Hyde traded
-
Dorsey probably knows Hue isn’t going to use Chubb as long as a veteran is around. Forced his hand.
Preparing for next year without Hue hopefully.
And when Chubbs YPC end up not being much better...? What then will you say?
On top of him being a liability when asked to protect.
And when Chubbs YPC end up not being much better...? What then will you say?
On top of him being a liability when asked to protect.
Well I bet it will be better
Dorsey drafted him at #35 to play, RB is not a long term position. Getting rid of Hyde’s contract and ensure your highly drafted RB gets significant carries at the same time = win win
-
Because he averages YPC in the Trent Richardson ballpark. He can’t run outside.
He’s rubbish.
Your posts are starting to rival Ghoolies
-
Dorsey taking the decision out of his coaches hands makes me happy
-
And when Chubbs YPC end up not being much better...? What then will you say?
On top of him being a liability when asked to protect.
Well I bet it will be better
Dorsey drafted him at #35 to play, RB is not a long term position. Getting rid of Hyde’s contract and ensure your highly drafted RB gets significant carries at the same time = win win
Well I bet it will be better
Dorsey drafted him at #35 to play, RB is not a long term position.
Getting rid of Hyde’s contract
ensure your highly drafted RB gets significant carries at the same time = win win
He is playing and this comment makes no sense. What is the issue with bringing along the rookie to have a more complete game?
Hyde's contract isn't substantial at all and this team can certainly afford it.
Drafted at 35 and you make it sound like Chubb was taken at a Fournette level pick. But this contradicts your "long term position". More carries = less career time.
I think you're just talking out of your butt at this point.
P.S. Fournette that I'm comparing averaged 3.7 ypc before he went down and 3.8 all of last year on an interior gap scheme, run first offense.
So you're saying you would be laughing about this team giving up Fournette if we had him?
-
He is playing and this comment makes no sense. What is the issue with bringing along the rookie to have a more complete game?
Hyde's contract isn't substantial at all and this team can certainly afford it.
Drafted at 35 and you make it sound like Chubb was taken at a Fournette level pick. But this contradicts your "long term position". More carries = less career time.
I think you're just talking out of your butt at this point.
P.S. Fournette that I'm comparing averaged 3.7 ypc before he went down and 3.8 all of last year on an interior gap scheme, run first offense.
So you're saying you would be laughing about this team giving up Fournette if we had him?
Hyde is five years older than Fournette ?
-
YES!! I have Hyde, Duke and Landry on one FL team......finally some direction! And I almost cut Duke.
Fournette was ruled out of Sunday’s game against the Houston Texans, and reports have said he could be out until Week 10. It’s not a great sign for Fournette’s return date that the Jaguars just traded a draft pick for an established running back who is in the first year of a three-year, $15.25 million deal.
Browns needed to get Nick Chubb more playing time
Chubb is the Browns’ most talented running back, but his playing time was limited. The trade should clear things up in the Cleveland backfield.
Chubb’s breakout game came against the Raiders, when he had 105 yards and two touchdowns on just three carries. He hasn’t had more than three carries in a game yet this season. That will change very soon........
-
He is playing and this comment makes no sense. What is the issue with bringing along the rookie to have a more complete game?
Hyde's contract isn't substantial at all and this team can certainly afford it.
Drafted at 35 and you make it sound like Chubb was taken at a Fournette level pick. But this contradicts your "long term position". More carries = less career time.
I think you're just talking out of your butt at this point.
P.S. Fournette that I'm comparing averaged 3.7 ypc before he went down and 3.8 all of last year on an interior gap scheme, run first offense.
So you're saying you would be laughing about this team giving up Fournette if we had him?
Hyde is five years older than Fournette ?
IDGAF.
If that's where you're going to take it then shouldn't Fournette have a significantly higher average?
Oh wait, now you realize your argument being flipped on you is pretty easy when you used YPC for foundation.
Go on, I'm waiting for you to answer my question. Would you be cool with this team getting rid of Fournette in this case?
-
-
Relax boys it's a strategy. We are stockpiling 5th round draft choices starting today!
WSS
-
-
Dorsey probably knows Hue isn’t going to use Chubb as long as a veteran is around. Forced his hand.
Preparing for next year without Hue hopefully.
Dorsey probably knows Hue isn’t going to use Chubb as long as a veteran is around. Forced his hand.
Preparing for next year without Hue hopefully.
We can only hope.
-
-
This had better be followed up by getting a new receiver. Otherwise I think it's a needless gamble.
-
This had better be followed up by getting a new receiver. Otherwise I think it's a needless gamble.
This had better be followed up by getting a new receiver. Otherwise I think it's a needless gamble.
Thinking the same way.
-
-
This strikes me as a move made by a GM who knows the current coaching staff isn't going to be here next season, and he could not give a flying fudge (but I didn't say fudge) about what they want or their feelings. He's going to get who he wants on the field now.
-
-
fukking Retarded trading ur grinder for a 5th. Hyde has been our workhorse. chubb needs time. Yesterday obe could argue this team had the best RB room ib the NFL. And today we dont. So god damn fukking stupid to do this now.
y'all can count on a thread im gonna make later this season when chibb gets dinged and this rerarded fukking kunt of an organization starts asking duke to do all the heavy lifting.....possibly getting him long term injured.
If this trade blows up in tbe browns face u can almoat guarantee we'll start to hear grumbling out of baker too cause they kunt swapped his stud backfield. Once baker has zero run game to rely on and teams just pin the ears back and come after him......well, baker was nice while it lasted. A couple feely good games, thanks jimmy...thanks dorsey. Now lets get baxk to talking about the #1 pick
-
This also clears a roster spot
A young WR off a practice squad somewhere?
Some close to Browns saying Chubb was earmarked for a much larger role from here on out so they got something for Hyde before his value became zero
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login