Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Tyrod Taylor A Brown

Tyrod Taylor A Brown

The Browns Board
177 46 8.3k 1

  • Hue ain't getting McCarron

  • jrb12711J jrb12711

    Perfect bridge QB that doesn't change any major draft plans. What a good day.

    @jrb12711 said:

    Perfect bridge QB that doesn't change any major draft plans. What a good day.

    You are typically a voice of reason, talk me off the ledge on the Taylor for 65th pick in the draft. I just dont like it. 

    jrb12711J 1 Reply

  • I'm with jrb on this. He's a stopgap nothing more. Starts until josh Allen is ready. Oh you didn't know? That's who they're taking. 

    Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind...
    B 1 Reply
    👍

  • Link?

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    Link?

    @dutch-oven said:

    Link?

    Browns strike again. This time, Cleveland agrees to trade a mid-round draft pick to Buffalo for QB Tyrod Taylor, source tells ESPN. Taylor now will throw to new Browns’ WR Jarvis Landry. And Buffalo back in QB market. More on SportsCenter now.

    👍

  • Bills looking to trade up for a QB ....maybe to 4 🙂

  • jcam222J jcam222

    @jrb12711 said:

    Perfect bridge QB that doesn't change any major draft plans. What a good day.

    You are typically a voice of reason, talk me off the ledge on the Taylor for 65th pick in the draft. I just dont like it. 

    @jcam222 said:

    You are typically a voice of reason, talk me off the ledge on the Taylor for 65th pick in the draft. I just dont like it. 

    Go look at tyrods efficiency numbers. His stats aren't going to be eye popping but he's consistently been a top 16 QB for several years in terms of qbr and things like turnovers. 

    As I said this still doesn't change the major draft plans either. QB high, BPA at 4 and 2nd round.

  • Now what if Bills offered both 21 and 22 for 4 so they can get a QB and we take our QB at 1 ?

    Bob806B 1 Reply

  • Underrated QB. Very happy with him for #65

    Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
    👍
  • jcam222J jcam222

    This really just pissed all over my Landry joy. Talk about underwhelming!! I sure hope its a our 3rd string option. Id have gladly brought McCown back over Taylor. The 65th pick>?!>!>!>!>!>!?! OMG stupid as hell. 

    @jcam222 said:

    This really just pissed all over my Landry joy. Talk about underwhelming!! I sure hope its a our 3rd string option. Id have gladly brought McCown back over Taylor. The 65th pick>?!>!>!>!>!>!?! OMG stupid as hell. 

    oh Shmucking calm down we have a load of picks and who else would u want ? McCarron has played what 6 games ?  Bradford is allways hurt Bridgewater may never be the same were not getting cousins so what other option do you see as a better move 

    👍
  • sydS syd

    @jcam222 said:

    This really just pissed all over my Landry joy. Talk about underwhelming!! I sure hope its a our 3rd string option. Id have gladly brought McCown back over Taylor. The 65th pick>?!>!>!>!>!>!?! OMG stupid as hell. 

    oh Shmucking calm down we have a load of picks and who else would u want ? McCarron has played what 6 games ?  Bradford is allways hurt Bridgewater may never be the same were not getting cousins so what other option do you see as a better move 

    @syd said:

    oh Shmucking calm down we have a load of picks and who else would u want ? McCarron has played what 6 games ?  Bradford is allways hurt Bridgewater may never be the same were not getting cousins so what other option do you see as a better move 

    well let me start that list , Bradford , McCarron, Bridgewater, Keenam, McCown, Elmer Fudd, Bugs Bunny , pretty much anything with a beating heart not named Tyrod Taylor. LOL I think most of you are so high on endorphins from the Landry deal its affecting your ability to realize just how mediocre this move is. 

    Hey I am all in though, just means we need a rookie who can start sooner rather than later. 

    sydS 1 Reply
    👍

  • This confirms we are going QB with #1 or #4.

    Woof Woof!
    jrb12711J 1 Reply
  • jcam222J jcam222

    @syd said:

    oh Shmucking calm down we have a load of picks and who else would u want ? McCarron has played what 6 games ?  Bradford is allways hurt Bridgewater may never be the same were not getting cousins so what other option do you see as a better move 

    well let me start that list , Bradford , McCarron, Bridgewater, Keenam, McCown, Elmer Fudd, Bugs Bunny , pretty much anything with a beating heart not named Tyrod Taylor. LOL I think most of you are so high on endorphins from the Landry deal its affecting your ability to realize just how mediocre this move is. 

    Hey I am all in though, just means we need a rookie who can start sooner rather than later. 

    @jcam222 said:

    well let me start that list , Bradford , McCarron, Bridgewater, Keenam, McCown, Elmer Fudd, Bugs Bunny , pretty much anything with a beating heart not named Tyrod Taylor. LOL I think most of you are so high on endorphins from the Landry deal its affecting your ability to realize just how mediocre this move is. 

    Hey I am all in though, just means we need a rookie who can start sooner rather than later. 

    Darnold at #1 and thank god for once we will not have to throw him to the wolves 

  • Keenum is going to the Vikes or Denver, he wont be available., Bradford cant stay healthy, McCown probably stays with the Jets and Bridgewater is an unknown. Whoever was starting week 1 was going to be a bridge QB. AJ has hardly seen the field. I am not big on Taylor but he doesn't turn the ball over and can move an offense. Guarantee you we win a few games last year without all the turn overs. You get an experienced starter who took his team to the playoffs last year mind you, for at least a year.

    sydS 1 Reply

  • One read wonder... maybe a little more at times but not seeing the value or much of an upgrade over kizer 

    Edit: unless Haley plans to supplement with more designed QB runs, RPO and option 

    runyon27R Tour2maT 2 Replies
    ❤
  • runyon27R runyon27

    Keenum is going to the Vikes or Denver, he wont be available., Bradford cant stay healthy, McCown probably stays with the Jets and Bridgewater is an unknown. Whoever was starting week 1 was going to be a bridge QB. AJ has hardly seen the field. I am not big on Taylor but he doesn't turn the ball over and can move an offense. Guarantee you we win a few games last year without all the turn overs. You get an experienced starter who took his team to the playoffs last year mind you, for at least a year.

    @runyon27 said:

    Keenum is going to the Vikes or Denver, he wont be available., Bradford cant stay healthy, McCown probably stays with the Jets and Bridgewater is an unknown. Whoever was starting week 1 was going to be a bridge QB. AJ has hardly seen the field. I am not big on Taylor but he doesn't turn the ball over and can move an offense. Guarantee you we win a few games last year without all the turn overs. You get an experienced starter who took his team to the playoffs last year mind you, for at least a year.

    I remember we were talking about Taylor last year and how ghoolie ripped on the idea HA HA bet he has a heart attack now

  • sydS syd

    @runyon27 said:

    Keenum is going to the Vikes or Denver, he wont be available., Bradford cant stay healthy, McCown probably stays with the Jets and Bridgewater is an unknown. Whoever was starting week 1 was going to be a bridge QB. AJ has hardly seen the field. I am not big on Taylor but he doesn't turn the ball over and can move an offense. Guarantee you we win a few games last year without all the turn overs. You get an experienced starter who took his team to the playoffs last year mind you, for at least a year.

    I remember we were talking about Taylor last year and how ghoolie ripped on the idea HA HA bet he has a heart attack now

    @syd said:

    I remember we were talking about Taylor last year and how ghoolie ripped on the idea HA HA bet he has a heart attack now

    Why should it bother a Steeler fan

    👍 😂
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    One read wonder... maybe a little more at times but not seeing the value or much of an upgrade over kizer 

    Edit: unless Haley plans to supplement with more designed QB runs, RPO and option 

    @tiamat63 said:

    One read wonder... maybe a little more at times but not seeing the value or much of an upgrade over kizer 

    Edit: unless Haley plans to supplement with more designed QB runs, RPO and option 

    The upgrade over Kizer is he doesn't turn the ball over.  He threw 4 picks all year last year, thats a 2 game stretch for Kizer.

    tiamat63T 1 Reply
  • Kennel ClubK Kennel Club

    This confirms we are going QB with #1 or #4.

    @kennel-club said:

    This confirms we are going QB with #1 or #4.

    100 percent. In fact I think it sends a clear message 

  • runyon27R runyon27

    @tiamat63 said:

    One read wonder... maybe a little more at times but not seeing the value or much of an upgrade over kizer 

    Edit: unless Haley plans to supplement with more designed QB runs, RPO and option 

    The upgrade over Kizer is he doesn't turn the ball over.  He threw 4 picks all year last year, thats a 2 game stretch for Kizer.

    @runyon27 said:

    The upgrade over Kizer is he doesn't turn the ball over.  He threw 4 picks all year last year, thats a 2 game stretch for Kizer.

    Fair point. Also helps that his coaches actively designed games to throw the ball less with him at QB.  Hard to turn the ball over when not given the opportunity. 

Log in to reply