Mark Levin on the border wall standoff
-
Although the NY Times is a left wing rag you like to use it alot so this one is fer you:
NY Times..Hillary Clinton has an 85 percent chance of winning:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
-
Although the NY Times is a left wing rag you like to use it alot so this one is fer you:
NY Times..Hillary Clinton has an 85 percent chance of winning:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
Although the NY Times is a left wing rag you like to use it alot so this one is fer you:
NY Times..Hillary Clinton has an 85 percent chance of winning:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
Non Cheetos Jesus you really don't understand how percentages work.... I would laugh but it is kind of sad.
-
cccjwh mz the pussy translation:
"I'm a pouty little ignorant beeach but I get a little attention so I feeeeeel better about myself...sometimes..."
-
Trump won even though most polls predicted he wouldn't. Now every poll that says something I disagree with us invalid because Trump.
Trump's election had the hidden consequence of being a big blow to the publics understanding and acceptance of math and statistics
-
Although the NY Times is a left wing rag you like to use it alot so this one is fer you:
NY Times..Hillary Clinton has an 85 percent chance of winning:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html
Non Cheetos Jesus you really don't understand how percentages work.... I would laugh but it is kind of sad.
Non Cheetos Jesus you really don't understand how percentages work.... I would laugh but it is kind of sad.
Percentages based on what???? bad polling that is what ...there you go.
-
Percentages based on what???? bad polling that is what ...there you go.
If they predict that Hillary has 85% chance of winning. That means she would win 85 out of 100 times. Which means Trump wins 15 out of 100. The polling didn't say she had 100% of winning.
-
Percentages based on what???? bad polling that is what ...there you go.
If they predict that Hillary has 85% chance of winning. That means she would win 85 out of 100 times. Which means Trump wins 15 out of 100. The polling didn't say she had 100% of winning.
If they predict that Hillary has 85% chance of winning. That means she would win 85 out of 100 times. Which means Trump wins 15 out of 100. The polling didn't say she had 100% of winning.
And why would they predict Clinton has an 85 percent chance of winning...again bad polling data.
-
And why would they predict Clinton has an 85 percent chance of winning...again bad polling data.
I really have no idea how to explain this to you any better. It's in your own words. She had an 85% CHANCE of winning. Which mean Trump had 15% CHANCE of winning. When flipping a coin you have 50% CHANCE of getting heads. When picking a card to have 4 out of 52 CHANCE of getting an Ace. Trump had a better CHANCE of winning than you do of pick a ace of heart randoming from a deck of cards.
-
And why would they predict Clinton has an 85 percent chance of winning...again bad polling data.
I really have no idea how to explain this to you any better. It's in your own words. She had an 85% CHANCE of winning. Which mean Trump had 15% CHANCE of winning. When flipping a coin you have 50% CHANCE of getting heads. When picking a card to have 4 out of 52 CHANCE of getting an Ace. Trump had a better CHANCE of winning than you do of pick a ace of heart randoming from a deck of cards.
I really have no idea how to explain this to you. It's in your own words. I am a pansy bot with no gender, and I'm stupid.
http://theconversation.com/explainer-how-do-you-read-an-election-poll-41204
-
And why would they predict Clinton has an 85 percent chance of winning...again bad polling data.
I really have no idea how to explain this to you any better. It's in your own words. She had an 85% CHANCE of winning. Which mean Trump had 15% CHANCE of winning. When flipping a coin you have 50% CHANCE of getting heads. When picking a card to have 4 out of 52 CHANCE of getting an Ace. Trump had a better CHANCE of winning than you do of pick a ace of heart randoming from a deck of cards.
I really have no idea how to explain this to you. It's in your own words. She had an 85% CHANCE of winning.
We are talking about two different things. You ever hear of taking something down to the common denominator? There is a phrase in computer programming that applies here, garbage in and garbage out...I'm speaking about bad polling that lead to wrong predictions.
"Garbage In, Garbage Out." GIGO is a computer science acronym that implies bad input will result in bad output. Because computers operate using strict logic, invalid input may produce unrecognizable output, or "garbage."
The election models showing a blow out win for Clinton were based on garbage input..
-
I really have no idea how to explain this to you. It's in your own words. She had an 85% CHANCE of winning.
We are talking about two different things. You ever hear of taking something down to the common denominator? There is a phrase in computer programming that applies here, garbage in and garbage out...I'm speaking about bad polling that lead to wrong predictions.
"Garbage In, Garbage Out." GIGO is a computer science acronym that implies bad input will result in bad output. Because computers operate using strict logic, invalid input may produce unrecognizable output, or "garbage."
The election models showing a blow out win for Clinton were based on garbage input..
We are talking about two different things. You ever hear of taking something down to the common denominator? There is a phrase in computer programming that applies here, garbage in and garbage out...I'm speaking about bad polling that lead to wrong predictions.
"Garbage In, Garbage Out." GIGO is a computer science acronym that implies bad input will result in bad output. Because computers operate using strict logic, invalid input may produce unrecognizable output, or "garbage."
The election models showing a blow out win for Clinton were based on garbage input..
Yeah, I really don't need you to tell me about coding. The polls said Trump had a small chance of winning. So your bullshit excuse for your war hero ignoring what the majority of the public wants, doesn't hold water. I also show you how well the polls did well predicting the 2018 elections. But you keep on repeating to yourself "I don't believe it, I don't believe it, I don't believe it".
The average from the polls was + 3.2 for Clinton that is not a blow out. She did win the pop vote by the way, by a lot.
-
We are talking about two different things. You ever hear of taking something down to the common denominator? There is a phrase in computer programming that applies here, garbage in and garbage out...I'm speaking about bad polling that lead to wrong predictions.
"Garbage In, Garbage Out." GIGO is a computer science acronym that implies bad input will result in bad output. Because computers operate using strict logic, invalid input may produce unrecognizable output, or "garbage."
The election models showing a blow out win for Clinton were based on garbage input..
Yeah, I really don't need you to tell me about coding. The polls said Trump had a small chance of winning. So your bullshit excuse for your war hero ignoring what the majority of the public wants, doesn't hold water. I also show you how well the polls did well predicting the 2018 elections. But you keep on repeating to yourself "I don't believe it, I don't believe it, I don't believe it".
The average from the polls was + 3.2 for Clinton that is not a blow out. She did win the pop vote by the way, by a lot.
Yeah, I really don't need you to tell me about coding. The polls said Trump had a small chance of winning. So your bullshit excuse for your war hero ignoring what the majority of the public wants, doesn't hold water. I also show you how well the polls did well predicting the 2018 elections. But you keep on repeating to yourself "I don't believe it, I don't believe it, I don't believe it".
The average from the polls was + 3.2 for Clinton that is not a blow out. She did win the pop vote by the way, by a lot.
I highlighted it for you. Bad polling.
-
Yeah, I really don't need you to tell me about coding. The polls said Trump had a small chance of winning. So your bullshit excuse for your war hero ignoring what the majority of the public wants, doesn't hold water. I also show you how well the polls did well predicting the 2018 elections. But you keep on repeating to yourself "I don't believe it, I don't believe it, I don't believe it".
The average from the polls was + 3.2 for Clinton that is not a blow out. She did win the pop vote by the way, by a lot.
I highlighted it for you. Bad polling.
I highlighted it for you. Bad polling.
Did they say he had no chance of winning? No. Which mean there was a chance of him winning. But you keep on using this childish excuse to avoid the facts that a majority of public doesn't support your war hero shutting down the government.
Wait here another poll you can ignore. 50% of registered voters Blame Trump for shutdown, up 4 points since Christmas.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-has-lost-ground-in-the-shutdown-blame-game/
Side Note: It is so much easier reading this forum with baby cow on ignore. No more scrolling through pages of copy paste garbage and childish memes. I would recommend it.
-
I highlighted it for you. Bad polling.
Did they say he had no chance of winning? No. Which mean there was a chance of him winning. But you keep on using this childish excuse to avoid the facts that a majority of public doesn't support your war hero shutting down the government.
Wait here another poll you can ignore. 50% of registered voters Blame Trump for shutdown, up 4 points since Christmas.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-has-lost-ground-in-the-shutdown-blame-game/
Side Note: It is so much easier reading this forum with baby cow on ignore. No more scrolling through pages of copy paste garbage and childish memes. I would recommend it.
Did they say he had no chance of winning? No. Which mean there was a chance of him winning. But you keep on using this childish excuse to avoid the facts that a majority of public doesn't support your war hero shutting down the government.
hey, cccjwh mz the pussy -
CBS Poll: 51% Of Americans Support Border Wall, Major Support For ...
Jun 25, 2018 - The poll shows 51% support for building a border wall, even if it means that a ... YouGov, also found that most Americans are not on the same page as many ... 48% of those polled say that the families should be sent back to their ... Many Trump Administration officials were either directly confronted by angry ... -
Shock poll: Americans want massive cuts to legal immigration ...
Jan 22, 2018 - But they also back Mr. Trump's three demands for a border wall, limits to ... The poll found that most Americans want annual legal immigration . -
But walls don't work....
-
I highlighted it for you. Bad polling.
Did they say he had no chance of winning? No. Which mean there was a chance of him winning. But you keep on using this childish excuse to avoid the facts that a majority of public doesn't support your war hero shutting down the government.
Wait here another poll you can ignore. 50% of registered voters Blame Trump for shutdown, up 4 points since Christmas.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-has-lost-ground-in-the-shutdown-blame-game/
Side Note: It is so much easier reading this forum with baby cow on ignore. No more scrolling through pages of copy paste garbage and childish memes. I would recommend it.
Did they say he had no chance of winning? No. Which mean there was a chance of him winning. But you keep on using this childish excuse to avoid the facts that a majority of public doesn't support your war hero shutting down the government.
Wait here another poll you can ignore. 50% of registered voters Blame Trump for shutdown, up 4 points since Christmas.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-has-lost-ground-in-the-shutdown-blame-game/
Side Note: It is so much easier reading this forum with baby cow on ignore. No more scrolling through pages of copy paste garbage and childish memes. I would recommend it.
-
Did they say he had no chance of winning? No. Which mean there was a chance of him winning. But you keep on using this childish excuse to avoid the facts that a majority of public doesn't support your war hero shutting down the government.
Wait here another poll you can ignore. 50% of registered voters Blame Trump for shutdown, up 4 points since Christmas.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-has-lost-ground-in-the-shutdown-blame-game/
Side Note: It is so much easier reading this forum with baby cow on ignore. No more scrolling through pages of copy paste garbage and childish memes. I would recommend it.
No need to cry about it. So you were made to look stupid again. Isn't the first time, won't be the last. ?
-
Turkey’s 900 km wall is complete (paid for by the EU).
https://www.thenational.ae/world/mena/syria-turkey-border-wall-completed-1.738637
-
No need to cry about it. So you were made to look stupid again. Isn't the first time, won't be the last. ?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login