Start Kevin Hogan NOW.
-
So, it's imperative that we lose the last two games to solidify his already overflowing draft stocking? Re-finger-u-louse.
So, it's imperative that we lose the last two games to solidify his already overflowing draft stocking? Re-finger-u-louse.
That would happen regardless if he or Kizer plays. Like I said....I would not mind if Hogan started because I am just so fatigued at seeing that guy who has probably been responsible for more turnovers in a season than any other player in 20 years.
But I would take Kessler if it meant just not having to watch Kizer....so that is no endorsement of Hogan.
-
Haven't we already locked up the first pic?
WSS
Thought I heard that somewhere Steve. But it's possible if we would win the last two and the Giants lost the last two. Strength of schedule comes into play...
Took some digging but here's how it stands as of today. . Of course one more loss and we have the #1 overall locked up. Giants are at .541 with the Cardinals (6-8) and Redskins (6-8) left (.420%). The Browns are .510 with the Bears (4-10) and Steelers (11-3) left (.535%) .
-
I'd love to see Kevin Hogan playing right on the Lake Michigan shore in late December.
It would be cool to see his noodle arm passes actually get blown back to him.
-
The Giants are 2-12... so theoretically if Hogan won two games and the NY lost the next two it would be a two way tie at 2-14.
The question is would you guys rather start Hogan to have a chance at a 2-14 record and pick #2 or keep playing Kizer to tank the rest of the season and remove all doubt that we're going 0-16- I mean there is the parade sponsored by Excedrin, because you know- they feel our pain...
The Giants are 2-12... so theoretically if Hogan won two games and the NY lost the next two it would be a two way tie at 2-14.
The question is would you guys rather start Hogan to have a chance at a 2-14 record and pick #2 or keep playing Kizer to tank the rest of the season and remove all doubt that we're going 0-16- I mean there is the parade sponsored by Excedrin, because you know- they feel our pain...
I have no love for Kizer, but so what PO? At this point, who really cares? 0-16, 2-14? Personally I don't think we're winning either of the last two. See above. Looks like two Browns wins and two Giants losses, and it just might get dicey who gets the #1. I'll pencil the Steelers in with at least one more win (Houston). Thanks Pittsburgh. The #1 and #5 will be sweet.
-
The Giants are 2-12... so theoretically if Hogan won two games and the NY lost the next two it would be a two way tie at 2-14.
The question is would you guys rather start Hogan to have a chance at a 2-14 record and pick #2 or keep playing Kizer to tank the rest of the season and remove all doubt that we're going 0-16- I mean there is the parade sponsored by Excedrin, because you know- they feel our pain...
I have no love for Kizer, but so what PO? At this point, who really cares? 0-16, 2-14? Personally I don't think we're winning either of the last two. See above. Looks like two Browns wins and two Giants losses, and it just might get dicey who gets the #1. I'll pencil the Steelers in with at least one more win (Houston). Thanks Pittsburgh. The #1 and #5 will be sweet.
I have no love for Kizer, but so what PO? At this point, who really cares? 0-16, 2-14? Personally I don't think we're winning either of the last two. See above. Looks like two Browns wins and two Giants losses, and it just might get dicey who gets the #1.
I really, really do not want the Browns to go 0-16. NO ONE forgets 0-16. 1-15 gets forgotten.
That being said, I'd be pretty pissed if the Browns won the next two games out of nowhere and lost out on the #1 pick.
-
The Giants are 2-12... so theoretically if Hogan won two games and the NY lost the next two it would be a two way tie at 2-14.
The question is would you guys rather start Hogan to have a chance at a 2-14 record and pick #2 or keep playing Kizer to tank the rest of the season and remove all doubt that we're going 0-16- I mean there is the parade sponsored by Excedrin, because you know- they feel our pain...
I have no love for Kizer, but so what PO? At this point, who really cares? 0-16, 2-14? Personally I don't think we're winning either of the last two. See above. Looks like two Browns wins and two Giants losses, and it just might get dicey who gets the #1. I'll pencil the Steelers in with at least one more win (Houston). Thanks Pittsburgh. The #1 and #5 will be sweet.
I have no love for Kizer, but so what PO? At this point, who really cares? 0-16, 2-14? Personally I don't think we're winning either of the last two. See above. Looks like two Browns wins and two Giants losses, and it just might get dicey who gets the #1.
Kizer is the best of the 3 shitty QB's we have. Who cares though who plays. Sadly...I wouldn't mind Hogan playing so we can all watch him shit himself and then his biggest cheerleader will finally shut the fuck up.
-
I have no love for Kizer, but so what PO? At this point, who really cares? 0-16, 2-14? Personally I don't think we're winning either of the last two. See above. Looks like two Browns wins and two Giants losses, and it just might get dicey who gets the #1.
I really, really do not want the Browns to go 0-16. NO ONE forgets 0-16. 1-15 gets forgotten.
That being said, I'd be pretty pissed if the Browns won the next two games out of nowhere and lost out on the #1 pick.
I really, really do not want the Browns to go 0-16. NO ONE forgets 0-16. 1-15 gets forgotten.
That being said, I'd be pretty pissed if the Browns won the next two games out of nowhere and lost out on the #1 pick.
I agree the Bucs 0-14 and Lions 0-16 are memorable. Apparently there's only one Hogan cheerleader left who really cares anymore who starts.
-
I have no love for Kizer, but so what PO? At this point, who really cares? 0-16, 2-14? Personally I don't think we're winning either of the last two. See above. Looks like two Browns wins and two Giants losses, and it just might get dicey who gets the #1.
Kizer is the best of the 3 shitty QB's we have. Who cares though who plays. Sadly...I wouldn't mind Hogan playing so we can all watch him shit himself and then his biggest cheerleader will finally shut the fuck up.
Kizer is the best of the 3 shitty QB's we have. Who cares though who plays. Sadly...I wouldn't mind Hogan playing so we can all watch him Sheet himself and then his biggest cheerleader will finally shut the Shmuck up.
Hogan already looked like complete dogshit in his one start, which resulted in the "PoG Excuseapalooza Tour 2017".
I'm guessing that he'll pick a new Kevin Hogan for 2018 and trot out the same tired, pathetic shtick.
I'm hoping the mods don't miss out on a golden opportunity to auto-correct whoever his man-crush is next year to "PoG's Salad Tossee"... Oh wait, YOU are a mod, right Mark?

-
I'm for Hogan starting and have been for awhile. I'm tired of all you old assholes wanting Kizer to play "to see what he's got" He has absolute Sheet. Perhaps Hogan has absolute Sheet too but Hogan has only Sheet once. Kizer 13 times! Don't act like Hogan coming in off the bench and marching it straight down the field multiple times didn't excite you. And garbage time touchdowns???? Once again... how many garbage time touchdowns does Kizer have again? Took him 13 games to throw 9 touchdowns. Hogan throws 4 in one start and a couple appearances off the bench. We got the #1 pick locked up!! Lets change something up and try not to go 0-16. Hogan or Kessler. You assholes want to keep starting Kizer because hogan had one bad game. I don't get it.
Only reason he is starting is because they drafted him high and because they wanted to tank the season. It has to be. Explain why else they keep starting this trainwreck? -
I'm for Hogan starting and have been for awhile. I'm tired of all you old assholes wanting Kizer to play "to see what he's got" He has absolute Sheet. Perhaps Hogan has absolute Sheet too but Hogan has only Sheet once. Kizer 13 times! Don't act like Hogan coming in off the bench and marching it straight down the field multiple times didn't excite you. And garbage time touchdowns???? Once again... how many garbage time touchdowns does Kizer have again? Took him 13 games to throw 9 touchdowns. Hogan throws 4 in one start and a couple appearances off the bench. We got the #1 pick locked up!! Lets change something up and try not to go 0-16. Hogan or Kessler. You assholes want to keep starting Kizer because hogan had one bad game. I don't get it.
Only reason he is starting is because they drafted him high and because they wanted to tank the season. It has to be. Explain why else they keep starting this trainwreck?Only reason he is starting is because they drafted him high and because they wanted to tank the season. It has to be. Explain why else they keep starting this trainwreck?
Perhaps because you actually have to be somewhere near tracks to be a trainwreck. Those two just are on a different track altogether.

-
Kizer is the best of the 3 shitty QB's we have. Who cares though who plays. Sadly...I wouldn't mind Hogan playing so we can all watch him Sheet himself and then his biggest cheerleader will finally shut the Shmuck up.
Hogan already looked like complete dogshit in his one start, which resulted in the "PoG Excuseapalooza Tour 2017".
I'm guessing that he'll pick a new Kevin Hogan for 2018 and trot out the same tired, pathetic shtick.
I'm hoping the mods don't miss out on a golden opportunity to auto-correct whoever his man-crush is next year to "PoG's Salad Tossee"... Oh wait, YOU are a mod, right Mark?

I'm hoping the mods don't miss out on a golden opportunity to auto-correct whoever his man-crush is next year to "PoG's Salad Tossee"... Oh wait, YOU are a mod, right Mark?

I'm a mod in name only.... i'm kinda like the vice president. I have a title but no real power to do anything.
-
It would be an absolutely idiotic move to cut Kizer
Heh? Why? Theres zero question at this point we're going qb with the 1st and getting a vet qb to start infront of our shiny new pick. Best kizer can do is be 3rd string. Do u really think kizer is backup material?
-
I'm hoping the mods don't miss out on a golden opportunity to auto-correct whoever his man-crush is next year to "PoG's Salad Tossee"... Oh wait, YOU are a mod, right Mark?

I'm a mod in name only.... i'm kinda like the vice president. I have a title but no real power to do anything.
-
Haven't we already locked up the first pic?
WSS
Thought I heard that somewhere Steve. But it's possible if we would win the last two and the Giants lost the last two. Strength of schedule comes into play...
Took some digging but here's how it stands as of today. . Of course one more loss and we have the #1 overall locked up. Giants are at .541 with the Cardinals (6-8) and Redskins (6-8) left (.420%). The Browns are .510 with the Bears (4-10) and Steelers (11-3) left (.535%) .
Thought I heard that somewhere Steve. But it's possible if we would win the last two and the Giants lost the last two. Strength of schedule comes into play...
Took some digging but here's how it stands as of today. . Of course one more loss and we have the #1 overall locked up. Giants are at .541 with the Cardinals (6-8) and Redskins (6-8) left (.420%). The Browns are .510 with the Bears (4-10) and Steelers (11-3) left (.535%) .
In that scenario, if my math is correct, Browns would end up 2-14 with a .513 SOS and Giants 2-14 with a .526 SOS. Bear in mind the pct will change for every team in these 2 weeks, but I don't think it'll change that much to lose #1.
Heh? Why? Theres zero question at this point we're going qb with the 1st and getting a vet qb to start infront of our shiny new pick. Best kizer can do is be 3rd string. Do u really think kizer is backup material?
We invested a 2nd round on him and he has a 4 year contract which doesn't take a lot of salary space. The logic move would be to trade him in Year 3 for a 5th round or something like that.
I really, really do not want the Browns to go 0-16. NO ONE forgets 0-16. 1-15 gets forgotten.
Completely agreed. The mission is 'avoid 0-16 at all costs'. Though they'll probably make fun of the 2-30 Browns, anyway.
-
The Giants are 2-12... so theoretically if Hogan won two games and the NY lost the next two it would be a two way tie at 2-14.
The question is would you guys rather start Hogan to have a chance at a 2-14 record and pick #2 or keep playing Kizer to tank the rest of the season and remove all doubt that we're going 0-16- I mean there is the parade sponsored by Excedrin, because you know- they feel our pain...
The Giants are 2-12... so theoretically if Hogan won two games and the NY lost the next two it would be a two way tie at 2-14.
The question is would you guys rather start Hogan to have a chance at a 2-14 record and pick #2 or keep playing Kizer to tank the rest of the season and remove all doubt that we're going 0-16- I mean there is the parade sponsored by Excedrin, because you know- they feel our pain...
Here's a case scenario. Kizer blows the game against the bears, Hogan gets the start and knocks the Steelers out of their sweet position.
WSS
-
-
The Giants are 2-12... so theoretically if Hogan won two games and the NY lost the next two it would be a two way tie at 2-14.
The question is would you guys rather start Hogan to have a chance at a 2-14 record and pick #2 or keep playing Kizer to tank the rest of the season and remove all doubt that we're going 0-16- I mean there is the parade sponsored by Excedrin, because you know- they feel our pain...
Here's a case scenario. Kizer blows the game against the bears, Hogan gets the start and knocks the Steelers out of their sweet position.
WSS
Here's a case scenario. Kizer blows the game against the bears, Hogan gets the start and knocks the Steelers out of their sweet position.
WSS
-
And Stan?
Yuppers Gip there's still a few screen names of guys who left when the other board started up on autocorrect.
-
At this point who cares I prefer to win one and still get the number one pick. Since the 49ers have their quarterback they'd be happy to trade that number one probably to the Giants and leave us holding the bag. It would still be nice to beat the Steelers.
Still screw O and 16 and screw anybody that wants to have a parade.
In the butt.
With a Pinecone.
WSS
Edit if we did go 0 and 16 it would be that much more fun to win the Superbowl in a couple of years.
-
At this point who cares I prefer to win one and still get the number one pick. Since the 49ers have their quarterback they'd be happy to trade that number one probably to the Giants and leave us holding the bag. It would still be nice to beat the Steelers.
Still screw O and 16 and screw anybody that wants to have a parade.
In the butt.
With a Pinecone.
WSS
Edit if we did go 0 and 16 it would be that much more fun to win the Superbowl in a couple of years.
At this point who cares I prefer to win one and still get the number one pick. Since the 49ers have their quarterback they'd be happy to trade that number one probably to the Giants and leave us holding the bag. It would still be nice to beat the Steelers.
Still screw O and 16 and screw anybody that wants to have a parade.
In the butt.
With a Pinecone.
WSS
Edit if we did go 0 and 16 it would be that much more fun to win the Superbowl in a couple of years.
in the butt with a pinecone sounds awfully painful.
I"m with you though... screw 0-16. Win a damn game...just one at this point is all I ask. Would love it to be the squeelers and screw up their week off for round 1. But Huey Cueball seems to only win games on Xmas eve, so maybe it will be this week against the Bears.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login