Kavanaugh yes or no?
-
Just wanted to mention that not unlike talking smack before the Steelers game I will personally feel a lot better about this vote once it's finished.
I don't trust politicians and especially Democrats.
WSS
-
If he gets confirmed, I'm going to get Sheet faced and then get some poontang in celebration.
-
Whether or not the accusations are true, some hit looking 15 year old doing questionable Sheet with an 18 year old is a side show compared to the identity politics of both parties. Right now more so the Shmuckin' liberals. There exist actual good reasons to not have Kavanaugh pushed through that in no way include these accusations. But they give so little a Sheet about the Constitution that they focus on the potential sexual deviance as their main point.
Likewise for the party and some here that claim to be "Constitutionalists". What a bunch of lip service being paid to that word. Here's a guy, Kavvy, with legitimate claims to have worked on the erosion of the 4th and 5th amendments, on top of his person stance re: The (failed,cowpoop) Drug War, NDAA, Patriot Act and 2nd amendment. Yet if the dude has an R next to his name, he has to be ight then...?
It's a god damn soap opera. All of it.
What is it about the 2nd 4th or 5th Amendment that you are concerned with having Kavanaugh on the bench?
WSS
What is it about the 2nd 4th or 5th Amendment that you are concerned with having Kavanaugh on the bench?
WSS
Kavvy outright expresses he beliefs it is more than acceptable to not only violate, but mutilate the 4th amendment protections of citizens because security is greater than natural or Constitutional rights. (See, NSA) To quote verbatim “critical national security need outweighs the impact on privacy.” His stance on the Patriot Act as both "Constitutional and responsible" is a pretty big red flag. He also believes the governments meta-data collection on citizens is in line with the 4th. ?
I guess my issue with the 2nd Amendment stance is, I have no problem with expansion of gun rights - I also support the "common sense" laws on access. The problem is those screaming common sense don't really mean it like I do. But I believe Kavanaugh supported the ban on clips greater than 10 rounds. I feel that isn't inline with an expansion on gun rights.
I also don't like writings that suggest the President can refuse to turn over evidence in a criminal investigation and also refuse to answer questions. I don't believe any man should be above the law. Most certainly the President.
-
Okay then. And I fully agree with him then on privacy vs security. I have no beef with the Patriot Act or collection of metadata. Matter of fact I think the HIPAA laws are a crock of crap. As far as the Second Amendment that ship has long sailed and it's been decided more than once that clamping down on certain types of weapons is perfectly constitutional. It's not a huge leap from Banning a machine gun to requiring all guns be bolt-action single-shot but we will see how that goes.
WSS
-
Okay then. And I fully agree with him then on privacy vs security. I have no beef with the Patriot Act or collection of metadata. Matter of fact I think the HIPAA laws are a crock of crap. As far as the Second Amendment that ship has long sailed and it's been decided more than once that clamping down on certain types of weapons is perfectly constitutional. It's not a huge leap from Banning a machine gun to requiring all guns be bolt-action single-shot but we will see how that goes.
WSS
Matter of fact I think the HIPAA laws are a crock of crap.
WSS
Yeah because it would be so cool for any old person to have access to my medical history....?
-
Matter of fact I think the HIPAA laws are a crock of crap.
WSS
Yeah because it would be so cool for any old person to have access to my medical history....?
Yeah because it would be so cool for any old person to have access to my medical history....?
Pretty much exactly. Anytime you had her medical facility anywhere in the United States or in the world, I want every pharmacist every registered nurse every nurse practitioner every surgeon every physician to know exactly my entire medical history.
I'm assuming you are against mandatory background checks for firearms correct?
WSS
-
This has been the saddest, lowest, most pathetic, shameful, despicable, disgusting display by the democrats that I've ever witnessed in politics. I already had no respect for senate Democrats but now Ive honestly lost respect for regular democrat voters who are still going with this piece of garbage dog and pony show and worse yet pretending Its a high road move.
How does it feel to watch your party fu¢k itself?
-
-
Yeah because it would be so cool for any old person to have access to my medical history....?
Pretty much exactly. Anytime you had her medical facility anywhere in the United States or in the world, I want every pharmacist every registered nurse every nurse practitioner every surgeon every physician to know exactly my entire medical history.
I'm assuming you are against mandatory background checks for firearms correct?
WSS
Pretty much exactly. Anytime you had her medical facility anywhere in the United States or in the world, I want every pharmacist every registered nurse every nurse practitioner every surgeon every physician to know exactly my entire medical history.
I'm assuming you are against mandatory background checks for firearms correct?
WSS
Then tell them your medical history.
-
Pretty much exactly. Anytime you had her medical facility anywhere in the United States or in the world, I want every pharmacist every registered nurse every nurse practitioner every surgeon every physician to know exactly my entire medical history.
I'm assuming you are against mandatory background checks for firearms correct?
WSS
Then tell them your medical history.
Then tell them your medical history.
Hard to do if your unconscious.
-
Pretty much exactly. Anytime you had her medical facility anywhere in the United States or in the world, I want every pharmacist every registered nurse every nurse practitioner every surgeon every physician to know exactly my entire medical history.
I'm assuming you are against mandatory background checks for firearms correct?
WSS
Then tell them your medical history.
Then tell them your medical history.
Yeah like I carry my entire detailed medical history in my briefcase where ever I go. I know it makes you feel like an outlaw to be under the radar but aren't you a little bit old for anarchy?
WSS
-
Then tell them your medical history.
Yeah like I carry my entire detailed medical history in my briefcase where ever I go. I know it makes you feel like an outlaw to be under the radar but aren't you a little bit old for anarchy?
WSS
Yeah like I carry my entire detailed medical history in my briefcase where ever I go. I know it makes you feel like an outlaw to be under the radar but aren't you a little bit old for anarchy?
WSS
https://www.healthedeals.com/blog/learn/4-top-apps-for-organizing-your-medical-records/
Here you go.
I don’t believe government needs to invade my privacy for the reasons they have set forth.
-
Yeah like I carry my entire detailed medical history in my briefcase where ever I go. I know it makes you feel like an outlaw to be under the radar but aren't you a little bit old for anarchy?
WSS
https://www.healthedeals.com/blog/learn/4-top-apps-for-organizing-your-medical-records/
Here you go.
I don’t believe government needs to invade my privacy for the reasons they have set forth.
https://www.healthedeals.com/blog/learn/4-top-apps-for-organizing-your-medical-records/
Here you go.
I don’t believe government needs to invade my privacy for the reasons they have set forth.
And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
https://www.healthedeals.com/blog/learn/4-top-apps-for-organizing-your-medical-records/
Here you go.
I don’t believe government needs to invade my privacy for the reasons they have set forth.
And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.
WSS
And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.
WSS
What about something similar in terms of guns and gun ownership?
-
And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.
WSS
What about something similar in terms of guns and gun ownership?
What about something similar in terms of guns and gun ownership?
I think I've said before that I have no beef with background checks. They're not going to be of much use if they have to conform to the HIPAA laws. I mean if somebody had a psychotic break and we're institutionalized that's probably something that should show up right?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
I"m fine with background checks for ccw. At some point, though, in the future, all the information they have on everybody...
one corrupt deep state group, like we have now, could get a hold of the presidency AND Congress, and use it in a manner of "Minority Report".
Under the current democommie party - a corey booker sleaze type could campaign on "those people are criminals, GET THEM before they commit these crimes".
Would anybody be surprised? Look at the nonsense they are doing already.
And, again, in NY, the folks who registered their guns... the left had that list PUBLISHED in the local newspaper.
Think about that.
Information is weaponized-possible.
....soviet dossiers.... nazi dossiers...
-
What about something similar in terms of guns and gun ownership?
I think I've said before that I have no beef with background checks. They're not going to be of much use if they have to conform to the HIPAA laws. I mean if somebody had a psychotic break and we're institutionalized that's probably something that should show up right?
WSS
I think I've said before that I have no beef with background checks. They're not going to be of much use if they have to conform to the HIPAA laws. I mean if somebody had a psychotic break and we're institutionalized that's probably something that should show up right?
WSS
DNA on file sounds like more of a registry than background checks
-
I think I've said before that I have no beef with background checks. They're not going to be of much use if they have to conform to the HIPAA laws. I mean if somebody had a psychotic break and we're institutionalized that's probably something that should show up right?
WSS
DNA on file sounds like more of a registry than background checks
DNA on file sounds like more of a registry than background checks
Two separate things but you asked me about the HIPAA laws. The HIPAA laws that would prevent somebody from finding out if the prospective gun owner that spent time in the nuthouse. DNA and retinal scans for purposes of identification, but the information that could be unlocked is probably endless. Better than a nine digit number he repeat in front of the people in the bank.
WSS
-
I never said HIPAA once. I saw you advocate for DNA on file for everyone. That sounds like a registry. Which makes me think you'd be for a gun owner registry as well.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login