Tyrod from a Bills Fan's Perspective
-
-
-
Appreciate you weighing in on a guy you've watched play every single week. A lot of his new critics haven't seen nearly that volume of him throughout all of the roster changes in Buffalo.
If we could combine Taylor's elusiveness and foot speed with Mayfield's accuracy - we might have a Russell Wilson equivalent. Only this time, we'll have to land such a QB at #1 or #4 as opposed to Seattle striking oil in round 3 Jed Clampett style (after giving Matt Flynn starter cake in free agency). Coincidentally, it's looking like we might be able to have both QBs on our roster. Before I hear all the stereotypes of short QBs don't work - Wilson got stereotyped into the ole "short QB" category. The taker who thought they had nothing to lose after securing their FA QB - was rewarded way more than the teams that drafted RG3&Out, Tannehill, and Weeden ahead of him. Wilson had a killer good completion % at Wisconsin and did a lot of things well, inclusive of winning frequently.
Gee...I am wondering if getting a 6'0" bridge QB is a portent to selecting a 6'0" QB in the draft?
Gee...I am wondering if getting a 6'0" bridge QB is a portent to selecting a 6'0" QB in the draft?
Maybe sometimes there is too much emphasis put on the 6' quarterbacks good or bad -but- naturally I'd rather start with a 6' 5" prototype if possible.
This 2018 quarterback class still doesn't do much for me.......oh I already said that.
GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND! -
A highlight football film set to Celine Dion?
Thanks literate... I think he's a solid, short-term solution. Should allow whoever the Browns to draft to sit and learn a bit.
-
Gee...I am wondering if getting a 6'0" bridge QB is a portent to selecting a 6'0" QB in the draft?
Maybe sometimes there is too much emphasis put on the 6' quarterbacks good or bad -but- naturally I'd rather start with a 6' 5" prototype if possible.
This 2018 quarterback class still doesn't do much for me.......oh I already said that.
-
Drafting a quarterback in the top 5 to match up well with the bum you just got from the scrapheap (but paid a high price for) is like buying a brand new car because it matches the seat covers in your old beater.
WSS
-
This will probably be less popular, but it's my honest opinion on the deal and what it means for those first couple selections:
http://nflroughdraft.com/the-tyrod-taylor-deal-and-its-ramifications/
-
You aren’t getting traffic to your site.
Post the article, dummy.
-
Drafting a quarterback in the top 5 to match up well with the bum you just got from the scrapheap (but paid a high price for) is like buying a brand new car because it matches the seat covers in your old beater.
WSS
Drafting a quarterback in the top 5 to match up well with the bum you just got from the scrapheap (but paid a high price for) is like buying a brand new car because it matches the seat covers in your old beater.
WSS
Not that I think Taylor's a bum ...
But I agree the idea of quarterback "pairings" is stupid.
Signing Taylor doesn't mean we are drafting Mayfield. It means he found him to be the best available bridge QB.
I'm pretty sure Todd Haley can draw gameplans for big strong-armed QBs too.
Zombo
-
If the browns draft Lamar Jackson, they are stupid fools...
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
If the browns draft Lamar Jackson, they are stupid fools...
And Jackson isn't getting drafted in the top 5.
My current take NIckers. With the moves Dorsey made, (picking up a WR, and CB) besides Taylor. It looks pretty clear QB #1, and hope Chubb is there at #4. If it looks like the Colts are going to take him, flip 4 and 3, give Indy the #35. We might not even have to if the Broncos or Jets trade up with the Colts- because they sure as hell aren't doing it to take a defensive player. We'll take Crow's replacement at the top of the second. I have doubts Dorsey would value Saquon over a top edge rusher, they way he looks at running back value.
-
If the browns draft Lamar Jackson, they are stupid fools...
And Jackson isn't getting drafted in the top 5.
My current take NIckers. With the moves Dorsey made, (picking up a WR, and CB) besides Taylor. It looks pretty clear QB #1, and hope Chubb is there at #4. If it looks like the Colts are going to take him, flip 4 and 3, give Indy the #35. We might not even have to if the Broncos or Jets trade up with the Colts- because they sure as hell aren't doing it to take a defensive player. We'll take Crow's replacement at the top of the second. I have doubts Dorsey would value Saquon over a top edge rusher, they way he looks at running back value.
And Jackson isn't getting drafted in the top 5.
My current take NIckers. With the moves Dorsey made, (picking up a WR, and CB) besides Taylor. It looks pretty clear QB #1, and hope Chubb is there at #4. If it looks like the Colts are going to take him, flip 4 and 3, give Indy the #35. We might not even have to if the Broncos or Jets trade up with the Colts- because they sure as hell aren't doing it to take a defensive player. We'll take Crow's replacement at the top of the second. I have doubts Dorsey would value Saquon over a top edge rusher, they way he looks a running back value.
I agree with you. I'm starting to think Mayfield or Allen #1 and then Barkley, Chubb, Minkah, or Ward 4th. I appreciate you checking out the article. I'm not a Browns fan, but I think you guys are set up for a great run with so many picks. For what it's worth, I loved your 3 other trades even though I didn't like the Tyrod deal.
-
I'm liking Chubb at #4 more and more. Him, Garrett, ogunjobi, Brantley, Coley, and whatever other rookie or free agents they get... now you can get some pressure on the qb
-
He'll be gone already.
To who? If we take QB at 1.... either #2 or #3 will take a QB, or trade away the pick for another team to get a QB, or they'll take Saquon.
-
He'll be gone already.
To who? If we take QB at 1.... either #2 or #3 will take a QB, or trade away the pick for another team to get a QB, or they'll take Saquon.
To who? If we take QB at 1.... either #2 or #3 will take a QB, or trade away the pick for another team to get a QB, or they'll take Saquon.
At this pace this board thinks that roughly 30 players are guaranteed to be gone by the time the Browns are on the clock at #4.
-
What if the plan has Buffalo on the line to trade 21 and 22 and.....for the 4 pick and draft a LT,CB, RB,or LB at 21 & 22
Things that make you go HMMMMMM!!!
GO BROWNS!!!
-
He'll be gone already.
To who? If we take QB at 1.... either #2 or #3 will take a QB, or trade away the pick for another team to get a QB, or they'll take Saquon.
To who? If we take QB at 1.... either #2 or #3 will take a QB, or trade away the pick for another team to get a QB, or they'll take Saquon.
At this pace this board thinks that roughly 30 players are guaranteed to be gone by the time the Browns are on the clock at #4.
We will find out if he is gone next Saturday when the real draft starts.....
-
What if the plan has Buffalo on the line to trade 21 and 22 and.....for the 4 pick and draft a LT,CB, RB,or LB at 21 & 22
Things that make you go HMMMMMM!!!
GO BROWNS!!!
What if the plan has Buffalo on the line to trade 21 and 22
Can we please stay away from pick #22?
Odds are either Chubb or Barkley will be there at 4. (If NY takes a QB or someone trades up for one)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login