Skip to content

ODDS TO WIN THE AFC, NFC and SB LII

The Browns Board
74 13 2.1k
  • On Friday 1/5/2018 from vegasinsider.com 

    ODDS TO WIN 2017-18 SUPER BOWL LII (2/4/18)
    Team Odds
    New England Patriots 2/1
    Minnesota Vikings 9/2
    Pittsburgh Steelers 6/1
    Philadelphia Eagles 10/1
    New Orleans Saints 10/1
    Los Angeles Rams 10/1
    Kansas City Chiefs 16/1
    Jacksonville Jaguars 20/1
    Atlanta Falcons 20/1
    Carolina Panthers 25/1
    Tennessee Titans 100/1
    Buffalo Bills 100/1
     
    ODDS TO WIN 2017-18 AFC CHAMPIONSHIP (7/21/18)
    Team Odds
    New England Patriots 10/13
    Pittsburgh Steelers 5/2
    Kansas City Chiefs 8/1
    Jacksonville Jaguars 10/1
    Buffalo Bills 40/1
    Tennessee Titans 40/1
     
    ODDS TO WIN 2017-18 NFC CHAMPIONSHIP (7/21/18)
    Team Odds
    Minnesota Vikings 9/5
    Philadelphia Eagles 3/1
    New Orleans Saints 5/1
    Los Angeles Rams 5/1
    Atlanta Falcons 10/1
    Carolina Panthers 12/1

    SO THERE YOU GO........

  • Why do I have the feeling that it will NOT be MIN vs NE and maybe neither?

  • I don't see how anyone can have that much confidence in the Vikings.

  • I don't see how anyone can have that much confidence in the Vikings.

    @wargograw said:

    I don't see how anyone can have that much confidence in the Vikings.

    Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

  • In the FWIW department, if you look at the betting trend under money it's pretty big on KC & ATL.....but we'll see on that.

    The NFC owns a 26-25 edge over the AFC in the first 51 Super Bowl matchups. The Pittsburgh Steelers have the most Super Bowl wins at six, while the Dallas Cowboys, New England Patriots and San Francisco 49ers all have five.

    First Round Saturday Jan 6, 2018
    TENNESSEE TITANS @ KANSAS CITY CHIEFS
    4:35 PM Game Time Record Line Betting Trend
    Teams Win-Loss Streak  Open Current Spread Money O/U
    101 Tennessee  (9-7) (3-5 A)  W-1  44.5 44.5 52% 38% 35%
    102 Kansas City  (10-6) (6-2 H)  W-4  -8 -8.5 48% 62% 65%
      Line Movements  ·  Preview  ·  BT Movements  ·  Weather  ·  Injuries  ·  Scoreboards  ·  Picks  ·  Bet Now
     
    ATLANTA FALCONS @ LOS ANGELES RAMS
    8:15 PM Game Time Record Line Betting Trend
    Teams Win-Loss Streak  Open Current Spread Money O/U
    103 Atlanta  (10-6) (5-3 A)  W-1  50 48 58% 71% 68%
    104 L.A. Rams  (11-5) (4-4 H)  L-1  -5 -6 42% 29% 32%
      Line Movements  ·  Preview  ·  BT Movements  ·  Weather  ·  Injuries  ·  Scoreboards  ·  Picks  ·  Bet Now
     
    First Round Sunday Jan 7, 2018
    BUFFALO BILLS @ JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS
    1:05 PM Game Time Record Line Betting Trend
    Teams Win-Loss Streak  Open Current Spread Money O/U
    105 Buffalo  (9-7) (3-5 A)  W-1  40 39.5 47% 76% 39%
    106 Jacksonville  (10-6) (6-2 H)  L-2  -8.5 -8.5 53% 24% 61%
      Line Movements  ·  Preview  ·  BT Movements  ·  Weather  ·  Injuries  ·  Scoreboards  ·  Picks  ·  Bet Now
     
    CAROLINA PANTHERS @ NEW ORLEANS SAINTS
    4:40 PM Game Time Record Line Betting Trend
    Teams Win-Loss Streak  Open Current Spread Money O/U
    107 Carolina  (11-5) (5-3 A)  L-1  48.5 47.5 52% 64% 47%
    108 New Orleans  (11-5) (7-1 H)  L-1  -6 -6.5 48% 36% 53%
  • I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

  • I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

    @dawg2fan said:

    I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

    Well DAL and SF aren't in it now, maybe DAL eventually so we're stuck rooting for NE or hopefully not the NFC in SB LII (gasp!). Oh geezzz, can the stlrz lose an AFC earlier round match? Something to hope for. 😕

  • @wargograw said:

    I don't see how anyone can have that much confidence in the Vikings.

    Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

    And, potentially the Jags should be given a decent chance because of their defense.

  • I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

    @dawg2fan said:

    I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

    6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

    Packers 13

    Bears 9

    Browns/Giants  8 each.

  • @dawg2fan said:

    I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

    6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

    Packers 13

    Bears 9

    Browns/Giants  8 each.

    @the-gipper said:

    6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

    Packers 13

    Bears 9

    Browns/Giants  8 each.

    The only thing being in the last 51 years with the expanded NFL it is much harder to win a championship and if you're under 58 or maybe 60 you've never experienced anything but the Super Bowl era. But we old farts older than 60 love to reminisce about the good old days and single bar helmets and all that stuff.

  • @dawg2fan said:

    I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

    6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

    Packers 13

    Bears 9

    Browns/Giants  8 each.

    @the-gipper said:

    6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

    Packers 13

    Bears 9

    Browns/Giants  8 each.

    My wife's family would argue that any Championship before the SuperBowl era does not count.  So, everything the Browns won before that era does not count, regardless of how much I try to argue.  So to put it mildy, they even have me believing that our wins don't count.  It's sick, but that's the way it is.

  • @dawg2fan said:

    I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

    Well DAL and SF aren't in it now, maybe DAL eventually so we're stuck rooting for NE or hopefully not the NFC in SB LII (gasp!). Oh geezzz, can the stlrz lose an AFC earlier round match? Something to hope for. 😕

    @mjp28 said:

    Well DAL and SF aren't in it now, maybe DAL eventually so we're stuck rooting for NE or hopefully not the NFC in SB LII (gasp!). Oh geezzz, can the stlrz lose an AFC earlier round match? Something to hope for. 😕

    I pray someone beats them.  Of course, I don't let my wife know this.  Just put on the sad face and pretend I'm upset.  My least favorite teams are the Steelers and the Cowboys.  So sick of the "America Team" with the Cowboys and they haven't done anything lately. 

  • @dawg2fan said:

    I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

    6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

    Packers 13

    Bears 9

    Browns/Giants  8 each.

    @the-gipper said:

    6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

    Packers 13

    Bears 9

    Browns/Giants  8 each.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah. Give it a rest already you fossil. lol

    AAFC titles, equivalent to the modern day Arena Bowl championships are not recognized by the NFL.

    The operative number is 6, and the only thing that matters in todays football world are Super Bowls.

    I bet even Browns fans grow weary of your "feel better about yourself because we actually have more Championships than the Steelers" rhetoric.

    But if it works for you then by all means keep going with it.

  • @wargograw said:

    I don't see how anyone can have that much confidence in the Vikings.

    Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

    This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

    Packers 13

    Bears 9

    Browns/Giants  8 each.

    My wife's family would argue that any Championship before the SuperBowl era does not count.  So, everything the Browns won before that era does not count, regardless of how much I try to argue.  So to put it mildy, they even have me believing that our wins don't count.  It's sick, but that's the way it is.

    @dawg2fan said:

    My wife's family would argue that any Championship before the SuperBowl era does not count.  So, everything the Browns won before that era does not count, regardless of how much I try to argue.  So to put it mildy, they even have me believing that our wins don't count.  It's sick, but that's the way it is.

    Your wife's family are fuyucking idiots.

  • @the-gipper said:

    6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

    Packers 13

    Bears 9

    Browns/Giants  8 each.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah. Give it a rest already you fossil. lol

    AAFC titles, equivalent to the modern day Arena Bowl championships are not recognized by the NFL.

    The operative number is 6, and the only thing that matters in todays football world are Super Bowls.

    I bet even Browns fans grow weary of your "feel better about yourself because we actually have more Championships than the Steelers" rhetoric.

    But if it works for you then by all means keep going with it.

    @stinkhole said:

    Yeah, yeah, yeah. Give it a rest already you fossil. lol

    AAFC titles, equivalent to the modern day Arena Bowl championships are not recognized by the NFL.

    The operative number is 6, and the only thing that matters in todays football world are Super Bowls.

    I bet even Browns fans grow weary of your "feel better about yourself because we actually have more Championships than the Steelers" rhetoric.

    But if it works for you then by all means keep going with it.

    Speaking of fuyucking idiots.   The operative number is 13....even though you are stupid of a fuyucking idiot to believe it. 

    Do they not count NBA titles before 1970?  Do they not count World Series titles before 1970?  Do they not count NHL titles before 1970?  They count them all....and all those leagues have expanded as much as the NFL.   The "Super Bowl" is merely an expansion of the playoffs due to the expansion of the teams in the league.  Its just that the other teams didn't come up with some marketing gimmick for their versions of the expanded playoffs. 

    And the reason it works...is because it is the pure truth and fact of the matter.

    The only titles that count are the last one and the next one...the rest are all just historical data. 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

    This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

    @wargograw said:

    This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

     Is ranked 1st in points allowed and 1st in yards allowed. I'd say they have dominated almost every game this year. And I am not going to compare stats with Denver's 2015 defense, but their attack is way better than 2015 Broncos' one. 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

    This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

    @wargograw said:

    This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

    https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-yards-per-game#

    NFL TEAM DEFENSE RANKINGS, wow Cleveland at #14 better than some playoff teams

    Season:                                                                          2003                                                                         2004                                                                         2005                                                                         2006                                                                         2007                                                                         2008                                                                         2009                                                                         2010                                                                         2011                                                                         2012                                                                         2013                                                                         2014                                                                         2015                                                                         2016                                                                         2017                                                         
    Date: 
    Rank Team 2017 Last 3 Last 1 Home Away 2016
    1 Minnesota 275.9 200.3 201.0 248.5 303.4 314.9
    2 Jacksonville 284.8 288.0 263.0 281.1 288.0 321.7
    3 Denver 290.0 331.0 379.0 262.8 317.2 316.1
    4 Philadelphia 306.5 359.7 301.0 280.6 332.4 342.8
    5 Pittsburgh 306.9 320.3 374.0 312.4 301.4 339.2
    6 Arizona 310.9 269.0 296.0 287.2 334.6 305.2
    7 Dallas 318.1 216.0 219.0 328.0 308.1 348.0
    8 Chicago 319.1 291.3 327.0 322.9 315.4 346.8
    9 Atlanta 320.9 308.0 361.0 301.1 338.4 376.9
    10 Carolina 322.6 391.0 410.0 331.0 315.1 359.8
    11 Seattle 323.2 297.7 259.0 319.1 327.2 319.6
    12 Baltimore 325.1 307.0 359.0 329.4 320.8 322.1
    13 Tennessee 327.8 318.7 325.0 344.1 313.3 357.5
    14 Cleveland 328.1 327.3 348.0 303.1 347.6 392.4
    15 LA Chargers 328.4 342.7 336.0 321.6 335.1 347.1
    16 Miami 335.7 348.0 312.0 284.3 375.7 381.7
    17 LA Rams 338.5 383.0 322.0 339.8 337.3 337.0
    18 Cincinnati 339.1 311.3 312.0 327.9 350.2 350.8
    19 New Orleans 341.0 399.7 413.0 353.6 326.9 375.4
    20 Houston 346.6 348.0 250.0 322.6 370.6 300.1
    21 Buffalo 347.8 332.3 230.0 360.9 336.1 357.0
    22 Washington 347.9 332.3 381.0 289.8 406.0 377.9
    23 Green Bay 348.9 326.3 356.0 323.2 374.5 374.2
    24 Oakland 350.1 347.0 495.0 316.4 376.2 370.1
    25 San Francisco 351.6 350.3 251.0 383.2 319.9 406.4
    26 NY Jets 352.2 373.7 330.0 344.5 360.0 342.4
    27 Detroit 355.8 323.0 256.0 364.5 347.0 356.6
    28 New England 366.0 328.7 247.0 360.5 371.5 328.3
    29 Kansas City 367.0 359.3 397.0 347.2 389.2 369.7
    30 Indianapolis 367.1 331.3 209.0 364.8 369.4 382.9
    31 NY Giants 373.2 275.7 197.0 361.5 384.9 343.6
    32 Tampa Bay 378.1 329.3 323.0 348.4 407.8 367.9
  • IF YOU BELIEVE IN SUCH THINGS, THE SIMULATION RESULTS A LOT OF PLAYOFF TEAMS WAY DOWN THE LIST.

    Rankings & Projections Summary

    Highlights from our predictive power ratings and simulations of currently scheduled games.

    Rank Rating Team Proj W Proj L Playoffs Win SB
    1 8.8
     
    New England (13-3)
    13.0 3.0 100.0% 34.3%
    2 5.8
     
    Philadelphia (13-3)
    13.0 3.0 100.0% 18.5%
    3 5.6
     
    Pittsburgh (13-3)
    13.0 3.0 100.0% 13.1%
    4 5.6
     
    Minnesota (13-3)
    13.0 3.0 100.0% 14.0%
    5 4.4
     
    New Orleans (12-5)
    11.0 5.0 100.0% 7.5%
    6 3.7
     
    Jacksonville (11-6)
    10.0 6.0 100.0% 5.8%
    7 3.5
     
    LA Rams (11-6)
    11.0 5.0 100.0% 0.0%
    8 3.5
     
    Atlanta (11-6)
    10.0 6.0 100.0% 5.2%
    9 3.3
     
    Kansas City (10-7)
    10.0 6.0 100.0% 0.0%
    10 3.0
     
    Baltimore (9-7)
    9.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0%
    11 2.9
     
    Seattle (9-7)
    9.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0%
    12 2.4
     
    Carolina (11-6)
    11.0 5.0 100.0% 0.0%
    13 2.1
     
    LA Chargers (9-7)
    9.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0%
    14 2.1
     
    Dallas (9-7)
    9.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0%
    15 1.3
     
    Detroit (9-7)
    9.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0%
    16 -0.0
     
    Green Bay (7-9)
    7.0 9.0 0.0% 0.0%
    17 -0.9
     
    Tennessee (10-7)
    9.0 7.0 100.0% 1.5%
    18 -1.4
     
    Tampa Bay (5-11)
    5.0 11.0 0.0% 0.0%
    19 -1.6
     
    Oakland (6-10)
    6.0 10.0 0.0% 0.0%
    20 -1.8
     
    Washington (7-9)
    7.0 9.0 0.0% 0.0%
    21 -2.1
     
    Arizona (8-8)
    8.0 8.0 0.0% 0.0%
    22 -2.1
     
    Cincinnati (7-9)
    7.0 9.0 0.0% 0.0%
    23 -3.2
     
    Chicago (5-11)
    5.0 11.0 0.0% 0.0%
    24 -3.3
     
    Denver (5-11)
    5.0 11.0 0.0% 0.0%
    25 -3.3
     
    Buffalo (9-8)
    9.0 7.0 100.0% 0.0%
    26 -3.5
     
    Houston (4-12)
    4.0 12.0 0.0% 0.0%
    27 -4.3
     
    San Francisco (6-10)
    6.0 10.0 0.0% 0.0%
    28 -4.5
     
    NY Giants (3-13)
    3.0 13.0 0.0% 0.0%
    29 -4.7
     
    Miami (6-10)
    6.0 10.0 0.0% 0.0%
    30 -6.1
     
    NY Jets (5-11)
    5.0 11.0 0.0% 0.0%
    31 -6.4
     
    Indianapolis (4-12)
    4.0 12.0 0.0% 0.0%
    32 -8.8
     
    Cleveland (0-16)
    0.0 16.0 0.0% 0.0%