Skip to content

Josh Gordon Traded to Pats

The Browns Board
853 73 21.3k 2
  • I'll take Barkley and Gordon on Sunday and you can have May-never-see-the-field and Rashard Higgins- wonder who would win? lol

  • I'll take Barkley and Gordon on Sunday and you can have May-never-see-the-field and Rashard Higgins- wonder who would win? lol

    @poeticg said:

    I'll take Barkley and Gordon on Sunday and you can have May-never-see-the-field and Rashard Higgins- wonder who would win? lol

    Who said this?  

    Ill take Jerry Rice and Emmitt Smith, you can take Mohammed Massaquoi.  Is this how this works?

  • The flip flopping attitudes crack me up.  Calling for dorseys head now?  Lol.  I guess its part of being a fan...constantly flip flopping.

    If you cant see any improvement in the team or talent then you have blinders on.  

    This isnt a pain free process.  Patience is a virtue.  Ill prefer to stay positive instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

  • @mark-o said:

    Kendricks who?  The guy who's going to jail?

    Who Shmucking cares about him.   He's gone.

    The one who won the Superbowl last year and who is now in Seattle with a deal. 

    It's cool we don't need good players in Cleveland- we root for the TEAM- lose or tie. 

    @poeticg said:

    The one who won the Superbowl last year and who is now in Seattle with a deal. 

    It's cool we don't need good players in Cleveland- we root for the TEAM- lose or tie. 

    Ahh, I thought I watched the Super Bowl, I guess I didnt since apparently Kendricks won the game for them.

    I actually have zero problem with you liking certain players. And even less problem with looking at a player for his talent level. That is what fans do. Me, while I try to remember to think of the man first and try not to I look at it with a coaches eyes, which isnt nearly as fun.

    But what I dont understand, not like I have a real problem with it, is overvaluing players and just completely talking bad about a team you supposedly like. It's just like saying Barkley was the best ever, and now so much about Gordon. They have A LOT of talent, but Barkley cant single handedly win a game (which has been shown), and Gordon cant be relied upon. Yes he played a few games last year, and the 1st game this year. Before that it had been over 2 years, and then he misses last week. 

    So in the coaches mind, whether a great or terrible coach, has designs on prep that they put in. And you said how much better he is than the others, which is true, but exactly how do you replace what you have worked on all week when he suddenly cant play, whether 1 game or the year?

    Unfortunately, things arent always on who has the most talent. There are a whole lot of other things to consider

  • Hm, imagine if our first pick of the draft was actually playing on Sunday instead of watching helpless from the sideline like Gordon. Sheet, we should just release Baker since we can't trust him to win games or show up on gameday. It's not like we're paying him millions of dollars to watch Tie-rod lose on Sunday... oh, wait....

    @poeticg said:

    Hm, imagine if our first pick of the draft was actually playing on Sunday instead of watching helpless from the sideline like Gordon. Sheet, we should just release Baker since we can't trust him to win games or show up on gameday. It's not like we're paying him millions of dollars to watch Tie-rod lose on Sunday... oh, wait....

    Why are you all so hell bent on ruining qb's? Baker doesn't need to start as tyrod is plenty capable.  Do you think baker is going to go out and perform substantially better than tyrod as a rookie? Let the f*cking kid develop behind tyrod so when he does start he's actually ready for a change.

  • @poeticg said:

    The one who won the Superbowl last year and who is now in Seattle with a deal. 

    It's cool we don't need good players in Cleveland- we root for the TEAM- lose or tie. 

    Ahh, I thought I watched the Super Bowl, I guess I didnt since apparently Kendricks won the game for them.

    I actually have zero problem with you liking certain players. And even less problem with looking at a player for his talent level. That is what fans do. Me, while I try to remember to think of the man first and try not to I look at it with a coaches eyes, which isnt nearly as fun.

    But what I dont understand, not like I have a real problem with it, is overvaluing players and just completely talking bad about a team you supposedly like. It's just like saying Barkley was the best ever, and now so much about Gordon. They have A LOT of talent, but Barkley cant single handedly win a game (which has been shown), and Gordon cant be relied upon. Yes he played a few games last year, and the 1st game this year. Before that it had been over 2 years, and then he misses last week. 

    So in the coaches mind, whether a great or terrible coach, has designs on prep that they put in. And you said how much better he is than the others, which is true, but exactly how do you replace what you have worked on all week when he suddenly cant play, whether 1 game or the year?

    Unfortunately, things arent always on who has the most talent. There are a whole lot of other things to consider

    @gunz41 said:

    Ahh, I thought I watched the Super Bowl, I guess I didnt since apparently Kendricks won the game for them.

    I actually have zero problem with you liking certain players. And even less problem with looking at a player for his talent level. That is what fans do. Me, while I try to remember to think of the man first and try not to I look at it with a coaches eyes, which isnt nearly as fun.

    But what I dont understand, not like I have a real problem with it, is overvaluing players and just completely talking bad about a team you supposedly like. It's just like saying Barkley was the best ever, and now so much about Gordon. They have A LOT of talent, but Barkley cant single handedly win a game (which has been shown), and Gordon cant be relied upon. Yes he played a few games last year, and the 1st game this year. Before that it had been over 2 years, and then he misses last week. 

    So in the coaches mind, whether a great or terrible coach, has designs on prep that they put in. And you said how much better he is than the others, which is true, but exactly how do you replace what you have worked on all week when he suddenly cant play, whether 1 game or the year?

    Unfortunately, things arent always on who has the most talent. There are a whole lot of other things to consider

    No there really isn’t.  The Jags are better than the Browns because position by position they have more talent.  Are there positions that are more important, sure, but don’t fool yourself into thinking culture means more than talent.

  • Per Ian Rappaport, Josh had an MRI on his hamstring today and it's totally fine and he will play/start on Sunday.  How the Shmuck does he get ruled out TWO DAYS ago, and then in TWO DAYS TIME his hamstring is totally fine?

  • And his hamstring was totally fine on FRIDAY?  And how the Shmuck do you injure a hamstring at a photo shoot anyhow?

  • Per Ian Rappaport, Josh had an MRI on his hamstring today and it's totally fine and he will play/start on Sunday.  How the Shmuck does he get ruled out TWO DAYS ago, and then in TWO DAYS TIME his hamstring is totally fine?

    @onkyoreceiver said:

    Per Ian Rappaport, Josh had an MRI on his hamstring today and it's totally fine and he will play/start on Sunday.  How the Shmuck does he get ruled out TWO DAYS ago, and then in TWO DAYS TIME his hamstring is totally fine?

    Hue and his power trip. This team HATES him. 

  • @poeticg said:

    Hm, imagine if our first pick of the draft was actually playing on Sunday instead of watching helpless from the sideline like Gordon. Sheet, we should just release Baker since we can't trust him to win games or show up on gameday. It's not like we're paying him millions of dollars to watch Tie-rod lose on Sunday... oh, wait....

    Why are you all so hell bent on ruining qb's? Baker doesn't need to start as tyrod is plenty capable.  Do you think baker is going to go out and perform substantially better than tyrod as a rookie? Let the f*cking kid develop behind tyrod so when he does start he's actually ready for a change.

    @vagitron said:

    Why are you all so hell bent on ruining qb's? Baker doesn't need to start as tyrod is plenty capable.  Do you think baker is going to go out and perform substantially better than tyrod as a rookie? Let the f*cking kid develop behind tyrod so when he does start he's actually ready for a change.

    I’m in the “don’t get Baker killed” camp but if I’m trumpeting best man for the job and Baker is better than Tyrod and still sitting, how is that received in the locker room?

    worse yet f he isn’t better than Taylor, what does that say about him

  • And his hamstring was totally fine on FRIDAY?  And how the Shmuck do you injure a hamstring at a photo shoot anyhow?

    @onkyoreceiver said:

    And his hamstring was totally fine on FRIDAY?  And how the Shmuck do you injure a hamstring at a photo shoot anyhow?

    Its cowpoop. 

    Gordon was fine at practice Friday, shows up late Saturday, then says he hurt his hamstring, then its fine. 

    Just like Gordon's training camp disappearance. 

    The guy is a world-class headcase, and it should be obvious that he wanted nothing to do with being a Cleveland Brown. 

  • @onkyoreceiver said:

    And his hamstring was totally fine on FRIDAY?  And how the Shmuck do you injure a hamstring at a photo shoot anyhow?

    Its cowpoop. 

    Gordon was fine at practice Friday, shows up late Saturday, then says he hurt his hamstring, then its fine. 

    Just like Gordon's training camp disappearance. 

    The guy is a world-class headcase, and it should be obvious that he wanted nothing to do with being a Cleveland Brown. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    Its cowpoop. 

    Gordon was fine at practice Friday, shows up late Saturday, then says he hurt his hamstring, then its fine. 

    Just like Gordon's training camp disappearance. 

    The guy is a world-class headcase, and it should be obvious that he wanted nothing to do with being a Cleveland Brown. 

    Maybe he didn't want anything to do with Hue. Shmucking joke butt piece of garbage. Can't inspire, can't lead, can't win. Trash.

  • @onkyoreceiver said:

    And his hamstring was totally fine on FRIDAY?  And how the Shmuck do you injure a hamstring at a photo shoot anyhow?

    Its cowpoop. 

    Gordon was fine at practice Friday, shows up late Saturday, then says he hurt his hamstring, then its fine. 

    Just like Gordon's training camp disappearance. 

    The guy is a world-class headcase, and it should be obvious that he wanted nothing to do with being a Cleveland Brown. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    The guy is a world-class headcase, and it should be obvious that he wanted nothing to do with being a Cleveland Brown. 

    Its obvious to everyone except for the fans who don't pay attention to such things and think the Browns should continue to kiss this guys ass.   They're the same people who are blame the team for players leaving as a free agent.

  • @dutch-oven said:

    The guy is a world-class headcase, and it should be obvious that he wanted nothing to do with being a Cleveland Brown. 

    Its obvious to everyone except for the fans who don't pay attention to such things and think the Browns should continue to kiss this guys ass.   They're the same people who are blame the team for players leaving as a free agent.

    @mark-o said:

    Its obvious to everyone except for the fans who don't pay attention to such things and think the Browns should continue to kiss this guys butt.   They're the same people who are blame the team for players leaving as a free agent.

    Enablers. 

    I'm actually enjoying the butthurt from Gordon fanboys. 

  • Look at the whack job they have created in pittspuke with AB...probably more hated than lev bell

  • He didn’t wanna be a Brown. Who gives a sh**. He did what’s best for him and his career. Time to move on

    I just hope Cleveland gets a chance to play against him...

  • Brady's magic Dr/guru or whatever, will hook Gordon up with "everything he needs"... Those Pats are sneaky shits!

  • Brady's magic Dr/guru or whatever, will hook Gordon up with "everything he needs"... Those Pats are sneaky shits!

    @falcon7 said:

    Brady's magic Dr/guru or whatever will hook Gordon up with "everything he needs"... Those Pats are sneaky shits!

    If he tries any the crap he did here he will be gone.  Bellichek dont play around

  • @mark-o said:

    Its obvious to everyone except for the fans who don't pay attention to such things and think the Browns should continue to kiss this guys butt.   They're the same people who are blame the team for players leaving as a free agent.

    Enablers. 

    I'm actually enjoying the butthurt from Gordon fanboys. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    Enablers. 

    I'm actually enjoying the butthurt from Gordon fanboys. 

    He is a absurd talent finally on the mend and they trade him to the pats for a 5th. It's moronic.

  • @gunz41 said:

    Ahh, I thought I watched the Super Bowl, I guess I didnt since apparently Kendricks won the game for them.

    I actually have zero problem with you liking certain players. And even less problem with looking at a player for his talent level. That is what fans do. Me, while I try to remember to think of the man first and try not to I look at it with a coaches eyes, which isnt nearly as fun.

    But what I dont understand, not like I have a real problem with it, is overvaluing players and just completely talking bad about a team you supposedly like. It's just like saying Barkley was the best ever, and now so much about Gordon. They have A LOT of talent, but Barkley cant single handedly win a game (which has been shown), and Gordon cant be relied upon. Yes he played a few games last year, and the 1st game this year. Before that it had been over 2 years, and then he misses last week. 

    So in the coaches mind, whether a great or terrible coach, has designs on prep that they put in. And you said how much better he is than the others, which is true, but exactly how do you replace what you have worked on all week when he suddenly cant play, whether 1 game or the year?

    Unfortunately, things arent always on who has the most talent. There are a whole lot of other things to consider

    No there really isn’t.  The Jags are better than the Browns because position by position they have more talent.  Are there positions that are more important, sure, but don’t fool yourself into thinking culture means more than talent.

    @baconhound said:

    No there really isn’t.  The Jags are better than the Browns because position by position they have more talent.  Are there positions that are more important, sure, but don’t fool yourself into thinking culture means more than talent.

    Alright, you obviously aren't going to listen to anything anybody says. Which is fine. 

    Then what a team needs to do is in the draft take the top 5 LT available, 3 slot receivers, and then sign the top 5 DEs.

    Since it is ALL about talent, play all 5 along the line, put 2 of the slots out wide, and run a 4-3 with 4 DE and 1 at MLB. Since the pass rusher is 2nd most important position, having 5 out there is the best call right