GOODBYE ZANE!
-
And i see the lesson took well!?
well done sir well done
-
and zombo through me off for punctuation wtf I have never been about tossing anyone
The problem is- we cant throw Ghoolie off, even though we'd like to. He got warned by none other than the board owner, and that calmed him down for less than a week. Back to the same old, same old.
-
And i see the lesson took well!?
Thanks I needed a good belly laugh
-
The problem is- we cant throw Ghoolie off, even though we'd like to. He got warned by none other than the board owner, and that calmed him down for less than a week. Back to the same old, same old.
oh I apologize for a misunderstanding I just do not agree with tossing anyone at all
except for are kicker
-
The problem is- we cant throw Ghoolie off, even though we'd like to. He got warned by none other than the board owner, and that calmed him down for less than a week. Back to the same old, same old.
oh I apologize for a misunderstanding I just do not agree with tossing anyone at all
except for are kicker
oh I apologize for a misunderstanding I just do not agree with tossing anyone at all
except for are kicker
Syd, I've been doing this a long time. There's a difference between difference of opinion, and posting stuff that's factually wrong. Or spewing opinions as fact that can't be backed up, like Gordon got cut because he was drunk and high.
Ghoolie's been told- and we have the green light from the board owner. Spewing crap just to get a response isn't going to be tolerated anymore, and is going to get deleted. Need examples? Garrett had a bad or mediocre game. OK. It wasn't Gonzalez's fault we lost that game- sorry, factually 90% false. Trolling.
-
oh I apologize for a misunderstanding I just do not agree with tossing anyone at all
except for are kicker
Syd, I've been doing this a long time. There's a difference between difference of opinion, and posting stuff that's factually wrong. Or spewing opinions as fact that can't be backed up, like Gordon got cut because he was drunk and high.
Ghoolie's been told- and we have the green light from the board owner. Spewing crap just to get a response isn't going to be tolerated anymore, and is going to get deleted. Need examples? Garrett had a bad or mediocre game. OK. It wasn't Gonzalez's fault we lost that game- sorry, factually 90% false. Trolling.
Syd, I've been doing this a long time. There's a difference between difference of opinion, and posting stuff that's factually wrong. Or spewing opinions as fact that can't be backed up, like Gordon got cut because he was drunk and high.
Ghoolie's been told- and we have the green light from the board owner. Spewing crap just to get a response isn't going to be tolerated anymore, and is going to get deleted. Need examples? Garrett had a bad or mediocre game. OK. It wasn't Gonzalez's fault we lost that game- sorry, factually 90% false. Trolling.
K
Ag 1969 made me laugh so all is fine with me
-
oh I apologize for a misunderstanding I just do not agree with tossing anyone at all
except for are kicker
Syd, I've been doing this a long time. There's a difference between difference of opinion, and posting stuff that's factually wrong. Or spewing opinions as fact that can't be backed up, like Gordon got cut because he was drunk and high.
Ghoolie's been told- and we have the green light from the board owner. Spewing crap just to get a response isn't going to be tolerated anymore, and is going to get deleted. Need examples? Garrett had a bad or mediocre game. OK. It wasn't Gonzalez's fault we lost that game- sorry, factually 90% false. Trolling.
Syd, I've been doing this a long time. There's a difference between difference of opinion, and posting stuff that's factually wrong. Or spewing opinions as fact that can't be backed up, like Gordon got cut because he was drunk and high.
Ghoolie's been told- and we have the green light from the board owner. Spewing crap just to get a response isn't going to be tolerated anymore, and is going to get deleted. Need examples? Garrett had a bad or mediocre game. OK. It wasn't Gonzalez's fault we lost that game- sorry, factually 90% false. Trolling.
If his posts get deleted does he still get paid by this board?
?
-
Syd, I've been doing this a long time. There's a difference between difference of opinion, and posting stuff that's factually wrong. Or spewing opinions as fact that can't be backed up, like Gordon got cut because he was drunk and high.
Ghoolie's been told- and we have the green light from the board owner. Spewing crap just to get a response isn't going to be tolerated anymore, and is going to get deleted. Need examples? Garrett had a bad or mediocre game. OK. It wasn't Gonzalez's fault we lost that game- sorry, factually 90% false. Trolling.
K
Ag 1969 made me laugh so all is fine with me
-
ghoolie has bi polar confirmed. One day he's acknwleding the work williams has done and the talent on the D, now he's back to talking about zumba instructors.
-
ghoolie has bi polar confirmed. One day he's acknwleding the work williams has done and the talent on the D, now he's back to talking about zumba instructors.
ghoolie has bi polar confirmed. One day he's acknwleding the work williams has done and the talent on the D, now he's back to talking about zumba instructors.
The ignore feature of this board is awesome.
-
ghoolie has bi polar confirmed. One day he's acknwleding the work williams has done and the talent on the D, now he's back to talking about zumba instructors.
ghoolie has bi polar confirmed. One day he's acknwleding the work williams has done and the talent on the D, now he's back to talking about zumba instructors.
That's what trolls do.
They say whatever they can to try and elicit attention.
Literally anything he says can be repudiated by something he said in the past. Sometimes the recent past.
That's why the only way you beat a troll is to ignore a troll.
-
10 points off of 8 turnovers so far this year. Offense sucks butt, like special teams does
10 points off of 8 turnovers so far this year. Offense sucks butt, like special teams does
Yea, and 7 of those came from a 1 yard drive! That's really PATHETIC!
-
@ghoolie said:
Zane isn't the reason the Browns lost. As long as this offense cannot move the ball and put up touchdowns, they will continue to lose. All this IF IF IF IF IF crap is just that. A Saints can could say if we didn't turn the ball over we would have won by 20 points. SO then what would you say? Zane lost because he didn't get to kick 6 field goals? The Browns lost because they blow.
What the hell are you talking about?
Zane missed a total of 8 points.
The Browns lost by 3.
They would have won by 5.
You never make any sense. Do you read what you write?
Oh ya, Paxton Lynch. I liked it better when you were Lumbergh.
-
@ghoolie said:
Zane isn't the reason the Browns lost. As long as this offense cannot move the ball and put up touchdowns, they will continue to lose. All this IF IF IF IF IF crap is just that. A Saints can could say if we didn't turn the ball over we would have won by 20 points. SO then what would you say? Zane lost because he didn't get to kick 6 field goals? The Browns lost because they blow.
The big difference there is when they fumble the ball they weren't running into the endzone. If they were then they could say that. Hypothetically speaking they could have scored on those drives. But there is no hypothetical when it comes to Zane missing those kicks if they go through the uprights they're worth 1 point 1 Point 3 points and 3 points. No ifs ands or buts about it they are worth that amount. The fumbles on a drive unless they are running into the endzone and drop it before crossing the goal line does not mean if they had held onto it they would have gotten six points. They could have gotten six points not would have scored. If Zane makes all his kicks we WOULD have gotten 8 points
-
-
BROWNS ANNOUNCE PLANS FOR THURSDAY IN CASE ZANE IS STILL ON THE TEAM .....
-
I was going to be quiet, but when someone constantly tells everyone how he is smarter than everyone, and that he could do a better job, and that the Browns refuse to get the top playmakers in a draft, yea time to be called out.
Mind you, these were the top playmakers taken at the time of or after the Browns drafted, and NOT by the Browns, so you cant say it was the dumb Browns FO. I even left Julio Jones. Now I did give you your boy Lynch since he was the QB you wanted.
2009- Percy Harvin
2010- CJ Spiller
2011- Julio Jones
2012- Trent Richardson
2013- Tavon Austin
2014- Sammy Watkins
2015- Devante Parker
2016- Paxton Lynch
2017- Mitch Trubisky
So here is Ghoolie depth chart with these TOP PLAYMAKERS
QB- Paxton Lynch, Mitch Trubisky
RB- CJ Spiller, Trent Richardson
WR- Julio Jones, Percy Harvin, Tavon Austin, Sammy Watkins, Devante Parker
-
-
I was going to be quiet, but when someone constantly tells everyone how he is smarter than everyone, and that he could do a better job, and that the Browns refuse to get the top playmakers in a draft, yea time to be called out.
Mind you, these were the top playmakers taken at the time of or after the Browns drafted, and NOT by the Browns, so you cant say it was the dumb Browns FO. I even left Julio Jones. Now I did give you your boy Lynch since he was the QB you wanted.
2009- Percy Harvin
2010- CJ Spiller
2011- Julio Jones
2012- Trent Richardson
2013- Tavon Austin
2014- Sammy Watkins
2015- Devante Parker
2016- Paxton Lynch
2017- Mitch Trubisky
So here is Ghoolie depth chart with these TOP PLAYMAKERS
QB- Paxton Lynch, Mitch Trubisky
RB- CJ Spiller, Trent Richardson
WR- Julio Jones, Percy Harvin, Tavon Austin, Sammy Watkins, Devante Parker
I was going to be quiet, but when someone constantly tells everyone how he is smarter than everyone, and that he could do a better job, and that the Browns refuse to get the top playmakers in a draft, yea time to be called out.
Mind you, these were the top playmakers taken at the time of or after the Browns drafted, and NOT by the Browns, so you cant say it was the dumb Browns FO. I even left Julio Jones. Now I did give you your boy Lynch since he was the QB you wanted.
2009- Percy Harvin
2010- CJ Spiller
2011- Julio Jones
2012- Trent Richardson
2013- Tavon Austin
2014- Sammy Watkins
2015- Devante Parker
2016- Paxton Lynch
2017- Mitch Trubisky
So here is Ghoolie depth chart with these TOP PLAYMAKERS
QB- Paxton Lynch, Mitch Trubisky
RB- CJ Spiller, Trent Richardson
WR- Julio Jones, Percy Harvin, Tavon Austin, Sammy Watkins, Devante Parker
You left out Barkley the Dog. He's 0-2 after tonight and no TD's today.
-
I was going to be quiet, but when someone constantly tells everyone how he is smarter than everyone, and that he could do a better job, and that the Browns refuse to get the top playmakers in a draft, yea time to be called out.
Mind you, these were the top playmakers taken at the time of or after the Browns drafted, and NOT by the Browns, so you cant say it was the dumb Browns FO. I even left Julio Jones. Now I did give you your boy Lynch since he was the QB you wanted.
2009- Percy Harvin
2010- CJ Spiller
2011- Julio Jones
2012- Trent Richardson
2013- Tavon Austin
2014- Sammy Watkins
2015- Devante Parker
2016- Paxton Lynch
2017- Mitch Trubisky
So here is Ghoolie depth chart with these TOP PLAYMAKERS
QB- Paxton Lynch, Mitch Trubisky
RB- CJ Spiller, Trent Richardson
WR- Julio Jones, Percy Harvin, Tavon Austin, Sammy Watkins, Devante Parker
You left out Barkley the Dog. He's 0-2 after tonight and no TD's today.
You left out Barkley the Dog. He's 0-2 after tonight and no TD's today.
Technically Baker would be, he was the top playmaker, and at one point in offseason he was the best player according to you know who. I just left this year out
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login