Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. NFL considering changing two rules...

NFL considering changing two rules...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
25 Posts 11 Posters 518 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Nero NeroN Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 2k Posts
    • 1k Reputation
    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by
    #15

    The problem with the catch rule for me is the introduction of the term 'process'. 

    I remember when I learnt what was a catch in the NFL that it was 'OK, catch and both feet, knee, arm or whatever that states that you're in bounds'. 

    Now they have to check thoroughly what happens between catcher's hand and the ball for 5 mins in an action that took place in less than a second. Did the ball move? Did it survive the ground? Did the catcher move or even free it for a second to assure that he makes the catch? (In Spanish we call it a two time catch) 

    The reviewing time-play time ratio is way too big on this one. And it happens even if it's not a catch for a TD!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • L LionOfBuddha

      There should be two tiers to PI.

      One that is less flagrant (CB makes contact without turning head around, etc.) should be 15 yards.

      But if it’s a 60 yd pass and the CB is beat and he tackles the WR? That should be a spot foul.

      If they change everything to 15 yds, then a CB beat for a touchdown will just tackle the WR, because why wouldn’t you? 15 yds is better than a TD for the defense.

      mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
      • 18k Posts
      • 4k Reputation
      mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
      #16

      @lionofbuddha said:

      There should be two tiers to PI.

      One that is less flagrant (CB makes contact without turning head around, etc.) should be 15 yards.

      But if it’s a 60 yd pass and the CB is beat and he tackles the WR? That should be a spot foul.

      If they change everything to 15 yds, then a CB beat for a touchdown will just tackle the WR, because why wouldn’t you? 15 yds is better than a TD for the defense.

      On #1 they need to address the issue. 

      On #2 Buddah is on to something, the free chuckit 60 yard penalty is way to easy, but changing it to either 15 or spot becomes the dreaded judgement call but better than it is now. The 15 only in college isn't good either, someone is clearly beat for a TD just deck him and only get 15.

      GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 3k Posts
        • 873 Reputation
        jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by jcam222
        #17

        The only change to PI should be in the endzone. PI in the endzone should be a TD. 

        Dutch OvenD OrionO 2 Replies Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • jcam222J jcam222

          The only change to PI should be in the endzone. PI in the endzone should be a TD. 

          Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 15k Posts
          • 8k Reputation
          Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
          #18

          @jcam222 said:

          The only change to PI should be in the endzone. PI in the endzone should be a TD. 

          What?

          jcam222J 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

            @jcam222 said:

            The only change to PI should be in the endzone. PI in the endzone should be a TD. 

            What?

            jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 3k Posts
            • 873 Reputation
            jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
            #19

            @dutch-oven said:

            What?

            Rather than placing the ball at the 1 yard line pass interference in the end zone should be ruled a TD

            mjp28M Dutch OvenD 2 Replies Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • jcam222J jcam222

              @dutch-oven said:

              What?

              Rather than placing the ball at the 1 yard line pass interference in the end zone should be ruled a TD

              mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
              • 18k Posts
              • 4k Reputation
              mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by mjp28
              #20

              @jcam222 said:

              Rather than placing the ball at the 1 yard line pass interference in the end zone should be ruled a TD

              No guarantee that the WR or recievers catch the ball. 1st and goal from the one.

              GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • jcam222J jcam222

                The only change to PI should be in the endzone. PI in the endzone should be a TD. 

                Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 9k Posts
                • 4k Reputation
                OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by Orion
                #21

                @jcam222 said:

                The only change to PI should be in the endzone. PI in the endzone should be a TD. 

                What if it's offensive PI.  A TD for the D?

                Then why not make a safety be worth 6 points? 

                And while we're at it we'll do away with 'half the distance to the goal'.  If a penalty moves you into the end zone then you get 6 points. (or your opponent gets 6 if it moves you into your own end zone)

                BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
                jcam222J 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • jcam222J jcam222

                  @dutch-oven said:

                  What?

                  Rather than placing the ball at the 1 yard line pass interference in the end zone should be ruled a TD

                  Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 15k Posts
                  • 8k Reputation
                  Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  @jcam222 said:

                  Rather than placing the ball at the 1 yard line pass interference in the end zone should be ruled a TD

                  😆

                  wpNIWlK.jpg

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • OrionO Orion

                    @jcam222 said:

                    The only change to PI should be in the endzone. PI in the endzone should be a TD. 

                    What if it's offensive PI.  A TD for the D?

                    Then why not make a safety be worth 6 points? 

                    And while we're at it we'll do away with 'half the distance to the goal'.  If a penalty moves you into the end zone then you get 6 points. (or your opponent gets 6 if it moves you into your own end zone)

                    jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 3k Posts
                    • 873 Reputation
                    jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    @orion said:

                    What if it's offensive PI.  A TD for the D?

                    Then why not make a safety be worth 6 points? 

                    And while we're at it we'll do away with 'half the distance to the goal'.  If a penalty moves you into the end zone then you get 6 points. (or your opponent gets 6 if it moves you into your own end zone)

                    Ok I'll buy som of the other arguments but come on, I was obviously referring to defensive PI 

                    OrionO 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • jcam222J jcam222

                      @orion said:

                      What if it's offensive PI.  A TD for the D?

                      Then why not make a safety be worth 6 points? 

                      And while we're at it we'll do away with 'half the distance to the goal'.  If a penalty moves you into the end zone then you get 6 points. (or your opponent gets 6 if it moves you into your own end zone)

                      Ok I'll buy som of the other arguments but come on, I was obviously referring to defensive PI 

                      Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 9k Posts
                      • 4k Reputation
                      OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
                      #24

                      @jcam222 said:

                      Ok I'll buy som of the other arguments but come on, I was obviously referring to defensive PI 

                      I understood that.  I'd be for it if you could limit it to just 'intentional' PI.  But that's subjective.

                      BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
                      jcam222J 1 Reply Last reply
                      👍
                      Quote Reply
                      • OrionO Orion

                        @jcam222 said:

                        Ok I'll buy som of the other arguments but come on, I was obviously referring to defensive PI 

                        I understood that.  I'd be for it if you could limit it to just 'intentional' PI.  But that's subjective.

                        jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 3k Posts
                        • 873 Reputation
                        jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by
                        #25

                        @orion said:

                        I understood that.  I'd be for it if you could limit it to just 'intentional' PI.  But that's subjective.

                        Fair enough 

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        ❤
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate