Skip to content

We Need To Keep Lamar Jackson In The Pocket

The Browns Board
172 29 4.1k 1
  • @the-gipper said:

    Year No. of
    men
    Nations
    (men)
    No. of
    women
    Nations
    (women)
    Total
    athletes
    Total
    nations
    Men's champion Women's champion
    1896[15] 15 8 N/A N/A 15 8 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Thomas Burke (USA) N/A
    1900[24] 20 9 N/A N/A 20 9 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Frank Jarvis (USA) N/A
    1904[25] 11 3 N/A N/A 11 3 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Archie Hahn (USA) N/A
    1908[26] 60 16 N/A N/A 60 16 22px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png Reggie Walker (RSA) N/A
    1912[27] 70 22 N/A N/A 70 22 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Ralph Craig (USA) N/A
    1920[28] 61 23 N/A N/A 61 23 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Charlie Paddock (USA) N/A
    1924[29] 86 34 N/A N/A 86 34 22px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png Harold Abrahams (GBR) N/A
    1928[30][31] 81 33 31 13 107 35 22px-Canadian_Red_Ensign_%281921%E2%80%9 Percy Williams (CAN) 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Betty Robinson (USA)
    1932[32][33] 33 17 20 10 51 19 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Eddie Tolan (USA) 22px-Flag_of_Poland.svg.png Stanisława Walasiewicz (POL)
    1936[34][35] 61 30 30 15 91 33 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Jesse Owens (USA) 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Helen Stephens (USA)
    1948[36][37] 61 33 38 21 99 39 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Harrison Dillard (USA) 22px-Flag_of_the_Netherlands.svg.png Fanny Blankers-Koen (NED)
    1952[38][39] 70 33 56 27 126 41 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Lindy Remigino (USA) 22px-Flag_of_Australia.svg.png Marjorie Jackson (AUS)
    1956[40][41] 63 31 34 16 97 34 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Bobby Morrow (USA) 22px-Flag_of_Australia.svg.png Betty Cuthbert (AUS)
    1960[9][42] 59 45 31 18 90 50 22px-German_Olympic_flag_%281959-1968%29 Armin Hary (EUA) 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Wilma Rudolph (USA)
    1964[10][43] 71 49 44 27 115 56 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Bob Hayes (USA) 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Wyomia Tyus (USA)
    1968[44][45] 63 42 42 22 105 48 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Jim Hines (USA) 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Wyomia Tyus (USA)
    1972[46][47] 83 55 47 33 130 68 22px-Flag_of_the_Soviet_Union.svg.png Valeriy Borzov (URS) 22px-Flag_of_East_Germany.svg.png Renate Stecher (GDR)
    1976[48][49] 61 40 39 22 100 45 22px-Flag_of_Trinidad_and_Tobago.svg.png Hasely Crawford (TRI) 22px-Flag_of_Germany.svg.png Annegret Richter (FRG)
    1980[50][51] 63 41 40 25 103 46 22px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png Allan Wells (GBR) 22px-Flag_of_the_Soviet_Union.svg.png Lyudmila Kondratyeva (URS)
    1984[52][53] 80 59 46 33 126 68 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Carl Lewis (USA) 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Evelyn Ashford (USA)
    1988[54][55] 100 69 64 42 164 85 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Carl Lewis (USA) 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Florence Griffith-Joyner (USA)
    1992[56][57] 79 66 54 41 133 86 22px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png Linford Christie (GBR) 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Gail Devers (USA)
    1996[58][59] 104 75 56 38 160 89 22px-Flag_of_Canada.svg.png Donovan Bailey (CAN) 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Gail Devers (USA)
    2000[60][61] 95 71 84 63 179 100 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Maurice Greene (USA) Vacated[62]
    2004[63][64] 80 62 63 51 143 89 22px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png Justin Gatlin (USA) 22px-Flag_of_Belarus.svg.png Yulia Nestsiarenka (BLR)
    2008[65][66] 78 64 85 69 163 96 22px-Flag_of_Jamaica.svg.png Usain Bolt (JAM) 22px-Flag_of_Jamaica.svg.png Shelly-Ann Fraser (JAM)
    2012[67][68] 72 61 79 65 151 92 22px-Flag_of_Jamaica.svg.png Usain Bolt (JAM) 22px-Flag_of_Jamaica.svg.png Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce (JAM)
    2016 84 57 80 56 164 82 22px-Flag_of_Jamaica.svg.png Usain Bolt (JAM) 22px-Flag_of_Jamaica.svg.png Elaine Thompson (JA

    All of the early guys on this list were white.....in fact, I think Jesse Owens was the first black winner of the 100 meters. Sisnce 1960 only Hary, Borzov, and Wells were white.

    Just stop with this argumentative crap Gipper, there was a thing called segregation, and even more recently apartheid in South Africa.  Those records (yeah, they're records, that's about it) from the 1800s and early 1900s are even less relevant to today's track athletes than the style of football the Canton Bulldogs were playing in the 1920s to today's NFL. What some white guy did 120 years ago in the Olympics, has sqatoosh bearing on the modern era, 

    Color doesn't matter anymore, so see any white guys here?    

    @hoorta said:

    Just stop with this argumentative crap Gipper, there was a thing called segregation, and even more recently apartheid in South Africa.  Those records (yeah, they're records, that's about it) from the 1800s and early 1900s are even less relevant to today's track athletes than the style of football the Canton Bulldogs were playing in the 1920s to today's NFL. What some white guy did 120 years ago in the Olympics, has sqatoosh bearing on the modern era, 

    Color doesn't matter anymore, so see any white guys here?    

    McCaffrey was preparing to play for the Carolina Panthers that day.?‍♂️

  • @gunz41 said:

    My only point was just saying someone lost a lot doesn't really tell the story, as others have done the same thing, or even take it a step further, I'm sure there are guys you would consider way better and was beating them to get there to lose

    Here is an article I agree with. Chokers. They have Tarkenton as the #6 all-time choker. Kelly, Fouts and Marino. Tarkenton really did single-handedly lose 4 SBs. He had so many chances in those games to make a play.

    Stinkenhiemer #1 NFL choker? Absolutely, Man, I hate that sonofabitch. 

    @ghoolie said:

    Here is an article I agree with. Chokers. They have Tarkenton as the #6 all-time choker. Kelly, Fouts and Marino. Tarkenton really did single-handedly lose 4 SBs. He had so many chances in those games to make a play.

    Stinkenhiemer #1 NFL choker? Absolutely, Man, I hate that sonofabitch. 

    Seeing that  Tarkenton only played in three super Bowls I question your credibility on this. Joe Kapp was the quarterback for one of those Viking losses

  • To be honest, Lamar Jackson doesn't scare me. What scares me is the Ravens' defense. The Ravens haven't been winning shootouts, they've been winning because their defense is putting the squadoosh down on fools. 

    @jiggins7919 said:

    To be honest, Lamar Jackson doesn't scare me. What scares me is the Ravens' defense. The Ravens haven't been winning shootouts, they've been winning because their defense is putting the squadoosh down on fools. 

    It's the combo... run-centric offense and staunch Defense. The former was not a part of our 12-9 win back in early October in Baker's coming out party when the Raven's D sacked him 5 times.

    Our biggest change since then is Chubb, who had no chunk plays in his limited role the first go 'round.

    Their biggest change is Jackson.

    @dutch-oven said:

    I'd play zone vs them. Keep everyone's eyes on him, make him read coverages and make smart throws.

    Bingo! We turn our backs in Man and he's 15 yards downfield before we're the wiser....

    @mld-woody said:

    Pep is probably our best option to spy Lamar

    But our best option to slow down Lamar is probably our DEs playing contain and pressuring him up the middle. Our edge defenders have to be smart and not get sucked in. 

    Agree on Pep as our spy, but I think we have to design in some "blown contains" to bait Jackson into taking off into Pep's arms. Especially to Jackson's left...

    So rush Garrett wide, cheat Pepper to the D's right and let the lane develop. Gives two shots at Jackson... MG, if he beats Stanley clean, and Pep, if Jackson flushes.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Lamar can pass much better than Tebow could...

    Run better too

    Yeah, Ghoolie's Black Tarkenton is a better fit. Tebow was a linebacker who thought he was a quarterback.

    @hoorta said:

    Yeah, Ghoolie's Black Tarkenton is a better fit.

    See below...

    @ghoolie said:

    So, my phrase, "Black Tarkenton" strike some as being racist, it is not, and I am not.

    Correct, not a racial comment. But also not a correct one.

    You seem to know something of Takenton's career, so it's odd that you cling classifing him as a running QB.

  • What really scares me is the way our team played against the Texans defense on the road. Also, we haven't fared well against teams playing well, either. The Texans, Chiefs, Chargers...all teams on streaks, and all teams that gave us the business. It's one thing to beat a team like the Bengals that stepped on their Johnson, but it's something entirely different to beat a team at their house fighting to get into the playoffs. We didn't compete in some of the nastier games, and even if we don't win this weekend, I want to see us BRING IT. It'll be a terrific learning experience for Baker because it's not really going to get much tougher than this. 

  • What really scares me is the way our team played against the Texans defense on the road. Also, we haven't fared well against teams playing well, either. The Texans, Chiefs, Chargers...all teams on streaks, and all teams that gave us the business. It's one thing to beat a team like the Bengals that stepped on their Johnson, but it's something entirely different to beat a team at their house fighting to get into the playoffs. We didn't compete in some of the nastier games, and even if we don't win this weekend, I want to see us BRING IT. It'll be a terrific learning experience for Baker because it's not really going to get much tougher than this. 

    @jiggins7919 said:

    What really scares me is the way our team played against the Texans defense on the road. Also, we haven't fared well against teams playing well, either. The Texans, Chiefs, Chargers...all teams on streaks, and all teams that gave us the business. It's one thing to beat a team like the Bengals that stepped on their Johnson, but it's something entirely different to beat a team at their house fighting to get into the playoffs. We didn't compete in some of the nastier games, and even if we don't win this weekend, I want to see us BRING IT. It'll be a terrific learning experience for Baker because it's not really going to get much tougher than this. 

    Baker will be fine.. He's fearless.. We contain Jackson.. the game is over...

  • First time in 4 seasons, I chose not to do the Baltimore amtrak game trip. Saw early, Last game of the season, after Xmas,End of December ☃️f'n buurrr! But man,now i feel like "damn u big dummy" with now cloudy skies, low of 34 degrees. I can hear PaPa Tom, you damm whimp. Who would have thought, with Hue still around, Browns could be taking a chit on the place that Art built. Or the steelqueers? a win/win in my book. That place will be bat chit crazy loud just as Denver was, so we should still be prepared for the crowd noise. Our Offense is not what bothers me anymore. Ravens only giving up 17 points per game does. And that D is playing at it's best all season.I'll be blunt, We can't count on our place kicking. We can't count on ST's & they owe us a blocked punt or FG at some point this game. D.Ward got them. So, It's time for Gregg Williams to lock this HC'ing position by beating a division rival with his defensive scheme. Not having D.Ward with Lamar working the outside edges clearly won't help. Lamar won't be hard to find. He'll be in the pistol formation with 1 of 3 guys coming out of the exchange with the ball. The Defensive front does not have to chase around after this guy. They just need to be the outside vises to clamp Lamar in the pocket. Williams has to have his unit committed to who's assignment is who's.Shobert has to be the vocal leader of the unit. If we hear the words missed tackles or a defensive miscommunication..were screwed!!   tackle well like that Denver game? We can do this..Brns.-17  Birds-13..and your welcome Tomlin, till your done the following week..          

  • @hoorta said:

    Yeah, Ghoolie's Black Tarkenton is a better fit.

    See below...

    @ghoolie said:

    So, my phrase, "Black Tarkenton" strike some as being racist, it is not, and I am not.

    Correct, not a racial comment. But also not a correct one.

    You seem to know something of Takenton's career, so it's odd that you cling classifing him as a running QB.

    @tour2ma said:

    See below...

    Correct, not a racial comment. But also not a correct one.

    You seem to know something of Takenton's career, so it's odd that you cling classifing him as a running QB.

    Tour, I would yield that there is a distinction between a running QB, and a scrambling QB, and that on overall examination it seems I have lumped them both together.

    On one hand, of course, I know the difference. On the other hand, to a great extent, I believe, whether the QB is a running QB ( or Run First QB), or just a scrambler, honestly, the end result in performance is the exact same. The euphemism that "one cannot serve two masters" sheds light on the problem.

    If there was some technology, an audible alarm, mounted in an earpiece that could somehow tell the QB when the outcome for the run was better than for the pass, the "Tarkenton" could be very reliable and effective. Alas, no such instrument exists and the balance between feet-fleeing, or hanging in to pass, under the pressure of live games, I believe, leaves this type of QB in a mental limbo, not really knowing which option to pursue.

    I remember watching Tarkenton, and even Kordell Stewart. Many times you could see that before Tark ever has back in the pocket, his head was moving, looking for a running/scrambling outlet, before even setting to read his recievers.

    I believe that from the time the ball is snapped, a"Tarkenton's mind is at work deciphering whether or not to pass. I think this dichotomy prevents this type of QB from ever really commanding the pass game. I believe this is why in very heated, pressure-filled games, the Tarkenton never has delivered and never will. 

    I believe that if WIlliams throws different blitzes at Jackson all day long, Jackson will self destruct.

    Let's see what happens.

  • Larmar has a short,stiff throwing motion.. He has shitty hitch steps I.E. Foot work.. He cannot throw to his left with any consistency.. Evreything it "to the right" for him.... You go 46 D and flood the right side. Send a different Pass rusher on each play.. And put your fastest defender on him (Peppers) spying on him..

  • Larmar has a short,stiff throwing motion.. He has shitty hitch steps I.E. Foot work.. He cannot throw to his left with any consistency.. Evreything it "to the right" for him.... You go 46 D and flood the right side. Send a different Pass rusher on each play.. And put your fastest defender on him (Peppers) spying on him..

    @nickers said:

    Larmar has a short,stiff throwing motion.. He has shitty hitch steps I.E. Foot work.. He cannot throw to his left with any consistency.. Evreything it "to the right" for him.... You go 46 D and flood the right side. Send a different Pass rusher on each play.. And put your fastest defender on him (Peppers) spying on him..

    Blake is gonna throw the book at him, then beat him about the head with it

  • When you face a running QB, sometimes you can do everything right and still get hurt. That's kind of what I see happening tomorrow, but another key is red zone defense. We hold them to 3, we can win. Very similar to our last game with them. We got that one TD before half, and that was really the difference. And btw, that was a BEAUTIFUL drive by Baker Mayfield in a 2 minute scenario against a darn good defense, culminated by a killer TD toss to Higgins. 

  • When you face a running QB, sometimes you can do everything right and still get hurt. That's kind of what I see happening tomorrow, but another key is red zone defense. We hold them to 3, we can win. Very similar to our last game with them. We got that one TD before half, and that was really the difference. And btw, that was a BEAUTIFUL drive by Baker Mayfield in a 2 minute scenario against a darn good defense, culminated by a killer TD toss to Higgins. 

    @jiggins7919 said:

    When you face a running QB, sometimes you can do everything right and still get hurt. That's kind of what I see happening tomorrow, but another key is red zone defense. We hold them to 3, we can win. Very similar to our last game with them. We got that one TD before half, and that was really the difference. And btw, that was a BEAUTIFUL drive by Baker Mayfield in a 2 minute scenario against a darn good defense, culminated by a killer TD toss to Higgins. 

    With Mayfield showing that he can run too but only when he has to. That would pose the same problem right back at the raisins wouldn’t it. Plus think of this... they have the vaunted D and we have nothing to lose. 

  • @ghoolie said:

    Well, my term Black Tarkenton is not a racist slur, nor a hidden thought of what I think of black QBs. I loved Moon and McNair, and am impressed with Mahomes and Sam Arnold.

    The term replies to a black kid who had his speed exploited in youth football, and was never taught like white kids are, to pass first.

    Sam Arnold?

    @mld-woody said:

    Sam Arnold?

    It's a joke. Ya gotta think fast to keep up with the Ghoolster.

  • When you face a running QB, sometimes you can do everything right and still get hurt. That's kind of what I see happening tomorrow, but another key is red zone defense. We hold them to 3, we can win. Very similar to our last game with them. We got that one TD before half, and that was really the difference. And btw, that was a BEAUTIFUL drive by Baker Mayfield in a 2 minute scenario against a darn good defense, culminated by a killer TD toss to Higgins. 

    @jiggins7919 said:

    When you face a running QB, sometimes you can do everything right and still get hurt. That's kind of what I see happening tomorrow, but another key is red zone defense. We hold them to 3, we can win. Very similar to our last game with them. We got that one TD before half, and that was really the difference. And btw, that was a BEAUTIFUL drive by Baker Mayfield in a 2 minute scenario against a darn good defense, culminated by a killer TD toss to Higgins. 

    Bullshit. THe ONLY ones who get hurt by Black Tarkentons are Marty Clones and dummies who think the way to beat black Tarkenton is to contain him. Black Tarkentons are very, very, low on intelligence. They are dimwits, who if forced all game to leave the pocket will absolutely, WITHOUT FAIL.....

    1) Make some great athletic plays

    2) Throw bad passes and interceptions

    3) Have a high probability of get hit hard, and getting fucked up

    You DO NOT try to contain pieces of shit like Vick, Watson and Jackson. YOu get in their face from bell-to-bell knowing that they are NEVER going to consistently beat ANYONE with their arms or their brains. You let them have their highlight plays, but at the end of the day, they are LOSERS.

    Lumbar Jackson isn't taking the Ravens anywhere. They only teams they will beat are the Marty Shittenhiemer faggots who are afraid to get after them. Blitz, Blitz, Blitz. Verbally abuse him, take some well planned later/borderline dirty hits and neutralize this picnic QB. Fuck the Ravens. Fuck Jackson and Fuck you snowflakes who are offended by swear words. What a bunch of **Mask** we have on this board.

  • Larmar has a short,stiff throwing motion.. He has shitty hitch steps I.E. Foot work.. He cannot throw to his left with any consistency.. Evreything it "to the right" for him.... You go 46 D and flood the right side. Send a different Pass rusher on each play.. And put your fastest defender on him (Peppers) spying on him..

    @nickers said:

    Larmar has a short,stiff throwing motion.. He has shitty hitch steps I.E. Foot work.. He cannot throw to his left with any consistency.. Evreything it "to the right" for him.... You go 46 D and flood the right side. Send a different Pass rusher on each play.. And put your fastest defender on him (Peppers) spying on him..

    BINGO.................. Or, you can do like some of the homosexuals here have suggested. Powder his nuts and by all means, for the love of humanity, don't swear at him.

  • @ghoolie said:

    Here is an article I agree with. Chokers. They have Tarkenton as the #6 all-time choker. Kelly, Fouts and Marino. Tarkenton really did single-handedly lose 4 SBs. He had so many chances in those games to make a play.

    Stinkenhiemer #1 NFL choker? Absolutely, Man, I hate that sonofabitch. 

    Seeing that  Tarkenton only played in three super Bowls I question your credibility on this. Joe Kapp was the quarterback for one of those Viking losses

    @the-gipper said:

    Seeing that  Tarkenton only played in three super Bowls I question your credibility on this. Joe Kapp was the quarterback for one of those Viking losses

    And if you followed my posts you will see that I corrected that BEFORE you did. HOWEVER....... in THREE SUPERBOWLS................. the run-first QB LOST ALL THREE...........with a lot of great players around him (Purple People Eater defense), AND PUT UP A WHOPPING 27 POINTS in THREE GAMES.

    Fran Tarkenton was the Putney Swope of NFL QBs. He was a piece of shit.

  • Lamar Jackson doesn't deserve your hatred.  When you call him a superpredator, that just makes you the idiot -- not him.

    He's one of the first round-1 draft picks in the modern era to negotiate a deal without an agent --- because he didn't want to lose the extra 3% the agent wanted.. his mom did the negotiations.  And his mom will be doing his endorsement deals as well -- because the agent take on endorsements is more than 3.  That's a smart business decision -- not crazy or wild.

    As well, adidas asked him during one of the UL - FSU games to wear Yeezy cleats... but he turned them down because he demanded his entire team be able to wear them.

    Dislike him all you want, but he's a good guy.

    @unsympathetic said:

    Lamar Jackson doesn't deserve your hatred.  When you call him a superpredator, that just makes you the idiot -- not him.

    He's one of the first round-1 draft picks in the modern era to negotiate a deal without an agent --- because he didn't want to lose the extra 3% the agent wanted.. his mom did the negotiations.  And his mom will be doing his endorsement deals as well -- because the agent take on endorsements is more than 3.  That's a smart business decision -- not crazy or wild.

    As well, adidas asked him during one of the UL - FSU games to wear Yeezy cleats... but he turned them down because he demanded his entire team be able to wear them.

    Dislike him all you want, but he's a good guy.

    Fuck good guys. Fuck him.

  • @ghoolie said:

    Gips, my old pal, as you and I head into a New Year, I am nudging you to get a little better grip on my tongue-in-cheek humor. Calling Sam D'Arnold black was a joke about color not meaning crap as far as a man's value. black, white, we are all loved equally by the one who counts.

    So, my phrase, "Black Tarkenton" strike some as being racist, it is not, and I am not. I do however think that run-first QBs are ALL shit QBs. Not one of them has ever held up through the playoffs and won a SB. Nor do I believe will one ever. The fact that run-first QBs seem to all be black doesn't make me racist. I hate the run-first QB because of the implications and shortcomings. It isn't my fault that these primarily tend to be blacks. Also FWIW, I despised Tarkenton and think he is the model of what a QB should NOT be. The fucking guy was in 4 Superbowls, and he got his ass kicked in all 4. Just like the Black Tarkentons, he put up all kinds of numbers, and created excitement. But, when it counted, like all run-first QBs, he turned to shit. 

    It's just the way it is. The black guys in general are faster. I don't remember a white guy ever running in the 100 in the Olympics. If one has, it's mighty rare.  

    @hoorta said:

    It's just the way it is. The black guys in general are faster. I don't remember a white guy ever running in the 100 in the Olympics. If one has, it's mighty rare.  

    For years the Russian sprinters held a lot of the Olympic records.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Valery Borzov, USSR 1972 Olympics, 100 meter  Winner:

    Alan Wells, Great Britain,  1980 Olympics 100 meter winner

    Of course, given the times....these both may have been heavily steroid aided victories.

    That's two in 45+ years (or 11 Olympics) = rare.  Break that down with # of competitors and I'd bet > 3%. 

    @hoorta said:

    That's two in 45+ years (or 11 Olympics) = rare.  Break that down with # of competitors and I'd bet > 3%. 

    WHites also are less likely to choose athletics as a career path. 

  • Hmmmm sounds like jimmy the Greek returneth. I was almost born a different color, I’m staying out