Camp Barkley #1 Overall
-
I was warming up to the idea of Barkley at 4 and then Rashaad Penny showed out in the senior bowl. I would much rather target Penny at 33 now.
1a. Sam Darnold
1b. Josh Jackson
2a. Rashaad Penny
2b. Christian Kirk
2c. Armani Watts
That's what I would like to see right now. It's early so this is subject to change
-
As a Redskins fan ... Cousins is solid but not elite. Of course, it's hard to tell with the team we've managed to assemble around him. Stick him on a team with a lot of talent and they could be perennial playoff team. At this point, I'd be happy if we brought Cousins back, and indifferent if we went another route. Part of the reason I'm taking an interest in the Browns is because (besides old family ties) I am intrigued by the team you've compiled, sick of the disfunction and BS of the Snyder/Allen regime in DC and the mismanagement of Cousins. and excited to see what happens in the coming years with all the young talent and draft picks you all have. If I'm a Browns fan, I'm excited to add Cousins because it instantly makes you a playoff-caliber team. Especially if you add Barkley then at #1. But I'm also not going to be drawing up tickets to the SB in 2-3 years. But if I'm a Browns fan that truly wants to become a SB contender in the next 5 years, I'm bringing in a veteran like Alex Smith, drafting a QB #1 or #4 overall that you think can be a stud and let him sit for 1-2 years ... and if they emerge and become a starter sooner, great. Now not saying Cousins can't lead a team to the super bowl ... he just isn't what I would term "elite" ... I'd stick Cousins in the next tier of guys that are between 5-12 overall at the position. Of course, it can click for him at any time ... and his shortcomings could be just as much the organization's fault as they are his.
As a Redskins fan ... Cousins is solid but not elite. Of course, it's hard to tell with the team we've managed to assemble around him. Stick him on a team with a lot of talent and they could be perennial playoff team. At this point, I'd be happy if we brought Cousins back, and indifferent if we went another route. Part of the reason I'm taking an interest in the Browns is because (besides old family ties) I am intrigued by the team you've compiled, sick of the disfunction and BS of the Snyder/Allen regime in DC and the mismanagement of Cousins. and excited to see what happens in the coming years with all the young talent and draft picks you all have. If I'm a Browns fan, I'm excited to add Cousins because it instantly makes you a playoff-caliber team. Especially if you add Barkley then at #1. But I'm also not going to be drawing up tickets to the SB in 2-3 years. But if I'm a Browns fan that truly wants to become a SB contender in the next 5 years, I'm bringing in a veteran like Alex Smith, drafting a QB #1 or #4 overall that you think can be a stud and let him sit for 1-2 years ... and if they emerge and become a starter sooner, great. Now not saying Cousins can't lead a team to the super bowl ... he just isn't what I would term "elite" ... I'd stick Cousins in the next tier of guys that are between 5-12 overall at the position. Of course, it can click for him at any time ... and his shortcomings could be just as much the organization's fault as they are his.
^^^ Thank you and welcome... also have had several conversations with another hard core 'Skins fan, and he shares your opinion of Cousins. That's my objection to signing Kirk, if the Washington lets him try the FA market. I'm averse to paying the guy probably the highest contract ever- for sub top of the line talent. We're married to him for the next three years at least on top of that. He's going nowhere without a long term contract. Some Browns fans are only looking at the ton of cap room we have, are tired of having lousy QB play, look at Kirk's 4,000+ passing yards, and say sign him, price is no object. I violently disagree.
& what you said- trade for Smith, draft a qb #1 overall and hope we drafted the right guy for a change.
-
Ha, more speak to text. With the XFL coming back, wonder what He Hate Me is doing.
You'd think Gip would stop posting on here via his phone considering all the problems he has doing so You'd think Gip would stop posting on here via his phone considering all the problems he has doing so
You'd think Gip would stop posting on here via his phone considering all the problems he has doing so You'd think Gip would stop posting on here via his phone considering all the problems he has doing so
Good thing he doesn't stutter....
I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!" -
As a Redskins fan ... Cousins is solid but not elite. Of course, it's hard to tell with the team we've managed to assemble around him. Stick him on a team with a lot of talent and they could be perennial playoff team. At this point, I'd be happy if we brought Cousins back, and indifferent if we went another route. Part of the reason I'm taking an interest in the Browns is because (besides old family ties) I am intrigued by the team you've compiled, sick of the disfunction and BS of the Snyder/Allen regime in DC and the mismanagement of Cousins. and excited to see what happens in the coming years with all the young talent and draft picks you all have. If I'm a Browns fan, I'm excited to add Cousins because it instantly makes you a playoff-caliber team. Especially if you add Barkley then at #1. But I'm also not going to be drawing up tickets to the SB in 2-3 years. But if I'm a Browns fan that truly wants to become a SB contender in the next 5 years, I'm bringing in a veteran like Alex Smith, drafting a QB #1 or #4 overall that you think can be a stud and let him sit for 1-2 years ... and if they emerge and become a starter sooner, great. Now not saying Cousins can't lead a team to the super bowl ... he just isn't what I would term "elite" ... I'd stick Cousins in the next tier of guys that are between 5-12 overall at the position. Of course, it can click for him at any time ... and his shortcomings could be just as much the organization's fault as they are his.
^^^ Thank you and welcome... also have had several conversations with another hard core 'Skins fan, and he shares your opinion of Cousins. That's my objection to signing Kirk, if the Washington lets him try the FA market. I'm averse to paying the guy probably the highest contract ever- for sub top of the line talent. We're married to him for the next three years at least on top of that. He's going nowhere without a long term contract. Some Browns fans are only looking at the ton of cap room we have, are tired of having lousy QB play, look at Kirk's 4,000+ passing yards, and say sign him, price is no object. I violently disagree.
& what you said- trade for Smith, draft a qb #1 overall and hope we drafted the right guy for a change.
A) Some Browns fans are only looking at the ton of cap room we have, are tired of having lousy QB play, look at Kirk's 4,000+ passing yards, and say sign him, price is no object. I violently disagree.
B)& what you said- trade for Smith, draft a qb #1 overall and hope we drafted the right guy for a change.
A)Over Pay the Man gets ya 3 years & Kizer.. and I'd still draft Cousins rookie look-alike other brother in Benkirk. B.) Dorsey threw the bouquet at Smith getting him to KC from 9'ers..but Dorsey also gave up the farm to draft Alex's replacement in MaHolmes & Reid playing both cards tells Alex of this daily ..Am still really confused on why Alex would still follow Dorsey to Browns? Money won't talk loud for Alex like Cousins this season, but as Pats & Jimmy G...KC's trade partner will..
-
It depends on which vet you would get, the length of the contract, and how long you expect him to play and be your starter. Whether you think he is worth it or not doesn't matter for this point, but if you get Kirk Cousins and you sign him to a 5 year deal, then it doesn't make any sense to draft a QB that high to be your backup. Doesn't make sense, because if you as a team expect Cousins to be your QB for the length of the contract, then the drafted QB wouldn't see the field, you wouldn't know what type of game player he could be, and most importantly he could walk after his rookie contract.
There is a reason Jimmy G wanted out in NE. He didn't want to leave because the team was bad, he had been there for a good amount of time, and he wanted to play.
Now, if you sign a vet you think can start a year or 2, then yes, get your guy. But to say you get one no matter what is wrong in my opinion
I understand what you and jbluhm are trying to say but Tour's reply was spot on. Of course it matters what is thought of Kirk Cousins.
The reason Jimmy G wanted out of NE is he has the G.O.A.T. starting ahead of him with a Personal Trainer keeping him as fit as someone in their 20s. Washington doesn't think they see the next Tom Brady in Kirk Cousins or this conversation wouldn't be taking place right now. They would be celebrating post season victories with a long term QB situation they don't have to worry about. Now, is the team that has watched him practice every day since they drafted him doing that? No, they remain just as reluctant to lock him up long term as they have the last 2 years. What do you know that they're incapable of? And, why should that make me feel like we need to take our very 1st draft pick overall and spend it on a RB in a draft that looks to be very deep with RBs over a QB like Kirk Cousins?
And who are going to be the first people complaining that we didn't take a QB at #1 overall when they see one of this year's QB prospects emerging in the next year or 2? If we wait until #4 overall - what's to stop Elway from trading up with Indy at #3 overall to pick a QB in front of us? Why overthink this? I'm pretty confident Barkley won't be the only RB in this draft to make an NFL team happy they drafted him.... Not only that, if we start the run on QBs at #1 overall, the Giants need a QB to replace an Eli Manning on his last leg at #2. Now, the Colts have choices such as QB (understanding Luck never healed in 2017) or trade (with a team desperate for a QB) or take Barkley.
I STILL remember the 1999 draft when it seemed like the entire Philly fanbase was certain the answer to all their prayers was Rickey WIlliams at #2 overall. Andy Reid did the unthinkable and drafted a Veer Option QB from Syracuse named Donovan McNabb (after being Favre's position coach in GB knowing Favre was also a Veer Option QB at So Miss). Well, Ricky Williams got drafted by Mike Ditka and ended up on prozac during his brief tenure in New Orleans. Meanwhile McNabb turned around the NFL team with the worst record in 1998 by leading Philly to the playoffs just every year from 2000 to 2010 inclusive of 5 NFC Championship Game appearances and 1 very exciting Superbowl Game with NE (not to mention how many Pro Bowls and conference MVP seasons he had while never missing post seasons). Ricky did well but never even came close to being the difference maker McNabb became. Again, the best RBs in the last draft were selected in round 3 (Kamara and Hunt).
I understand what you and jbluhm are trying to say but Tour's reply was spot on. Of course it matters what is thought of Kirk Cousins.
The reason Jimmy G wanted out of NE is he has the G.O.A.T. starting ahead of him with a Personal Trainer keeping him as fit as someone in their 20s. Washington doesn't think they see the next Tom Brady in Kirk Cousins or this conversation wouldn't be taking place right now. They would be celebrating post season victories with a long term QB situation they don't have to worry about. Now, is the team that has watched him practice every day since they drafted him doing that? No, they remain just as reluctant to lock him up long term as they have the last 2 years. What do you know that they're incapable of? And, why should that make me feel like we need to take our very 1st draft pick overall and spend it on a RB in a draft that looks to be very deep with RBs over a QB like Kirk Cousins?
And who are going to be the first people complaining that we didn't take a QB at #1 overall when they see one of this year's QB prospects emerging in the next year or 2? If we wait until #4 overall - what's to stop Elway from trading up with Indy at #3 overall to pick a QB in front of us? Why overthink this? I'm pretty confident Barkley won't be the only RB in this draft to make an NFL team happy they drafted him.... Not only that, if we start the run on QBs at #1 overall, the Giants need a QB to replace an Eli Manning on his last leg at #2. Now, the Colts have choices such as QB (understanding Luck never healed in 2017) or trade (with a team desperate for a QB) or take Barkley.
I STILL remember the 1999 draft when it seemed like the entire Philly fanbase was certain the answer to all their prayers was Rickey WIlliams at #2 overall. Andy Reid did the unthinkable and drafted a Veer Option QB from Syracuse named Donovan McNabb (after being Favre's position coach in GB knowing Favre was also a Veer Option QB at So Miss). Well, Ricky Williams got drafted by Mike Ditka and ended up on prozac during his brief tenure in New Orleans. Meanwhile McNabb turned around the NFL team with the worst record in 1998 by leading Philly to the playoffs just every year from 2000 to 2010 inclusive of 5 NFC Championship Game appearances and 1 very exciting Superbowl Game with NE (not to mention how many Pro Bowls and conference MVP seasons he had while never missing post seasons). Ricky did well but never even came close to being the difference maker McNabb became. Again, the best RBs in the last draft were selected in round 3 (Kamara and Hunt).
You missed my point. It doesn't matter how you or I evaluate or think about Cousins. The fact is, the Browns can even think he is just good, but if they sign him to a 5 year contract like that, then they won't and IMO shouldn't draft one #1. If the Browns expectations are for Cousins to start for 5 years, then they would be wasting that pick.
As for Jimmy G, if he had Blake Bortles in front of him and wasn't getting the opportunity to play, he would want out.
I am not saying the Browns should sign Cousins. My point was to say they will and should draft QB #1 no matter who the vet is isn't correct
-
It depends on which vet you would get, the length of the contract, and how long you expect him to play and be your starter. Whether you think he is worth it or not doesn't matter for this point, but if you get Kirk Cousins and you sign him to a 5 year deal, then it doesn't make any sense to draft a QB that high to be your backup. Doesn't make sense, because if you as a team expect Cousins to be your QB for the length of the contract, then the drafted QB wouldn't see the field, you wouldn't know what type of game player he could be, and most importantly he could walk after his rookie contract.
There is a reason Jimmy G wanted out in NE. He didn't want to leave because the team was bad, he had been there for a good amount of time, and he wanted to play.
Now, if you sign a vet you think can start a year or 2, then yes, get your guy. But to say you get one no matter what is wrong in my opinion
Disagree...
I have my #1 overall QB. I am highly confident... as confident as I have been in years... that my #1 is "the guy." Therefore I let that dictate the vet QB I pursue.
I get the feeling that you are coming from the opposite camp. You have a vet you want and are letting that dictate the QB prospect you draft and, more importantly, when.
In my view whether Cousins is great or merely good, you are never going to get back into the position to draft a QB at the top of the first round again without mortgaging the future of the franchise for the opportunity to do so. And you can never offer enough to trade up for an elite prospect.
As to your points...
- A rookie deal for a 1st rounder is 5-years as well.
- Somehow NE (and other teams) got comfortable with Jimmy G's progress... and Brady's before that... same in GB with Rodgers... Wilson in Seattle... Dak in Dallas... Rivers in SD...
- Agree you don't draft that high for a backup... you draft that high in an attempt to secure your QB for the next 12-15 years... not just 5.. or 7... that's why I take this shot at a prospect. It helps (a lot) that I see my prospect as so promising.
Disagree...
I have my #1 overall QB. I am highly confident... as confident as I have been in years... that my #1 is "the guy." Therefore I let that dictate the vet QB I pursue.
I get the feeling that you are coming from the opposite camp. You have a vet you want and are letting that dictate the QB prospect you draft and, more importantly, when.
In my view whether Cousins is great or merely good, you are never going to get back into the position to draft a QB at the top of the first round again without mortgaging the future of the franchise for the opportunity to do so. And you can never offer enough to trade up for an elite prospect.
As to your points...
- A rookie deal for a 1st rounder is 5-years as well.
- Somehow NE (and other teams) got comfortable with Jimmy G's progress... and Brady's before that... same in GB with Rodgers... Wilson in Seattle... Dak in Dallas... Rivers in SD...
- Agree you don't draft that high for a backup... you draft that high in an attempt to secure your QB for the next 12-15 years... not just 5.. or 7... that's why I take this shot at a prospect. It helps (a lot) that I see my prospect as so promising.
Like I replied to the other gentleman, I am not saying they should sign Cousins and not draft a QB 1 or the other way around. The point was that saying you draft one no matter what is wrong. IF they were to sign Cousins, they are expecting him to be the starter for the entirety of the contract. And if the length of that contract were 5 years, then the drafted QB would be your backup and then leave, meaning the pick was wasted.
The Browns or any other team wouldn't sign someone for that much money (could be richest ever and certainly doesn't deserve that, but just how they go) and not expect him to play or to be a mentor for the next guy. With a older guy like Alex Smith, sure, but not Cousins.
-
Rashaard Penny is a beast and I'm an advocate for drafting him as well.
Barkley and Penny would be awesome.
And I wouldn't even sign a veteran QB like Cousins or Smith. For one- Smith is a bandaid. You can get the same production from Kevin Hogan as you get from Cousins.
You draft Barkley 1st and then zero in on the QB that you want at 4.
CLE- #1
NY- #2
INDY- #3
CLE- #4
You guys get too caught up in thinking because we select 4th that we're getting the 4th best QB. No, no, no, no... that isn't how it's going to happen-
CLE - #1 - Barkley
NY - #2 - They are going with Eli for a while longer so it's hard to tell what they will do, they may fortify the OL, get Eli some help in taking a player like Barkley(if he's available), they might go defense, there are a number of edge rushers and players like Fitzpatrick that are in play. Their QB is their biggest strength and it would not help them win now by taking a QB. But they may.
INDY - #3 - They aren't going to draft a QB. They are taking the best player available. OL to help protect their already huge investment in Luck or trying to get him so help at RB or WR, they may also go Defense early here.
CLE - #4- Despite all the QB talk, I'm not sold on Rosen, Darnold, Allen, Mayfield or Rudolph. Even so, if the Browns FO is comfortable with one of these guys then you have your pick.
The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain- -
NYG will either take Darnold or Barkley at #2. The colts will take defense but likely will trade out to someone who wants a QB. So at worst you’d get the 3rd best QB but as others said above, you may lose out on getting “your” QB and if you’ve got one you’re honed in on, you should take them at #1. If you have 3 guys who are very close together and you love Barkley then sure.
Still think the best rout is QB at 1, Fitzpatrick at 4 to be your FS. Then draft OT/RB at 33/35 and WR/DL/CB with your next 3 picks which should all still be starter caliber talent
-
Rashaard Penny is a beast and I'm an advocate for drafting him as well.
Barkley and Penny would be awesome.
And I wouldn't even sign a veteran QB like Cousins or Smith. For one- Smith is a bandaid. You can get the same production from Kevin Hogan as you get from Cousins.
You draft Barkley 1st and then zero in on the QB that you want at 4.
CLE- #1
NY- #2
INDY- #3
CLE- #4
You guys get too caught up in thinking because we select 4th that we're getting the 4th best QB. No, no, no, no... that isn't how it's going to happen-
CLE - #1 - Barkley
NY - #2 - They are going with Eli for a while longer so it's hard to tell what they will do, they may fortify the OL, get Eli some help in taking a player like Barkley(if he's available), they might go defense, there are a number of edge rushers and players like Fitzpatrick that are in play. Their QB is their biggest strength and it would not help them win now by taking a QB. But they may.
INDY - #3 - They aren't going to draft a QB. They are taking the best player available. OL to help protect their already huge investment in Luck or trying to get him so help at RB or WR, they may also go Defense early here.
CLE - #4- Despite all the QB talk, I'm not sold on Rosen, Darnold, Allen, Mayfield or Rudolph. Even so, if the Browns FO is comfortable with one of these guys then you have your pick.
And I wouldn't even sign a veteran QB like Cousins or Smith. For one- Smith is a bandaid. You can get the same production from Kevin Hogan as you get from Cousins.
I just want to make sure everyone sees this.
-
I liked Hogan out of college. He’s a DC guy. But to say you can get the same production out of him that you could with Smith or Cousins seems a bit extreme.
Smith or Cousins on last years Browns would make you at least 5-11. With the added picks from this year with Dorsey at the helm, and presumably some high end FAs ... I would say adding Cousins or Smith makes you between 7-9 and 9-7 depending on how your health is and your youngsters play. Maybe better if everything clicks.
-
I liked Hogan out of college. He’s a DC guy. But to say you can get the same production out of him that you could with Smith or Cousins seems a bit extreme.
Smith or Cousins on last years Browns would make you at least 5-11. With the added picks from this year with Dorsey at the helm, and presumably some high end FAs ... I would say adding Cousins or Smith makes you between 7-9 and 9-7 depending on how your health is and your youngsters play. Maybe better if everything clicks.
I liked Hogan out of college. He’s a DC guy. But to say you can get the same production out of him that you could with Smith or Cousins seems a bit extreme.
Smith or Cousins on last years Browns would make you at least 5-11. With the added picks from this year with Dorsey at the helm, and presumably some high end FAs ... I would say adding Cousins or Smith makes you between 7-9 and 9-7 depending on how your health is and your youngsters play. Maybe better if everything clicks.
What do you think Hogan could have done with a whole season? Say for instance that he was the guy from training camp and OTAs?
-
I liked Hogan out of college. He’s a DC guy. But to say you can get the same production out of him that you could with Smith or Cousins seems a bit extreme.
Smith or Cousins on last years Browns would make you at least 5-11. With the added picks from this year with Dorsey at the helm, and presumably some high end FAs ... I would say adding Cousins or Smith makes you between 7-9 and 9-7 depending on how your health is and your youngsters play. Maybe better if everything clicks.
I liked Hogan out of college. He’s a DC guy. But to say you can get the same production out of him that you could with Smith or Cousins seems a bit extreme.
I'd like to introduce you PoG. He's a great guy and has a lot of energy and optimism.
He's a fan of Hogan and has preached about all his unexistant skills to the point of extenuation. Well, everyone has his flaws.
-
Rashaard Penny is a beast and I'm an advocate for drafting him as well.
Barkley and Penny would be awesome.
And I wouldn't even sign a veteran QB like Cousins or Smith. For one- Smith is a bandaid. You can get the same production from Kevin Hogan as you get from Cousins.
You draft Barkley 1st and then zero in on the QB that you want at 4.
CLE- #1
NY- #2
INDY- #3
CLE- #4
You guys get too caught up in thinking because we select 4th that we're getting the 4th best QB. No, no, no, no... that isn't how it's going to happen-
CLE - #1 - Barkley
NY - #2 - They are going with Eli for a while longer so it's hard to tell what they will do, they may fortify the OL, get Eli some help in taking a player like Barkley(if he's available), they might go defense, there are a number of edge rushers and players like Fitzpatrick that are in play. Their QB is their biggest strength and it would not help them win now by taking a QB. But they may.
INDY - #3 - They aren't going to draft a QB. They are taking the best player available. OL to help protect their already huge investment in Luck or trying to get him so help at RB or WR, they may also go Defense early here.
CLE - #4- Despite all the QB talk, I'm not sold on Rosen, Darnold, Allen, Mayfield or Rudolph. Even so, if the Browns FO is comfortable with one of these guys then you have your pick.
And I wouldn't even sign a veteran QB like Cousins or Smith. For one- Smith is a bandaid. You can get the same production from Kevin Hogan as you get from Cousins.
You draft Barkley 1st and then zero in on the QB that you want at 4.
CLE- #1
NY- #2
INDY- #3
CLE- #4
You guys get too caught up in thinking because we select 4th that we're getting the 4th best QB. No, no, no, no... that isn't how it's going to happen-
CLE - #1 - Barkley
NY - #2 - They are going with Eli for a while longer so it's hard to tell what they will do, they may fortify the OL, get Eli some help in taking a player like Barkley(if he's available), they might go defense, there are a number of edge rushers and players like Fitzpatrick that are in play. Their QB is their biggest strength and it would not help them win now by taking a QB. But they may.
INDY - #3 - They aren't going to draft a QB. They are taking the best player available. OL to help protect their already huge investment in Luck or trying to get him so help at RB or WR, they may also go Defense early here.
CLE - #4- Despite all the QB talk, I'm not sold on Rosen, Darnold, Allen, Mayfield or Rudolph. Even so, if the Browns FO is comfortable with one of these guys then you have your pick.
I just want to make sure everyone sees this.
Alex give me "3 Poe'ny Tales" for $500.00
-
You don't solve the QB issue by simply throwing a #1 pick on it. That's lazy and it's still not a guaranteed sure thing. There are countless examples of players looking the part in college and they fold in the pros. If you pick the guy #1 or #4 it doesn't mean he's going to be better... Not unless your talking about Saquon. He's going to try and be the strongest player on the team. SuperSaquon. lol
The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain- -
You don't solve the QB issue by simply throwing a #1 pick on it. That's lazy and it's still not a guaranteed sure thing. There are countless examples of players looking the part in college and they fold in the pros. If you pick the guy #1 or #4 it doesn't mean he's going to be better... Not unless your talking about Saquon. He's going to try and be the strongest player on the team. SuperSaquon. lol
You don't solve the QB issue by simply throwing a #1 pick on it. That's lazy and it's still not a guaranteed sure thing. There are countless examples of players looking the part in college and they fold in the pros. If you pick the guy #1 or #4 it doesn't mean he's going to be better... Not unless your talking about Saquon. He's going to try and be the strongest player on the team. SuperSaquon. lol
According to the NFL scouts, Barkley won’t even go in the top 7. They’re saying the media is higher on him. I’d trust the NFL guys over the media.
Plus Voch Lombardi has concerns about Barkley. And I’ve never seen that guy be wrong.
-
You don't solve the QB issue by simply throwing a #1 pick on it. That's lazy and it's still not a guaranteed sure thing. There are countless examples of players looking the part in college and they fold in the pros. If you pick the guy #1 or #4 it doesn't mean he's going to be better... Not unless your talking about Saquon. He's going to try and be the strongest player on the team. SuperSaquon. lol
According to the NFL scouts, Barkley won’t even go in the top 7. They’re saying the media is higher on him. I’d trust the NFL guys over the media.
Plus Voch Lombardi has concerns about Barkley. And I’ve never seen that guy be wrong.
According to the NFL scouts, Barkley won’t even go in the top 7. They’re saying the media is higher on him. I’d trust the NFL guys over the media.
Plus Voch Lombardi has concerns about Barkley. And I’ve never seen that guy be wrong.
I think you should watch Voch again... he says Barkley is not human.
My favorite part is right at 13:00 min
-
You don't solve the QB issue by simply throwing a #1 pick on it. That's lazy and it's still not a guaranteed sure thing. There are countless examples of players looking the part in college and they fold in the pros. If you pick the guy #1 or #4 it doesn't mean he's going to be better... Not unless your talking about Saquon. He's going to try and be the strongest player on the team. SuperSaquon. lol
You don't solve the QB issue by simply throwing a #1 pick on it. That's lazy and it's still not a guaranteed sure thing. There are countless examples of players looking the part in college and they fold in the pros. If you pick the guy #1 or #4 it doesn't mean he's going to be better... Not unless your talking about Saquon. He's going to try and be the strongest player on the team. SuperSaquon. lol
So every players this year and in years past was prone to not be worth #1 pick or prone to be a bust, but Barkley isn't?
There are players who looked the part in college but folded in the pros, but Barkley is exempt from being just like them? What makes Barkley different than ANY other person
-
You don't solve the QB issue by simply throwing a #1 pick on it. That's lazy and it's still not a guaranteed sure thing. There are countless examples of players looking the part in college and they fold in the pros. If you pick the guy #1 or #4 it doesn't mean he's going to be better... Not unless your talking about Saquon. He's going to try and be the strongest player on the team. SuperSaquon. lol
So every players this year and in years past was prone to not be worth #1 pick or prone to be a bust, but Barkley isn't?
There are players who looked the part in college but folded in the pros, but Barkley is exempt from being just like them? What makes Barkley different than ANY other person
So every players this year and in years past was prone to not be worth #1 pick or prone to be a bust, but Barkley isn't?
There are players who looked the part in college but folded in the pros, but Barkley is exempt from being just like them? What makes Barkley different than ANY other person
That is exactly my point. That is the excuse we keep seeing for taking Barkley at #1. Oh, he's such a talented player, but you can get the same thing later in the draft.
It is the same for every player. You have to look at the player, regardless of position, there are no true clones. Only similar, not the same.. So Barkley is a rare talent, from his skill set and abilities. His strength, he's so strong and fast. He has ZERO character concerns, he's a leader and a quality individual. If you can't find a QB to be the face of a franchise then Barkley is not a bad consolation prize. We have NO IDENTITY. Barkley gives us that, and it's one that can be rallied behind. Rosen/Darnold would just be another name on that jersey
-
I watch football for entertainment and Barkley is fun to watch. If the team goes 1-15 next year and he has 2000 yards from scrimmage, great pick.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login