Darnold at #1?
-
USC may have scored 27 but, to me at least, this is the game I watched that most scares me about Darnold's ability at the pro level. If you haven't watched the game vs Washy St. I suggest you do. So many things here that just aren't good which would show their ugly head again and various points throughout the season.
He had 3 oline starters missing on this Road trip had to break in 3 first time starters The gameswas played after ONLY 4 day rest. They played on THURSDAY in Pullman, Washington. Took less than 50 players on that trip because they were banged up. If you watch reci3vers made route mistakes, not learning the right calls. Only reliable reciever on this trip was Deontay Burnett. Vaughns, rs freshman, broke out in this game for the first time bur still making freshman mistakes. You do realize pac 12 has arguably the best secondary talent in college ball because all the qbs and recievers in the league, right? Just go back last decade and see how many NFL starters are from the pac 12.
He had 3 oline starters missing on this Road trip had to break in 3 first time starters The gameswas played after ONLY 4 day rest. They played on THURSDAY in Pullman, Washington. Took less than 50 players on that trip because they were banged up. If you watch reci3vers made route mistakes, not learning the right calls. Only reliable reciever on this trip was Deontay Burnett. Vaughns, rs freshman, broke out in this game for the first time bur still making freshman mistakes. You do realize pac 12 has arguably the best secondary talent in college ball because all the qbs and recievers in the league, right? Just go back last decade and see how many NFL starters are from the pac 12.
That doesn't excuse @ 0:12. Take a look where the lead foot is pointing when the throwing motion starts. See how the ball sails? That's max pro, champ. Boy has all day to pass then.
How's about 1:10 where he blatantly throws into a rolled look though he has plenty of time to throw?
@ 1:55 is an example of both. You have a lazy route by the receiver who should have pressed the DB to get him to flip his hips a little. But ultimately it's on the QB. That's his read and he see's a CB, hips and shoulders square, sitting on the route yet never looked off of it.
@2:10 fade with absolutely trash ball placement. Even if it was back shoulder... still not ideal placement.
@2:23 Bunny hop and launch. Not a negative per-say, but a funny play no less.
@2:30 with pretty poor ball placement again. WR gets the DB to open his hips then breaks it out. Sam places it too far outside. Getting flashbacks of his last pick then over corrects.
@3:50 absolutely inexcusable. You win the down by avoiding the sack, you consciously say no to the throw away. Then you attempt to run right back up the middle and for good measure hit it with the old Weeden Shovel pass. These are examples of poor decision making while under pressure. Pressure that will be unavoidable in the NFL.
So far the rollout game/half field stuff has been his best work. But that does not a good NFL QB make.
@4:20 this has popped up several times throughout the season when I've watched. Locking into the pre-snap. The box is stacked and you have a true zero look to the outside. What's worse is that you see the field CB already has his hips turned. These are plays where, in my mind, elite NFL QB prospects are not afraid to attack the perimeter.
Is the Oline good? No. Are the receivers good? Not really. They need some seasoning. However when presented with opportunities to make plays, or at worst - not have a play potentially turn into a disaster, the decision making the execution becomes an issue. I could do this with quite a few videos of his. In the meantime, you're welcome to defend the player all you want.
-
USC may have scored 27 but, to me at least, this is the game I watched that most scares me about Darnold's ability at the pro level. If you haven't watched the game vs Washy St. I suggest you do. So many things here that just aren't good which would show their ugly head again and various points throughout the season.
USC may have scored 27 but, to me at least, this is the game I watched that most scares me about Darnold's ability at the pro level. If you haven't watched the game vs Washy St. I suggest you do. So many things here that just aren't good which would show their ugly head again and various points throughout the season.
Wow... finally took the time to look.
All depends on his feet doesn't it? And most the first half they were spectacularly bad. Early overthrow he was doing his bunny hop into his set. Completed a couple of quick bubbles without ever setting. Predetermined two GL throws... one picked and a second pick dropped. Finally at start of Q4 he got his feet under him and aligned with the direction of the throw and it was a beauty (the pass with PI called).
And then there's the Wheezy special... oy!
EDIT: had I just turned the page I could have said, "What tia said." Even included the times... and the hop...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Anyone think Jackson will be better than Allen?
I think his floor is higher
Rosen couldn't win at ucla when they were projected to challenge for the pac 12 title. On paper they were as talented as any team in the pac 12. They under achieved big time. Rosen the chosen supposed to save ucla football as the #1 rated player out of high school but lost to bad teams and decent teams. He did not make his teammates better. Since 2014 ucla recruiting was in the top 20 until last year. Watch his games and Darnold against the common opponents. It's night and day. Watch vs. 2 Arizona schools and a quality opponent Washington in 2017. Against U of A he throws 3 picks has qb rating in the 90's. All three games his completion percentage in the 58% that's Josh Allen range. Against Washington he has less than 100 yards passing. In 2016 as a rs freshman Darnold beats then undefeated Washington team at Washington. Look, when darnold faced tough teams and won most of them and even the loses are headliners because they are.tough teams like Ohio st. Rosen couldn't win vs lesser teams. Go watch those games he lost. There are alot since he lost 13 games won only 17 games in 3 seasons he played at ucla.
So Darnold was held down due to teammates dragging him down, but Rosen is downgraded for failing to elevate play of others around him?
Is that about it?
-
Rosen couldn't win at ucla when they were projected to challenge for the pac 12 title. On paper they were as talented as any team in the pac 12. They under achieved big time. Rosen the chosen supposed to save ucla football as the #1 rated player out of high school but lost to bad teams and decent teams. He did not make his teammates better. Since 2014 ucla recruiting was in the top 20 until last year. Watch his games and Darnold against the common opponents. It's night and day. Watch vs. 2 Arizona schools and a quality opponent Washington in 2017. Against U of A he throws 3 picks has qb rating in the 90's. All three games his completion percentage in the 58% that's Josh Allen range. Against Washington he has less than 100 yards passing. In 2016 as a rs freshman Darnold beats then undefeated Washington team at Washington. Look, when darnold faced tough teams and won most of them and even the loses are headliners because they are.tough teams like Ohio st. Rosen couldn't win vs lesser teams. Go watch those games he lost. There are alot since he lost 13 games won only 17 games in 3 seasons he played at ucla.
Darnold also had an NFL rb in Ronald Jones. Had better talent at skill positions.
Hard to win games when your defense allows 37ppg and gives up close to 500 yds a game
Darnold also had an NFL rb in Ronald Jones. Had better talent at skill positions.
Hard to win games when your defense allows 37ppg and gives up close to 500 yds a game
So you are saying that first, so his defense made his completion percentage in the 50s? His defense made him throw 3 ints? So all ints weren't Kiser's fault then. Second, even though players they have is better than the oppsing team, it's okay to lose the game as long as you have good mechanic and footwork? Losing 13 games out of 30 in college mostly against lesser opponents is the quality you look for in a qb?
-
USC may have scored 27 but, to me at least, this is the game I watched that most scares me about Darnold's ability at the pro level. If you haven't watched the game vs Washy St. I suggest you do. So many things here that just aren't good which would show their ugly head again and various points throughout the season.
Wow... finally took the time to look.
All depends on his feet doesn't it? And most the first half they were spectacularly bad. Early overthrow he was doing his bunny hop into his set. Completed a couple of quick bubbles without ever setting. Predetermined two GL throws... one picked and a second pick dropped. Finally at start of Q4 he got his feet under him and aligned with the direction of the throw and it was a beauty (the pass with PI called).
And then there's the Wheezy special... oy!
EDIT: had I just turned the page I could have said, "What tia said." Even included the times... and the hop...
Wow... finally took the time to look.
All depends on his feet doesn't it? And most the first half they were spectacularly bad. Early overthrow he was doing his bunny hop into his set. Completed a couple of quick bubbles without ever setting. Predetermined two GL throws... one picked and a second pick dropped. Finally at start of Q4 he got his feet under him and aligned with the direction of the throw and it was a beauty (the pass with PI called).
And then there's the Wheezy special... oy!
EDIT: had I just turned the page I could have said, "What tia said." Even included the times... and the hop...
The footwork, especially at the top of his 5 &7 step drops is just pure comedy. Nevermind the other things like how his hips don't come around in sync with his arm.
Why would you want to draft a QB where you spend the bulk of his first off season fixing his terrible mechanics when you could take Rosen - who you could immediately begin working on absorbing the playbook, adapting to NFL speeds and the mental/classroom work of the game because he doesn't possess such incredibly obvious flaws?!?
When the #1 pick is in and should the Browns not call Rosen's name, then they're only making it as hard on themselves as humanly possible.
-
Darnold also had an NFL rb in Ronald Jones. Had better talent at skill positions.
Hard to win games when your defense allows 37ppg and gives up close to 500 yds a game
So you are saying that first, so his defense made his completion percentage in the 50s? His defense made him throw 3 ints? So all ints weren't Kiser's fault then. Second, even though players they have is better than the oppsing team, it's okay to lose the game as long as you have good mechanic and footwork? Losing 13 games out of 30 in college mostly against lesser opponents is the quality you look for in a qb?
So you are saying that first, so his defense made his completion percentage in the 50s? His defense made him throw 3 ints? So all ints weren't Kiser's fault then. Second, even though players they have is better than the oppsing team, it's okay to lose the game as long as you have good mechanic and footwork? Losing 13 games out of 30 in college mostly against lesser opponents is the quality you look for in a qb?
His career stats put his comp % at 62 I think. You act like he was terrible in every game. Yeah, he put up 90 yds in a game he left with a concussion. That's an exception not the rule. What was the rule is he got hit way too much.
Yeah, the wins argument... Great call. Then countless usc QB's should be world beaters in the NFL, cuz they all win almost every single game. Didn't really work out that way though.
Head to head. Rosen was 32/52 for 421 yds 3 tds and 1 int. Darnold was 17/28 for 264 zero tds (he had 1 rushing) and 1 int.
So yeah, ucla lost but it wasn't because Darnold was way better.
-
So you are saying that first, so his defense made his completion percentage in the 50s? His defense made him throw 3 ints? So all ints weren't Kiser's fault then. Second, even though players they have is better than the oppsing team, it's okay to lose the game as long as you have good mechanic and footwork? Losing 13 games out of 30 in college mostly against lesser opponents is the quality you look for in a qb?
His career stats put his comp % at 62 I think. You act like he was terrible in every game. Yeah, he put up 90 yds in a game he left with a concussion. That's an exception not the rule. What was the rule is he got hit way too much.
Yeah, the wins argument... Great call. Then countless usc QB's should be world beaters in the NFL, cuz they all win almost every single game. Didn't really work out that way though.
Head to head. Rosen was 32/52 for 421 yds 3 tds and 1 int. Darnold was 17/28 for 264 zero tds (he had 1 rushing) and 1 int.
So yeah, ucla lost but it wasn't because Darnold was way better.
His career stats put his comp % at 62 I think. You act like he was terrible in every game. Yeah, he put up 90 yds in a game he left with a concussion. That's an exception not the rule. What was the rule is he got hit way too much.
Yeah, the wins argument... Great call. Then countless usc QB's should be world beaters in the NFL, cuz they all win almost every single game. Didn't really work out that way though.
Head to head. Rosen was 32/52 for 421 yds 3 tds and 1 int. Darnold was 17/28 for 264 zero tds (he had 1 rushing) and 1 int.
So yeah, ucla lost but it wasn't because Darnold was way better.
Hmm...yeah Carson Palmer was barely above .500 winning perc before his senior year. He blossomed under better coaching (norm chow, carroll) and defense, . When the head coach was asked about darnold's funky thowing motion and bad footwork, he was quoted saying leave things that is working for us. Basically, they didn't want to tinker with it because we were winning. SC started 1-3 in 2016 and most people in the program didn't believe in the hiring the current staff and players seemed to play below their potential. When Darnold stepped in he changed the team into winners, and many close to the program will say he was the main factor for the turn around. They also say coaching and play calling has hurt the program. People who knows football like John Robinson, Lonnie Lott, Marcus Allen all have stated how this team lacked physicality along the line of scrimmage since the Coach Helton tenure. They all have said how special Darnold is as well. Listen to what Stanford coach says about Darnold he says best anticipatory thrower since Luck. Listen to Joel Klatts and other experts who has watched and followed pac 12 football they will all say how special Darnold is. And I agree with Jim Mora as well Darnold is better fit than Rosen. I do think Rosen has great potential, just pointing out there are more questions than Darnold. I get what you say. You make rational argument against him but I agree with the experts who have seen the games- how he makes 3rd and long possible every time he has the ball. Comeback drives are possible with him. With Kessler and Matt Barkley we didnt feel that way during the game. They couldn't overcome thing and situation. Darnold did more often than not. If you are basing on his game highlights tapes and not watching the entire game how things breakdown during the game and he seems to rise above that. In the past 15 years of watching pac 12 football only qb comparable is Luck.
This is my take on darnold:
Pluses
One of the best Anticipatory thrower go checknthe comment by all of his oppsing coaches
Mobility in and out of the pocket- deceptively quick
Keeps his eyes down field at all times- this was one of the weakest when Cody kessler was the starter at sc. He loves dumping the ball 5yard shy of the first down all the time. Plus he had a weak arm.
He makes his teammates better.
Blue collar work ethics. He was always an under dog. And he was beating the 1st team defense as a scout team qb as a teue freshman.
Toughness- He was first recruited as a linebacker
Youth - only 20...he will be much much better than Weeden when he was drafted as a 28 yr old. As he physically matures he will get stronger and even bigger/taller.
Winner- even with his turnover , which is him trying to compensate for lack of talent experience around him, puts the team in a position to win. Only two was blowout loss which was at ND and Cotton bowl. 20-4
Minuses
Turnovers- fumbles are well documented can be fixed by keeping both hands on the ball/ half of the ints were on th wrs for wrong-bad route running-
Youth - was a primarily a linebacker and wr as a sophomore inhigh school. Was thrusted into the starting role when the started Travis Wilson qb, who would start for Utah, was injured. He needs more experience at the position. But so does all the qbs in this draft. He also tries to do too much that's lack of experience and coaching.
Footwork- he definitely needs to work on that. At least he shows progress at his pro day. When his feet are set he is accurate as any qb in the draft.
-
You've still yet to respond to my more in depth criticisms that came with video evidence. I'll be happy to provide more from this past season alone. But the anticipation you speak of only tends to apply to Sam's primary read.
-
Doing a little fact checking and came across this photo evidence of how not to align for a throw...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
His career stats put his comp % at 62 I think. You act like he was terrible in every game. Yeah, he put up 90 yds in a game he left with a concussion. That's an exception not the rule. What was the rule is he got hit way too much.
Yeah, the wins argument... Great call. Then countless usc QB's should be world beaters in the NFL, cuz they all win almost every single game. Didn't really work out that way though.
Head to head. Rosen was 32/52 for 421 yds 3 tds and 1 int. Darnold was 17/28 for 264 zero tds (he had 1 rushing) and 1 int.
So yeah, ucla lost but it wasn't because Darnold was way better.
Hmm...yeah Carson Palmer was barely above .500 winning perc before his senior year. He blossomed under better coaching (norm chow, carroll) and defense, . When the head coach was asked about darnold's funky thowing motion and bad footwork, he was quoted saying leave things that is working for us. Basically, they didn't want to tinker with it because we were winning. SC started 1-3 in 2016 and most people in the program didn't believe in the hiring the current staff and players seemed to play below their potential. When Darnold stepped in he changed the team into winners, and many close to the program will say he was the main factor for the turn around. They also say coaching and play calling has hurt the program. People who knows football like John Robinson, Lonnie Lott, Marcus Allen all have stated how this team lacked physicality along the line of scrimmage since the Coach Helton tenure. They all have said how special Darnold is as well. Listen to what Stanford coach says about Darnold he says best anticipatory thrower since Luck. Listen to Joel Klatts and other experts who has watched and followed pac 12 football they will all say how special Darnold is. And I agree with Jim Mora as well Darnold is better fit than Rosen. I do think Rosen has great potential, just pointing out there are more questions than Darnold. I get what you say. You make rational argument against him but I agree with the experts who have seen the games- how he makes 3rd and long possible every time he has the ball. Comeback drives are possible with him. With Kessler and Matt Barkley we didnt feel that way during the game. They couldn't overcome thing and situation. Darnold did more often than not. If you are basing on his game highlights tapes and not watching the entire game how things breakdown during the game and he seems to rise above that. In the past 15 years of watching pac 12 football only qb comparable is Luck.
This is my take on darnold:
Pluses
One of the best Anticipatory thrower go checknthe comment by all of his oppsing coaches
Mobility in and out of the pocket- deceptively quick
Keeps his eyes down field at all times- this was one of the weakest when Cody kessler was the starter at sc. He loves dumping the ball 5yard shy of the first down all the time. Plus he had a weak arm.
He makes his teammates better.
Blue collar work ethics. He was always an under dog. And he was beating the 1st team defense as a scout team qb as a teue freshman.
Toughness- He was first recruited as a linebacker
Youth - only 20...he will be much much better than Weeden when he was drafted as a 28 yr old. As he physically matures he will get stronger and even bigger/taller.
Winner- even with his turnover , which is him trying to compensate for lack of talent experience around him, puts the team in a position to win. Only two was blowout loss which was at ND and Cotton bowl. 20-4
Minuses
Turnovers- fumbles are well documented can be fixed by keeping both hands on the ball/ half of the ints were on th wrs for wrong-bad route running-
Youth - was a primarily a linebacker and wr as a sophomore inhigh school. Was thrusted into the starting role when the started Travis Wilson qb, who would start for Utah, was injured. He needs more experience at the position. But so does all the qbs in this draft. He also tries to do too much that's lack of experience and coaching.
Footwork- he definitely needs to work on that. At least he shows progress at his pro day. When his feet are set he is accurate as any qb in the draft.
I do think Rosen has great potential, just pointing out there are more questions than Darnold.
ummm... no...
There is no... I repeat, no... comparison between the floors of these two QB prospects. See the visual evidence for the post above as a starting point.
Anticipation... hitting a primary receiver who is entering a dead spot in a zone is not NFL grade anticipation and neither is hitting a streaking WR clearing his man. Throwing to an opening man is not the same as throwing a man open... and it is the latter that takes anticipation.
Keeps his eyes Downfield? All the time? No... drops eyes to the rush. Now once clear he looks back up... throws it if he is running east/west... runs it if he's heading north/south. He is not adept at sliding in the pocket, but bails prematurely.
I love this San Capistrano blue-collar narrative... but Dad is a plumber... a medical gas plumber who pulls down 6-figues...
"Recruited" to play LB (nice Wikipedia use there)... yeah when he was a Sophomore in HS and the USC DC stopped by the school. At the time he was splitting his time between LB and WR.
Switched to QB but was hurt most of his JR year. Played his Sr. year. The started two years at USC. For those who are counting that's 3 years and change of QB'ing at the HS and College level.
Small wonder the kid lacks the biggest plus of all... read progressions.
Good player... good kid... posted good numbers despite many, many flaws from his feet to his elongated throwing motion (a source of turnovers) and questionable ball security and head.
If he's the next Browns QB as more and more sources are saying, then I will root for his success, but I'm going in with my eyes wide open.
-
but Darnold's completion percentage !
67.2, 63.1 !
Rosenbum
60.0
59.3
62.6
Rosen - head coach - Jim Mora trained. He'll look the part in his offense, but around a bunch of seniors,
and a first round left tackle....a very good center.... never had a completion percentage as high as Darnold's worst year.
59 not far from 56. and Allen had far, far less talent around him vs UCLA versus a few common opponents.
Facts.
-
Wow... finally took the time to look.
All depends on his feet doesn't it? And most the first half they were spectacularly bad. Early overthrow he was doing his bunny hop into his set. Completed a couple of quick bubbles without ever setting. Predetermined two GL throws... one picked and a second pick dropped. Finally at start of Q4 he got his feet under him and aligned with the direction of the throw and it was a beauty (the pass with PI called).
And then there's the Wheezy special... oy!
EDIT: had I just turned the page I could have said, "What tia said." Even included the times... and the hop...
The footwork, especially at the top of his 5 &7 step drops is just pure comedy. Nevermind the other things like how his hips don't come around in sync with his arm.
Why would you want to draft a QB where you spend the bulk of his first off season fixing his terrible mechanics when you could take Rosen - who you could immediately begin working on absorbing the playbook, adapting to NFL speeds and the mental/classroom work of the game because he doesn't possess such incredibly obvious flaws?!?
When the #1 pick is in and should the Browns not call Rosen's name, then they're only making it as hard on themselves as humanly possible.
The footwork, especially at the top of his 5 &7 step drops is just pure comedy. Nevermind the other things like how his hips don't come around in sync with his arm.
Why would you want to draft a QB where you spend the bulk of his first off season fixing his terrible mechanics when you could take Rosen - who you could immediately begin working on absorbing the playbook, adapting to NFL speeds and the mental/classroom work of the game because he doesn't possess such incredibly obvious flaws?!?
When the #1 pick is in and should the Browns not call Rosen's name, then they're only making it as hard on themselves as humanly possible.
So who's worse in the footwork department- Darnold or Allen? Yeah I get Rosen has the best mechanics, but didn't Kosar have terrible mechanics?
-
-
Wow... finally took the time to look.
All depends on his feet doesn't it? And most the first half they were spectacularly bad. Early overthrow he was doing his bunny hop into his set. Completed a couple of quick bubbles without ever setting. Predetermined two GL throws... one picked and a second pick dropped. Finally at start of Q4 he got his feet under him and aligned with the direction of the throw and it was a beauty (the pass with PI called).
And then there's the Wheezy special... oy!
EDIT: had I just turned the page I could have said, "What tia said." Even included the times... and the hop...
The footwork, especially at the top of his 5 &7 step drops is just pure comedy. Nevermind the other things like how his hips don't come around in sync with his arm.
Why would you want to draft a QB where you spend the bulk of his first off season fixing his terrible mechanics when you could take Rosen - who you could immediately begin working on absorbing the playbook, adapting to NFL speeds and the mental/classroom work of the game because he doesn't possess such incredibly obvious flaws?!?
When the #1 pick is in and should the Browns not call Rosen's name, then they're only making it as hard on themselves as humanly possible.
The footwork, especially at the top of his 5 &7 step drops is just pure comedy. Nevermind the other things like how his hips don't come around in sync with his arm.
Why would you want to draft a QB where you spend the bulk of his first off season fixing his terrible mechanics when you could take Rosen - who you could immediately begin working on absorbing the playbook, adapting to NFL speeds and the mental/classroom work of the game because he doesn't possess such incredibly obvious flaws?!?
When the #1 pick is in and should the Browns not call Rosen's name, then they're only making it as hard on themselves as humanly possible.
For me, this is a BIG reason. We just destroyed 2 QB's careers (Kizer, Kessler) and now we are trying to get the best of Darnold? I'd go with the safest bet.
Rosen can be concerning for his injury history, but even if you took the strongest QB that wouldn't assure you that he cannot suffer a career ending injury.
And if someone believes that other guys' ceiling is higher than Rosen's, did you see Browns' quaterback list since '99? At this point I'd be more than happy with a good FRANCHISE quaterback, even if he is not top 5 in the league. Just so we don't have to worry about the most important position in the sport.
-
-
-
-
The footwork, especially at the top of his 5 &7 step drops is just pure comedy. Nevermind the other things like how his hips don't come around in sync with his arm.
Why would you want to draft a QB where you spend the bulk of his first off season fixing his terrible mechanics when you could take Rosen - who you could immediately begin working on absorbing the playbook, adapting to NFL speeds and the mental/classroom work of the game because he doesn't possess such incredibly obvious flaws?!?
When the #1 pick is in and should the Browns not call Rosen's name, then they're only making it as hard on themselves as humanly possible.
So who's worse in the footwork department- Darnold or Allen? Yeah I get Rosen has the best mechanics, but didn't Kosar have terrible mechanics?
So who's worse in the footwork department- Darnold or Allen? Yeah I get Rosen has the best mechanics, but didn't Kosar have terrible mechanics?
Darnold by a long way but there are times when Allen's feet go erratic as well.
Bernie had a 3/4 delivery but good footwork, and more importantly, a great mind. You can overcome some deficiencies by having the latter, but not all. Most especially in the modern NFL with defenders as fast as they have become.
-
So who's worse in the footwork department- Darnold or Allen? Yeah I get Rosen has the best mechanics, but didn't Kosar have terrible mechanics?
Darnold by a long way but there are times when Allen's feet go erratic as well.
Bernie had a 3/4 delivery but good footwork, and more importantly, a great mind. You can overcome some deficiencies by having the latter, but not all. Most especially in the modern NFL with defenders as fast as they have become.
Darnold by a long way but there are times when Allen's feet go erratic as well.
Agree... easy call. Allen's routine footwork in his drops is actually quite pretty... in any color. His mystery throws are the issue that remains with him. While I know over-striding is a thing, I cannot say that I have seen it in his case.
Rosen can be concerning for his injury history, but even if you took the strongest QB that wouldn't assure you that he cannot suffer a career ending injury.
And if someone believes that other guys' ceiling is higher than Rosen's, did you see Browns' quaterback list since '99? At this point I'd be more than happy with a good FRANCHISE quaterback, even if he is not top 5 in the league. Just so we don't have to worry about the most important position in the sport.
Yup... you'd think Rosen was the only QB to ever be injured in football history. Anyone talking about Darnold missing his Jr. year in HS?
And again... when you see a floor as high as Rosen's, then phuck projecting ceilings.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login