More trauma for our young people.
-
How many Confederates were executed as traitors?
Also liberals seem to misremember thar this country was born out of treason.
LOL! And the "new" conservatives have "disremembered" that this country was born to release us from the shackles of a King, yet seem to want a new ? who would undermine the democratic foundations of this country for his own selfish greed and adulation.
LOL! And the "new" conservatives have "disremembered" that this country was born to release us from the shackles of a King, yet seem to want a new ? who would undermine the democratic foundations of this country for his own selfish greed and adulation.
And the South wanted to free themselves from the shackles of the president. So what? And why was that? Because Washington and his Pals Who are the .1% of wealthy people on the continent. Felt they were being overtaxed for ship they didn't care about. Like now.
WSS
-
How many Confederates were executed as traitors?
Also liberals seem to misremember thar this country was born out of treason.
LOL! And the "new" conservatives have "disremembered" that this country was born to release us from the shackles of a King, yet seem to want a new ? who would undermine the democratic foundations of this country for his own selfish greed and adulation.
LOL! And the "new" conservatives have "disremembered" that this country was born to release us from the shackles of a King, yet seem to want a new ? who would undermine the democratic foundations of this country for his own selfish greed and adulation.
Again, you, like cccwhatever are guilty of acting as though I give a fuck about Trump one way or the other. I don't. I think he's a dick who is more effective than the guy everyone loved and now you've all got your panties in a bunch about it. I couldn't care less what happens to him one way or the other though. Long term this country belongs to the Democrats and it's irrevocably fucked.
-
when a country makes itself the oppressive, deadly enemy - Real Americans take up
arms to defend themselves. That isn't a matter of being traitors, it's a matter of being
persecuted and being made slaves to a vicious, powerful force. They already fled their country.
They left for freedom. Their FORMER country came after them.
when a country makes itself the oppressive, deadly enemy - Real Americans take up
arms to defend themselves. That isn't a matter of being traitors, it's a matter of being
persecuted and being made slaves to a vicious, powerful force. They already fled their country.
They left for freedom. Their FORMER country came after them.
Were Confederates Real Americans?
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
If you like geniuses you should read up on Genghis Khan. Yes, he was a ruthless, but there always seemed to be sound reasoning behind the killing. And a lot of killing was exaggerated and purposely spread to discourage future problems. I don't think he was any worse than Alexander, he just scared the shit of out the people who ended up writing a lot of our history.
Sack of Baghdad 1258.
Murder of between 250,000 - 1,000,000 in one week. Near total rape and annihilation of the civilian citizenry. Completely fucked any progress the middle East had made. Ramifications still being felt today.
Yeah, no, the Mongols were cool guys.
Sack of Baghdad 1258.
Murder of between 250,000 - 1,000,000 in one week. Near total rape and annihilation of the civilian citizenry. Completely fucked any progress the middle East had made. Ramifications still being felt today.
Yeah, no, the Mongols were cool guys.
I never said Genghis was a swell guy, I said what he was able to do was amazing.
1. Genghis wasn't at the sack of Baghdad.
2. The leaders of the city should have just surrender, but they were stupid.
3. Thanks for proving my point about exaggerating the numbers.
Over 350,000 Americans were killed by your heroes in the south trying their best to keep on owning people.
-
Sack of Baghdad 1258.
Murder of between 250,000 - 1,000,000 in one week. Near total rape and annihilation of the civilian citizenry. Completely fucked any progress the middle East had made. Ramifications still being felt today.
Yeah, no, the Mongols were cool guys.
I never said Genghis was a swell guy, I said what he was able to do was amazing.
1. Genghis wasn't at the sack of Baghdad.
2. The leaders of the city should have just surrender, but they were stupid.
3. Thanks for proving my point about exaggerating the numbers.
Over 350,000 Americans were killed by your heroes in the south trying their best to keep on owning people.
I never said Genghis was a swell guy, I said what he was able to do was amazing.
1. Genghis wasn't at the sack of Baghdad.
2. The leaders of the city should have just surrender, but they were stupid.
3. Thanks for proving my point about exaggerating the numbers.
Over 350,000 Americans were killed by your heroes in the south trying their best to keep on owning people.
Hitler wasn't at Stalingrad. No culpability I suppose.
Heroes? No. I'm from Ohio. We fought for the Union in case you weren't aware. No less than U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman themselves were Ohio Natives.
If those two guys, as well as Abraham Lincoln were able to put enmity aside and accept the vanquished south back into the Union who the fuck is anonymous internet troll cccjlgbt to try and sway my opinion?
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind... -
when a country makes itself the oppressive, deadly enemy - Real Americans take up
arms to defend themselves. That isn't a matter of being traitors, it's a matter of being
persecuted and being made slaves to a vicious, powerful force. They already fled their country.
They left for freedom. Their FORMER country came after them.
Were Confederates Real Americans?
Were Confederates Real Americans?
If you remember how I explained the definition to you many times before - yes. It involves
love of country, family values, independence, honor....etc. The civil war was over how those values were implemented.
Your questions are getting far more stupidass than usual.
-
Were Confederates Real Americans?
If you remember how I explained the definition to you many times before - yes. It involves
love of country, family values, independence, honor....etc. The civil war was over how those values were implemented.
Your questions are getting far more stupidass than usual.
If you remember how I explained the definition to you many times before - yes. It involves
love of country, family values, independence, honor....etc. The civil war was over how those values were implemented.
Your questions are getting far more stupidass than usual.
So both sides were real Americans?
-
I never said Genghis was a swell guy, I said what he was able to do was amazing.
1. Genghis wasn't at the sack of Baghdad.
2. The leaders of the city should have just surrender, but they were stupid.
3. Thanks for proving my point about exaggerating the numbers.
Over 350,000 Americans were killed by your heroes in the south trying their best to keep on owning people.
Hitler wasn't at Stalingrad. No culpability I suppose.
Heroes? No. I'm from Ohio. We fought for the Union in case you weren't aware. No less than U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman themselves were Ohio Natives.
If those two guys, as well as Abraham Lincoln were able to put enmity aside and accept the vanquished south back into the Union who the fuck is anonymous internet troll cccjlgbt to try and sway my opinion?
Hitler wasn't at Stalingrad. No culpability I suppose.
Heroes? No. I'm from Ohio. We fought for the Union in case you weren't aware. No less than U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman themselves were Ohio Natives.
If those two guys, as well as Abraham Lincoln were able to put enmity aside and accept the vanquished south back into the Union who the fuck is anonymous internet troll cccjlgbt to try and sway my opinion?
Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride.
-
I never said Genghis was a swell guy, I said what he was able to do was amazing.
1. Genghis wasn't at the sack of Baghdad.
2. The leaders of the city should have just surrender, but they were stupid.
3. Thanks for proving my point about exaggerating the numbers.
Over 350,000 Americans were killed by your heroes in the south trying their best to keep on owning people.
Hitler wasn't at Stalingrad. No culpability I suppose.
Heroes? No. I'm from Ohio. We fought for the Union in case you weren't aware. No less than U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman themselves were Ohio Natives.
If those two guys, as well as Abraham Lincoln were able to put enmity aside and accept the vanquished south back into the Union who the fuck is anonymous internet troll cccjlgbt to try and sway my opinion?
Hitler wasn't at Stalingrad. No culpability I suppose.
Heroes? No. I'm from Ohio. We fought for the Union in case you weren't aware. No less than U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman themselves were Ohio Natives.
If those two guys, as well as Abraham Lincoln were able to put enmity aside and accept the vanquished south back into the Union who the fuck is anonymous internet troll cccjlgbt to try and sway my opinion?
yeah - "genderless" as well. Maybe foreign who doesn't know our history, our Constitution, and some of the grammar sounds like the posts are from a russian dimwitted troll.
Эй, cccjwh, вернуться домой, они на тебе, ОК?
-
If you remember how I explained the definition to you many times before - yes. It involves
love of country, family values, independence, honor....etc. The civil war was over how those values were implemented.
Your questions are getting far more stupidass than usual.
So both sides were real Americans?
So both sides were real Americans?
well, moron, I wasn't there to coin the term at the time, woodypeckerhead. Go learn something about the civil war before you ask stupid questions.
-
So you know Confederates were Real Americans but you're not sure about the Yankees?
-
No, the answer is obvious. Just look past your gay pinko beak.
-
Hitler wasn't at Stalingrad. No culpability I suppose.
Heroes? No. I'm from Ohio. We fought for the Union in case you weren't aware. No less than U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman themselves were Ohio Natives.
If those two guys, as well as Abraham Lincoln were able to put enmity aside and accept the vanquished south back into the Union who the fuck is anonymous internet troll cccjlgbt to try and sway my opinion?
Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride.
Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride.
Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either
Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.
Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man.
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind... -
Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride.
Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either
Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.
Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man.
Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either
Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of am enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.
Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man.
Funny thing is I live within 20 miles of a place where no less than the Father of Texas, Sam Houston, gave one of his anti--secession speeches from the balcony of a still existent Inn on the Salado River. He paid the price of ostracism for his stance. But it earn him a permanent place in John F. Kennedy's "Profiles in Courage" with the title of Chapter V, "...I can forget that I am called a traitor."-Sam Houston
-
Obviously they should have listened to Sam Houston because everything he said turned out to be accurate, but that changes nothing about what I wrote.
-
Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride.
Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either
Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.
Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man.
Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man.
this is exactly true. Probably all the time, the truth is more comprehensive than a simple emotional knee jerk from a liberal.
-
Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either
Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of am enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.
Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man.
Funny thing is I live within 20 miles of a place where no less than the Father of Texas, Sam Houston, gave one of his anti--secession speeches from the balcony of a still existent Inn on the Salado River. He paid the price of ostracism for his stance. But it earn him a permanent place in John F. Kennedy's "Profiles in Courage" with the title of Chapter V, "...I can forget that I am called a traitor."-Sam Houston
Funny thing is I live within 20 miles of a place where no less than the Father of Texas, Sam Houston, gave one of his anti--secession speeches from the balcony of a still existent Inn on the Salado River. He paid the price of ostracism for his stance. But it earn him a permanent place in John F. Kennedy's "Profiles in Courage" with the title of Chapter V, "...I can forget that I am called a traitor."-Sam Houston
Even Lee himself spoke out against succession and by all accounts Jefferson Davis was none to pleased to have been elected president of the Confederate states.
-
when a country makes itself the oppressive, deadly enemy - Real Americans take up
arms to defend themselves. That isn't a matter of being traitors, it's a matter of being
persecuted and being made slaves to a vicious, powerful force. They already fled their country.
They left for freedom. Their FORMER country came after them.
Were Confederates Real Americans?
Were Confederates Real Americans?
The original real Americans.
-
Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride.
Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either
Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.
Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man.
Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either
Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.
Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man.
You can use the same reasoning to justify the Nazi soldiers decisions. Poor Hans was just fighting for his family back in Germany.
I have heard all of the excuses for the traitors. Hey they were just following orders, right. But this isn't about them, they were forgiven for their treason. It's about people idolizing the South for wanting to keep people as slaves. Proud that half the country revolted and caused hundreds of thousands deaths, set back the country for a few decades. All because they wanted to keep on owning people.
-
horseshit just further cementing your simple black and white thinking. Are you even capable of higher thought than a dog?
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login