Skip to content

WTF!!

Political Discussion
74 12 2.4k
  • If India and China doesn’t stop burning coal for fuel, heat, and electricity generation. Then it really doesn’t matter if the U.S. does more than what we’re currently doing. So to all of the global warming activists out there, get your azz over to Asia and start protesting. Oh...and let me know how that works out for you.

  • If India and China doesn’t stop burning coal for fuel, heat, and electricity generation. Then it really doesn’t matter if the U.S. does more than what we’re currently doing. So to all of the global warming activists out there, get your azz over to Asia and start protesting. Oh...and let me know how that works out for you.

    @canton-dawg said:

    If India and China doesn’t stop burning coal for fuel, heat, and electricity generation. Then it really doesn’t matter if the U.S. does more than what we’re currently doing. So to all of the global warming activists out there, get your azz over to Asia and start protesting. Oh...and let me know how that works out for you.

    Let's try to get people to pull their head out of their political party's butt and stop denying the science first. 

  • 30 inches. My god. 30ft would be cya to the human race. 

    @clevfan4life said:

    30 inches. My god. 30ft would be cya to the human race. 

    Sorry- I miss-wrote it. I meant 30 inches. Correction being made. Still that's 2 1/2 feet.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    If India and China doesn’t stop burning coal for fuel, heat, and electricity generation. Then it really doesn’t matter if the U.S. does more than what we’re currently doing. So to all of the global warming activists out there, get your azz over to Asia and start protesting. Oh...and let me know how that works out for you.

    Let's try to get people to pull their head out of their political party's butt and stop denying the science first. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Let's try to get people to pull their head out of their political party's butt and stop denying the science first. 

    I agree, what science are referring to?

    Do we have hard evidence of what is causing global warming?

  • @mld-woody said:

    Let's try to get people to pull their head out of their political party's butt and stop denying the science first. 

    I agree, what science are referring to?

    Do we have hard evidence of what is causing global warming?

  • 30 ft  and 6 degrees? That is a Shmuck ton

    @mld-woody said:

    30 ft  and 6 degrees? That is a Shmuck ton

    As usual, you have no clue..

  • And overall,

    5735690507_23d5b93c1c.jpg

  • AxeA Axe

    @mld-woody said:

    30 ft  and 6 degrees? That is a Shmuck ton

    As usual, you have no clue..

    @axe said:

    As usual, you have no clue..

    He replied to my original post where I inadvertently said 30 ft and not 30 inches. I edited it after he had replied.

  • AxeA Axe

    And overall,

    5735690507_23d5b93c1c.jpg

    @axe said:

    And overall,

    5735690507_23d5b93c1c.jpg

    And this Sheet comes right out of the Trump administration, so read the articles.

  • AxeA Axe

    @mld-woody said:

    30 ft  and 6 degrees? That is a Shmuck ton

    As usual, you have no clue..

    @axe said:

    As usual, you have no clue..

    calm down faggot meat, we already addressed the error

  • @axe said:

    As usual, you have no clue..

    calm down faggot meat, we already addressed the error

    @clevfan4life said:

    calm down faggot meat

    Got yer faggot meat right here young man..

  • Well hopefully we don't all die before Mark lewisohn finishes that Beatles trilogy. 

    So how many of you actually believe the catastrophic changes will be here in less than 83 years? And how many think but reassembly the EPA would save us?

    WSS

  • How many think round about arguments against hyperbolic language designed to make you defend against statements you never made instead  of the actual issue at hand that's been debated here countless times with dozens of denier "studies" shown to be false would be a good use of time? 

  • AxeA Axe

    @clevfan4life said:

    calm down faggot meat

    Got yer faggot meat right here young man..

    @axe said:

    Got yer faggot meat right here young man..

    calm down faggot tits

  • Current meteorological technology can’t accurately predict the path of a hurricane beyond 48 hours, but we’re supposed to believe a forecast 180 years into the future...right.

  • @axe said:

    As usual, you have no clue..

    He replied to my original post where I inadvertently said 30 ft and not 30 inches. I edited it after he had replied.

    @texasag1969 said:

    He replied to my original post where I inadvertently said 30 ft and not 30 inches. I edited it after he had replied.

    Well nearly two and a half feet is not insignificant. But as a lapsed Republican pseudo conservative posing as a Libertarian where do you personally stand on the EPA? Since it would seem you atribute this approaching crisis as the fault of people who don't like it? Do Libertarians love to eat PA and do they think the EPA will save us from disaster?

    WSS

  • @axe said:

    And overall,

    5735690507_23d5b93c1c.jpg

    And this Sheet comes right out of the Trump administration, so read the articles.

    @texasag1969 said:

    And this Sheet comes right out of the Trump administration, so read the articles.

    So any rise in water world wide is Trumps fault?  The EPA can stop this horrible disaster from happening?  I don't get it.  

  • One  thing is since the Trump Administration is predicting ill effects from global warming the conservationists will now start calling MMGW a hoax.

    ?

    WSS

  • @texasag1969 said:

    He replied to my original post where I inadvertently said 30 ft and not 30 inches. I edited it after he had replied.

    Well nearly two and a half feet is not insignificant. But as a lapsed Republican pseudo conservative posing as a Libertarian where do you personally stand on the EPA? Since it would seem you atribute this approaching crisis as the fault of people who don't like it? Do Libertarians love to eat PA and do they think the EPA will save us from disaster?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Well nearly two and a half feet is not insignificant. But as a lapsed Republican pseudo conservative posing as a Libertarian where do you personally stand on the EPA? Since it would seem you atribute this approaching crisis as the fault of people who don't like it? Do Libertarians love to eat PA and do they think the EPA will save us from disaster?

    WSS

    I was not in favor of a president who does not believe global warming is real and thus withdraws us from international efforts to do something about it. That does not mean I am in favor of us being left holding the bag alone, but that we at least remain in the game and not go into denial. Are there things wrong with the EPA? Sure. But wholesale dismantling is not the answer, especially when you put a pure fossil fuels guy in charge who also does not believe in global warming, but does believe in corporate profits only. 

    And I never posed as a Libertarian, only said I was thinking about it after discussing with my cousin who, like me, thinks ? is an absolute fraud.

  • liberals feel issues, they don't THINK issues.

    sad state of affairs for them.