BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES
-
they are the sources of the quotes, woodpecker. READ THE QUOTES. THEY PROVE WHAT WE HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR YEARS.
Those all YOUR HEROES OF THE PRO FAKE MMGW GARBAGE.
Just stop being a cowardly woodypeckerhead. Answer the quotes listed. What do they say, and admit you are one of their
birdbrains.
-
Cal, you can't just copy and paste / vomit text on to the screen then thump your chest like you won when someone doesn't read it all. Ah, who am I kidding, that's your whole thing...
Here's one
" "It’s unlikely that the U.S. is going to take serious action on climate change until there are observable, dramatic events, almost catastrophic in nature, that drive public opinion and drive the political process in that direction."
what's wrong with that quote? I agree with it
-
then you are ridiculously biased. What about all the other quotes?
In the context of all the other quotes - this one refers to the need for a nearly? catastrophic event that drives public opinion...
and a bunch of others say that it doesn't matter if it's a fake crisis, as long as it helps with their goal of wealth redistribution.
Want me to post all those quotes again? This is the problem, woodpecker - you ignore everything you can't refute. You found
one quote that you agree with. What about the dozens and dozens of other quotes? Count em.
There are 127, give or take a few, I counted pretty quickly and may have counted a few twice.
About 127, and you smart butt about just one of them that isn't all that bad. Seriously, woodpecker?
That is the point - bird poop beak.
-
Cal... Again... Vomiting all over the screen then acting like you've won when I refuse to clean it up is dumb.
Will you first admit NAS is a biased, conservative group? Let's get that straightened out first.
-
I have to put cal back on ignore so i can shrink this mountain of useless text. Fuk cal u really dont help urself. We learned in high school how to cite things. How to make arguments in our own words while incorporating cites. But you wanna talk about snowflakes? I know children that would bury you in a debate and that is not hyperbole, i literally know pre teen children that can already express their ideas in a clear and concise manner that incorporates information they obtained from other sources, but its their own thoughts and ideas.
Ur u a bot cal. Are u an experimental AI ir something that ur creators are testing on an internet forum?
-
Cal... Again... Vomiting all over the screen then acting like you've won when I refuse to clean it up is dumb.
Will you first admit NAS is a biased, conservative group? Let's get that straightened out first.
Cal... Again... Vomiting all over the screen then acting like you've won when I refuse to clean it up is dumb.
Will you first admit NAS is a biased, conservative group? Let's get that straightened out first.
no, you stop being an ignorant woodypeckerhead and admit the quotes are concerning, and show serious reason to
figure that mmgw is really a farce - for political/global redistribution of wealth benefit. You attacked one quote out of 127.
Put up, or shut up.
-
I have to put cal back on ignore so i can shrink this mountain of useless text. Fuk cal u really dont help urself. We learned in high school how to cite things. How to make arguments in our own words while incorporating cites. But you wanna talk about snowflakes? I know children that would bury you in a debate and that is not hyperbole, i literally know pre teen children that can already express their ideas in a clear and concise manner that incorporates information they obtained from other sources, but its their own thoughts and ideas.
Ur u a bot cal. Are u an experimental AI ir something that ur creators are testing on an internet forum?
I have to put cal back on ignore so i can shrink this mountain of useless text. Fuk cal u really dont help urself. We learned in high school how to cite things. How to make arguments in our own words while incorporating cites. But you wanna talk about snowflakes? I know children that would bury you in a debate and that is not hyperbole, i literally know pre teen children that can already express their ideas in a clear and concise manner that incorporates information they obtained from other sources, but its their own thoughts and ideas.
Ur u a bot cal. Are u an experimental AI ir something that ur creators are testing on an internet forum?
cowardly lie'in. You can't refute the way over a hundred serious quotes by people around the world who show that they
hope mmgw will redistribute wealth, and be a help to their liberal causes - and several defend mmgw for that, even if it is
absolutely a farce. They figure an effective farce, is a wonderful farce if it benefits them. Speaking of farces, there's
mueller/comey/lynch/holder/obaMao/higgardly etc etcetc fake news, outright lies, and the faked dossier paid for by the dems.
and you two fools refuse to admit that it is all a belligerent farce because they lost the election.
-
The election happened a year ago, gw research goes back to the 70's and early 80's when i was a kid. So this is why i dont read ur mountain of useless copy/paste. Back when there was no lib money behind anything, people were sounding the warning bells and these arctic cold blasts i read about as a child in the 80's that would be the predicted outcome of the jetstream loss. All of this is settled science. The nonsense fake blurbs you post from fake nonsensical blurbing people is irrelevant to me
-
There are over 31,000 doctors and scientists that have signed a petition to say that they disagree with the global warming nonsense.
Watch as the founder of the Weather Channel schools the CNN anchor.
-
The election happened a year ago, gw research goes back to the 70's and early 80's when i was a kid. So this is why i dont read ur mountain of useless copy/paste. Back when there was no lib money behind anything, people were sounding the warning bells and these arctic cold blasts i read about as a child in the 80's that would be the predicted outcome of the jetstream loss. All of this is settled science. The nonsense fake blurbs you post from fake nonsensical blurbing people is irrelevant to me
The election happened a year ago, gw research goes back to the 70's and early 80's when i was a kid. So this is why i dont read ur mountain of useless copy/paste. Back when there was no lib money behind anything, people were sounding the warning bells and these arctic cold blasts i read about as a child in the 80's that would be the predicted outcome of the jetstream loss. All of this is settled science. The nonsense fake blurbs you post from fake nonsensical blurbing people is irrelevant to me
Cleve translation:
"WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ! I can't refute those damaging to our mmgw cult cause, so I will ignore them and change the subject again !"
The quotes are not fake. You are just running scared from scary reality.
-
Is that the list that's been passed around on here a dozen times? The list that means nothing? The list that I can be on?
Lol
-
Cal, admit the NAS is a conservative bias group and then we can move forward.
Passing of groups as fact because they sound scientific doesn't make them a good source. That's like 4th grade English
-
Is that the list that's been passed around on here a dozen times? The list that means nothing? The list that I can be on?
Lol
Is that the list that's been passed around on here a dozen times? The list that means nothing? The list that I can be on?
Lol
I think you’re on a totally different list.
-
Over the past century, atmospheric CO2 has increased by one part per ten thousand. That is equivalent to packing an extra ten people into the Rose Bowl.
@l_lucullus calls this a "huge addition of CO2"
realclimatescience.com/2018/01/visual… -
Is that the list that's been passed around on here a dozen times? The list that means nothing? The list that I can be on?
Lol
I think you’re on a totally different list.
I think you’re on a totally different list.
no he has a degree in engineering....so it totally qualifies his opinion on climate change to be documented in these papers that conservatives pass around. They literally walk up to people with science degrees, even psychologists.....and ask them what they think of GW. If they give the correct response their names go "on the list"......Chris Jericho literally pops out from around a corner and tells em "you just made the list" if they give the right answer.
-
and not one word about all those glaring, serious quotes that show what mmgw really is.
hardy har har har har.
what a cult.
-
I think you’re on a totally different list.
no he has a degree in engineering....so it totally qualifies his opinion on climate change to be documented in these papers that conservatives pass around. They literally walk up to people with science degrees, even psychologists.....and ask them what they think of GW. If they give the correct response their names go "on the list"......Chris Jericho literally pops out from around a corner and tells em "you just made the list" if they give the right answer.
no he has a degree in engineering....so it totally qualifies his opinion on climate change to be documented in these papers that conservatives pass around. They literally walk up to people with science degrees, even psychologists.....and ask them what they think of GW. If they give the correct response their names go "on the list"......Chris Jericho literally pops out from around a corner and tells em "you just made the list" if they give the right answer.
You mean like Bill Nye...the self proclaimed science guy?
I have a degree that I acquired long before Woody was "the wet spot" on his parent's mattress, and I don't qualify?
-
Yeah bill nye is some recent opportunist, this goes back tomthe 70's and 80's before al gore gave a fuk. Thats why its real. People were studying it before there was a dime of spec interest money on either side
-
and not one word about all those glaring, serious quotes that show what mmgw really is.
hardy har har har har.
what a cult.
and not one word about all those glaring, serious quotes that show what mmgw really is.
hardy har har har har.
what a cult.
First off a "quote" doest refute anything. But if ud like to pull obe out of that crap slap andpost it fine, but im not reading ur board polluting sht. U make threads imposdible to scroll through, i dont know why u feel the need to constantly do thay
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
