Skip to content

More trauma for our young people.

Political Discussion
72 11 1.3k
  • @cccjwh said:

    I never said Genghis was a swell guy,  I said what he was able to do was amazing.  

    1. Genghis wasn't at the sack of Baghdad.

    2. The leaders of the city should have just surrender, but they were stupid.

    3. Thanks for proving my point about exaggerating the numbers.

    Over 350,000 Americans were killed by your heroes in the south trying their best to keep on owning people. 

    Hitler wasn't at Stalingrad. No culpability I suppose. 

    Heroes? No. I'm from Ohio. We fought for the Union in case you weren't aware. No less than  U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman themselves were Ohio Natives. 

    If those two guys, as well as Abraham Lincoln were able to put enmity aside and accept the vanquished south back into the Union who the fuck is anonymous internet troll cccjlgbt to try and sway my opinion? 

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Hitler wasn't at Stalingrad. No culpability I suppose. 

    Heroes? No. I'm from Ohio. We fought for the Union in case you weren't aware. No less than  U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman themselves were Ohio Natives. 

    If those two guys, as well as Abraham Lincoln were able to put enmity aside and accept the vanquished south back into the Union who the fuck is anonymous internet troll cccjlgbt to try and sway my opinion? 

      yeah - "genderless" as well. Maybe foreign who doesn't know our history, our Constitution, and some of the grammar sounds like the posts are from a russian dimwitted troll.

    Эй, cccjwh, вернуться домой, они на тебе, ОК?

  • @calfoxwc said:

    If you remember how I explained the definition to you many times before - yes. It involves

    love of country, family values, independence, honor....etc. The civil war was over how those values were implemented.

    Your questions are getting far more stupidass than usual.

    So both sides were real Americans?

    @mld-woody said:

    So both sides were real Americans?

    well, moron, I wasn't there to coin the term at the time, woodypeckerhead. Go learn something about the civil war before you ask stupid questions.

  • So you know Confederates were Real Americans but you're not sure about the Yankees?

  • No, the answer is obvious. Just look past your gay pinko beak.

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Hitler wasn't at Stalingrad. No culpability I suppose. 

    Heroes? No. I'm from Ohio. We fought for the Union in case you weren't aware. No less than  U.S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman themselves were Ohio Natives. 

    If those two guys, as well as Abraham Lincoln were able to put enmity aside and accept the vanquished south back into the Union who the fuck is anonymous internet troll cccjlgbt to try and sway my opinion? 

    Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride. 

    @cccjwh said:

    Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride. 

    Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either

    Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.

    Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man. 

  • @cccjwh said:

    Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride. 

    Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either

    Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.

    Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man. 

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either

    Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of am enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.

    Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man. 

    Funny thing is I live within 20 miles of a place where no less than the Father of Texas, Sam Houston, gave one of his anti--secession speeches from the balcony of a still existent Inn on the Salado River. He paid the price of ostracism for his stance. But it earn him a permanent place in John F. Kennedy's "Profiles in Courage" with the title of Chapter V, "...I can forget that I am called a traitor."-Sam Houston

  • Obviously they should have listened to Sam Houston because everything he said turned out to be accurate, but that changes nothing about what I wrote. 

  • @cccjwh said:

    Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride. 

    Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either

    Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.

    Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man. 

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man. 

    this is exactly true. Probably all the time, the truth is more comprehensive than a simple emotional knee jerk from a liberal.

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either

    Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of am enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.

    Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man. 

    Funny thing is I live within 20 miles of a place where no less than the Father of Texas, Sam Houston, gave one of his anti--secession speeches from the balcony of a still existent Inn on the Salado River. He paid the price of ostracism for his stance. But it earn him a permanent place in John F. Kennedy's "Profiles in Courage" with the title of Chapter V, "...I can forget that I am called a traitor."-Sam Houston

    @texasag1969 said:

    Funny thing is I live within 20 miles of a place where no less than the Father of Texas, Sam Houston, gave one of his anti--secession speeches from the balcony of a still existent Inn on the Salado River. He paid the price of ostracism for his stance. But it earn him a permanent place in John F. Kennedy's "Profiles in Courage" with the title of Chapter V, "...I can forget that I am called a traitor."-Sam Houston

    Even Lee himself spoke out against succession and by all accounts Jefferson Davis was none to pleased to have been elected president of the Confederate states. 

  • @calfoxwc said:

    when a country makes itself the oppressive, deadly enemy - Real Americans take up

    arms to defend themselves. That isn't a matter of being traitors, it's a matter of being

    persecuted and being made slaves to a vicious, powerful force. They already fled their country.

    They left for freedom. Their FORMER country came after them.

    Were Confederates Real Americans? 

    @mld-woody said:

    Were Confederates Real Americans? 

    The original real Americans.

  • @cccjwh said:

    Well I can see you don't know shit about Khan, so I won't bother. Being proud of people who were traitors to your country has nothing to do with enmity. Are the Germans proud of their Nazi history? No. But the assholes in this country sure are proud of people how committed treason and killed a bunch of Americans.And what was the primary reason for these traitors to commit treason? So they could keep on owning people. Hey I'm sure they didn't rape and murder a bunch slaves either, that is just fake news. If they actual had some noble cause to fight for, then you could have some pride. 

    Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either

    Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.

    Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man. 

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. I wouldn't bother to go any farther down that road if I were you either

    Grant remarked that he was filled with sadness and depression at the defeat of the South and could take no joy at the vanquishing of an enemy who had fought so hard and valiantly despite their cause being one of the worst anyone has ever fought for.

    Again this is typical liberal oversimplification. The wealthy plantation owners pushed for secession but the majority of the rebels were regular non-slave owning American boys and men that were roped into the war with big politicians' silky words about fighting for their homes and families. I can't find it in my heart any more than Grant could to condemn the typical Confederate fighting man. 

    You can use the same reasoning to justify the Nazi soldiers decisions. Poor Hans was just fighting for his family back in Germany.

    I have heard all of the excuses for the traitors. Hey they were just following orders, right. But this isn't about them, they were forgiven for their treason. It's about people idolizing the South for wanting to keep people as slaves. Proud that half the country revolted and caused hundreds of thousands deaths, set back the country for a few decades. All because they wanted to keep on owning people. 

  •  horseshit just further cementing your simple black and white thinking. Are you even capable of higher thought than a dog?

  • Who, exactly, is idolizing the South for slave society? I'm pretty sure you won't be able to give any specific examples. 

  •  horseshit just further cementing your simple black and white thinking. Are you even capable of higher thought than a dog?

    @the-cysko-kid said:

     horseshit just further cementing your simple black and white thinking. Are you even capable of higher thought than a dog?

    Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. 

  • No, the answer is obvious. Just look past your gay pinko beak.

    @calfoxwc said:

    No, the answer is obvious. Just look past your gay pinko beak.

    Then what is it?

    You said Confederates were real Americans

    You haven't said Yankees were

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

     horseshit just further cementing your simple black and white thinking. Are you even capable of higher thought than a dog?

    Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. 

    @cccjwh said:

    Typical response of someone arguing on inherently broken logic. 

    Nice try though. 

  • Who, exactly, is idolizing the South for slave society? I'm pretty sure you won't be able to give any specific examples. 

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Who, exactly, is idolizing the South for slave society? I'm pretty sure you won't be able to give any specific examples. 

    Do these ngr fgts ring any bells for u?

    charlottesville-unite-the-right.png

  • Oh right, those guys.....?

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Funny thing is I live within 20 miles of a place where no less than the Father of Texas, Sam Houston, gave one of his anti--secession speeches from the balcony of a still existent Inn on the Salado River. He paid the price of ostracism for his stance. But it earn him a permanent place in John F. Kennedy's "Profiles in Courage" with the title of Chapter V, "...I can forget that I am called a traitor."-Sam Houston

    Even Lee himself spoke out against succession and by all accounts Jefferson Davis was none to pleased to have been elected president of the Confederate states. 

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Even Lee himself spoke out against succession and by all accounts Jefferson Davis was none to pleased to have been elected president of the Confederate states. 

    Lee's price was Arlington National Cemetery established on the Lee family plantation (via his wife's family) around Arlington mansion. Poetic Justice at it's best.?

  • All this faggot outrage has me amused.  All you poor little fuckers who are outraged about shit that happened over one hundred years ago.  Fuck you!?