Skip to content

newsweek poll suggests 55% of republican voters dont think attempted rape is disqualifying for scotus..

Political Discussion
53 9 896
  • This was the question

    34. Assault disqualifying If it were proven that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when they were both high school students 36 years ago, do you think that does or does not disqualify Kavanaugh from being a Supreme Court Justice?

    And the poll was by The Economist / YouGov

    https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/m6ng12ro4y/econTabReport.pdf

    Page 118

  • @clevfan4life said:

    https://www.newsweek.com/sexual-assault-should-not-disqualify-kavanaugh-proven-majority-republicans-1141877?comment_id=2001246023230317

    this is pure msm sht starting right?

    Well most of those Republicans voted against Bill Clinton as opposed to, let's just call them the other party.

    And did you use the term attempted rape in your heading? 

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Well most of those Republicans voted against Bill Clinton as opposed to, let's just call them the other party.

    And did you use the term attempted rape in your heading? 

    WSS

    if i recall correctly, the "accusation" is he held her down and was going to rape her right? but she managed to get away when him and his buddy forgot about her and started blowing each other. Do i have that right? how much of that did i get right? 

  • @westside-steve said:

    Well most of those Republicans voted against Bill Clinton as opposed to, let's just call them the other party.

    And did you use the term attempted rape in your heading? 

    WSS

    if i recall correctly, the "accusation" is he held her down and was going to rape her right? but she managed to get away when him and his buddy forgot about her and started blowing each other. Do i have that right? how much of that did i get right? 

    @clevfan4life said:

    if i recall correctly, the "accusation" is he held her down and was going to rape her right? but she managed to get away when him and his buddy forgot about her and started blowing each other. Do i have that right? how much of that did i get right? 

    So the accusation by a crazy woman is your source? Thanks.

    But your own noticeably slanted article says sexual assault not attempted. You should apply for a job as a headlight writer for The Blaze.

    WSS

  • But, and I know it's probably impossible free people who are hyperventilating over this, quite possibly a crime even if someone is convicted of it 30 or 40 years ago would not necessarily make them incapable of doing a good job no matter what that was. The problem in a pseudo democracy like ours would be the Optics.

    WSS

  • But, and I know it's probably impossible free people who are hyperventilating over this, quite possibly a crime even if someone is convicted of it 30 or 40 years ago would not necessarily make them incapable of doing a good job no matter what that was. The problem in a pseudo democracy like ours would be the Optics.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    But, and I know it's probably impossible free people who are hyperventilating over this, quite possibly a crime even if someone is convicted of it 30 or 40 years ago would not necessarily make them incapable of doing a good job no matter what that was. The problem in a pseudo democracy like ours would be the Optics.

    WSS

    ahhhh, theres the west syde we know. Typical steve is back. 

  • @westside-steve said:

    But, and I know it's probably impossible free people who are hyperventilating over this, quite possibly a crime even if someone is convicted of it 30 or 40 years ago would not necessarily make them incapable of doing a good job no matter what that was. The problem in a pseudo democracy like ours would be the Optics.

    WSS

    ahhhh, theres the west syde we know. Typical steve is back. 

    @clevfan4life said:

    @clevfan4life said:

    ahhhh, theres the west syde we know. Typical steve is back. 

    Exposing you for the fool and liar you are. Typical? Yes indeed.

    WSS

  • @clevfan4life said:

    @clevfan4life said:

    ahhhh, theres the west syde we know. Typical steve is back. 

    Exposing you for the fool and liar you are. Typical? Yes indeed.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Exposing you for the fool and liar you are. Typical? Yes indeed.

    WSS

    sure thing tippy?

  • This was the question

    34. Assault disqualifying If it were proven that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when they were both high school students 36 years ago, do you think that does or does not disqualify Kavanaugh from being a Supreme Court Justice?

    And the poll was by The Economist / YouGov

    https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/m6ng12ro4y/econTabReport.pdf

    Page 118

    @mld-woody said:

    This was the question

    34. Assault disqualifying If it were proven that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when they were both high school students 36 years ago, do you think that does or does not disqualify Kavanaugh from being a Supreme Court Justice?

    Sexual assault could mean a pat on the butt.

    Had it been proven Kavanaugh assaulted this woman as an adult then yes, he should be disqualified.

    But Kavanaugh "assaulted" this woman as a 17yr. old high school kid. To disqualify him after compiling a spotless record all his adult working life would be ludicrous.

    Those that voted no got it right...because they used logic and reason.....qualities rare amongst libtards.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    https://www.newsweek.com/sexual-assault-should-not-disqualify-kavanaugh-proven-majority-republicans-1141877?comment_id=2001246023230317

    this is pure msm sht starting right?

    Stuart

    Yes I suppose you can say that.  The first impression you get from this article is that the majority of Republican voters... who happened to get the question right...must be sexual deviants.

    Why they got it right is explained in the above post. They used logic and reason.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Well most of those Republicans voted against Bill Clinton as opposed to, let's just call them the other party.

    And did you use the term attempted rape in your heading? 

    WSS

    if i recall correctly, the "accusation" is he held her down and was going to rape her right? but she managed to get away when him and his buddy forgot about her and started blowing each other. Do i have that right? how much of that did i get right? 

    @clevfan4life said:

    if i recall correctly, the "accusation" is he held her down and was going to rape her right? but she managed to get away when him and his buddy forgot about her and started blowing each other. Do i have that right? how much of that did i get right? 

    Stuart

    Your thread title was absurd, and you trying to explain it away is even more absurd.

     More proof there's no debating libtards.

    The respondents were responding to the question being asked...not responding to some story being told.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    if i recall correctly, the "accusation" is he held her down and was going to rape her right? but she managed to get away when him and his buddy forgot about her and started blowing each other. Do i have that right? how much of that did i get right? 

    So the accusation by a crazy woman is your source? Thanks.

    But your own noticeably slanted article says sexual assault not attempted. You should apply for a job as a headlight writer for The Blaze.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    So the accusation by a crazy woman is your source? Thanks.

    But your own noticeably slanted article says sexual assault not attempted. You should apply for a job as a headlight writer for The Blaze.

    WSS

    "If it were proven that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when they were both high school students 36 years ago, do you think that does or does not disqualify Kavanaugh from being a Supreme Court Justice?" 

    are u able to read the english language properly? they're pretty clearly referring to not some vague broad def of sexual assault. They're referring to the specific accusations. And if they're true they are absolutely disqualifying

  • Boys will be boys.  At least that used to be true............

  • Every poll on Earth gave Hillary Clinton a 100% chance of winning on the election and you're still buying this sh!t?

  • Every poll on Earth gave Hillary Clinton a 100% chance of winning on the election and you're still buying this sh!t?

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Every poll on Earth gave Hillary Clinton a 100% chance of winning on the election and you're still buying this sh!t?

    Every poll from now until the end of time no longer matters. Got it.

  • Boys will be boys.  At least that used to be true............

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Boys will be boys.  At least that used to be true............

    i buy that up to a point. I never personally witnessed what christine ford alleges happened to.her....i would never associated with dudes like that. And i was at plenty parties where both guys and girls were sloppy AF. But we know this sht happens, and it isnt just "boys will be boys". Was the stanford kid just being a rowdy youth in ur eyes? 

    yes or no answer, would u have shot a lil ngr that did to ur daughter what Ford claims was done to her? I think we all know that answer so im gonna go ahead and ask do u think its wise in a society to say "boys just bein boys"? cause they hear/read that.....and some of em will think well i might as well get that rape itch out of my system now

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Every poll on Earth gave Hillary Clinton a 100% chance of winning on the election and you're still buying this sh!t?

    Every poll from now until the end of time no longer matters. Got it.

    @mld-woody said:

    Every poll from now until the end of time no longer matters. Got it.

    Pretty much. You should definitely see by now how easily they can be manipulated to give the desired result. 

     
  • 75326D99-6667-4AE2-85AF-382B5CBE1467.png

  • well, isnt this special....

    42500416_10214112937632039_6756227880117

  • well, isnt this special....

    42500416_10214112937632039_6756227880117

    @clevfan4life said:

    well, isnt this special....

    42500416_10214112937632039_6756227880117

    Let’s see, one is being accused of sexual misconduct with no proof, and the other admitted to it.

    Apples and oranges.

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Every poll on Earth gave Hillary Clinton a 100% chance of winning on the election and you're still buying this sh!t?

    Every poll from now until the end of time no longer matters. Got it.

    @mld-woody said:

    Every poll from now until the end of time no longer matters. Got it.

    Get some pussy.