Question
-
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
except her story is full of holes. Her alleged witnesses are denying her story.
:"Innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to the left, per the left.
nazis were above the law, too. The left is now going after conservatives like
the nazis went after the Jews.
the left has their own brownshirts as final leverage.
Being not guilty is not the same as "we wish and say he's guilty because of our fuhrer (read: "leftwing ideology"
-
She should be prosecuted for lying under oath, and also after her interview with the FBI, lying to them also. Then sued by Justice Kavanaugh for slander.
-
its interesting he hasnt taken a rebuttal polygraph
its interesting he hasnt taken a rebuttal polygraph
Those aren't admissible in a court of law for a reason. I personally know a guy who skated on one. What's more interesting is that she hasn't taken one not administered by Democrat operatives which has been said to be unreliable because of her supposed emotional state.
WSS
-
The Dems better be careful asking for an FBI investigation.
I’m sure there’s several things they’re going to look into...like Ford’s recently closed social media accounts.
Not to mention that big fat Go Fund Me account that’s currently sitting over $500k.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
If, and if is the key word, you support giving someone a pass for making false statements that can ruin someone's life I think that's a pretty fuked-up position.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
Last I heard, Roy Moore’s accusers are being sued.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
Last I heard, Roy Moore’s accusers are being sued.
Last I heard, Roy Moore’s accusers are being sued.
If they are found guilty hope there's jail time. Hey Woody would you feel the same way about a white supremacist female who falsley accused a negro of sexual assault?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
If, and if is the key word, you support giving someone a pass for making false statements that can ruin someone's life I think that's a pretty fuked-up position.
WSS
If, and if is the key word, you support giving someone a pass for making false statements that can ruin someone's life I think that's a pretty fuked-up position.
WSS
No, it isn't.
Just like it needs to be proven that he committed this crimes, it would need to be proven that she purposefully falsely accused him.
There is a middle ground in there where neither is proven in a court of law.
I know some of you on here have a hard time with things that aren't black and white though
-
Last I heard, Roy Moore’s accusers are being sued.
If they are found guilty hope there's jail time. Hey Woody would you feel the same way about a white supremacist female who falsley accused a negro of sexual assault?
WSS
If they are found guilty hope there's jail time. Hey Woody would you feel the same way about a white supremacist female who falsley accused a negro of sexual assault?
WSS
I have no idea what you're even talking about now. I'm not sure what kind of "gotcha" you're going for.
It isn't that hard to follow. A man not getting convicted of sexual assault in a court of law is not the same thing as proving the alleged victim made up the story in a court of law.
This isn't hard...
-
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
except her story is full of holes. Her alleged witnesses are denying her story.
:"Innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to the left, per the left.
nazis were above the law, too. The left is now going after conservatives like
the nazis went after the Jews.
the left has their own brownshirts as final leverage.
Being not guilty is not the same as "we wish and say he's guilty because of our fuhrer (read: "leftwing ideology"
except her story is full of holes. Her alleged witnesses are denying her story.
:"Innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to the left, per the left.
nazis were above the law, too. The left is now going after conservatives like
the nazis went after the Jews.
the left has their own brownshirts as final leverage.
Being not guilty is not the same as "we wish and say he's guilty because of our fuhrer (read: "leftwing ideology"
You're insane btw
"Conservatives today are just like jews during the holocaust"
.....
if the blaze told you to stop breathing you'd drop dead
-
I'm happy with the developments of the day.
If any of the allegations are shown to be true and Kavanaugh was lying under oath then Kananaugh is history... including removal from the DC Court of Appeals.
If the allegations are shown to be false and Cavanaugh was truthful in his testimony, then he should be confirmed 100-0.
Should she then be prosecuted?
WSS
Should she then be prosecuted?
Prosecuted? If the investigation produces evidence that she "made sh!t up", then yes. A Grand Jury would likely indict and she would be tried.
That's how the process works.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
except her story is full of holes. Her alleged witnesses are denying her story.
:"Innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to the left, per the left.
nazis were above the law, too. The left is now going after conservatives like
the nazis went after the Jews.
the left has their own brownshirts as final leverage.
Being not guilty is not the same as "we wish and say he's guilty because of our fuhrer (read: "leftwing ideology"
except her story is full of holes. Her alleged witnesses are denying her story.
:"Innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to the left, per the left.
nazis were above the law, too. The left is now going after conservatives like
the nazis went after the Jews.
the left has their own brownshirts as final leverage.
Being not guilty is not the same as "we wish and say he's guilty because of our fuhrer (read: "leftwing ideology"
cal, what is it that drives you to win every race to the bottom?
First... holes. She has gaps in her memory of the event. This is common in PTSD cases. One of the principle symptoms is "intrusive memories", a/k/a flashbacks.
Second... "denying" is an interesting choice here. How can someone deny they did not see an event at a party on an unknown date at an unknown time in an unknown place?
Your "denials" take the form of "I do not recall". Which is not an explicit denial. The exception to this point is Mark Whats-his-face. We'll see if that denial holds up.
Third... everything else is pure garbage and not worth addressing.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Sexual Assualt allegations not being proved true is not the same thing as proving they were purposefully false allegations
Last I heard, Roy Moore’s accusers are being sued.
Last I heard, Roy Moore’s accusers are being sued.
True... but then I read it in the NYT so it could be fake news.
Also true...one of his accusers filed suit against him first making his in this one case a countersuit...
https://www.al.com/news/huntsville/index.ssf/2018/03/judge_denies_roy_moores_reques.html
I found nothing about him suing the mall that banned him...
If they are found guilty hope there's jail time.
Ummmmm... that's not how civil suits work, Steve.
I edited out the garbage in your case.. You are welcome.
-
The Dems better be careful asking for an FBI investigation.
I’m sure there’s several things they’re going to look into...like Ford’s recently closed social media accounts.
Not to mention that big fat Go Fund Me account that’s currently sitting over $500k.
The Dems better be careful asking for an FBI investigation.
I’m sure there’s several things they’re going to look into...like Ford’s recently closed social media accounts.
Not to mention that big fat Go Fund Me account that’s currently sitting over $500k.
Go Fund Me's are illegal?
As for the social media accounts... how many death threats, how much vitriol would you subject yourself to before cancelling them?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
The Dems better be careful asking for an FBI investigation.
I’m sure there’s several things they’re going to look into...like Ford’s recently closed social media accounts.
Not to mention that big fat Go Fund Me account that’s currently sitting over $500k.
Go Fund Me's are illegal?
As for the social media accounts... how many death threats, how much vitriol would you subject yourself to before cancelling them?
Go Fund Me's are illegal?
As for the social media accounts... how many death threats, how much vitriol would you subject yourself to before cancelling them?
Who said Go Fund Me’s are illegal?
Let’s just say if the FBI uncovers some large contributions from Feinstein or Maxine...it wouldn’t be flattering.
While we’re talking about flattering, the mini FBI investigation its going to uncover some not no nice things about Ford.
Kavanaugh has already been investigated like 5 or 6 times, I would be surprised if they found anything on him.
Like I said in another post, it doesn’t matter if the FBI comes up clean...the Libs won’t vote for him regardless (can you say sham?).
Ford didn’t cancel her social media accounts, she just changed her name, but her new handle didn’t remain a secret for long.
And to answer your question regarding how many death threats did she receive? I would guess about half as many as Kavanaugh.
-
except her story is full of holes. Her alleged witnesses are denying her story.
:"Innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to the left, per the left.
nazis were above the law, too. The left is now going after conservatives like
the nazis went after the Jews.
the left has their own brownshirts as final leverage.
Being not guilty is not the same as "we wish and say he's guilty because of our fuhrer (read: "leftwing ideology"
cal, what is it that drives you to win every race to the bottom?
First... holes. She has gaps in her memory of the event. This is common in PTSD cases. One of the principle symptoms is "intrusive memories", a/k/a flashbacks.
Second... "denying" is an interesting choice here. How can someone deny they did not see an event at a party on an unknown date at an unknown time in an unknown place?
Your "denials" take the form of "I do not recall". Which is not an explicit denial. The exception to this point is Mark Whats-his-face. We'll see if that denial holds up.
Third... everything else is pure garbage and not worth addressing.
First... holes. She has gaps in her memory of the event. This is common in PTSD cases. One of the principle symptoms is "intrusive memories", a/k/a flashbacks.
Second... "denying" is an interesting choice here. How can someone deny they did not see an event at a party on an unknown date at an unknown time in an unknown place?
Your "denials" take the form of "I do not recall". Which is not an explicit denial. The exception to this point is Mark Whats-his-face. We'll see if that denial holds up.
Third... everything else is pure garbage and not worth addressing.
Great! now when can we all expect our tax dollars at work back! man i hope they find out who filled up this broken down Ford..Carry on..
-
The Dems better be careful asking for an FBI investigation.
I’m sure there’s several things they’re going to look into...like Ford’s recently closed social media accounts.
Not to mention that big fat Go Fund Me account that’s currently sitting over $500k.
Go Fund Me's are illegal?
As for the social media accounts... how many death threats, how much vitriol would you subject yourself to before cancelling them?
Go Fund Me's are illegal?
As for the social media accounts... how many death threats, how much vitriol would you subject yourself to before cancelling them?
The legal system probably needs to take a look at some of the Go Fund Me accounts:
LAW PROFESSOR JONATHAN TURLEY CRITICIZES GOFUNDME FOR ALLOWING PEOPLE TO PURCHASE LEGAL TESTIMONY
https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/27/gofundme-legal-testimony-purchase/
-
except her story is full of holes. Her alleged witnesses are denying her story.
:"Innocent until proven guilty" doesn't apply to the left, per the left.
nazis were above the law, too. The left is now going after conservatives like
the nazis went after the Jews.
the left has their own brownshirts as final leverage.
Being not guilty is not the same as "we wish and say he's guilty because of our fuhrer (read: "leftwing ideology"
cal, what is it that drives you to win every race to the bottom?
First... holes. She has gaps in her memory of the event. This is common in PTSD cases. One of the principle symptoms is "intrusive memories", a/k/a flashbacks.
Second... "denying" is an interesting choice here. How can someone deny they did not see an event at a party on an unknown date at an unknown time in an unknown place?
Your "denials" take the form of "I do not recall". Which is not an explicit denial. The exception to this point is Mark Whats-his-face. We'll see if that denial holds up.
Third... everything else is pure garbage and not worth addressing.
cal, what is it that drives you to win every race to the bottom?
Tour, what drives you to to bitch about a good point being made? What I posted, contrary to what you posted...is TRUE.
***************************************************
SAGE Reference - Character Assassination - SAGE Knowledge
Items 1 - 22 of 22 - For example, collective character assassination, as a form of summary punishment, was practiced by the Nazi regime to discredit the Jewish ..****************************************************************
First... holes. She has gaps in her memory of the event. This is common in PTSD cases. One of the principle symptoms is "intrusive memories", a/k/a flashbacks.
her "gaps" are pretty profound. She has no idea who drove her to the party? No idea who drove her home? The people she said were there, say no such event happened at all? never did happen? Then she says they left the upstairs and she heard them conversing with others at the party, then said she "knows" they did because she guesses that they did?" and she has every poltiical motive to lie? NEVER mentioned Kavanaugh all these freaking years until he was in the last three list of nominees, and the most obvious nominee? PTSD - pretty little whiney voice? did you listen to the body language expert ridiculing her performance? no tears for your fake "PTSD" ? But go ahead and "know" you WANT her story to be true. That is what is really scum-bucket low.
Second... "denying" is an interesting choice here. How can someone deny they did not see an event at a party on an unknown date at an unknown time in an unknown place?
They denied it ever happened EVER. It never happened. NEVER. Doesn't matter about unknown time or place. It never happened. You really don't understand that? Sad.
Your "denials" take the form of "I do not recall". Which is not an explicit denial. The exception to this point is Mark Whats-his-face. We'll see if that denial holds up.
Legally, "I do not recall" is a nice way of saying your new heroine Phoney Ford is a liar. Nobody, not one person, even her closest friend from back then, remembered ANYTHING about what she was saying. and, Ford said her parents lived close to the party. LIE. Eight miles is not close.
Third... everything else is pure garbage and not worth addressing.
Tour translation: "I want to give Ford great big smoochies for destroying Kavanaugh's life and family with grief, because I support the liberals and I love ROE vs WADE"
Your support of this farce is tragic. With ZERO EVIDENCE, she has ruined an excellent man's life.
-
I don't know that anyone here believes dr. Ford or seriously wants the FBI investigation to go forward. But if you do what in fact do you expect, or hope for, the investigation to show you? And if her accusations remain unverified would you support her being prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law? Why or why not?
WSS
I don't know that anyone here believes dr. Ford or seriously wants the FBI investigation to go forward. But if you do what in fact do you expect, or hope for, the investigation to show you? And if her accusations remain unverified would you support her being prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law? Why or why not?
WSS
This was a mistake by Dems. Rosenstien likes Kavanaugh. The FBI is only going to interview those who already have no knowledge of this nonsense. Under an FBI investigation the press and Dems are going to have to shut up.
I predict they wrap this up and even some Dems will vote for the judge.
-
If, and if is the key word, you support giving someone a pass for making false statements that can ruin someone's life I think that's a pretty fuked-up position.
WSS
No, it isn't.
Just like it needs to be proven that he committed this crimes, it would need to be proven that she purposefully falsely accused him.
There is a middle ground in there where neither is proven in a court of law.
I know some of you on here have a hard time with things that aren't black and white though
No, it isn't.
Just like it needs to be proven that he committed this crimes, it would need to be proven that she purposefully falsely accused him.
There is a middle ground in there where neither is proven in a court of law.
I know some of you on here have a hard time with things that aren't black and white though
You really don't have to go down the playing stupid path every time and pretend you don't know what I'm talking about. If alleging sexual misconduct is not that big a deal to you even if it has extreme negative effects on a man's life then I think your position is fuked up. I gave you the example of a black man being accused of rape or something similar by a woman who is an outspoken racist and he loses his job and or does jail time. You wouldn't think she should be prosecuted for that? But it's okay if the accused is a white male?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login