Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Evil Ted Cruz Has Past History of DUI/Hit and Run

Evil Ted Cruz Has Past History of DUI/Hit and Run

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
34 Posts 9 Posters 964 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T TexasAg1969

    I thought Obama sucked when it came to foreign affairs/Putin/China/etc. And why did Putin say he wanted Trump to win? Because he thought Clinton would be harder to manipulate and/or Trump is Kompromate.

    I don't think anyone knows where Mueller's investigation is going until he actually files charges. Trump has a lot of fears about where it's going because he has tons to hide. He would never make a good poker player. Too easy to read.

    Can you say you knew all the places the investigation led beforehand? And part of his mission was to send anything he came across that was illegal to the proper courts/prosecutors to investigate and file charges when warranted. That he has done very well so far.  Otherwise there is just a lot of speculation because he keeps a tight ship.

    And you are following the usual Trump line of no evidence for Russian interference which originally said there was no contact either. Bet that has been a total surprise (though not to me). So far the investigation has been hitting all the fringe outliers (you like my word?) to the hurricane at the center of it all. His time is coming. He will go ballistic when charges are filed on family and then expect a twitter storm of pardons.Trump so far has been tweeting himself into an excellent case for obstruction of justice.

    Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
    • 39k Posts
    • 9k Reputation
    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @texasag1969 said:

    I thought Obama sucked when it came to foreign affairs/Putin/China/etc. And why did Putin say he wanted Trump to win? Because he thought Clinton would be harder to manipulate and/or Trump is Kompromate.

     I don't believe Putin ever said that. You've been reading too much fake news.

    I don't think anyone knows where Mueller's investigation is going until he actually files charges. Trump has a lot of fears about where it's going because he has tons to hide. He would never make a good poker player. Too easy to read.

     I would be afraid to if it was an open-ended investigation determined to find anything at all. So would you.

    Can you say you knew all the places the investigation led beforehand? And part of his mission was to send anything he came across that was illegal to the proper courts/prosecutors to investigate and file charges when warranted. That he has done very well so far.  Otherwise there is just a lot of speculation because he keeps a tight ship.

     so you admit it's a fishing Expedition and really has little or nothing to do with any Russian interference. Exactly true.

    And you are following the usual Trump line of no evidence for Russian interference which originally said there was no contact either. Bet that has been a total surprise (though not to me). So far the investigation has been hitting all the fringe outliers (you like my word?) to the hurricane at the center of it all. His time is coming. He will go ballistic when charges are filed on family and then expect a twitter storm of pardons.Trump so far has been tweeting himself into an excellent case for obstruction of justice.

    of course none of that garbage was the Crux of this investigation. If it was then your two buddies McCain and Graham are liars period and not even outliers. ?

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
    T 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
      • 39k Posts
      • 9k Reputation
      W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
      #21

      Beyond that if anybody really cares about campaign impropriety a full court press from a special prosecutor to the Clinton campaign and the DNC would certainly turn up as much or a hell of a lot more impropriety. You guys have a hard-on for a perjury trap why wouldn't you insist Hillary be put on the stand to answer the lies she told two James Comey? Trey Gowdy ripped him a new bum. Why no outrage there?

      And as far as Putin being a despot ask the North Vietnamese who were raped murdered tortured other Villages burn to the ground for absolutely nothing by American soldiers. Then ask yourself if maybe their grudge against Senator McCain might have been Justified?

      WSS

      www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • W Westside Steve

        @texasag1969 said:

        I thought Obama sucked when it came to foreign affairs/Putin/China/etc. And why did Putin say he wanted Trump to win? Because he thought Clinton would be harder to manipulate and/or Trump is Kompromate.

         I don't believe Putin ever said that. You've been reading too much fake news.

        I don't think anyone knows where Mueller's investigation is going until he actually files charges. Trump has a lot of fears about where it's going because he has tons to hide. He would never make a good poker player. Too easy to read.

         I would be afraid to if it was an open-ended investigation determined to find anything at all. So would you.

        Can you say you knew all the places the investigation led beforehand? And part of his mission was to send anything he came across that was illegal to the proper courts/prosecutors to investigate and file charges when warranted. That he has done very well so far.  Otherwise there is just a lot of speculation because he keeps a tight ship.

         so you admit it's a fishing Expedition and really has little or nothing to do with any Russian interference. Exactly true.

        And you are following the usual Trump line of no evidence for Russian interference which originally said there was no contact either. Bet that has been a total surprise (though not to me). So far the investigation has been hitting all the fringe outliers (you like my word?) to the hurricane at the center of it all. His time is coming. He will go ballistic when charges are filed on family and then expect a twitter storm of pardons.Trump so far has been tweeting himself into an excellent case for obstruction of justice.

        of course none of that garbage was the Crux of this investigation. If it was then your two buddies McCain and Graham are liars period and not even outliers. ?

        TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 23k Posts
        • 6k Reputation
        T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
        #22

        @westside-steve said:

        1. Putin only said he wanted Trump to win. The rest is my logical conclusion as to why.

        2 &3. If you read his mandate that is exactly what his guidance states. Anything illegal he comes across in conducting his investigation not related to Russian interference is to be referred out. He's done that.

        4. Cambridge Analytica-so yes the Trump campaign is deeply tied in to the crux of Russian interference via this company. All the strands of the strings are coming together and it will be spelled out in detail that will rival the detail provided for each charge so far. We had no idea until each charge was filed, how much they had uncovered. And we won't know what else is coming until more are filed.

        EDIT: I'd have no problem with a special prosecutor looking into Hillarity's stuff. The more we clean out ALL of them the better, if they are found guilty in a court of law. Same applies to Trump & cronies. In a court of law, not in pardons or a shutdown of investigations because they don't like where it's going. The mockery is the constant attacks on the underpinnings of constitutional law. Allow that to happen then we have no democracy based on separation of powers. We revert to a Monarchy and we all know that a constitution resulted from that state of government to prevent it occurring again.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 23k Posts
          • 6k Reputation
          T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
          #23

          One more revisit to Helsinki. It was easily seen back in Feb. by this guy who warned us about what he thought was happening. Usually he is a very balanced reporter, not favoring either side against another but trying to see the bigger picture.

          https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/18/opinion/trump-russia-putin.html

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
            • 64k Posts
            • 8k Reputation
            C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
            #24

            big bunch of unsubstantiated pouty-pouty loss of election hysteria.

            The left almost OWNED our supreme court, and almost had longterm cover for the deep state

            dipwads who are traitors to everything except themselves.

            It seems to be a mental illness - like nazis drunk on power, and brownshirts paid to go after the Jews in Germany.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • htownbrownH htownbrown

              Nevermind.....it was his liberal opponent so it's perfectly acceptable.  The hill country weirdos will love him even more now.

              https://www.dailywire.com/news/35320/ted-cruz-challenger-beto-orourke-tried-flee-scene-ryan-saavedra

              jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 3k Posts
              • 883 Reputation
              jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
              #25

              @htownbrown said:

              Nevermind.....it was his liberal opponent so it's perfectly acceptable.  The hill country weirdos will love him even more now.

              https://www.dailywire.com/news/35320/ted-cruz-challenger-beto-orourke-tried-flee-scene-ryan-saavedra

              George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

              "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
              OldBrownsFanO htownbrownH 2 Replies Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                @htownbrown said:

                Nevermind.....it was his liberal opponent so it's perfectly acceptable.  The hill country weirdos will love him even more now.

                https://www.dailywire.com/news/35320/ted-cruz-challenger-beto-orourke-tried-flee-scene-ryan-saavedra

                George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                • 11k Posts
                • 3k Reputation
                OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                #26

                @jbluhm86 said:

                George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                If I remember right the dems  knew about Bush's DUI conviction and sat on it until the weekend before the election and then made it public. It almost cost Bush the election. He was ahead in the polls going into the weekend and barely pulled out a squeaker win but no doubt that DUI revelation cost him down the stretch.

                jbluhm86J 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                  @jbluhm86 said:

                  George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                  If I remember right the dems  knew about Bush's DUI conviction and sat on it until the weekend before the election and then made it public. It almost cost Bush the election. He was ahead in the polls going into the weekend and barely pulled out a squeaker win but no doubt that DUI revelation cost him down the stretch.

                  jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 3k Posts
                  • 883 Reputation
                  jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  @oldbrownsfan said:

                  If I remember right the dems  knew about Bush's DUI conviction and sat on it until the weekend before the election and then made it public. It almost cost Bush the election. He was ahead in the polls going into the weekend and barely pulled out a squeaker win but no doubt that DUI revelation cost him down the stretch.

                  Technically, it was actually FoxNews, of all places, that first broke the news, not Democrats. 

                  "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                  OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                    @oldbrownsfan said:

                    If I remember right the dems  knew about Bush's DUI conviction and sat on it until the weekend before the election and then made it public. It almost cost Bush the election. He was ahead in the polls going into the weekend and barely pulled out a squeaker win but no doubt that DUI revelation cost him down the stretch.

                    Technically, it was actually FoxNews, of all places, that first broke the news, not Democrats. 

                    OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                    • 11k Posts
                    • 3k Reputation
                    OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    @jbluhm86 said:

                    Technically, it was actually FoxNews, of all places, that first broke the news, not Democrats. 

                    But it was the dems who leaked this to Fox News:

                    Five days before the election, GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush admits he was arrested for drunk driving in 1976. Bush says Democrats were behind the disclosure.

                    ABCNEWS.com Nov. 3

                    — George W. Bush is accusing Democrats of playing “dirty politics” by leaking information about his 24-year-old arrest for drunken driving just days before

                    https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95114&page=1

                    jbluhm86J 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                      @jbluhm86 said:

                      Technically, it was actually FoxNews, of all places, that first broke the news, not Democrats. 

                      But it was the dems who leaked this to Fox News:

                      Five days before the election, GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush admits he was arrested for drunk driving in 1976. Bush says Democrats were behind the disclosure.

                      ABCNEWS.com Nov. 3

                      — George W. Bush is accusing Democrats of playing “dirty politics” by leaking information about his 24-year-old arrest for drunken driving just days before

                      https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95114&page=1

                      jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 3k Posts
                      • 883 Reputation
                      jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      @oldbrownsfan said:

                      But it was the dems who leaked this to Fox News:

                      Five days before the election, GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush admits he was arrested for drunk driving in 1976. Bush says Democrats were behind the disclosure.

                      ABCNEWS.com Nov. 3

                      — George W. Bush is accusing Democrats of playing “dirty politics” by leaking information about his 24-year-old arrest for drunken driving just days before

                      https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95114&page=1

                      The article you posted states that Bush accused the Dems of leaking it, not that it was confirmed that they did. 

                      "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                      OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                        @oldbrownsfan said:

                        But it was the dems who leaked this to Fox News:

                        Five days before the election, GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush admits he was arrested for drunk driving in 1976. Bush says Democrats were behind the disclosure.

                        ABCNEWS.com Nov. 3

                        — George W. Bush is accusing Democrats of playing “dirty politics” by leaking information about his 24-year-old arrest for drunken driving just days before

                        https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95114&page=1

                        The article you posted states that Bush accused the Dems of leaking it, not that it was confirmed that they did. 

                        OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                        • 11k Posts
                        • 3k Reputation
                        OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        @jbluhm86 said:

                        The article you posted states that Bush accused the Dems of leaking it, not that it was confirmed that they did. 

                        From the article:

                        "Tom Connolly, a former nominee for governor in Maine and a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, acknowledged today that he had provided the information to the press."

                        jbluhm86J 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                          @jbluhm86 said:

                          The article you posted states that Bush accused the Dems of leaking it, not that it was confirmed that they did. 

                          From the article:

                          "Tom Connolly, a former nominee for governor in Maine and a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, acknowledged today that he had provided the information to the press."

                          jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 3k Posts
                          • 883 Reputation
                          jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          @oldbrownsfan said:

                          From the article:

                          "Tom Connolly, a former nominee for governor in Maine and a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, acknowledged today that he had provided the information to the press."

                          Ok, so they leaked it. My next question, then, is what part of that bothers you, if it does?

                          "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                          OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                            @oldbrownsfan said:

                            From the article:

                            "Tom Connolly, a former nominee for governor in Maine and a delegate to the Democratic National Convention, acknowledged today that he had provided the information to the press."

                            Ok, so they leaked it. My next question, then, is what part of that bothers you, if it does?

                            OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                            • 11k Posts
                            • 3k Reputation
                            OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            @jbluhm86 said:

                            Ok, so they leaked it. My next question, then, is what part of that bothers you, if it does?

                            I was responding to your saying Bush's DUI didn't hurt him when it did. It nearly cost him the election as he dropped in the polls when the DUI conviction was made public right before the election. Was it dirty politics to make the DUI public days before the election? Sure but politics is a dirty business. Bush should have disclosed it but he said it was because of his daughters he didn't. 

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                              @htownbrown said:

                              Nevermind.....it was his liberal opponent so it's perfectly acceptable.  The hill country weirdos will love him even more now.

                              https://www.dailywire.com/news/35320/ted-cruz-challenger-beto-orourke-tried-flee-scene-ryan-saavedra

                              George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                              htownbrown htownbrownH Reacting Well Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 2k Posts
                              • 685 Reputation
                              htownbrownH htownbrown wrote on last edited by
                              #33

                              @jbluhm86 said:

                              George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                              Attempting to flee the scene (not taking responsibility) is the real character flaw here.  But for the record, I have never liked Bush and wish Forbes had won the primary in 2000.  You could go further than just DUIs with Bush, but that would be whataboutism.  Right?

                              “It is impossible to get a man to understand something if his livelihood depends on him not understanding.”
                              F 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • htownbrownH htownbrown

                                @jbluhm86 said:

                                George Bush's DUI arrest didn't seem to put a damper on people voting him in as the Governor of Texas and the President - twice, so I don't see what the hoopla is over this guy getting a DUI either. 

                                Attempting to flee the scene (not taking responsibility) is the real character flaw here.  But for the record, I have never liked Bush and wish Forbes had won the primary in 2000.  You could go further than just DUIs with Bush, but that would be whataboutism.  Right?

                                FairHooker11 F Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                                • 4k Posts
                                • 2k Reputation
                                F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by
                                #34

                                @htownbrown said:

                                Attempting to flee the scene (not taking responsibility) is the real character flaw here.  But for the record, I have never liked Bush and wish Forbes had won the primary in 2000.  You could go further than just DUIs with Bush, but that would be whataboutism.  Right?

                                your talking about fleet of foot Beto right? 

                                in fact am I the only one so far to bring up his name among all the cheap shot posts on Cruz and Bush? ? 

                                I could care less over this guys character flaws because we already know the managed agenda on this  - he is on the ticket and the DNC has alot at stake

                                that said, if I were a Texan, I sure would vote Cruz back into senate

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply

                                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                Register Login
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                Theme
                                • System
                                • Light
                                • Dark
                                The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Forums
                                • Recent
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Donate