WTF!!
-
If India and China doesn’t stop burning coal for fuel, heat, and electricity generation. Then it really doesn’t matter if the U.S. does more than what we’re currently doing. So to all of the global warming activists out there, get your azz over to Asia and start protesting. Oh...and let me know how that works out for you.
Let's try to get people to pull their head out of their political party's butt and stop denying the science first.
Let's try to get people to pull their head out of their political party's butt and stop denying the science first.
I agree, what science are referring to?
Do we have hard evidence of what is causing global warming?
-
Let's try to get people to pull their head out of their political party's butt and stop denying the science first.
I agree, what science are referring to?
Do we have hard evidence of what is causing global warming?
I agree, what science are referring to?
Do we have hard evidence of what is causing global warming?
-
30 ft and 6 degrees? That is a Shmuck ton
As usual, you have no clue..
-
30 ft and 6 degrees? That is a Shmuck ton
As usual, you have no clue..
-
And overall,
And this Sheet comes right out of the Trump administration, so read the articles.
-
30 ft and 6 degrees? That is a Shmuck ton
As usual, you have no clue..
-
calm down faggot meat
Got yer faggot meat right here young man..
-
Well hopefully we don't all die before Mark lewisohn finishes that Beatles trilogy.
So how many of you actually believe the catastrophic changes will be here in less than 83 years? And how many think but reassembly the EPA would save us?
WSS
-
How many think round about arguments against hyperbolic language designed to make you defend against statements you never made instead of the actual issue at hand that's been debated here countless times with dozens of denier "studies" shown to be false would be a good use of time?
-
calm down faggot meat
Got yer faggot meat right here young man..
-
Current meteorological technology can’t accurately predict the path of a hurricane beyond 48 hours, but we’re supposed to believe a forecast 180 years into the future...right.
-
He replied to my original post where I inadvertently said 30 ft and not 30 inches. I edited it after he had replied.
Well nearly two and a half feet is not insignificant. But as a lapsed Republican pseudo conservative posing as a Libertarian where do you personally stand on the EPA? Since it would seem you atribute this approaching crisis as the fault of people who don't like it? Do Libertarians love to eat PA and do they think the EPA will save us from disaster?
WSS
-
And this Sheet comes right out of the Trump administration, so read the articles.
So any rise in water world wide is Trumps fault? The EPA can stop this horrible disaster from happening? I don't get it.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
One thing is since the Trump Administration is predicting ill effects from global warming the conservationists will now start calling MMGW a hoax.
?
WSS
-
He replied to my original post where I inadvertently said 30 ft and not 30 inches. I edited it after he had replied.
Well nearly two and a half feet is not insignificant. But as a lapsed Republican pseudo conservative posing as a Libertarian where do you personally stand on the EPA? Since it would seem you atribute this approaching crisis as the fault of people who don't like it? Do Libertarians love to eat PA and do they think the EPA will save us from disaster?
WSS
Well nearly two and a half feet is not insignificant. But as a lapsed Republican pseudo conservative posing as a Libertarian where do you personally stand on the EPA? Since it would seem you atribute this approaching crisis as the fault of people who don't like it? Do Libertarians love to eat PA and do they think the EPA will save us from disaster?
WSS
I was not in favor of a president who does not believe global warming is real and thus withdraws us from international efforts to do something about it. That does not mean I am in favor of us being left holding the bag alone, but that we at least remain in the game and not go into denial. Are there things wrong with the EPA? Sure. But wholesale dismantling is not the answer, especially when you put a pure fossil fuels guy in charge who also does not believe in global warming, but does believe in corporate profits only.
And I never posed as a Libertarian, only said I was thinking about it after discussing with my cousin who, like me, thinks ? is an absolute fraud.
-
liberals feel issues, they don't THINK issues.
sad state of affairs for them.
-
liberals feel issues, they don't THINK issues.
sad state of affairs for them.
says the people who think mmgw cant be legit cause jesus wouldnt let us down like that
-
Well nearly two and a half feet is not insignificant. But as a lapsed Republican pseudo conservative posing as a Libertarian where do you personally stand on the EPA? Since it would seem you atribute this approaching crisis as the fault of people who don't like it? Do Libertarians love to eat PA and do they think the EPA will save us from disaster?
WSS
I was not in favor of a president who does not believe global warming is real and thus withdraws us from international efforts to do something about it. That does not mean I am in favor of us being left holding the bag alone, but that we at least remain in the game and not go into denial. Are there things wrong with the EPA? Sure. But wholesale dismantling is not the answer, especially when you put a pure fossil fuels guy in charge who also does not believe in global warming, but does believe in corporate profits only.
And I never posed as a Libertarian, only said I was thinking about it after discussing with my cousin who, like me, thinks ? is an absolute fraud.
I was not in favor of a president who does not believe global warming is real and thus withdraws us from international efforts to do something about it. That does not mean I am in favor of us being left holding the bag alone, but that we at least remain in the game and not go into denial. Are there things wrong with the EPA? Sure. But wholesale dismantling is not the answer, especially when you put a pure fossil fuels guy in charge who also does not believe in global warming, but does believe in corporate profits only.
And I never posed as a Libertarian, only said I was thinking about it after discussing with my cousin who, like me, thinks ? is an absolute fraud.
Frankly I don't, and many thinking people don't, think about man-made global warming in the same way you hysterical Democrats do.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login