The Browns are on the clock!
-
There is 1 thing the Browns havent tried since 1999... drafting a QB in the top half of the draft... hmmm.... maybe that could be the problem... considering the majority of great QBs all time have been drafted there... Not to mention our best QB of the v2.0 Browns was probably Tim Couch...
We "ruin" QBs because we draft crappy QBs... Let's TRY one of these top guys... what do you think?
There is 1 thing the Browns havent tried since 1999... drafting a QB in the top half of the draft... hmmm.... maybe that could be the problem... considering the majority of great QBs all time have been drafted there... Not to mention our best QB of the v2.0 Browns was probably Tim Couch...
We "ruin" QBs because we draft crappy QBs... Let's TRY one of these top guys... what do you think?
Fair statement.
-
I'm happy with saquon with the 5th pick, or 4th whatever. I'm in no mood for anyone talking about saquon with the 1st. Fuk you. #1 is a qb, period!! We have some decent O line play now so as long as he doesn't have that insane Kizer fetish to hold the ball for 10 minutes while running around, our O line should be able to decently protect him. So now is the time for a QB. Rosen, Allen and Darnold are better prospects than wentz and goff.....this year we can't fuk around.
-
Who’s playing QB for the Texans this week? Both got hurt last week and they both looked as bad as Kizer has looked.
I think the colts will beat the Texans
-
Who’s playing QB for the Texans this week? Both got hurt last week and they both looked as bad as Kizer has looked.
I think the colts will beat the Texans
Who’s playing QB for the Texans this week? Both got hurt last week and they both looked as bad as Kizer has looked.
I think the colts will beat the Texans
TJ Yates is listed in the depth chart as #1.....but are you saying his is hurt? Their backup is Taylor Heinke.
Edit: In checking, it seems that Yates avoided being sidelined with a concussion, and will start...the same may not be said for Heinke:
Texans' T.J. Yates: Sidesteps concussion diagnosisby RotoWire Staff | RotoWireYates avoided a concussion during Monday's game versus the Steelers, Aaron Wilson of the Houston Chronicle reports.
Yates was knocked from the game after getting sacked for a fourth time near the end of the first. After a lengthy evaluation, he was cleared of any symptoms and returned to the sideline. A short time after he was given the thumbs up, his backup, Taylor Heinicke, left the game under similar circumstances and will be beholden to the protocol for head injuries. On a positive note, Yates is back under center for theTexans.
-
Only Huey staying could make the Browns look more foolish that they already look. Where we get Houston's #1 is all that matters at this point in this foolish wasted season.
I am fine jumping on the bandwagon and being optimistic that Dorsey can start bringing us better talent. I am supportive and hopeful of it. It is rare that one draft makes a huge change in a team, although we have seen improvement that Mariotta, Wentz, Goff, Watson, Trubisky, and others have made. Are the Browns just one QB from being a 8-8 up and comer? Or better?
Where my sticking point is centers around Hue Jackson not making one-single stride forward in reducing penalties, catching the ball, clock management, aggressive offense, and in general basic discipline and fundamental football. If we keep Hue, where do those things rise up from that they haven't over the course of 1 - 30?
Work with me here, am I to believe that all the stupid crap we do (dropping the football right before crossing the goal line) is because Hue was not given good talent? I am sorry, but this is a stretch for me. How can anyone argue that Hue Jackson has not failed in these basic tenets of pro football? What will Hue do in 2018, that somehow two years did not find him doing? This is just bizarre to me.
Finally, I have an issue with how the Hue matter has been treated by Haslam. No secret that I don't like Hue. However, as an owner I would never have even let the debate of whether or not Hue will be back, to be undertaken. Whether Hue is staying or not, this should never have been allowed to be kicked around in the media. Hue is the HC. That is the only answer that should have ever been given.
Now, maybe the average rabid fan, in all his urban culture glory, doesn't care how an owner or execs carry themselves, but I believe the quality players and execs do.
In the event that Haslam fires Hue after the season, he makes himself look bad by changing his mind. On the other hand, if Hue says, there is an inference, and the media will harp on it all next year, that Dorsey really does not have much clout. I just don't get how unprofessional Haslam and his collection of circle jerkers can be.
-
Hopkins continues to be one of the best receivers I've ever seen. God help the world if he played with Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers. He just LOOKS different, ya know? He catches the ball so quickly and immediately runs with it. Craziness.
That being said, the Colts can definitely win. So what's the final verdict...if Colts win, where do we pick?
If the Colts win they have the lower SOS so they pick before Houston and Houston before Tampa Bay even if they lose again.
EDIT: It will be interesting to see how many teams play their 2nd/3rd teamers to "tank" into a better pick this week. Too much calculus for this old guy to figure out.
If the Colts win they have the lower SOS so they pick before Houston and Houston before Tampa Bay even if they lose again.
EDIT: It will be interesting to see how many teams play their 2nd/3rd teamers to "tank" into a better pick this week. Too much calculus for this old guy to figure out.
Ok, so Colts win and we pick 4th? Let the daydreaming begin. Oh, and apparently John Dorsey doesn't want anything to do with Josh Rosen, nor does Rosen want to play for us. Awesome. So who the heck do we pick #1? Darnold didn't want to come here either, did he? And that's if he even comes out, LOL.
-
If the Colts win they have the lower SOS so they pick before Houston and Houston before Tampa Bay even if they lose again.
EDIT: It will be interesting to see how many teams play their 2nd/3rd teamers to "tank" into a better pick this week. Too much calculus for this old guy to figure out.
Ok, so Colts win and we pick 4th? Let the daydreaming begin. Oh, and apparently John Dorsey doesn't want anything to do with Josh Rosen, nor does Rosen want to play for us. Awesome. So who the heck do we pick #1? Darnold didn't want to come here either, did he? And that's if he even comes out, LOL.
Ok, so Colts win and we pick 4th? Let the daydreaming begin. Oh, and apparently John Dorsey doesn't want anything to do with Josh Rosen, nor does Rosen want to play for us. Awesome. So who the heck do we pick #1? Darnold didn't want to come here either, did he? And that's if he even comes out, LOL.
Darnold said that he never said anything about not wanting to come to the Browns, for what it's worth.
Here's the reality boys - if you polled every draft eligible player on what team he DIDN'T want to go to, I feel safe to say that the Browns would easily win. I hate to say it - but can you blame them? Dorsey's job is to draft well and get the roster improved so the players who didn't want to be here look around and say, "You know what... I didn't want to come here, but there's talent here. We can win here."
Because there are very few locations in this nation that is a better place to play football as Cleveland when you win. There's a reason so many of the 80s guys still live here - and it isn't the weather. The 80s players - who won ZERO titles - are still treated like gods here.
-
I don't get the love for Barkley at all. He's an athletic freak but he isnt all that as a running back. We've had Gurley, Zeke, and Fournette in the last couple drafts and I was all for taking one of them. Don't fall for the trend Barkley isn't on the same level.
I have a similar grades for Barkley, Chubb, and Harris. Right now I have Chubb as the #1 running back and he could be had in the 2nd. There is no reason to take a running back in round 1 in this draft
-
I don't get the love for Barkley at all. He's an athletic freak but he isnt all that as a running back. We've had Gurley, Zeke, and Fournette in the last couple drafts and I was all for taking one of them. Don't fall for the trend Barkley isn't on the same level.
I have a similar grades for Barkley, Chubb, and Harris. Right now I have Chubb as the #1 running back and he could be had in the 2nd. There is no reason to take a running back in round 1 in this draft
I don't get the love for Barkley at all. He's an athletic freak but he isnt all that as a running back. We've had Gurley, Zeke, and Fournette in the last couple drafts and I was all for taking one of them. Don't fall for the trend Barkley isn't on the same level.
I have a similar grades for Barkley, Chubb, and Harris. Right now I have Chubb as the #1 running back and he could be had in the 2nd. There is no reason to take a running back in round 1 in this draft
There's almost never any reason to take a RB so early.
Get yourself three decent RBs and rotate them in. When one approaches free agency, let him go and replace him with a mid-round rookie. Rinse, repeat.
-
I don't get the love for Barkley at all. He's an athletic freak but he isnt all that as a running back. We've had Gurley, Zeke, and Fournette in the last couple drafts and I was all for taking one of them. Don't fall for the trend Barkley isn't on the same level.
I have a similar grades for Barkley, Chubb, and Harris. Right now I have Chubb as the #1 running back and he could be had in the 2nd. There is no reason to take a running back in round 1 in this draft
I don't get the love for Barkley at all. He's an athletic freak but he isnt all that as a running back. We've had Gurley, Zeke, and Fournette in the last couple drafts and I was all for taking one of them. Don't fall for the trend Barkley isn't on the same level.
I have a similar grades for Barkley, Chubb, and Harris. Right now I have Chubb as the #1 running back and he could be had in the 2nd. There is no reason to take a running back in round 1 in this draft
I also like Chubb better than Barkley Dog.
-
About all the chatter with the Draft order... Current pick is #4
If Houston wins, we go ONE SPOT DOWN in each of this cases (2 spots if both cases happen):
- If Denver doesn't win vs Kansas City
- Tampa Bay doesn't win vs Saints
If Houston losses, we go one spot up if:
- Tampa Bay wins vs Saints. If Tampa wins, then there would be only Colts and Texans with 4-12, so then it would be head to head and Colts would have won both games.
If there is a triple tie between those teams, the order is #3 Colts #4 Texans #5 Buccaneers because the tiebreaker is the strength of schedule. It would be ironic because if Colts win they would end up 3rd in AFCS and still pick higher than Texans, which doesn't make any sense to me.
NOTES:
1. Kansas City has already a playoff berth, and are locked in the 4th seed (Chargers can't overtake them as they lost both head to head matches and can't overtake the Jaguars, I believe because they have a worse record with common rivals)
2. The Saints (4th seed) lost to the Rams, so they can't get 3rd seed. If they lose, BUT Falcons win vs Panthers, they keep the Division title. Falcons not only play at home, but also winning they assure a playoff spot independently of what Seahawks do.
I used Tankathon and Playoff predictor, I hope all of the above is correct.
-
I like Barkley, but if it were up to me I wait and draft Rashaad Penny in the second
What happens if the Browns pay a guy like Cousins, Bridgewater, or even McCarron? trade for Alex Smith? Essentially, any other qb on the market that could be deemed a viable starter.. What do they then, do with the number one overall pick? Do you still take a qb? Do you trade down? Do you still draft a qb and sit him? Does this mean you are more open to drafting a guy like Josh Allen who needs time to develop? Is Josh Allen Paxton Lynch, 2.0?
-
About all the chatter with the Draft order... Current pick is #4
If Houston wins, we go ONE SPOT DOWN in each of this cases (2 spots if both cases happen):
- If Denver doesn't win vs Kansas City
- Tampa Bay doesn't win vs Saints
If Houston losses, we go one spot up if:
- Tampa Bay wins vs Saints. If Tampa wins, then there would be only Colts and Texans with 4-12, so then it would be head to head and Colts would have won both games.
If there is a triple tie between those teams, the order is #3 Colts #4 Texans #5 Buccaneers because the tiebreaker is the strength of schedule. It would be ironic because if Colts win they would end up 3rd in AFCS and still pick higher than Texans, which doesn't make any sense to me.
NOTES:
1. Kansas City has already a playoff berth, and are locked in the 4th seed (Chargers can't overtake them as they lost both head to head matches and can't overtake the Jaguars, I believe because they have a worse record with common rivals)
2. The Saints (4th seed) lost to the Rams, so they can't get 3rd seed. If they lose, BUT Falcons win vs Panthers, they keep the Division title. Falcons not only play at home, but also winning they assure a playoff spot independently of what Seahawks do.
I used Tankathon and Playoff predictor, I hope all of the above is correct.
About all the chatter with the Draft order... Current pick is #4
If Houston wins, we go ONE SPOT DOWN in each of this cases (2 spots if both cases happen):
- If Denver doesn't win vs Kansas City
- Tampa Bay doesn't win vs Saints
If Houston losses, we go one spot up if:
- Tampa Bay wins vs Saints. If Tampa wins, then there would be only Colts and Texans with 4-12, so then it would be head to head and Colts would have won both games.
If there is a triple tie between those teams, the order is #3 Colts #4 Texans #5 Buccaneers because the tiebreaker is the strength of schedule. It would be ironic because if Colts win they would end up 3rd in AFCS and still pick higher than Texans, which doesn't make any sense to me.
NOTES:
1. Kansas City has already a playoff berth, and are locked in the 4th seed (Chargers can't overtake them as they lost both head to head matches and can't overtake the Jaguars, I believe because they have a worse record with common rivals)
2. The Saints (4th seed) lost to the Rams, so they can't get 3rd seed. If they lose, BUT Falcons win vs Panthers, they keep the Division title. Falcons not only play at home, but also winning they assure a playoff spot independently of what Seahawks do.
I used Tankathon and Playoff predictor, I hope all of the above is correct.
You must have been reading my mind as I was just contemplating this.
But I am still trying to get this right. Now...per Tankathon, DATs/Browns have the #4 pick. The Colts have #3 and the Bucs have #5
But you seem to be saying that if the DATs lose to the Colts....and the Bucs lose to the Saints, they would jump the DAT pick, giving the Bucs #3 and the Browns would stay at #4.
Is that what you are saying?
I question if the Bucs can end up with a lower SOS than the Texans....their SOS right now is at .558. The DATs is at .508.
And I do not believe that head to head is ever used for determining draft order....only SOS. Even if the Colts sweep the DATs, if they are tied...and have a weaker SOS, they would still pick higher than the DATs. I DO see where the Broncos would pick higher if they lose and the Texans win....as their SOS is now at .483.
I guess we just have to see how it plays out.
-
About all the chatter with the Draft order... Current pick is #4
If Houston wins, we go ONE SPOT DOWN in each of this cases (2 spots if both cases happen):
- If Denver doesn't win vs Kansas City
- Tampa Bay doesn't win vs Saints
If Houston losses, we go one spot up if:
- Tampa Bay wins vs Saints. If Tampa wins, then there would be only Colts and Texans with 4-12, so then it would be head to head and Colts would have won both games.
If there is a triple tie between those teams, the order is #3 Colts #4 Texans #5 Buccaneers because the tiebreaker is the strength of schedule. It would be ironic because if Colts win they would end up 3rd in AFCS and still pick higher than Texans, which doesn't make any sense to me.
NOTES:
1. Kansas City has already a playoff berth, and are locked in the 4th seed (Chargers can't overtake them as they lost both head to head matches and can't overtake the Jaguars, I believe because they have a worse record with common rivals)
2. The Saints (4th seed) lost to the Rams, so they can't get 3rd seed. If they lose, BUT Falcons win vs Panthers, they keep the Division title. Falcons not only play at home, but also winning they assure a playoff spot independently of what Seahawks do.
I used Tankathon and Playoff predictor, I hope all of the above is correct.
You must have been reading my mind as I was just contemplating this.
But I am still trying to get this right. Now...per Tankathon, DATs/Browns have the #4 pick. The Colts have #3 and the Bucs have #5
But you seem to be saying that if the DATs lose to the Colts....and the Bucs lose to the Saints, they would jump the DAT pick, giving the Bucs #3 and the Browns would stay at #4.
Is that what you are saying?
I question if the Bucs can end up with a lower SOS than the Texans....their SOS right now is at .558. The DATs is at .508.
And I do not believe that head to head is ever used for determining draft order....only SOS. Even if the Colts sweep the DATs, if they are tied...and have a weaker SOS, they would still pick higher than the DATs. I DO see where the Broncos would pick higher if they lose and the Texans win....as their SOS is now at .483.
I guess we just have to see how it plays out.
You must have been reading my mind as I was just contemplating this.
But I am still trying to get this right. Now...per Tankathon, DATs/Browns have the #4 pick. The Colts have #3 and the Bucs have #5
But you seem to be saying that if the DATs lose to the Colts....and the Bucs lose to the Saints, they would jump the DAT pick, giving the Bucs #3 and the Browns would stay at #4.
Is that what you are saying?
I question if the Bucs can end up with a lower SOS than the Texans....their SOS right now is at .558. The DATs is at .508.
And I do not believe that head to head is ever used for determining draft order....only SOS. Even if the Colts sweep the DATs, if they are tied...and have a weaker SOS, they would still pick higher than the DATs. I DO see where the Broncos would pick higher if they lose and the Texans win....as their SOS is now at .483.
I guess we just have to see how it plays out.
What I'm implying, because I think it's reasonable, is that if there are only Colts and Texans (what does DAT stand for?) Tied at 4-12, Colts would be 3rd in AFC South and Texans 4th, so to me, the reasonable thing is that Texans pick ahead the Colts, as they ended up the league in a worse position.
I understand SOS being used as the first tiebreaker in teams from different divisions or even conferences, but using it when both tied teams are in the same division... How many different teams do they play during the year? 2?
So, for them to be the only two teams in 4-12, the Buccaneers have to win.
-
You must have been reading my mind as I was just contemplating this.
But I am still trying to get this right. Now...per Tankathon, DATs/Browns have the #4 pick. The Colts have #3 and the Bucs have #5
But you seem to be saying that if the DATs lose to the Colts....and the Bucs lose to the Saints, they would jump the DAT pick, giving the Bucs #3 and the Browns would stay at #4.
Is that what you are saying?
I question if the Bucs can end up with a lower SOS than the Texans....their SOS right now is at .558. The DATs is at .508.
And I do not believe that head to head is ever used for determining draft order....only SOS. Even if the Colts sweep the DATs, if they are tied...and have a weaker SOS, they would still pick higher than the DATs. I DO see where the Broncos would pick higher if they lose and the Texans win....as their SOS is now at .483.
I guess we just have to see how it plays out.
What I'm implying, because I think it's reasonable, is that if there are only Colts and Texans (what does DAT stand for?) Tied at 4-12, Colts would be 3rd in AFC South and Texans 4th, so to me, the reasonable thing is that Texans pick ahead the Colts, as they ended up the league in a worse position.
I understand SOS being used as the first tiebreaker in teams from different divisions or even conferences, but using it when both tied teams are in the same division... How many different teams do they play during the year? 2?
So, for them to be the only two teams in 4-12, the Buccaneers have to win.
What I'm implying, because I think it's reasonable, is that if there are only Colts and Texans (what does DAT stand for?) Tied at 4-12, Colts would be 3rd in AFC South and Texans 4th, so to me, the reasonable thing is that Texans pick ahead the Colts, as they ended up the league in a worse position.
That is "reasonable" but that is not the way the system is set up. SOS is the only difference maker...unless that is a tie...then they go to somewhere else. If the DumbAssTexans (it is a long held nickname around here for them because most Texans are dumbasses
) have the lower SOS they will get the higher pick....regardless of division or head to head record
I understand SOS being used as the first tiebreaker in teams from different divisions or even conferences, but using it when both tied teams are in the same division... How many different teams do they play during the year? 2?
See above....it is irrelevent to draft positioning.
So, for them to be the only two teams in 4-12, the Buccaneers have to win.
Which they won't....the Saints aren't going to lose to them.
-
Great.franchise. As the playoff picture heats up we look to April. Then another circle.jerk.
-
What I'm implying, because I think it's reasonable, is that if there are only Colts and Texans (what does DAT stand for?) Tied at 4-12, Colts would be 3rd in AFC South and Texans 4th, so to me, the reasonable thing is that Texans pick ahead the Colts, as they ended up the league in a worse position.
That is "reasonable" but that is not the way the system is set up. SOS is the only difference maker...unless that is a tie...then they go to somewhere else. If the DumbAssTexans (it is a long held nickname around here for them because most Texans are dumbasses
) have the lower SOS they will get the higher pick....regardless of division or head to head record
I understand SOS being used as the first tiebreaker in teams from different divisions or even conferences, but using it when both tied teams are in the same division... How many different teams do they play during the year? 2?
See above....it is irrelevent to draft positioning.
So, for them to be the only two teams in 4-12, the Buccaneers have to win.
Which they won't....the Saints aren't going to lose to them.
That means we will have #4, #5 or #6 pick.
-
When the Browns made the trade I was just hoping the Texans would be somewhere around .500 and miss the playoffs, giving us a #15-20 range first rounder.
This turn of events could help the Browns turn their fortune around, if they can take advantage of their good luck.
-
When the Browns made the trade I was just hoping the Texans would be somewhere around .500 and miss the playoffs, giving us a #15-20 range first rounder.
This turn of events could help the Browns turn their fortune around, if they can take advantage of their good luck.
When the Browns made the trade I was just hoping the Texans would be somewhere around .500 and miss the playoffs, giving us a #15-20 range first rounder.
This turn of events could help the Browns turn their fortune around, if they can take advantage of their good luck.
just heard hue will keep his promise and jump into the lake maybe this good fortune you speak of starts there
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login