Trump bump stock ban
-
-
-
Sad! First bump stocks, then all of our guns. Dirty Obamao strikes again. Next he's going to come for all of your guns!
wait...
Sad! First bump stocks, then all of our guns. Dirty Obamao strikes again. Next he's going to come for all of your guns!
wait...
After all the years of boogeyman rumors, Obama never pushed through an EO to hose gun owners. I don’t think it was because he was pro 2A by any means but he left it up to legislators.
-
Sad! First bump stocks, then all of our guns. Dirty Obamao strikes again. Next he's going to come for all of your guns!
wait...
After all the years of boogeyman rumors, Obama never pushed through an EO to hose gun owners. I don’t think it was because he was pro 2A by any means but he left it up to legislators.
After all the years of boogeyman rumors, Obama never pushed through an EO to hose gun owners. I don’t think it was because he was pro 2A by any means but he left it up to legislators.
He also had a Republican House and Senate. But it's good you are so trusting.
WSS
-
After all the years of boogeyman rumors, Obama never pushed through an EO to hose gun owners. I don’t think it was because he was pro 2A by any means but he left it up to legislators.
He also had a Republican House and Senate. But it's good you are so trusting.
WSS
He also had a Republican House and Senate. But it's good you are so trusting.
WSS
Where did I ever infer trust in either party? Obama had openings to trot out EOs and didn’t. They wouldn’t have to go through the legislative process. Trump has the same opportunity, he is.
-
He also had a Republican House and Senate. But it's good you are so trusting.
WSS
Where did I ever infer trust in either party? Obama had openings to trot out EOs and didn’t. They wouldn’t have to go through the legislative process. Trump has the same opportunity, he is.
Where did I ever infer trust in either party? Obama had openings to trot out EOs and didn’t. They wouldn’t have to go through the legislative process. Trump has the same opportunity, he is.
I don’t think any pressure was put on Obama while he was prez to issue EO’s regarding firearms.
None of the mass shootings were blamed on BO during his tenure.
Naturally, the MSM lays blame on Trump for every mass shooting...and for the sun not shining everyday.
-
He also had a Republican House and Senate. But it's good you are so trusting.
WSS
Where did I ever infer trust in either party? Obama had openings to trot out EOs and didn’t. They wouldn’t have to go through the legislative process. Trump has the same opportunity, he is.
Where did I ever infer trust in either party? Obama had openings to trot out EOs and didn’t. They wouldn’t have to go through the legislative process. Trump has the same opportunity, he is.
Baby steps. Come on don't be naive. First you legalize controlling the number of rounds a gun can carry. Which means anything over a single shot bolt action could easily be outlawed. I don't suppose England was neutered in one day.
Correctly if any of that crap was enforceable and across-the-board I could live with it.
WSS
-
Where did I ever infer trust in either party? Obama had openings to trot out EOs and didn’t. They wouldn’t have to go through the legislative process. Trump has the same opportunity, he is.
I don’t think any pressure was put on Obama while he was prez to issue EO’s regarding firearms.
None of the mass shootings were blamed on BO during his tenure.
Naturally, the MSM lays blame on Trump for every mass shooting...and for the sun not shining everyday.
I don’t think any pressure was put on Obama while he was prez to issue EO’s regarding firearms.
None of the mass shootings were blamed on BO during his tenure.
Naturally, the MSM lays blame on Trump for every mass shooting...and for the sun not shining everyday.
That is not ok but at the same time it doesn’t get a pass from me on relenting on 2A support. This won’t be the end of it as far as this action being used as a later justification.
-
Where did I ever infer trust in either party? Obama had openings to trot out EOs and didn’t. They wouldn’t have to go through the legislative process. Trump has the same opportunity, he is.
Baby steps. Come on don't be naive. First you legalize controlling the number of rounds a gun can carry. Which means anything over a single shot bolt action could easily be outlawed. I don't suppose England was neutered in one day.
Correctly if any of that crap was enforceable and across-the-board I could live with it.
WSS
Baby steps. Come on don't be naive. First you legalize controlling the number of rounds a gun can carry. Which means anything over a single shot bolt action could easily be outlawed. I don't suppose England was neutered in one day.
Correctly if any of that crap was enforceable and across-the-board I could live with it.
WSS
Being naive isn’t it. It is a matter of not spitting on it before they slide it in on gun owners. But it seems the protesting to it is selective and political. It is like when the anti war movement disappered after Obama got in office.
-
Baby steps. Come on don't be naive. First you legalize controlling the number of rounds a gun can carry. Which means anything over a single shot bolt action could easily be outlawed. I don't suppose England was neutered in one day.
Correctly if any of that crap was enforceable and across-the-board I could live with it.
WSS
Being naive isn’t it. It is a matter of not spitting on it before they slide it in on gun owners. But it seems the protesting to it is selective and political. It is like when the anti war movement disappered after Obama got in office.
Being naive isn’t it. It is a matter of not spitting on it before they slide it in on gun owners. But it seems the protesting to it is selective and political. It is like when the anti war movement disappered after Obama got in office.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/28/gun-control-polling-parkland-430099
-
All of those were for research and awareness. The guy was not pro 2A as discussed previously but, like the Forbes article said, none of impacted gun owners.
I imagine they got real quiet after looking more at the numbers. All violent crime, including gun crime, has been dropping for years.
-
Being naive isn’t it. It is a matter of not spitting on it before they slide it in on gun owners. But it seems the protesting to it is selective and political. It is like when the anti war movement disappered after Obama got in office.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/28/gun-control-polling-parkland-430099
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/28/gun-control-polling-parkland-430099
At some point, the will and the money will be there. But until then, no point in laying down. Joining in on the fu-ckery isn’t the answer.
-
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/28/gun-control-polling-parkland-430099
At some point, the will and the money will be there. But until then, no point in laying down. Joining in on the fu-ckery isn’t the answer.
At some point, the will and the money will be there. But until then, no point in laying down. Joining in on the fu-ckery isn’t the answer.
Probably not. Ask the frog in the pot.
WSS
-
At some point, the will and the money will be there. But until then, no point in laying down. Joining in on the fu-ckery isn’t the answer.
Probably not. Ask the frog in the pot.
WSS
Probably not. Ask the frog in the pot.
WSS
Boiling frog syndrome regarding 2A...I couldn’t agree more.
-
Banning ‘Bump Stocks’ Won’t Solve Anything
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/06/opinion/banning-bump-stocks-wont-solve-anything.html
Without coming out and saying it directly the author is really wanting a ban on assault rifles and that is the goal of the gun grabbers. Banning of bumpstocks may be feel good legislation but with 82 percent of the public wanting a ban of bump stocks I would rather see supporters of 2A more focused on fighting the battle to keep another "assault weapons" ban from happening again like we had in the 90's that fortunately had a 10 year sunset clause that Bush allowed to expire. Once the dems gain power again no doubt if they get another assault weapons ban there will be no sunset clause.
I get that the gun control crowd is out to incrementally take away gun control rights and they are probing every avenue in their attempt to do it. Although they would like more sweeping legislation to take away gun rights all at once they know they can't do that so they try to take away gun rights bit by bit and I see the reason why those who support 2A fight them at every step but I don't see bump stocks as the hill to die on for those fighting the gun grabbers.
-
Just for the hell of it take a couple deep breaths and consider how much damage the bump stock has done so far. Almost done. Oh I have no problem with a ban but let's not get too worked up over Panacea it will provide for American Safety.
WSS
-
You guys convinced me. Let’s lay down until they mess with bolt action rifles and shotguns. The NRA might put up a fight before then given that Ruger makes ARs now. If only they had made bump stocks...
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
