Latest Pluto
-
You yourself just posted 3 different Qbs that you would consider a perfect draft. Darnold, Rosen and Mayfield. You are going to get one at 4 and Camp Barkley is going to get our guy at #1.
This isn't a Sock-measuring competition, both the RB pick and the QB pick are going to be pivot able for our future. Barkley is useful now, and he'll be even more valuable(stronger, faster and smarter)when your guy is ready to step in. It's going to be a win/win for the Browns... don't get caught up in semantics. We can't gift Barkley to the Giants. He's going to be the talk of the NFL all season, and our offense is going to the top!
I got $100 that says the Browns don't draft Barkley at #1. Time's a tickin'...
I got $100 that says the Browns don't draft Barkley at #1. Time's a tickin'...
I think Dutch is so confident that he will put some odds on it put up $100 and he'll pay $150 if Barkley is picked ##1 by the Cleveland Browns.
.......and I will volunteer to hold the money until after the draft for a small fee.
-
FIFY. Still dreaming of Barkley at #1? It's not happening.
You yourself just posted 3 different Qbs that you would consider a perfect draft. Darnold, Rosen and Mayfield. You are going to get one at 4 and Camp Barkley is going to get our guy at #1.
This isn't a Sock-measuring competition, both the RB pick and the QB pick are going to be pivot able for our future. Barkley is useful now, and he'll be even more valuable(stronger, faster and smarter)when your guy is ready to step in. It's going to be a win/win for the Browns... don't get caught up in semantics. We can't gift Barkley to the Giants. He's going to be the talk of the NFL all season, and our offense is going to the top!
You yourself just posted 3 different Qbs that you would consider a perfect draft. Darnold, Rosen and Mayfield. You are going to get one at 4 and Camp Barkley is going to get our guy at #1.
This isn't a Sock-measuring competition, both the RB pick and the QB pick are going to be pivot able for our future. Barkley is useful now, and he'll be even more valuable(stronger, faster and smarter)when your guy is ready to step in. It's going to be a win/win for the Browns... don't get caught up in semantics. We can't gift Barkley to the Giants. He's going to be the talk of the NFL all season, and our offense is going to the top!
Would it have made you any happier if I had just used Darnold? Boo-hoo, ANY of those three QBs are a better option than Saquon at #1. I don't have my head up a particular players azz like you do with Barkley. Guys have tried to bet you Saquon isn't going #1, damn near every reputable mock has the Browns drafting a QB first, and you keep droning on with unabated Barkley love. Try to get a grip on reality Po. Saquon at #1 isn't happening, and it's 50\50 at #4. 10 days to the Draft, and it can't get here soon enough. Barkley gets drafted by another team, start following him wherever he winds up. Got your Hogan Redskins jersey yet?
-
Yes it is. I don't care what you or any of these stupid scientists say.
Also
St Patrick is, by God, still a saint regardless of the popes anti-irish sentiment.
So there you bastard
WSS
Been an astronomy geek since I was six Steve, I'm with you. Pluto is more of a planet than Mercury if you want to get technical. If it's orbiting the sun and has its own mini solar system of moons, it's a planet.
-
Yes it is. I don't care what you or any of these stupid scientists say.
Also
St Patrick is, by God, still a saint regardless of the popes anti-irish sentiment.
So there you bastard
WSS
Been an astronomy geek since I was six Steve, I'm with you. Pluto is more of a planet than Mercury if you want to get technical. If it's orbiting the sun and has its own mini solar system of moons, it's a planet.
Been an astronomy geek since I was six Steve, I'm with you. Pluto is more of a planet than Mercury if you want to get technical. If it's orbiting the sun and has its own mini solar system of moons, it's a planet.
Especially now that they know how active it is geologically which is something that surprised them in seeing from the fly-by. And most surprising of all is that it actually has an atmosphere.
-
Yes it is. I don't care what you or any of these stupid scientists say.
Also
St Patrick is, by God, still a saint regardless of the popes anti-irish sentiment.
So there you bastard
WSS
Pluto meets the textbook definitions of a planet. It IS, a planet. No scientist would say otherwise. It is driven by our sun, a part of our solar system, locked in synchronized orbit, exhibits rotation, exerts the force science calls gravity on the rest of the planets. It is a planet. Some scientists say that an individual born with a penis who identifies as a woman, is simply a woman with a penis. So what, that is not considered science? Idiots.
-
Yes it is. I don't care what you or any of these stupid scientists say.
Also
St Patrick is, by God, still a saint regardless of the popes anti-irish sentiment.
So there you bastard
WSS
Pluto meets the textbook definitions of a planet. It IS, a planet. No scientist would say otherwise. It is driven by our sun, a part of our solar system, locked in synchronized orbit, exhibits rotation, exerts the force science calls gravity on the rest of the planets. It is a planet. Some scientists say that an individual born with a penis who identifies as a woman, is simply a woman with a penis. So what, that is not considered science? Idiots.
Pluto meets the textbook definitions of a planet. It IS, a planet. No scientist would say otherwise. It is driven by our sun, a part of our solar system, locked in synchronized orbit, exhibits rotation, exerts the force science calls gravity on the rest of the planets. It is a planet. Some scientists say that an individual born with a penis who identifies as a woman, is simply a woman with a penis. So what, that is not considered science? Idiots.
What if.....as does happen.....they cut their schmekel off and reform the skin into a vagina...or vaginal like entity?
-
Yes it is. I don't care what you or any of these stupid scientists say.
Also
St Patrick is, by God, still a saint regardless of the popes anti-irish sentiment.
So there you bastard
WSS
Been an astronomy geek since I was six Steve, I'm with you. Pluto is more of a planet than Mercury if you want to get technical. If it's orbiting the sun and has its own mini solar system of moons, it's a planet.
Pluto is more of a planet than Mercury if you want to get technical.
The planetary scientists say, "How come they didn't ask US if Pluto was a planet or not?"
But, as you can see, Pluto's orbit is not on the same plane as the other planets. And it's quite eccentric. Sometimes it's outside of Neptune's orbit and sometimes it isn't.
And Pluto is small. About half the diameter of Mercury. - It acts very much like a Kuiper Belt object...but it's geology and atmosphere are very planet like.
Gipper asked if Terry Pluto knew of Landry's signing. Yes, he did.
- Here's my favorite pic of Pluto:
-
It is not DNA....it is Chromosomes. Learn your science. (yes, I know....chromosomes are made up of DNA)
Besides....as we have said.....sex IDENTIFICATION....is a social...not biologic or genetic matter.
Its like your particular brand of being a football fan......You may have once been a male (Browns fan)....but you seem to have chosen...socially...to identify yourself as a female (Steeler fan).
So....if anyone can identify with those folks, it is you.
Beyond that, men that have had their peckers trimmed are called Eunuchs. At least you are not that.....football wise. You still at least have some kind of football/sexual identification.
-
It is not DNA....it is Chromosomes. Learn your science. (yes, I know....chromosomes are made up of DNA)
Besides....as we have said.....sex IDENTIFICATION....is a social...not biologic or genetic matter.
Its like your particular brand of being a football fan......You may have once been a male (Browns fan)....but you seem to have chosen...socially...to identify yourself as a female (Steeler fan).
So....if anyone can identify with those folks, it is you.
Beyond that, men that have had their peckers trimmed are called Eunuchs. At least you are not that.....football wise. You still at least have some kind of football/sexual identification.
It is not DNA....it is Chromosomes. Learn your science. (yes, I know....chromosomes are made up of DNA)
Besides....as we have said.....sex IDENTIFICATION....is a social...not biologic or genetic matter.
Its like your particular brand of being a football fan......You may have once been a male (Browns fan)....but you seem to have chosen...socially...to identify yourself as a female (Steeler fan).
So....if anyone can identify with those folks, it is you.
Beyond that, men that have had their peckers trimmed are called Eunuchs. At least you are not that.....football wise. You still at least have some kind of football/sexual identification.
It is DNA. If your DNA causes you to have a penis at birth....you are a man. There is no discussion needed here. Genetics, not judges determine the sexual identity of a person.
The Cleveland Browns have the hardest hit players in the NFL -
It is not DNA....it is Chromosomes. Learn your science. (yes, I know....chromosomes are made up of DNA)
Besides....as we have said.....sex IDENTIFICATION....is a social...not biologic or genetic matter.
Its like your particular brand of being a football fan......You may have once been a male (Browns fan)....but you seem to have chosen...socially...to identify yourself as a female (Steeler fan).
So....if anyone can identify with those folks, it is you.
Beyond that, men that have had their peckers trimmed are called Eunuchs. At least you are not that.....football wise. You still at least have some kind of football/sexual identification.
It is DNA. If your DNA causes you to have a penis at birth....you are a man. There is no discussion needed here. Genetics, not judges determine the sexual identity of a person.
It is DNA. If your DNA causes you to have a penis at birth....you are a man. There is no discussion needed here. Genetics, not judges determine the sexual identity of a person.
You really are thickheaded and don't get it aren't you really you are aren't you! You are demonstrating a lack of intellectual agility to understand social concepts and or anything out of your narrow tunnel vision and world
-
From now on, when a beautiful woman goes into the ladies room, I'm going to align my social self as a female and go on in the ladies room. I've always thought that I'd make a great lesbian.
From now on, when a beautiful woman goes into the ladies room, I'm going to align my social self as a female and go on in the ladies room. I've always thought that I'd make a great lesbian.
In your case yeah you probably are about the closest thing we have on here to a lesbianIn your case yeah you probably are about the closest thing we have on here to a lesbian
-
From now on, when a beautiful woman goes into the ladies room, I'm going to align my social self as a female and go on in the ladies room. I've always thought that I'd make a great lesbian.
In your case yeah you probably are about the closest thing we have on here to a lesbianIn your case yeah you probably are about the closest thing we have on here to a lesbian
In your case yeah you probably are about the closest thing we have on here to a lesbianIn your case yeah you probably are about the closest thing we have on here to a lesbian
I don't think you meant that as a compliment I don't think you meant that as a compliment I don't think you meant that as a compliment
-
In your case yeah you probably are about the closest thing we have on here to a lesbianIn your case yeah you probably are about the closest thing we have on here to a lesbian
I don't think you meant that as a compliment I don't think you meant that as a compliment I don't think you meant that as a compliment
I don't think you meant that as a compliment I don't think you meant that as a compliment I don't think you meant that as a compliment
Are you gay are you gay are you gay are you gayAre you gay are you gay are you gay are you
-
Are you gay are you gay are you gay are you gayAre you gay are you gay are you gay are you
No. Not gay. I like women. That's why I can understand lesbianism. But I cannot fathom gayness.
...and stop your stuttering.
-
Are you gay are you gay are you gay are you gayAre you gay are you gay are you gay are you
No. Not gay. I like women. That's why I can understand lesbianism. But I cannot fathom gayness.
...and stop your stuttering.
No. Not gay. I like women. That's why I can understand lesbianism. But I cannot fathom gayness.
...and stop your stuttering.
I don't stutter, my phone stutters. It must have been made by Browns #1 overall draft pick in 1954, Bobby Garrett....who could not play in the NFL because he stuttered so badly he could not get the plays out in the huddle or call them at the line.
-
Steve, I really like Pluto even though he really never explained what specific football event with a defense on the field changed his mind about Allen. And while nobody will confuse Mayfield with prototypical size - he's way closer to 6'1" than he is the 5'11" convicted him of.
I think we have 3 really good QBs we can choose from and Josh Allen isn't 1 of them. I've been wrong before but I'm usually right when I feel a QB is getting way overrated. When there's defenses on the field - Josh Allen wasn't getting ANY interest from Major DI programs whatsoever. And in 2016 he threw 15 INTs against 2nd rate DBs and pass rushers while he only threw a ho-hum 16 TD passes in 2017. What am I missing here?
People that are moving to the Josh Allen idea are being swayed by his physical tools, IMO. I think after watching MONTHS of video, workouts, and game film, after a while...you just start to fall in love with a guy who can throw it a country mile. The problem is, that doesn't mean SQUAT in the NFL. I want to know who can THINK the fastest, who can process the quickest, who can get the ball out to the RIGHT GUY consistently, who can deliver it IN STRIDE, and many other qualities that have nothing to do with how much zip the ball has on it. Josh Allen terrifies me. Now, for what it's worth, I BELIEVE Josh Allen had the highest Wonderlic test by far out of the top QB prospects. Something like a 36. I'm not sure if there's really a correlation to high Wonderlic vs high performance, but I did find it interesting.
People that are moving to the Josh Allen idea are being swayed by his physical tools, IMO. I think after watching MONTHS of video, workouts, and game film, after a while...you just start to fall in love with a guy who can throw it a country mile. The problem is, that doesn't mean SQUAT in the NFL. I want to know who can THINK the fastest, who can process the quickest, who can get the ball out to the RIGHT GUY consistently, who can deliver it IN STRIDE, and many other qualities that have nothing to do with how much zip the ball has on it. Josh Allen terrifies me. Now, for what it's worth, I BELIEVE Josh Allen had the highest Wonderlic test by far out of the top QB prospects. Something like a 36. I'm not sure if there's really a correlation to high Wonderlic vs high performance, but I did find it interesting.
Jim Kelly who ran a No Huddle offense to 4 consecutive AFC Championships got a 16 on it just like Dan Marino (who QBed his team to a Superbowl as a rookie). 2 Hall of Fame QBs that did a lot better with a football than a #2 pencil.
-
People that are moving to the Josh Allen idea are being swayed by his physical tools, IMO. I think after watching MONTHS of video, workouts, and game film, after a while...you just start to fall in love with a guy who can throw it a country mile. The problem is, that doesn't mean SQUAT in the NFL. I want to know who can THINK the fastest, who can process the quickest, who can get the ball out to the RIGHT GUY consistently, who can deliver it IN STRIDE, and many other qualities that have nothing to do with how much zip the ball has on it. Josh Allen terrifies me. Now, for what it's worth, I BELIEVE Josh Allen had the highest Wonderlic test by far out of the top QB prospects. Something like a 36. I'm not sure if there's really a correlation to high Wonderlic vs high performance, but I did find it interesting.
Jim Kelly who ran a No Huddle offense to 4 consecutive AFC Championships got a 16 on it just like Dan Marino (who QBed his team to a Superbowl as a rookie). 2 Hall of Fame QBs that did a lot better with a football than a #2 pencil.
Jim Kelly who ran a No Huddle offense to 4 consecutive AFC Championships got a 16 on it just like Dan Marino (who QBed his team to a Superbowl as a rookie). 2 Hall of Fame QBs that did a lot better with a football than a #2 pencil.
Terry Bradshaw was considered a dolt his first few years and then he suddenly "got it" with the help of a great defense to set him up all the time.
From wiki: "Bradshaw became a starter in his second season after splitting time with Terry Hanratty in his rookie campaign. During his first few seasons, the 6'3", 215-pound quarterback was erratic, threw many interceptions (he threw 210 interceptions over the course of his career) and was widely ridiculed by the media for his rural roots and perceived lack of intelligence."
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login