Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. ODDS TO WIN THE AFC, NFC and SB LII

ODDS TO WIN THE AFC, NFC and SB LII

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
74 Posts 13 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T TexasAg1969

    @wargograw said:

    I don't see how anyone can have that much confidence in the Vikings.

    Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

    The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
    • 57k Posts
    • 4k Reputation
    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @texasag1969 said:

    Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

    And, potentially the Jags should be given a decent chance because of their defense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • dawg2fanD dawg2fan

      I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

      The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
      • 57k Posts
      • 4k Reputation
      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
      #9

      @dawg2fan said:

      I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

      6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

      Packers 13

      Bears 9

      Browns/Giants  8 each.

      mjp28M dawg2fanD StinkHoleS 3 Replies Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • The GipperT The Gipper

        @dawg2fan said:

        I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

        6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

        Packers 13

        Bears 9

        Browns/Giants  8 each.

        mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
        • 18k Posts
        • 4k Reputation
        mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
        #10

        @the-gipper said:

        6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

        Packers 13

        Bears 9

        Browns/Giants  8 each.

        The only thing being in the last 51 years with the expanded NFL it is much harder to win a championship and if you're under 58 or maybe 60 you've never experienced anything but the Super Bowl era. But we old farts older than 60 love to reminisce about the good old days and single bar helmets and all that stuff.

        GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
        The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • The GipperT The Gipper

          @dawg2fan said:

          I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

          6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

          Packers 13

          Bears 9

          Browns/Giants  8 each.

          dawg2fan dawg2fanD
          • 713 Posts
          • 74 Reputation
          dawg2fanD dawg2fan wrote on last edited by dawg2fan
          #11

          @the-gipper said:

          6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

          Packers 13

          Bears 9

          Browns/Giants  8 each.

          My wife's family would argue that any Championship before the SuperBowl era does not count.  So, everything the Browns won before that era does not count, regardless of how much I try to argue.  So to put it mildy, they even have me believing that our wins don't count.  It's sick, but that's the way it is.

          The GipperT T 2 Replies Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • mjp28M mjp28

            @dawg2fan said:

            I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

            Well DAL and SF aren't in it now, maybe DAL eventually so we're stuck rooting for NE or hopefully not the NFC in SB LII (gasp!). Oh geezzz, can the stlrz lose an AFC earlier round match? Something to hope for. 😕

            dawg2fan dawg2fanD
            • 713 Posts
            • 74 Reputation
            dawg2fanD dawg2fan wrote on last edited by
            #12

            @mjp28 said:

            Well DAL and SF aren't in it now, maybe DAL eventually so we're stuck rooting for NE or hopefully not the NFC in SB LII (gasp!). Oh geezzz, can the stlrz lose an AFC earlier round match? Something to hope for. 😕

            I pray someone beats them.  Of course, I don't let my wife know this.  Just put on the sad face and pretend I'm upset.  My least favorite teams are the Steelers and the Cowboys.  So sick of the "America Team" with the Cowboys and they haven't done anything lately. 

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • The GipperT The Gipper

              @dawg2fan said:

              I could care less as long as the Steelers don't win.  I would actually root on NE just because they would get their 6th ring, which ties the Steelers.  My wife is a Steelers fan, and just keeps rubbing their 6 rings in my face.  So any one that wins 6 is fine with me. 

              6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

              Packers 13

              Bears 9

              Browns/Giants  8 each.

              StinkHole StinkHoleS One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 3k Posts
              • 365 Reputation
              StinkHoleS StinkHole wrote on last edited by StinkHole
              #13

              @the-gipper said:

              6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

              Packers 13

              Bears 9

              Browns/Giants  8 each.

              Yeah, yeah, yeah. Give it a rest already you fossil. lol

              AAFC titles, equivalent to the modern day Arena Bowl championships are not recognized by the NFL.

              The operative number is 6, and the only thing that matters in todays football world are Super Bowls.

              I bet even Browns fans grow weary of your "feel better about yourself because we actually have more Championships than the Steelers" rhetoric.

              But if it works for you then by all means keep going with it.

              The GipperT R 2 Replies Last reply
              👍
              Quote Reply
              • T TexasAg1969

                @wargograw said:

                I don't see how anyone can have that much confidence in the Vikings.

                Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

                wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 5k Posts
                • 363 Reputation
                W wargograw wrote on last edited by
                #14

                @texasag1969 said:

                Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

                This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

                NeroN mjp28M 2 Replies Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • dawg2fanD dawg2fan

                  @the-gipper said:

                  6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

                  Packers 13

                  Bears 9

                  Browns/Giants  8 each.

                  My wife's family would argue that any Championship before the SuperBowl era does not count.  So, everything the Browns won before that era does not count, regardless of how much I try to argue.  So to put it mildy, they even have me believing that our wins don't count.  It's sick, but that's the way it is.

                  The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                  • 57k Posts
                  • 4k Reputation
                  The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  @dawg2fan said:

                  My wife's family would argue that any Championship before the SuperBowl era does not count.  So, everything the Browns won before that era does not count, regardless of how much I try to argue.  So to put it mildy, they even have me believing that our wins don't count.  It's sick, but that's the way it is.

                  Your wife's family are fuyucking idiots.

                  dawg2fanD 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • StinkHoleS StinkHole

                    @the-gipper said:

                    6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

                    Packers 13

                    Bears 9

                    Browns/Giants  8 each.

                    Yeah, yeah, yeah. Give it a rest already you fossil. lol

                    AAFC titles, equivalent to the modern day Arena Bowl championships are not recognized by the NFL.

                    The operative number is 6, and the only thing that matters in todays football world are Super Bowls.

                    I bet even Browns fans grow weary of your "feel better about yourself because we actually have more Championships than the Steelers" rhetoric.

                    But if it works for you then by all means keep going with it.

                    The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                    • 57k Posts
                    • 4k Reputation
                    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    @stinkhole said:

                    Yeah, yeah, yeah. Give it a rest already you fossil. lol

                    AAFC titles, equivalent to the modern day Arena Bowl championships are not recognized by the NFL.

                    The operative number is 6, and the only thing that matters in todays football world are Super Bowls.

                    I bet even Browns fans grow weary of your "feel better about yourself because we actually have more Championships than the Steelers" rhetoric.

                    But if it works for you then by all means keep going with it.

                    Speaking of fuyucking idiots.   The operative number is 13....even though you are stupid of a fuyucking idiot to believe it. 

                    Do they not count NBA titles before 1970?  Do they not count World Series titles before 1970?  Do they not count NHL titles before 1970?  They count them all....and all those leagues have expanded as much as the NFL.   The "Super Bowl" is merely an expansion of the playoffs due to the expansion of the teams in the league.  Its just that the other teams didn't come up with some marketing gimmick for their versions of the expanded playoffs. 

                    And the reason it works...is because it is the pure truth and fact of the matter.

                    The only titles that count are the last one and the next one...the rest are all just historical data. 

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • W wargograw

                      @texasag1969 said:

                      Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

                      This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

                      Nero NeroN Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 2k Posts
                      • 1k Reputation
                      NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @wargograw said:

                      This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

                       Is ranked 1st in points allowed and 1st in yards allowed. I'd say they have dominated almost every game this year. And I am not going to compare stats with Denver's 2015 defense, but their attack is way better than 2015 Broncos' one. 

                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • W wargograw

                        @texasag1969 said:

                        Defense wins is why. Ask Denver when Peyton was a shadow of his former self.

                        This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

                        mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                        • 18k Posts
                        • 4k Reputation
                        mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28
                        #18

                        @wargograw said:

                        This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

                        https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-yards-per-game#

                        NFL TEAM DEFENSE RANKINGS, wow Cleveland at #14 better than some playoff teams

                        More Team Stats...
                        Season:                                                                          2003                                                                         2004                                                                         2005                                                                         2006                                                                         2007                                                                         2008                                                                         2009                                                                         2010                                                                         2011                                                                         2012                                                                         2013                                                                         2014                                                                         2015                                                                         2016                                                                         2017                                                         
                        Date: 
                        Rank Team 2017 Last 3 Last 1 Home Away 2016
                        1 Minnesota 275.9 200.3 201.0 248.5 303.4 314.9
                        2 Jacksonville 284.8 288.0 263.0 281.1 288.0 321.7
                        3 Denver 290.0 331.0 379.0 262.8 317.2 316.1
                        4 Philadelphia 306.5 359.7 301.0 280.6 332.4 342.8
                        5 Pittsburgh 306.9 320.3 374.0 312.4 301.4 339.2
                        6 Arizona 310.9 269.0 296.0 287.2 334.6 305.2
                        7 Dallas 318.1 216.0 219.0 328.0 308.1 348.0
                        8 Chicago 319.1 291.3 327.0 322.9 315.4 346.8
                        9 Atlanta 320.9 308.0 361.0 301.1 338.4 376.9
                        10 Carolina 322.6 391.0 410.0 331.0 315.1 359.8
                        11 Seattle 323.2 297.7 259.0 319.1 327.2 319.6
                        12 Baltimore 325.1 307.0 359.0 329.4 320.8 322.1
                        13 Tennessee 327.8 318.7 325.0 344.1 313.3 357.5
                        14 Cleveland 328.1 327.3 348.0 303.1 347.6 392.4
                        15 LA Chargers 328.4 342.7 336.0 321.6 335.1 347.1
                        16 Miami 335.7 348.0 312.0 284.3 375.7 381.7
                        17 LA Rams 338.5 383.0 322.0 339.8 337.3 337.0
                        18 Cincinnati 339.1 311.3 312.0 327.9 350.2 350.8
                        19 New Orleans 341.0 399.7 413.0 353.6 326.9 375.4
                        20 Houston 346.6 348.0 250.0 322.6 370.6 300.1
                        21 Buffalo 347.8 332.3 230.0 360.9 336.1 357.0
                        22 Washington 347.9 332.3 381.0 289.8 406.0 377.9
                        23 Green Bay 348.9 326.3 356.0 323.2 374.5 374.2
                        24 Oakland 350.1 347.0 495.0 316.4 376.2 370.1
                        25 San Francisco 351.6 350.3 251.0 383.2 319.9 406.4
                        26 NY Jets 352.2 373.7 330.0 344.5 360.0 342.4
                        27 Detroit 355.8 323.0 256.0 364.5 347.0 356.6
                        28 New England 366.0 328.7 247.0 360.5 371.5 328.3
                        29 Kansas City 367.0 359.3 397.0 347.2 389.2 369.7
                        30 Indianapolis 367.1 331.3 209.0 364.8 369.4 382.9
                        31 NY Giants 373.2 275.7 197.0 361.5 384.9 343.6
                        32 Tampa Bay 378.1 329.3 323.0 348.4 407.8 367.9
                        GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                          • 18k Posts
                          • 4k Reputation
                          mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          IF YOU BELIEVE IN SUCH THINGS, THE SIMULATION RESULTS A LOT OF PLAYOFF TEAMS WAY DOWN THE LIST.

                          Rankings & Projections Summary

                          Highlights from our predictive power ratings and simulations of currently scheduled games.

                          Rank Rating Team Proj W Proj L Playoffs Win SB
                          1 8.8
                           
                          New England (13-3)
                          13.0 3.0 100.0% 34.3%
                          2 5.8
                           
                          Philadelphia (13-3)
                          13.0 3.0 100.0% 18.5%
                          3 5.6
                           
                          Pittsburgh (13-3)
                          13.0 3.0 100.0% 13.1%
                          4 5.6
                           
                          Minnesota (13-3)
                          13.0 3.0 100.0% 14.0%
                          5 4.4
                           
                          New Orleans (12-5)
                          11.0 5.0 100.0% 7.5%
                          6 3.7
                           
                          Jacksonville (11-6)
                          10.0 6.0 100.0% 5.8%
                          7 3.5
                           
                          LA Rams (11-6)
                          11.0 5.0 100.0% 0.0%
                          8 3.5
                           
                          Atlanta (11-6)
                          10.0 6.0 100.0% 5.2%
                          9 3.3
                           
                          Kansas City (10-7)
                          10.0 6.0 100.0% 0.0%
                          10 3.0
                           
                          Baltimore (9-7)
                          9.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          11 2.9
                           
                          Seattle (9-7)
                          9.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          12 2.4
                           
                          Carolina (11-6)
                          11.0 5.0 100.0% 0.0%
                          13 2.1
                           
                          LA Chargers (9-7)
                          9.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          14 2.1
                           
                          Dallas (9-7)
                          9.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          15 1.3
                           
                          Detroit (9-7)
                          9.0 7.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          16 -0.0
                           
                          Green Bay (7-9)
                          7.0 9.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          17 -0.9
                           
                          Tennessee (10-7)
                          9.0 7.0 100.0% 1.5%
                          18 -1.4
                           
                          Tampa Bay (5-11)
                          5.0 11.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          19 -1.6
                           
                          Oakland (6-10)
                          6.0 10.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          20 -1.8
                           
                          Washington (7-9)
                          7.0 9.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          21 -2.1
                           
                          Arizona (8-8)
                          8.0 8.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          22 -2.1
                           
                          Cincinnati (7-9)
                          7.0 9.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          23 -3.2
                           
                          Chicago (5-11)
                          5.0 11.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          24 -3.3
                           
                          Denver (5-11)
                          5.0 11.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          25 -3.3
                           
                          Buffalo (9-8)
                          9.0 7.0 100.0% 0.0%
                          26 -3.5
                           
                          Houston (4-12)
                          4.0 12.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          27 -4.3
                           
                          San Francisco (6-10)
                          6.0 10.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          28 -4.5
                           
                          NY Giants (3-13)
                          3.0 13.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          29 -4.7
                           
                          Miami (6-10)
                          6.0 10.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          30 -6.1
                           
                          NY Jets (5-11)
                          5.0 11.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          31 -6.4
                           
                          Indianapolis (4-12)
                          4.0 12.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          32 -8.8
                           
                          Cleveland (0-16)
                          0.0 16.0 0.0% 0.0%
                          GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                            • 18k Posts
                            • 4k Reputation
                            mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            Our new power ratings have been in development since 2011. Designed exclusively for predictive purposes, these ratings improve upon the old ratings in several ways, most notably by incorporating a preseason rating for each team that improves early season accuracy.

                            Rating name Best Worst
                            Predictive Rating New England Cleveland
                            Home Rating Minnesota Cleveland
                            Away Rating LA Rams Denver
                            Home Advantage NY Jets LA Rams
                            Strength Of Schedule Atlanta Jacksonville
                            Future SOS Tennessee Cleveland
                            Season SOS Atlanta Indianapolis
                            SOS - Basic Chicago Jacksonville
                            In-Div SOS Tampa Bay New England
                            Non-Div SOS New England Denver
                            Last 5 Rating Minnesota Houston
                            Last 10 Rating New England Houston
                            In-Div Rating Jacksonville Cleveland
                            Non-Div Rating Philadelphia Cleveland
                            Luck Rating Minnesota Cleveland
                            Consistency Rating Cleveland LA Rams
                            Vs. 1-5 Rating Jacksonville Buffalo
                            Vs. 6-10 Rating Atlanta Baltimore
                            Vs. 11-16 Rating LA Chargers Indianapolis
                            Vs. 17-22 Rating New England Cleveland
                            Vs. 23-32 Rating New Orleans Cleveland
                            First Half Rating New England Cleveland
                            Second Half Rating Seattle Indianapolis

                            Do you still use our old rankings for your personal system? See our old rankings.

                            GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                              • 18k Posts
                              • 4k Reputation
                              mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28
                              #21

                              MAYBE I SHOULD HAVE BEEN WATCHING THIS EARLIER? 2017 ATS NUMBERS.....

                              NFL Team ATS Trends                                                      

                              Team ATS Record Cover % MOV ATS +/-
                              Minnesota 11-5-0 68.8% 8.1 +4.8
                              New England 11-5-0 68.8% 10.1 +1.5
                              Buffalo 10-6-1 62.5% -3.8 -1.4
                              Philadelphia 10-6-0 62.5% 10.1 +6.0
                              NY Jets 9-6-1 60.0% -5.2 +1.1
                              Carolina 10-7-0 58.8% 1.8 +1.0
                              Kansas City 10-7-0 58.8% 4.4 +0.7
                              Cincinnati 9-7-0 56.2% -3.7 -2.8
                              San Francisco 9-7-0 56.2% -3.2 +1.1
                              Tennessee 9-7-1 56.2% -1.2 -2.4
                              Chicago 8-7-1 53.3% -3.5 +1.2
                              Dallas 8-7-1 53.3% 1.4 -0.8
                              Detroit 8-7-1 53.3% 2.1 +1.6
                              LA Chargers 8-7-1 53.3% 5.2 +3.8
                              Baltimore 8-7-1 53.3% 5.8 +3.5
                              Jacksonville 9-8-0 52.9% 9.2 +6.3
                              LA Rams 9-8-0 52.9% 8.0 +5.5
                              New Orleans 9-8-0 52.9% 7.5 +3.9
                              Indianapolis 8-8-0 50.0% -8.8 -3.3
                              Atlanta 8-9-0 47.1% 3.0 -0.6
                              NY Giants 7-9-0 43.8% -8.9 -4.3
                              Houston 7-9-0 43.8% -6.1 -2.6
                              Pittsburgh 7-9-0 43.8% 6.1 +0.3
                              Green Bay 7-9-0 43.8% -4.0 -2.3
                              Washington 7-9-0 43.8% -2.9 -1.9
                              Tampa Bay 6-9-1 40.0% -2.9 -0.8
                              Arizona 6-9-1 40.0% -4.1 -2.2
                              Seattle 6-9-1 40.0% 2.1 -0.7
                              Miami 5-9-2 35.7% -7.0 -2.4
                              Oakland 5-9-2 35.7% -4.5 -4.3
                              Denver 4-11-1 26.7% -5.8 -6.0
                              Cleveland 4-12-0 25.0% -11.0 -4.4
                               
                              GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • StinkHoleS StinkHole

                                @the-gipper said:

                                6 is not the operative number.    The operative number is 13.   Those are the number of Championship the Green Bay Packers have won.   6 doesn't even match the number of titles the Browns have won.

                                Packers 13

                                Bears 9

                                Browns/Giants  8 each.

                                Yeah, yeah, yeah. Give it a rest already you fossil. lol

                                AAFC titles, equivalent to the modern day Arena Bowl championships are not recognized by the NFL.

                                The operative number is 6, and the only thing that matters in todays football world are Super Bowls.

                                I bet even Browns fans grow weary of your "feel better about yourself because we actually have more Championships than the Steelers" rhetoric.

                                But if it works for you then by all means keep going with it.

                                RoyceRolls R
                                • 1k Posts
                                • 345 Reputation
                                R RoyceRolls wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                @stinkhole said:

                                Yeah, yeah, yeah. Give it a rest already you fossil. lol

                                AAFC titles, equivalent to the modern day Arena Bowl championships are not recognized by the NFL.

                                The operative number is 6, and the only thing that matters in todays football world are Super Bowls.

                                I bet even Browns fans grow weary of your "feel better about yourself because we actually have more Championships than the Steelers" rhetoric.

                                But if it works for you then by all means keep going with it.

                                Everyone has their biases. Most people wouldn’t consider the 70s Steelers viable because they were the first brand managers for steroids in football. Just because they got away with belichecking their way to some early Super Bowl wins doesn’t mean mark McGuire belongs in the hall of fame. 

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • NeroN Nero

                                  @wargograw said:

                                  This Vikings D is nowhere near that good. 

                                   Is ranked 1st in points allowed and 1st in yards allowed. I'd say they have dominated almost every game this year. And I am not going to compare stats with Denver's 2015 defense, but their attack is way better than 2015 Broncos' one. 

                                  wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 5k Posts
                                  • 363 Reputation
                                  W wargograw wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @nero said:

                                   Is ranked 1st in points allowed and 1st in yards allowed. I'd say they have dominated almost every game this year. And I am not going to compare stats with Denver's 2015 defense, but their attack is way better than 2015 Broncos' one. 

                                  No one is talking about that defense as transcendent or anything. They were about 15 Denver. PFF wrote a ton of articles saying it was by far the best defense since they started the site. No one's saying that stuff about Minnesota. 

                                  NeroN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • W wargograw

                                    @nero said:

                                     Is ranked 1st in points allowed and 1st in yards allowed. I'd say they have dominated almost every game this year. And I am not going to compare stats with Denver's 2015 defense, but their attack is way better than 2015 Broncos' one. 

                                    No one is talking about that defense as transcendent or anything. They were about 15 Denver. PFF wrote a ton of articles saying it was by far the best defense since they started the site. No one's saying that stuff about Minnesota. 

                                    Nero NeroN Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                    • 2k Posts
                                    • 1k Reputation
                                    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @wargograw said:

                                    No one is talking about that defense as transcendent or anything. They were about 15 Denver. PFF wrote a ton of articles saying it was by far the best defense since they started the site. No one's saying that stuff about Minnesota. 

                                    It's not about being trascendent, it's about being effective. 

                                    Truly what Denver achieved in 2015 is outstanding. Peyton had an awful year and they even had to win some games with Osweiler under center. That offense semt like a joke and they could pull out wins with their defense. I was amazed at Superbowl L, I never thought you could win ONLY with defense.

                                    Minnesota's defense probably can't be compared to that defense, but I have seen them dominating games against good teams like Atlanta and Rams. Their only loss lately has been against Carolina, which has a great D. 

                                    It's the best defense among the ones that are left and it's the most balanced one (Philadelphia or Carolina rely on their front 7, for example). They have best defense and a good offense (11th in the league), I prefer that than teams with a very good O and a bad D (like Pats, but they seem to have fixed that).

                                    W 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • NeroN Nero

                                      @wargograw said:

                                      No one is talking about that defense as transcendent or anything. They were about 15 Denver. PFF wrote a ton of articles saying it was by far the best defense since they started the site. No one's saying that stuff about Minnesota. 

                                      It's not about being trascendent, it's about being effective. 

                                      Truly what Denver achieved in 2015 is outstanding. Peyton had an awful year and they even had to win some games with Osweiler under center. That offense semt like a joke and they could pull out wins with their defense. I was amazed at Superbowl L, I never thought you could win ONLY with defense.

                                      Minnesota's defense probably can't be compared to that defense, but I have seen them dominating games against good teams like Atlanta and Rams. Their only loss lately has been against Carolina, which has a great D. 

                                      It's the best defense among the ones that are left and it's the most balanced one (Philadelphia or Carolina rely on their front 7, for example). They have best defense and a good offense (11th in the league), I prefer that than teams with a very good O and a bad D (like Pats, but they seem to have fixed that).

                                      wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 5k Posts
                                      • 363 Reputation
                                      W wargograw wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @nero said:

                                      It's not about being trascendent, it's about being effective. 

                                      Truly what Denver achieved in 2015 is outstanding. Peyton had an awful year and they even had to win some games with Osweiler under center. That offense semt like a joke and they could pull out wins with their defense. I was amazed at Superbowl L, I never thought you could win ONLY with defense.

                                      Minnesota's defense probably can't be compared to that defense, but I have seen them dominating games against good teams like Atlanta and Rams. Their only loss lately has been against Carolina, which has a great D. 

                                      It's the best defense among the ones that are left and it's the most balanced one (Philadelphia or Carolina rely on their front 7, for example). They have best defense and a good offense (11th in the league), I prefer that than teams with a very good O and a bad D (like Pats, but they seem to have fixed that).

                                      I'm not saying it's not the best defense. Most certainly is. But Ag was talking specifically about that 2015 team as a comparison for this Minnesota team, and I simply don't think it is. I think it can and will be had.

                                      NeroN T 2 Replies Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • W wargograw

                                        @nero said:

                                        It's not about being trascendent, it's about being effective. 

                                        Truly what Denver achieved in 2015 is outstanding. Peyton had an awful year and they even had to win some games with Osweiler under center. That offense semt like a joke and they could pull out wins with their defense. I was amazed at Superbowl L, I never thought you could win ONLY with defense.

                                        Minnesota's defense probably can't be compared to that defense, but I have seen them dominating games against good teams like Atlanta and Rams. Their only loss lately has been against Carolina, which has a great D. 

                                        It's the best defense among the ones that are left and it's the most balanced one (Philadelphia or Carolina rely on their front 7, for example). They have best defense and a good offense (11th in the league), I prefer that than teams with a very good O and a bad D (like Pats, but they seem to have fixed that).

                                        I'm not saying it's not the best defense. Most certainly is. But Ag was talking specifically about that 2015 team as a comparison for this Minnesota team, and I simply don't think it is. I think it can and will be had.

                                        Nero NeroN Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 2k Posts
                                        • 1k Reputation
                                        NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @wargograw said:

                                        I'm not saying it's not the best defense. Most certainly is. But Ag was talking specifically about that 2015 team as a comparison for this Minnesota team, and I simply don't think it is. I think it can and will be had.

                                        Well, I think that Ag mentioned Denver because it's the most obvious example of 'defense wins championships' and also the last one. Last year  Superbowl was more about offensive teams, I'd say.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • W wargograw

                                          @nero said:

                                          It's not about being trascendent, it's about being effective. 

                                          Truly what Denver achieved in 2015 is outstanding. Peyton had an awful year and they even had to win some games with Osweiler under center. That offense semt like a joke and they could pull out wins with their defense. I was amazed at Superbowl L, I never thought you could win ONLY with defense.

                                          Minnesota's defense probably can't be compared to that defense, but I have seen them dominating games against good teams like Atlanta and Rams. Their only loss lately has been against Carolina, which has a great D. 

                                          It's the best defense among the ones that are left and it's the most balanced one (Philadelphia or Carolina rely on their front 7, for example). They have best defense and a good offense (11th in the league), I prefer that than teams with a very good O and a bad D (like Pats, but they seem to have fixed that).

                                          I'm not saying it's not the best defense. Most certainly is. But Ag was talking specifically about that 2015 team as a comparison for this Minnesota team, and I simply don't think it is. I think it can and will be had.

                                          TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 23k Posts
                                          • 6k Reputation
                                          T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @wargograw said:

                                          I'm not saying it's not the best defense. Most certainly is. But Ag was talking specifically about that 2015 team as a comparison for this Minnesota team, and I simply don't think it is. I think it can and will be had.

                                          I used Denver as an example of defenses winning playoffs. I did not say Minn. had an defense that good, but they are a very fine defense capable of taking a team there, especially given they have a better offense than the '15 Denver team which relied on Ossie to get them there over a lot of the season and Peyton to provide "adequate" service to win the SB. They gave the MVP to the right guy.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate