Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Evil Ted Cruz Has Past History of DUI/Hit and Run

Evil Ted Cruz Has Past History of DUI/Hit and Run

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
34 Posts 9 Posters 964 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T TexasAg1969

    @westside-steve said:

    So basically you have nothing. I understand you really don't care about the Mueller investigation aside from the fact that it would damage the president you have a personal grudge against.

    And unless you were lying and have been a Democrat all along can you tell me the difference between the CIA and the KGB? And then tell me if you hated George HW Bush?

    WSS

    I have said from the very beginning that I trusted the Mueller investigation to go through a thorough judicial process through our court system. If King Liar is not guilty of anything then he has nothing to fear. It is my opinion that he is Kompromat. I've never had that opinion about any other politicians, Republican or Democrat. If Mueller finds nothing then I can live with the results. But I fully expect the Kompromat King to stop it when it gets too close to home. And the CIA works for a democracy. The KGB works for a despot. 

    So tell me this. Why do you think Trump is so innocent? Two can play the fishing expedition game.

    Are you in favor of communist governments ruling the world?

    Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
    • 39k Posts
    • 9k Reputation
    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
    #17

    @texasag1969 said:

    I have said from the very beginning that I trusted the Mueller investigation to go through a thorough judicial process through our court system. If King Liar is not guilty of anything then he has nothing to fear. It is my opinion that he is Kompromat. I've never had that opinion about any other politicians, Republican or Democrat. If Mueller finds nothing then I can live with the results. But I fully expect the Kompromat King to stop it when it gets too close to home. And the CIA works for a democracy. The KGB works for a despot. 

    So tell me this. Why do you think Trump is so innocent? Two can play the fishing expedition game.

    Are you in favor of communist governments ruling the world?

    I guess that's a fair question I asked you often enough. But first and foremost the special prosecutor in and of itself is a Witch Hunt no matter who the target may be. Take a moment to remember special prosecutors in the past who pretend to investigate one thing but look for anything to nail the target for. Scooter Libby never outed Valerie Plame Bill Clinton was never mailed for Whitewater Martha Stewart never committed insider trading. All three were set up on a stupid perjury trap. That's what mower wants to do with President Trump. I'm sure the guy has done plenty of stuff that he'd rather weren't public record. So have I. So has just about everybody that I know. But unless somebody can prove that he actually dealt with Putin this Representatives to dig up dirt on Hillary... And even if he did the dirt was real.

    If in fact the investigation was to truly find out what effect the Russian interference had with the election then I think the evidence proves there was none. I have no doubt somebody hacked your candidates party as well as the Republicans. I don't. There was some fake news but I can't imagine you won't admit it came from all different places. God only that it was happily repeated for Fun and Profit by United States news organizations. So tell me who's the bad guy? The people that dug up the dirt or the people who spread it for money? Not only that but your candidate when she was Secretary of State at her boss President Obama bent over backwards for the Russians. A lot more than the Trump Administration ever has. But I didn't hear you crying about that.

    Communist ruling the world??? Come on Senator McCarthy. What do you think the Iranians and Russians Afghanistani and other governments all over the world teach about the United States? You want to cry that Putin is a despot? Tell that to the thousands of innocent people killed by us War intervention and get back to me. How much worldwide fuhrer has been stirred up buy reports of atrocities at gitmo? CIA still seem pure and clean to you?

    Frankly I don't even believe that John McCain and Lindsey Graham care at all about the investigation aside from the fact it's meant to take down a guy they hate. Probably rightly so because as I said often the president tends to be an a-hole and probably handled the entire McCain incident poorly. But don't kid yourself those guys love power as much as anybody else.

    Still at the end of the day most every platform espoused by the Republicans is exactly counter to the ones put forth by the Democrats. That's why I will almost always vote that way whether I like the candidate personally or not. Because personality doesn't matter. I met Gus Hall back in the 70s and he was an extremely nice man. That doesn't mean I would vote for the Communist Party. On the other hand Donald Trump, as I said before, seems like he can be obnoxious. Of course he was running against Hillary so that's a wash.

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 23k Posts
      • 6k Reputation
      T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
      #18

      I thought Obama sucked when it came to foreign affairs/Putin/China/etc. And why did Putin say he wanted Trump to win? Because he thought Clinton would be harder to manipulate and/or Trump is Kompromate.

      I don't think anyone knows where Mueller's investigation is going until he actually files charges. Trump has a lot of fears about where it's going because he has tons to hide. He would never make a good poker player. Too easy to read.

      Can you say you knew all the places the investigation led beforehand? And part of his mission was to send anything he came across that was illegal to the proper courts/prosecutors to investigate and file charges when warranted. That he has done very well so far.  Otherwise there is just a lot of speculation because he keeps a tight ship.

      And you are following the usual Trump line of no evidence for Russian interference which originally said there was no contact either. Bet that has been a total surprise (though not to me). So far the investigation has been hitting all the fringe outliers (you like my word?) to the hurricane at the center of it all. His time is coming. He will go ballistic when charges are filed on family and then expect a twitter storm of pardons.Trump so far has been tweeting himself into an excellent case for obstruction of justice.

      W 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
        • 28k Posts
        • 6k Reputation
        DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
        #19

        I heard that there is a woman peeing on Trump video. However, it will never become public.  Because the woman is Hillary Clinton.

        "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • T TexasAg1969

          I thought Obama sucked when it came to foreign affairs/Putin/China/etc. And why did Putin say he wanted Trump to win? Because he thought Clinton would be harder to manipulate and/or Trump is Kompromate.

          I don't think anyone knows where Mueller's investigation is going until he actually files charges. Trump has a lot of fears about where it's going because he has tons to hide. He would never make a good poker player. Too easy to read.

          Can you say you knew all the places the investigation led beforehand? And part of his mission was to send anything he came across that was illegal to the proper courts/prosecutors to investigate and file charges when warranted. That he has done very well so far.  Otherwise there is just a lot of speculation because he keeps a tight ship.

          And you are following the usual Trump line of no evidence for Russian interference which originally said there was no contact either. Bet that has been a total surprise (though not to me). So far the investigation has been hitting all the fringe outliers (you like my word?) to the hurricane at the center of it all. His time is coming. He will go ballistic when charges are filed on family and then expect a twitter storm of pardons.Trump so far has been tweeting himself into an excellent case for obstruction of justice.

          Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
          • 39k Posts
          • 9k Reputation
          W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
          #20

          @texasag1969 said:

          I thought Obama sucked when it came to foreign affairs/Putin/China/etc. And why did Putin say he wanted Trump to win? Because he thought Clinton would be harder to manipulate and/or Trump is Kompromate.

           I don't believe Putin ever said that. You've been reading too much fake news.

          I don't think anyone knows where Mueller's investigation is going until he actually files charges. Trump has a lot of fears about where it's going because he has tons to hide. He would never make a good poker player. Too easy to read.

           I would be afraid to if it was an open-ended investigation determined to find anything at all. So would you.

          Can you say you knew all the places the investigation led beforehand? And part of his mission was to send anything he came across that was illegal to the proper courts/prosecutors to investigate and file charges when warranted. That he has done very well so far.  Otherwise there is just a lot of speculation because he keeps a tight ship.

           so you admit it's a fishing Expedition and really has little or nothing to do with any Russian interference. Exactly true.

          And you are following the usual Trump line of no evidence for Russian interference which originally said there was no contact either. Bet that has been a total surprise (though not to me). So far the investigation has been hitting all the fringe outliers (you like my word?) to the hurricane at the center of it all. His time is coming. He will go ballistic when charges are filed on family and then expect a twitter storm of pardons.Trump so far has been tweeting himself into an excellent case for obstruction of justice.

          of course none of that garbage was the Crux of this investigation. If it was then your two buddies McCain and Graham are liars period and not even outliers. ?

          www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
          T 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
            • 39k Posts
            • 9k Reputation
            W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
            #21

            Beyond that if anybody really cares about campaign impropriety a full court press from a special prosecutor to the Clinton campaign and the DNC would certainly turn up as much or a hell of a lot more impropriety. You guys have a hard-on for a perjury trap why wouldn't you insist Hillary be put on the stand to answer the lies she told two James Comey? Trey Gowdy ripped him a new bum. Why no outrage there?

            And as far as Putin being a despot ask the North Vietnamese who were raped murdered tortured other Villages burn to the ground for absolutely nothing by American soldiers. Then ask yourself if maybe their grudge against Senator McCain might have been Justified?

            WSS

            www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • W Westside Steve

              @texasag1969 said:

              I thought Obama sucked when it came to foreign affairs/Putin/China/etc. And why did Putin say he wanted Trump to win? Because he thought Clinton would be harder to manipulate and/or Trump is Kompromate.

               I don't believe Putin ever said that. You've been reading too much fake news.

              I don't think anyone knows where Mueller's investigation is going until he actually files charges. Trump has a lot of fears about where it's going because he has tons to hide. He would never make a good poker player. Too easy to read.

               I would be afraid to if it was an open-ended investigation determined to find anything at all. So would you.

              Can you say you knew all the places the investigation led beforehand? And part of his mission was to send anything he came across that was illegal to the proper courts/prosecutors to investigate and file charges when warranted. That he has done very well so far.  Otherwise there is just a lot of speculation because he keeps a tight ship.

               so you admit it's a fishing Expedition and really has little or nothing to do with any Russian interference. Exactly true.

              And you are following the usual Trump line of no evidence for Russian interference which originally said there was no contact either. Bet that has been a total surprise (though not to me). So far the investigation has been hitting all the fringe outliers (you like my word?) to the hurricane at the center of it all. His time is coming. He will go ballistic when charges are filed on family and then expect a twitter storm of pardons.Trump so far has been tweeting himself into an excellent case for obstruction of justice.

              of course none of that garbage was the Crux of this investigation. If it was then your two buddies McCain and Graham are liars period and not even outliers. ?

              TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 23k Posts
              • 6k Reputation
              T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
              #22

              @westside-steve said:

              1. Putin only said he wanted Trump to win. The rest is my logical conclusion as to why.

              2 &3. If you read his mandate that is exactly what his guidance states. Anything illegal he comes across in conducting his investigation not related to Russian interference is to be referred out. He's done that.

              4. Cambridge Analytica-so yes the Trump campaign is deeply tied in to the crux of Russian interference via this company. All the strands of the strings are coming together and it will be spelled out in detail that will rival the detail provided for each charge so far. We had no idea until each charge was filed, how much they had uncovered. And we won't know what else is coming until more are filed.

              EDIT: I'd have no problem with a special prosecutor looking into Hillarity's stuff. The more we clean out ALL of them the better, if they are found guilty in a court of law. Same applies to Trump & cronies. In a court of law, not in pardons or a shutdown of investigations because they don't like where it's going. The mockery is the constant attacks on the underpinnings of constitutional law. Allow that to happen then we have no democracy based on separation of powers. We revert to a Monarchy and we all know that a constitution resulted from that state of government to prevent it occurring again.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 23k Posts
                • 6k Reputation
                T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                #23

                One more revisit to Helsinki. It was easily seen back in Feb. by this guy who warned us about what he thought was happening. Usually he is a very balanced reporter, not favoring either side against another but trying to see the bigger picture.

                https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/18/opinion/trump-russia-putin.html

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                  • 64k Posts
                  • 8k Reputation
                  C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  big bunch of unsubstantiated pouty-pouty loss of election hysteria.

                  The left almost OWNED our supreme court, and almost had longterm cover for the deep state

                  dipwads who are traitors to everything except themselves.

                  It seems to be a mental illness - like nazis drunk on power, and brownshirts paid to go after the Jews in Germany.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • htownbrownH htownbrown

                    Nevermind.....it was his liberal opponent so it's perfectly acceptable.  The hill country weirdos will love him even more now.

                    https://www.dailywire.com/news/35320/ted-cruz-challenger-beto-orourke-tried-flee-scene-ryan-saavedra

                    jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 3k Posts
                    • 883 Reputation
                    jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    @htownbrown said:

                    Nevermind.....it was his liberal opponent so it's perfectly acceptable.  The hill country weirdos will love him even more now.

                    https://www.dailywire.com/news/35320/ted-cruz-challenger-beto-orourke-tried-flee-scene-ryan-saavedra

                    George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                    "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                    OldBrownsFanO htownbrownH 2 Replies Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                      @htownbrown said:

                      Nevermind.....it was his liberal opponent so it's perfectly acceptable.  The hill country weirdos will love him even more now.

                      https://www.dailywire.com/news/35320/ted-cruz-challenger-beto-orourke-tried-flee-scene-ryan-saavedra

                      George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                      OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                      • 11k Posts
                      • 3k Reputation
                      OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      @jbluhm86 said:

                      George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                      If I remember right the dems  knew about Bush's DUI conviction and sat on it until the weekend before the election and then made it public. It almost cost Bush the election. He was ahead in the polls going into the weekend and barely pulled out a squeaker win but no doubt that DUI revelation cost him down the stretch.

                      jbluhm86J 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                        @jbluhm86 said:

                        George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                        If I remember right the dems  knew about Bush's DUI conviction and sat on it until the weekend before the election and then made it public. It almost cost Bush the election. He was ahead in the polls going into the weekend and barely pulled out a squeaker win but no doubt that DUI revelation cost him down the stretch.

                        jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 3k Posts
                        • 883 Reputation
                        jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        @oldbrownsfan said:

                        If I remember right the dems  knew about Bush's DUI conviction and sat on it until the weekend before the election and then made it public. It almost cost Bush the election. He was ahead in the polls going into the weekend and barely pulled out a squeaker win but no doubt that DUI revelation cost him down the stretch.

                        Technically, it was actually FoxNews, of all places, that first broke the news, not Democrats. 

                        "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                        OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                          @oldbrownsfan said:

                          If I remember right the dems  knew about Bush's DUI conviction and sat on it until the weekend before the election and then made it public. It almost cost Bush the election. He was ahead in the polls going into the weekend and barely pulled out a squeaker win but no doubt that DUI revelation cost him down the stretch.

                          Technically, it was actually FoxNews, of all places, that first broke the news, not Democrats. 

                          OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                          • 11k Posts
                          • 3k Reputation
                          OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          @jbluhm86 said:

                          Technically, it was actually FoxNews, of all places, that first broke the news, not Democrats. 

                          But it was the dems who leaked this to Fox News:

                          Five days before the election, GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush admits he was arrested for drunk driving in 1976. Bush says Democrats were behind the disclosure.

                          ABCNEWS.com Nov. 3

                          — George W. Bush is accusing Democrats of playing “dirty politics” by leaking information about his 24-year-old arrest for drunken driving just days before

                          https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95114&page=1

                          jbluhm86J 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                            @jbluhm86 said:

                            Technically, it was actually FoxNews, of all places, that first broke the news, not Democrats. 

                            But it was the dems who leaked this to Fox News:

                            Five days before the election, GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush admits he was arrested for drunk driving in 1976. Bush says Democrats were behind the disclosure.

                            ABCNEWS.com Nov. 3

                            — George W. Bush is accusing Democrats of playing “dirty politics” by leaking information about his 24-year-old arrest for drunken driving just days before

                            https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95114&page=1

                            jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 3k Posts
                            • 883 Reputation
                            jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            @oldbrownsfan said:

                            But it was the dems who leaked this to Fox News:

                            Five days before the election, GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush admits he was arrested for drunk driving in 1976. Bush says Democrats were behind the disclosure.

                            ABCNEWS.com Nov. 3

                            — George W. Bush is accusing Democrats of playing “dirty politics” by leaking information about his 24-year-old arrest for drunken driving just days before

                            https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95114&page=1

                            The article you posted states that Bush accused the Dems of leaking it, not that it was confirmed that they did. 

                            "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                            OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                              @oldbrownsfan said:

                              But it was the dems who leaked this to Fox News:

                              Five days before the election, GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush admits he was arrested for drunk driving in 1976. Bush says Democrats were behind the disclosure.

                              ABCNEWS.com Nov. 3

                              — George W. Bush is accusing Democrats of playing “dirty politics” by leaking information about his 24-year-old arrest for drunken driving just days before

                              https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95114&page=1

                              The article you posted states that Bush accused the Dems of leaking it, not that it was confirmed that they did. 

                              OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                              • 11k Posts
                              • 3k Reputation
                              OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                              #30

                              @jbluhm86 said:

                              The article you posted states that Bush accused the Dems of leaking it, not that it was confirmed that they did. 

                              From the article:

                              "Tom Connolly, a former nominee for governor in Maine and a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, acknowledged today that he had provided the information to the press."

                              jbluhm86J 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                                @jbluhm86 said:

                                The article you posted states that Bush accused the Dems of leaking it, not that it was confirmed that they did. 

                                From the article:

                                "Tom Connolly, a former nominee for governor in Maine and a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, acknowledged today that he had provided the information to the press."

                                jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 3k Posts
                                • 883 Reputation
                                jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
                                #31

                                @oldbrownsfan said:

                                From the article:

                                "Tom Connolly, a former nominee for governor in Maine and a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, acknowledged today that he had provided the information to the press."

                                Ok, so they leaked it. My next question, then, is what part of that bothers you, if it does?

                                "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                                OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                                  @oldbrownsfan said:

                                  From the article:

                                  "Tom Connolly, a former nominee for governor in Maine and a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, acknowledged today that he had provided the information to the press."

                                  Ok, so they leaked it. My next question, then, is what part of that bothers you, if it does?

                                  OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                                  • 11k Posts
                                  • 3k Reputation
                                  OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                  #32

                                  @jbluhm86 said:

                                  Ok, so they leaked it. My next question, then, is what part of that bothers you, if it does?

                                  I was responding to your saying Bush's DUI didn't hurt him when it did. It nearly cost him the election as he dropped in the polls when the DUI conviction was made public right before the election. Was it dirty politics to make the DUI public days before the election? Sure but politics is a dirty business. Bush should have disclosed it but he said it was because of his daughters he didn't. 

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                                    @htownbrown said:

                                    Nevermind.....it was his liberal opponent so it's perfectly acceptable.  The hill country weirdos will love him even more now.

                                    https://www.dailywire.com/news/35320/ted-cruz-challenger-beto-orourke-tried-flee-scene-ryan-saavedra

                                    George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                                    htownbrown htownbrownH Reacting Well Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                    • 2k Posts
                                    • 685 Reputation
                                    htownbrownH htownbrown wrote on last edited by
                                    #33

                                    @jbluhm86 said:

                                    George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                                    Attempting to flee the scene (not taking responsibility) is the real character flaw here.  But for the record, I have never liked Bush and wish Forbes had won the primary in 2000.  You could go further than just DUIs with Bush, but that would be whataboutism.  Right?

                                    “It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.”
                                    F 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • htownbrownH htownbrown

                                      @jbluhm86 said:

                                      George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                                      Attempting to flee the scene (not taking responsibility) is the real character flaw here.  But for the record, I have never liked Bush and wish Forbes had won the primary in 2000.  You could go further than just DUIs with Bush, but that would be whataboutism.  Right?

                                      FairHooker11 F Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                      • 4k Posts
                                      • 2k Reputation
                                      F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by
                                      #34

                                      @htownbrown said:

                                      Attempting to flee the scene (not taking responsibility) is the real character flaw here.  But for the record, I have never liked Bush and wish Forbes had won the primary in 2000.  You could go further than just DUIs with Bush, but that would be whataboutism.  Right?

                                      your talking about fleet of foot Beto right? 

                                      in fact am I the only one so far to bring up his name among all the cheap shot posts on Cruz and Bush? ? 

                                      I could care less over this guys character flaws because we already know the managed agenda on this  - he is on the ticket and the DNC has alot at stake

                                      that said, if I were a Texan, I sure would vote Cruz back into senate

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply

                                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                      Register Login
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      Theme
                                      • System
                                      • Light
                                      • Dark
                                      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Forums
                                      • Recent
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Donate