Skip to content

Kavanaugh yes or no?

Political Discussion
64 11 1.6k
  • Okay then. And I fully agree with him then on privacy vs security. I have no beef with the Patriot Act or collection of metadata. Matter of fact I think the HIPAA laws are a crock of crap. As far as the Second Amendment that ship has long sailed and it's been decided more than once that clamping down on certain types of weapons is perfectly constitutional. It's not a huge leap from Banning a machine gun to requiring all guns be bolt-action single-shot but we will see how that goes.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

     Matter of fact I think the HIPAA laws are a crock of crap. 

    WSS

    Yeah because it would be so cool for any old person to have access to my medical history....? 

  • @westside-steve said:

     Matter of fact I think the HIPAA laws are a crock of crap. 

    WSS

    Yeah because it would be so cool for any old person to have access to my medical history....? 

    @tiamat63 said:

    Yeah because it would be so cool for any old person to have access to my medical history....? 

    Pretty much exactly. Anytime you had her medical facility anywhere in the United States or in the world, I want every pharmacist every registered nurse every nurse practitioner every surgeon every physician to know exactly my entire medical history.

    I'm assuming you are against mandatory background checks for firearms correct?

    WSS

  • This has been the saddest, lowest, most pathetic, shameful, despicable, disgusting display by the democrats that I've ever witnessed in politics. I already had no respect for senate Democrats but now Ive honestly lost respect for regular democrat voters who are still going with this piece of garbage dog and pony show and worse yet pretending Its a high road move. 

    How does it feel to watch your party fu¢k itself?

  • Image may contain: 6 people, people standing, suit and indoor

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Yeah because it would be so cool for any old person to have access to my medical history....? 

    Pretty much exactly. Anytime you had her medical facility anywhere in the United States or in the world, I want every pharmacist every registered nurse every nurse practitioner every surgeon every physician to know exactly my entire medical history.

    I'm assuming you are against mandatory background checks for firearms correct?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Pretty much exactly. Anytime you had her medical facility anywhere in the United States or in the world, I want every pharmacist every registered nurse every nurse practitioner every surgeon every physician to know exactly my entire medical history.

    I'm assuming you are against mandatory background checks for firearms correct?

    WSS

    Then tell them your medical history.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Pretty much exactly. Anytime you had her medical facility anywhere in the United States or in the world, I want every pharmacist every registered nurse every nurse practitioner every surgeon every physician to know exactly my entire medical history.

    I'm assuming you are against mandatory background checks for firearms correct?

    WSS

    Then tell them your medical history.

    @baconhound said:

    Then tell them your medical history.

    Hard to do if your unconscious.

  • 43443918_2392736597408148_68004082158267

  • @westside-steve said:

    Pretty much exactly. Anytime you had her medical facility anywhere in the United States or in the world, I want every pharmacist every registered nurse every nurse practitioner every surgeon every physician to know exactly my entire medical history.

    I'm assuming you are against mandatory background checks for firearms correct?

    WSS

    Then tell them your medical history.

    @baconhound said:

    Then tell them your medical history.

    Yeah like I carry my entire detailed medical history in my briefcase where ever I go. I know it makes you feel like an outlaw to be under the radar but aren't you a little bit old for anarchy?

    WSS

  • @baconhound said:

    Then tell them your medical history.

    Yeah like I carry my entire detailed medical history in my briefcase where ever I go. I know it makes you feel like an outlaw to be under the radar but aren't you a little bit old for anarchy?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Yeah like I carry my entire detailed medical history in my briefcase where ever I go. I know it makes you feel like an outlaw to be under the radar but aren't you a little bit old for anarchy?

    WSS

    https://www.healthedeals.com/blog/learn/4-top-apps-for-organizing-your-medical-records/

    Here you go.

    I don’t believe government needs to invade my privacy for the reasons they have set forth.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Yeah like I carry my entire detailed medical history in my briefcase where ever I go. I know it makes you feel like an outlaw to be under the radar but aren't you a little bit old for anarchy?

    WSS

    https://www.healthedeals.com/blog/learn/4-top-apps-for-organizing-your-medical-records/

    Here you go.

    I don’t believe government needs to invade my privacy for the reasons they have set forth.

    @baconhound said:

    https://www.healthedeals.com/blog/learn/4-top-apps-for-organizing-your-medical-records/

    Here you go.

    I don’t believe government needs to invade my privacy for the reasons they have set forth.

    And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.

    WSS

  • @baconhound said:

    https://www.healthedeals.com/blog/learn/4-top-apps-for-organizing-your-medical-records/

    Here you go.

    I don’t believe government needs to invade my privacy for the reasons they have set forth.

    And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.

    WSS

    What about something similar in terms of guns and gun ownership?

  • @westside-steve said:

    And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.

    WSS

    What about something similar in terms of guns and gun ownership?

    @mld-woody said:

    What about something similar in terms of guns and gun ownership?

    I think I've said before that I have no beef with background checks. They're not going to be of much use if they have to conform to the HIPAA laws. I mean if somebody had a psychotic break and we're institutionalized that's probably something that should show up right?

    WSS

  • I"m fine with background checks for ccw. At some point, though, in the future, all the information they have on everybody...

    one corrupt deep state group, like we have now, could get a hold of the presidency AND Congress, and use it in a manner of "Minority Report".

       Under the current democommie party - a corey booker sleaze type could campaign on "those people are criminals, GET THEM before they commit these crimes".

    Would anybody be surprised? Look at the nonsense they are doing already.

    And, again, in NY, the folks who registered their guns... the left had that list PUBLISHED in the local newspaper.

    Think about that.

    Information is weaponized-possible.

    ....soviet dossiers.... nazi dossiers...

  • @mld-woody said:

    What about something similar in terms of guns and gun ownership?

    I think I've said before that I have no beef with background checks. They're not going to be of much use if they have to conform to the HIPAA laws. I mean if somebody had a psychotic break and we're institutionalized that's probably something that should show up right?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    I think I've said before that I have no beef with background checks. They're not going to be of much use if they have to conform to the HIPAA laws. I mean if somebody had a psychotic break and we're institutionalized that's probably something that should show up right?

    WSS

    DNA on file sounds like more of a registry than background checks

  • @westside-steve said:

    I think I've said before that I have no beef with background checks. They're not going to be of much use if they have to conform to the HIPAA laws. I mean if somebody had a psychotic break and we're institutionalized that's probably something that should show up right?

    WSS

    DNA on file sounds like more of a registry than background checks

    @mld-woody said:

    DNA on file sounds like more of a registry than background checks

    Two separate things but you asked me about the HIPAA laws. The HIPAA laws that would prevent somebody from finding out if the prospective gun owner that spent time in the nuthouse. DNA and retinal scans for purposes of identification, but the information that could be unlocked is probably endless. Better than a nine digit number he repeat in front of the people in the bank.

    WSS

  • I never said HIPAA once. I saw you advocate for DNA on file for everyone. That sounds like a registry. Which makes me think you'd be for a gun owner registry as well.

  • I never said HIPAA once. I saw you advocate for DNA on file for everyone. That sounds like a registry. Which makes me think you'd be for a gun owner registry as well.

    @mld-woody said:

    I never said HIPAA once. I saw you advocate for DNA on file for everyone. That sounds like a registry. Which makes me think you'd be for a gun owner registry as well.

    Don't be tedious. Just go back a few posts at least part of the conversation between myself and bacon Hound. Remember? Talking about medical history. The sharing of which would be against the HIPAA laws. DNA a triple scans are a separate portion of the same conversation. Even though they could also be helpful in a background check. But those on the left would drop a load in their pants if the hillbilly at the gun show could run a scan and find out if the guy ever had AIDS or an STD or was bipolar.

    And before you flip out AIDS or the STD wouldn't preclude a guy from having a gun but having full disclosure of medical records would probably turn that up.

    WSS

  • Image may contain: 1 person

  • @baconhound said:

    https://www.healthedeals.com/blog/learn/4-top-apps-for-organizing-your-medical-records/

    Here you go.

    I don’t believe government needs to invade my privacy for the reasons they have set forth.

    And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.

    WSS

    I see no real stumbling blocks to getting a warrant.  A logical request made before a judge doesn’t seem like too much to ask.  The warrant process has worked for decades.

  • @westside-steve said:

    And I have no problem with it. As I said before I think every man woman and child should have DNA on file. Probably a retinal scan for purposes of identification.

    WSS

    I see no real stumbling blocks to getting a warrant.  A logical request made before a judge doesn’t seem like too much to ask.  The warrant process has worked for decades.

    @baconhound said:

    I see no real stumbling blocks to getting a warrant.  A logical request made before a judge doesn’t seem like too much to ask.  The warrant process has worked for decades.

    To what purpose? Just to give the bad guys a heads up?

    WSS