Skip to content

GOODBYE ZANE!

The Browns Board
156 51 4.6k 2
  • ghoolie has bi polar confirmed. One day he's acknwleding the work williams has done and the talent on the D, now he's back to talking about zumba instructors.

    @clevfan4life said:

    ghoolie has bi polar confirmed. One day he's acknwleding the work williams has done and the talent on the D, now he's back to talking about zumba instructors.

    The ignore feature of this board is awesome. 

  • ghoolie has bi polar confirmed. One day he's acknwleding the work williams has done and the talent on the D, now he's back to talking about zumba instructors.

    @clevfan4life said:

    ghoolie has bi polar confirmed. One day he's acknwleding the work williams has done and the talent on the D, now he's back to talking about zumba instructors.

    That's what trolls do. 

    They say whatever they can to try and elicit attention.

    Literally anything he says can be repudiated by something he said in the past. Sometimes the recent past.

    That's why the only way you beat a troll is to ignore a troll. 

  • 10 points off of 8 turnovers so far this year. Offense sucks butt, like special teams does

    @typicalbrowns50 said:

    10 points off of 8 turnovers so far this year. Offense sucks butt, like special teams does

    Yea, and 7 of those came from a 1 yard drive! That's really PATHETIC!

  • @ghoolie said:

    Zane isn't the reason the Browns lost. As long as this offense cannot move the ball and put up touchdowns, they will continue to lose. All this IF IF IF IF IF crap is just that. A Saints can could say if we didn't turn the ball over we would have won by 20 points. SO then what would you say? Zane lost because he didn't get to kick 6 field goals? The Browns lost because they blow.

    What the hell are you talking about? 

    Zane missed a total of 8 points. 

    The Browns lost by 3. 

    They would have won by 5. 

    You never make any sense. Do you read what you write?  

    Oh ya, Paxton Lynch. I liked it better when you were Lumbergh.

  • @ghoolie said:

    Zane isn't the reason the Browns lost. As long as this offense cannot move the ball and put up touchdowns, they will continue to lose. All this IF IF IF IF IF crap is just that. A Saints can could say if we didn't turn the ball over we would have won by 20 points. SO then what would you say? Zane lost because he didn't get to kick 6 field goals? The Browns lost because they blow.

    The big difference there is when they fumble the ball they weren't running into the endzone. If they were then they could say that. Hypothetically speaking they could have scored on those drives. But there is no hypothetical when it comes to Zane missing those kicks if they go through the uprights they're worth 1 point 1 Point 3 points and 3 points. No ifs ands or buts about it they are worth that amount. The fumbles on a drive unless they are running into the endzone and drop it before crossing the goal line does not mean if they had held onto it they would have gotten six points. They could have gotten six points not would have scored. If Zane makes all his kicks we WOULD have gotten 8 points

  • Gostkowski missed a FG, Raiders miss PAT... not a good day for kickers today.

    @marc1971 said:

    Gostkowski missed a FG, Raiders miss PAT... not a good day for kickers today.

    Boswell missed a FG as well.

  • BROWNS ANNOUNCE PLANS FOR THURSDAY IN CASE ZANE IS STILL ON THE TEAM .....

    movinggoalpost.gif

  • I was going to be quiet, but when someone constantly tells everyone how he is smarter than everyone, and that he could do a better job, and that the Browns refuse to get the top playmakers in a draft, yea time to be called out.

    Mind you, these were the top playmakers taken at the time of or after the Browns drafted, and NOT by the Browns, so you cant say it was the dumb Browns FO. I even left Julio Jones. Now I did give you your boy Lynch since he was the QB you wanted.

    2009- Percy Harvin

    2010- CJ Spiller

    2011- Julio Jones 

    2012- Trent Richardson 

    2013- Tavon Austin 

    2014- Sammy Watkins

    2015- Devante Parker 

    2016- Paxton Lynch 

    2017- Mitch Trubisky 

    So here is Ghoolie depth chart with these TOP PLAYMAKERS

    QB- Paxton Lynch, Mitch Trubisky 

    RB- CJ Spiller, Trent Richardson 

    WR- Julio Jones, Percy Harvin, Tavon Austin, Sammy Watkins, Devante Parker 

  • BROWNS ANNOUNCE PLANS FOR THURSDAY IN CASE ZANE IS STILL ON THE TEAM .....

    movinggoalpost.gif

    @darren15 said:

    BROWNS ANNOUNCE PLANS FOR THURSDAY IN CASE ZANE IS STILL ON THE TEAM .....

    movinggoalpost.gif

    Thank God he's being activated. Watching him just sitting still in the dome was a killer for the Browns.?

  • I was going to be quiet, but when someone constantly tells everyone how he is smarter than everyone, and that he could do a better job, and that the Browns refuse to get the top playmakers in a draft, yea time to be called out.

    Mind you, these were the top playmakers taken at the time of or after the Browns drafted, and NOT by the Browns, so you cant say it was the dumb Browns FO. I even left Julio Jones. Now I did give you your boy Lynch since he was the QB you wanted.

    2009- Percy Harvin

    2010- CJ Spiller

    2011- Julio Jones 

    2012- Trent Richardson 

    2013- Tavon Austin 

    2014- Sammy Watkins

    2015- Devante Parker 

    2016- Paxton Lynch 

    2017- Mitch Trubisky 

    So here is Ghoolie depth chart with these TOP PLAYMAKERS

    QB- Paxton Lynch, Mitch Trubisky 

    RB- CJ Spiller, Trent Richardson 

    WR- Julio Jones, Percy Harvin, Tavon Austin, Sammy Watkins, Devante Parker 

    @gunz41 said:

    I was going to be quiet, but when someone constantly tells everyone how he is smarter than everyone, and that he could do a better job, and that the Browns refuse to get the top playmakers in a draft, yea time to be called out.

    Mind you, these were the top playmakers taken at the time of or after the Browns drafted, and NOT by the Browns, so you cant say it was the dumb Browns FO. I even left Julio Jones. Now I did give you your boy Lynch since he was the QB you wanted.

    2009- Percy Harvin

    2010- CJ Spiller

    2011- Julio Jones 

    2012- Trent Richardson 

    2013- Tavon Austin 

    2014- Sammy Watkins

    2015- Devante Parker 

    2016- Paxton Lynch 

    2017- Mitch Trubisky 

    So here is Ghoolie depth chart with these TOP PLAYMAKERS

    QB- Paxton Lynch, Mitch Trubisky 

    RB- CJ Spiller, Trent Richardson 

    WR- Julio Jones, Percy Harvin, Tavon Austin, Sammy Watkins, Devante Parker 

    You left out Barkley the Dog. He's 0-2 after tonight and no TD's today.

  • @gunz41 said:

    I was going to be quiet, but when someone constantly tells everyone how he is smarter than everyone, and that he could do a better job, and that the Browns refuse to get the top playmakers in a draft, yea time to be called out.

    Mind you, these were the top playmakers taken at the time of or after the Browns drafted, and NOT by the Browns, so you cant say it was the dumb Browns FO. I even left Julio Jones. Now I did give you your boy Lynch since he was the QB you wanted.

    2009- Percy Harvin

    2010- CJ Spiller

    2011- Julio Jones 

    2012- Trent Richardson 

    2013- Tavon Austin 

    2014- Sammy Watkins

    2015- Devante Parker 

    2016- Paxton Lynch 

    2017- Mitch Trubisky 

    So here is Ghoolie depth chart with these TOP PLAYMAKERS

    QB- Paxton Lynch, Mitch Trubisky 

    RB- CJ Spiller, Trent Richardson 

    WR- Julio Jones, Percy Harvin, Tavon Austin, Sammy Watkins, Devante Parker 

    You left out Barkley the Dog. He's 0-2 after tonight and no TD's today.

    @texasag1969 said:

    You left out Barkley the Dog. He's 0-2 after tonight and no TD's today.

    Technically Baker would be, he was the top playmaker, and at one point in offseason he was the best player according to you know who. I just left this year out

  • srsly, which one of u kunts played soccer in HS? present urself in berea tommorrow. 

    @clevfan4life said:

    srsly, which one of u kunts played soccer in HS? present urself in berea tommorrow. 

    Please they didn’t play soccer when I was in high school it’s truePlease they didn’t play soccer when I was in high school it’s true

  • @syd said:

    and zombo through me off for punctuation wtf I have never been about tossing anyone 

    The problem is- we cant throw Ghoolie off, even though we'd like to. He got warned by none other than the board owner, and that calmed him down for less than a week. Back to the same old, same old. 

    @hoorta said:

    The problem is- we cant throw Ghoolie off, even though we'd like to. He got warned by none other than the board owner, and that calmed him down for less than a week. Back to the same old, same old. 

    As bad as his trolling may be the fact is that Tommy is often completely in accurate and wrong about his statement of facts he just doesn’t pay attention to what happens in the gamesAs bad as his trolling may be the fact is that Tommy is often completely in accurate and wrong about his statement of facts he just doesn’t pay attention to what happens in the games

  • @clevfan4life said:

    srsly, which one of u kunts played soccer in HS? present urself in berea tommorrow. 

    Please they didn’t play soccer when I was in high school it’s truePlease they didn’t play soccer when I was in high school it’s true

    @the-gipper said:

    Please they didn’t play soccer when I was in high school it’s truePlease they didn’t play soccer when I was in high school it’s true

    rugby man and the drop kick

  • @ghoolie said:

    Can you show me where the board owner "warned me?

    Look, I haven't posted anything questionable, just things that upset you. Zane is not the problem with the Browns. No offensive weapons, a dink and dump offense, wasting top draft picks on Zumba instructors and passing on offensive weapons is NOT a way to build a winning team. Anything that goes against what you two azzholes want as a narrative, you now call trolling.

    Dude, Haley and WIlliams are a problem. If you don't think Dorsey isn't now in a hot seat you are the one who is batschidt crazy. This guy is supposedly a talent genius and the Browns are literally self-destructing before our very eyes. In case you haven't noticed, our not-winning streak has been extended to 18 in a row. If you think that's progress, then why not put WIlliams, Dorkey, and Haley into your imaginary HOF with Blow Thomas?

    47 yard Calloway TD (in the air mind you) = dink and dump in Trollie's mind.   

  • @ghoolie said:

    Can you show me where the board owner "warned me?

    Dude, Haley and WIlliams are a problem. If you don't think Dorsey isn't now in a hot seat you are the one who is batschidt crazy. This guy is supposedly a talent genius and the Browns are literally self-destructing before our very eyes. In case you haven't noticed, our not-winning streak has been extended to 18 in a row. If you think that's progress, then why not put WIlliams, Dorkey, and Haley into your imaginary HOF with Blow Thomas?

    1) you have a reading comprehension problem. 

    2) OMG, we're 0-1-1 against two teams that are supposed to be Super Bowl contenders and Chicken Little says the sky is falling. Yeah- Hoorta was expecting a Saint's blowout with Gordon gone and Kirksey not playing. Didn't happen. Anyone who had the Browns covering the ridiculous spread did quite well in Vegas. The fact is Trollie, the Browns proved in the first two games they can hang with anyone in the NFL- and are a few breaks away from being 2-0. They aren't getting blown out like the Buffalo Bills -55 point differential to date. 

    3) How bout that Saquon Barkley? - A real game changer- Giants have a worse record (0-2) than the Browns with your stud RB, WR, and 2X Super Bowl winning qb. Man that great offense couldn't even beat the Cowboys. No one is predicting the Cowboys making the Super Bowl.  😁 😁 😁 

    Finally, Joe Thomas will be in the HOF- sorry to tell you Paxton Lynch will not be. 

  • Something to remember each and every time Ghoolie posts:

    Bill Walsh used to say that he never wanted to spend good draft picks on offensive skill players, because he could and should be using schemes, not raw talent, to move the ball on offense. He spent most of his high picks on defenders, since defense is harder to scheme.

  • As we start winning and get new people to the board...we dont need fecal fountain pissing off new members with his drivel

  • @hoorta said:

    The problem is- we cant throw Ghoolie off, even though we'd like to. He got warned by none other than the board owner, and that calmed him down for less than a week. Back to the same old, same old. 

    As bad as his trolling may be the fact is that Tommy is often completely in accurate and wrong about his statement of facts he just doesn’t pay attention to what happens in the gamesAs bad as his trolling may be the fact is that Tommy is often completely in accurate and wrong about his statement of facts he just doesn’t pay attention to what happens in the games

    @the-gipper said:

    As bad as his trolling may be the fact is that Tommy is often completely in accurate and wrong about his statement of facts he just doesn’t pay attention to what happens in the gamesAs bad as his trolling may be the fact is that Tommy is often completely in accurate and wrong about his statement of facts he just doesn’t pay attention to what happens in the games

    Take it to the poly board................................oh Tommy......................I thought you said ?................................never mind.?

  • Since the Browns' return:

    Our 1st of MANY non winning QBs wore #2 (Couch wasn't awful, but that was our new beginning), manziel wore #2, now the kicker. Talk about a number with a negative history!!

    The Jersey #2 has lead us NOWHERE, therefore I have a question. Should the #2 EVER be made available to a Browns' player in Cleveland again?

    AAAAARRRRRGH!!!!! I HATE the #2!!!!!!!

    Mike