thrown 35 yards from the line of scrimmage. There has only been one other player that I have coached that did it in 34 and that was Sean Taylor. Most of the times, you see guys making that play at 38 and 39, if they are any good. If you can’t do that at 40 yards about being at the point of attack at 40 yards from a post-middle of the field safety, then you don’t belong in the National Football League.
I have had to cut players when we see that analytic on you can’t get there on time. It is 42, 44, 45 yards. Mom and Dad didn’t give you enough speed to get over there. He made that play on contact on trying to break it up at 35 yards. That is with slowing down to try to make sure that he was in the strike zone. It is what it is. I know he has appealed it, and we will see where it goes from there, but I thought it was a rare play and I thought it was an outstanding play.
Never, ever do we want it to hurt our team and put them in field position the way they did, but now when that happens again, we have to get off the field and force them into a third down. We can’t be worried or can’t be thinking about that play too long and let it affect the next play. It affected the next play or two. That is what I really don’t like either.”
-
A few thoughts on this:
1. While not blatant, his helmet went into his chin. By the letter of the law, it should have been called a penalty.
2. If the Browns/Peppers hadn't gotten a penalty on that play, and it was deemed just an incomplete pass, it would have been the Bengals who would have been screwed on that play because of the obvious pass interference that the refs missed. He caught the ball one-handed because our corner had hold of the Bengals receivers other arm.
Even without a penalty called at all or on the other team, Peppers gets fined. They do it all the time regardless of penalty being issued or not. It's the rule now.
Even without a penalty called at all or on the other team, Peppers gets fined. They do it all the time regardless of penalty being issued or not. It's the rule now.
I just think it is bs tht refs can pick and choose on when and what to call. They control the game and the never call the other team for those hits or even PI
-
Even without a penalty called at all or on the other team, Peppers gets fined. They do it all the time regardless of penalty being issued or not. It's the rule now.
I just think it is bs tht refs can pick and choose on when and what to call. They control the game and the never call the other team for those hits or even PI
I just think it is bs tht refs can pick and choose on when and what to call. They control the game and the never call the other team for those hits or even PI
I know, look how many time they fined Harrison and yet didn't call the penalty too. Goodells gay league.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login