Skip to content

Conference Finals live Chat room

The Browns Board
308 31 5.3k 1
  • @axe said:

    50292169_2325072157539459_29653682142733

    Honest question: The Patriots in the south is Lousiana, where New Orleans is? I don't know by heart all the states.

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by

    @nero said:

    Honest question: The Patriots in the south is Lousiana, where New Orleans is? I don't know by heart all the states.

    You are correct.

    I would've thought that Florida would be for the Pats.....as so many of us New Englanders are there this time of year.

  • @the-gipper said:

    The Browns won seven championships in a 10 year time span so I’m not worried about the patriots matching that

    You forced me to look this up. The AAFC did not entirely merge with the NFL- as the AFL did. The Browns won three championships from 1950 until 1964 by NFL reckoning- by Pro Football HOF standards, and that's the yardstick that matters,  not yours. According to the NFL- your count doesn't mean jack shit, as far as official records are concerned. Anything Otto Graham did prior to 1950? Ditto. Three teams in the (minor league) AAFC folded.  Go ahead, count those AAFC championships if you must. They mean about as much as any team that won a USFL Championship- where a lot of "useful" players from that league wound up in the NFL when the league folded, including several that landed on the Browns... 

    I'm not saying the AAFC Browns weren't a great team,  just don't go saying "I count those Championships" because the NFL doesn't.

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by Dutch Oven

    @hoorta said:

    I'm not saying the AAFC Browns weren't a great team,  just don't go saying "I count those Championships" because the NFL doesn't.

    That is true, shouldn't be, but it is true. 

    There's an argument that can be made that the AAFC in its last two seasons was overall a better league than the NFL. It might be thought of as a minor league, but it most likely was as good as the NFL at its end. 

    One of the best Browns books I've ever read dives into this topic: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/best-show-in-football-andy-piascik/1111631235

  • @the-gipper said:

    The Browns won seven championships in a 10 year time span so I’m not worried about the patriots matching that

    You forced me to look this up. The AAFC did not entirely merge with the NFL- as the AFL did. The Browns won three championships from 1950 until 1964 by NFL reckoning- by Pro Football HOF standards, and that's the yardstick that matters,  not yours. According to the NFL- your count doesn't mean jack shit, as far as official records are concerned. Anything Otto Graham did prior to 1950? Ditto. Three teams in the (minor league) AAFC folded.  Go ahead, count those AAFC championships if you must. They mean about as much as any team that won a USFL Championship- where a lot of "useful" players from that league wound up in the NFL when the league folded, including several that landed on the Browns... 

    I'm not saying the AAFC Browns weren't a great team,  just don't go saying "I count those Championships" because the NFL doesn't.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @hoorta said:

    You forced me to look this up. The AAFC did not entirely merge with the NFL- as the AFL did. The Browns won three championships from 1950 until 1964 by NFL reckoning- by Pro Football HOF standards, and that's the yardstick that matters,  not yours. According to the NFL- your count doesn't mean jack shit, as far as official records are concerned. Anything Otto Graham did prior to 1950? Ditto. Three teams in the (minor league) AAFC folded.  Go ahead, count those AAFC championships if you must. They mean about as much as any team that won a USFL Championship- where a lot of "useful" players from that league wound up in the NFL when the league folded, including several that landed on the Browns... 

    I'm not saying the AAFC Browns weren't a great team,  just don't go saying "I count those Championships" because the NFL doesn't.

    Your key word was "Entirely".  But it was still a merger.

    Almost all mergers are only partial mergers.   When the ABA merged with the NBA....that was only partial.  Only some teams came in....its why we have no Kentucky Colonels in the NBA, or Virginia Squires, or Pittsburgh Pipers or  Utah Stars.   So a number of teams often do not make it into mergers. But some did:  Nets, Nuggets, Pacers, Spurs

    Same with the WHL/NHL merger. It was a partial merger.  The Quebec Nordiques (nka Colorado Avalanche), The Hartford Whalers nka Carolina Hurricane.  The Edmonton Oilers and the Winnipeg Jets.....

    So...actually, the AFL/NFL merger is the outlier in major league sports mergers.  The only one where all the teams from both leagues combined to remain active.

    And FYI...the AAFC was certainly NOT a "minor league" compared to the NFL at the time.  The AAFC paid its players more....it had greater average attendance...and there is that little thing where the AAFC Champion played in 6 consecutive NFL title games after it joined...and that AAFC teams won 5 of the 10 NFL titles in the first decade after the merger.

    The AAFC didn't survive because the Browns were too good.

    And FYI....the NFL is NOT the keeper of the records.  The Hall of Fame counts those titles.....as does the likes of the Sporting News...and every other reporting body.   The NFL's opinion is just one of many when it comes to this.....and is by NO means the authoritative opionion.

    And you can ignore the history of why the NFL chooses not to do so all you want.  It does not make it any less of a fact of what that history is because some people choose to ignore or deny it.   (I could bring up the whole Holocaust thing....)

  • @axe said:

    50292169_2325072157539459_29653682142733

    Honest question: The Patriots in the south is Lousiana, where New Orleans is? I don't know by heart all the states.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @nero said:

    Honest question: The Patriots in the south is Lousiana, where New Orleans is? I don't know by heart all the states.

    The Patriots are in New England...in the very northeast of the country....the ONLY place that this map has that supposedly a majority of the people there would want the Pats to win.....except for Louisiana.

    And they have Louisiana going for the Pats because they assume there is resentment because of the bitter loss that the New Orleans (Louisiana)  Saints just suffered to the LA Rams. 

  • @nero said:

    Honest question: The Patriots in the south is Lousiana, where New Orleans is? I don't know by heart all the states.

    The Patriots are in New England...in the very northeast of the country....the ONLY place that this map has that supposedly a majority of the people there would want the Pats to win.....except for Louisiana.

    And they have Louisiana going for the Pats because they assume there is resentment because of the bitter loss that the New Orleans (Louisiana)  Saints just suffered to the LA Rams. 

    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    The Patriots are in New England...in the very northeast of the country....the ONLY place that this map has that supposedly a majority of the people there would want the Pats to win.....except for Louisiana.

    And they have Louisiana going for the Pats because they assume there is resentment because of the bitter loss that the New Orleans (Louisiana)  Saints just suffered to the LA Rams. 

    It was a pure geographical question, non-football related. I had understood the joke 😉

  • @hoorta said:

    I'm not saying the AAFC Browns weren't a great team,  just don't go saying "I count those Championships" because the NFL doesn't.

    That is true, shouldn't be, but it is true. 

    There's an argument that can be made that the AAFC in its last two seasons was overall a better league than the NFL. It might be thought of as a minor league, but it most likely was as good as the NFL at its end. 

    One of the best Browns books I've ever read dives into this topic: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/best-show-in-football-andy-piascik/1111631235

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @dutch-oven said:

    That is true, shouldn't be, but it is true. 

    There's an argument that can be made that the AAFC in its last two seasons was overall a better league than the NFL. It might be thought of as a minor league, but it most likely was as good as the NFL at its end. 

    One of the best Browns books I've ever read dives into this topic: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/best-show-in-football-andy-piascik/1111631235

    As I said....the AAFC was no more of a minor league than the AFL was.  Sure, perhaps overall in the beginning both leagues would not have been able to match up game to game vs. the NFL.  

    The Browns certainly would have however.   There had been proposed after the initial  AAFC season that a "World Series of Football" be held between the winners of the AAFC and the winners of the NFL.  You know, kind of like a "super bowl" game.  The NFL refused. to do that. But there is no doubt in my mind that if the AAFC Champion Browns had played the NFL champions those years that the Browns would have easily won vs. the 1947 NFL Champions Chicago Cardinals...and the 48/49 NFL champion Phil. Eagles. (The Browns manhandled the Eagles in their first ever NFL game).  The real game would have been the 1946 Browns vs. the 1946 Bears......that could have been a barnburner:

    George Halas vs.  Paul Brown

    Sid Luckman vs. Otto Graham. 

    The Monsters of the Midway vs. the........I don't think the Browns defense had a nickname at that time.   ...a damned good Browns defense

  • @the-gipper said:

    The Patriots are in New England...in the very northeast of the country....the ONLY place that this map has that supposedly a majority of the people there would want the Pats to win.....except for Louisiana.

    And they have Louisiana going for the Pats because they assume there is resentment because of the bitter loss that the New Orleans (Louisiana)  Saints just suffered to the LA Rams. 

    It was a pure geographical question, non-football related. I had understood the joke 😉

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @nero said:

    It was a pure geographical question, non-football related. I had understood the joke 😉

    I understood, and I was giving you the geography.  Any other questions of the sort? 

  • @nero said:

    It was a pure geographical question, non-football related. I had understood the joke 😉

    I understood, and I was giving you the geography.  Any other questions of the sort? 

    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    I understood, and I was giving you the geography.  Any other questions of the sort? 

    Nah, thanks. I told you that because Orion had already responded to my question. I know that USA has California, Texas, Florida, Washington, Ohio, Louisiana... And fortysome Dakotas. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    I understood, and I was giving you the geography.  Any other questions of the sort? 

    Nah, thanks. I told you that because Orion had already responded to my question. I know that USA has California, Texas, Florida, Washington, Ohio, Louisiana... And fortysome Dakotas. 

    Mark OM Mark O wrote on last edited by

    @nero said:

    Nah, thanks. I told you that because Orion had already responded to my question. I know that USA has California, Texas, Florida, Washington, Ohio, Louisiana... And fortysome Dakotas. 

    LOL

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    Here is some geographical data:    States who had teams win the most Championships (NFL, AFL, AAFC)

    Ohio:   13  (4 or 5 franchises: Pro/Rams/Browns/Bulldogs)

    Wisconsin:  13.....all Packers

    New York:  11....Jets/Giants/Bills  (note...count Jets/Giants as NY even though they play in New Jersey)

    California:  11... Chargers/Rams/49ers/Raiders

    Pennsylvania:  11.....Yellow Jackets/Eagles/Steelers

    Illinois:  10   Bears/Cardinals

    Texas:  8 .....Cowboys/Dall. Texans/Oilers

    Massachussets:   5     Patriots

    Maryland:  5:  Colts/Ravens

    Washington DC:  5   Redskins  (count as DC even though they play in Maryland)

    Michigan:  4......Lions

    Colorado:  3.....Broncos

    Florida:   3.....Dolphins, Bucs

    Missouri:  3.....Chiefs/Rams

    Indiana:  1....Colts

    Louisiana:  1....Saints

    Washington State:  1   Seahawks

    Rhode Island:  1    Steam Roller

    (states that currently have teams, but have never won a title:  Arizona, Minnesota, Tennessee,  North Carolina, Georgia

  • @the-gipper said:

    I understood, and I was giving you the geography.  Any other questions of the sort? 

    Nah, thanks. I told you that because Orion had already responded to my question. I know that USA has California, Texas, Florida, Washington, Ohio, Louisiana... And fortysome Dakotas. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @nero said:

    Nah, thanks. I told you that because Orion had already responded to my question. I know that USA has California, Texas, Florida, Washington, Ohio, Louisiana... And fortysome Dakotas. 

    You of all people shouldn't forget Maine.   Remember the Maine?   We had to kick your asses in a war over the Maine.

    😛😆

  • Here is some geographical data:    States who had teams win the most Championships (NFL, AFL, AAFC)

    Ohio:   13  (4 or 5 franchises: Pro/Rams/Browns/Bulldogs)

    Wisconsin:  13.....all Packers

    New York:  11....Jets/Giants/Bills  (note...count Jets/Giants as NY even though they play in New Jersey)

    California:  11... Chargers/Rams/49ers/Raiders

    Pennsylvania:  11.....Yellow Jackets/Eagles/Steelers

    Illinois:  10   Bears/Cardinals

    Texas:  8 .....Cowboys/Dall. Texans/Oilers

    Massachussets:   5     Patriots

    Maryland:  5:  Colts/Ravens

    Washington DC:  5   Redskins  (count as DC even though they play in Maryland)

    Michigan:  4......Lions

    Colorado:  3.....Broncos

    Florida:   3.....Dolphins, Bucs

    Missouri:  3.....Chiefs/Rams

    Indiana:  1....Colts

    Louisiana:  1....Saints

    Washington State:  1   Seahawks

    Rhode Island:  1    Steam Roller

    (states that currently have teams, but have never won a title:  Arizona, Minnesota, Tennessee,  North Carolina, Georgia

    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    (states that currently have teams, but have never won a title:  Arizona, Minnesota, Tennessee,  North Carolina

    Georgia?

    @the-gipper said:

    You of all people shouldn't forget Maine.   Remember the Maine?   We had to kick your asses in a war over the Maine.

    😛😆

    Lol. Damn you... I remember Maine, I was just setting up the joke. In fact, it's 7pm and I'm still studying so I decided to rehearse my knowledge of the states at https://online.seterra.com/en/vgp/3003... Here are the results:

    image.png.a74501db7ff36626d493269c7bb8f969.png

    image.png.bfea5252749f78b95b0e96f29a7794c0.png

    image.png.1e8a3264ce2ec3a781f326cbea24a6ce.png

    image.png.da4c93ec71c274f43053af61db7e6aee.pngThis one got me pretty angry... 

    image.png.1cda7f13034e1fa8b1d188b50d18a450.png

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    I think you need to explain this "test"....

    and why would you get angry over Nebraska.  No one gets mad at Nebraska.

  • I think you need to explain this "test"....

    and why would you get angry over Nebraska.  No one gets mad at Nebraska.

    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    I think you need to explain this "test"....

    and why would you get angry over Nebraska.  No one gets mad at Nebraska.

    Click the link and check the exercise, man. And you got many unimportant states in that middle area no one knows about... Thank God Kentucky resembles a fried chicken finger. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    I think you need to explain this "test"....

    and why would you get angry over Nebraska.  No one gets mad at Nebraska.

    Click the link and check the exercise, man. And you got many unimportant states in that middle area no one knows about... Thank God Kentucky resembles a fried chicken finger. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by

    @nero said:

    Click the link and check the exercise, man. And you got many unimportant states in that middle area no one knows about... Thank God Kentucky resembles a fried chicken finger. 

    You could end up with a pitchfork right up your ass by a farmer for that comment.  Those "unimportant" states is the area that primarily feeds this planet. 

    . The United States

    No country produces food as efficiently as the U.S. Despite having a significantly smaller workforce than China, total U.S. agricultural product is almost as high. Food production is spread across much of the country, but the largest food-producing states include California, Iowa, Texas, Nebraska and Illinois.

     

    American companies dominate the food export market. Second-place Netherlands exports 35% less than the U.S. and is closer to tenth-place China in terms of international product. The U.S. has been the world's largest exporter of food for a very long time thanks to an increasingly productive farming sector. In fact, the total food production in the U.S. has more than doubled in the post-war period.

    Twelve (12) states generate over $10 billion in agricultural cash reciepts:  California, Iowa, Nebraska, Texas, Minnesota, Illinois, Kansas, Wisconsin, Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio & South Dakota.

  • @nero said:

    Click the link and check the exercise, man. And you got many unimportant states in that middle area no one knows about... Thank God Kentucky resembles a fried chicken finger. 

    You could end up with a pitchfork right up your ass by a farmer for that comment.  Those "unimportant" states is the area that primarily feeds this planet. 

    . The United States

    No country produces food as efficiently as the U.S. Despite having a significantly smaller workforce than China, total U.S. agricultural product is almost as high. Food production is spread across much of the country, but the largest food-producing states include California, Iowa, Texas, Nebraska and Illinois.

     

    American companies dominate the food export market. Second-place Netherlands exports 35% less than the U.S. and is closer to tenth-place China in terms of international product. The U.S. has been the world's largest exporter of food for a very long time thanks to an increasingly productive farming sector. In fact, the total food production in the U.S. has more than doubled in the post-war period.

    Twelve (12) states generate over $10 billion in agricultural cash reciepts:  California, Iowa, Nebraska, Texas, Minnesota, Illinois, Kansas, Wisconsin, Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio & South Dakota.

    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by

    @the-gipper said:

    You could end up with a pitchfork right up your ass by a farmer for that comment.  Those "unimportant" states is the area that primarily feeds this planet. 

    . The United States

    No country produces food as efficiently as the U.S. Despite having a significantly smaller workforce than China, total U.S. agricultural product is almost as high. Food production is spread across much of the country, but the largest food-producing states include California, Iowa, Texas, Nebraska and Illinois.

     

    American companies dominate the food export market. Second-place Netherlands exports 35% less than the U.S. and is closer to tenth-place China in terms of international product. The U.S. has been the world's largest exporter of food for a very long time thanks to an increasingly productive farming sector. In fact, the total food production in the U.S. has more than doubled in the post-war period.

    Twelve (12) states generate over $10 billion in agricultural cash reciepts:  California, Iowa, Nebraska, Texas, Minnesota, Illinois, Kansas, Wisconsin, Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio & South Dakota.

    I bet that farmer would look for me going south of Texas... 

    Interesting data, though! 

  • @the-gipper said:

    I think you need to explain this "test"....

    and why would you get angry over Nebraska.  No one gets mad at Nebraska.

    Click the link and check the exercise, man. And you got many unimportant states in that middle area no one knows about... Thank God Kentucky resembles a fried chicken finger. 

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by

    @nero said:

    Click the link and check the exercise, man. And you got many unimportant states in that middle area no one knows about... Thank God Kentucky resembles a fried chicken finger. 

    Couldn't tell, but the test was to name the state associated with the number? Very tough for a European.  I would kill that one, I'm pretty good at geography. 🙂 If you notice my interests, one is mountaineering. There's a Highpointers Club, get to the highest point of every state, many folks have done it, and Denali in Alaska is a real challenge by any standard. My count stands at six, though you can ride a bicycle to the high points of Ohio (Campbell Hill) and Indiana (Hoosier Hill- that doesn't even look like a hill). Most definitely can't ride a bike up Gannett Peak in Wyoming. 

    Gipper was being modest- he's been to all 50 states, some of them multiple times. 

  • @nero said:

    Click the link and check the exercise, man. And you got many unimportant states in that middle area no one knows about... Thank God Kentucky resembles a fried chicken finger. 

    Couldn't tell, but the test was to name the state associated with the number? Very tough for a European.  I would kill that one, I'm pretty good at geography. 🙂 If you notice my interests, one is mountaineering. There's a Highpointers Club, get to the highest point of every state, many folks have done it, and Denali in Alaska is a real challenge by any standard. My count stands at six, though you can ride a bicycle to the high points of Ohio (Campbell Hill) and Indiana (Hoosier Hill- that doesn't even look like a hill). Most definitely can't ride a bike up Gannett Peak in Wyoming. 

    Gipper was being modest- he's been to all 50 states, some of them multiple times. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    @hoorta said:

    Couldn't tell, but the test was to name the state associated with the number? Very tough for a European.  I would kill that one, I'm pretty good at geography. 🙂 If you notice my interests, one is mountaineering. There's a Highpointers Club, get to the highest point of every state, many folks have done it, and Denali in Alaska is a real challenge by any standard. My count stands at six, though you can ride a bicycle to the high points of Ohio (Campbell Hill) and Indiana (Hoosier Hill- that doesn't even look like a hill). Most definitely can't ride a bike up Gannett Peak in Wyoming. 

    Gipper was being modest- he's been to all 50 states, some of them multiple times. 

    I have been to ALL of them multiple times actually.....except Alaska.  Just one time there....Unless you count the fact that during the same trip I went from Alaska over to The Yukon, and then came back to Alaska...as two trips?  I do not. 😉

    FYI....on a recent trip, I hit the high points to both Illinois and Iowa.  I have not really made it a point to hit all the high points...in terms of climbing to them.   I have seen quite a few....but not physically gone to the top:

  • @nero said:

    Click the link and check the exercise, man. And you got many unimportant states in that middle area no one knows about... Thank God Kentucky resembles a fried chicken finger. 

    Couldn't tell, but the test was to name the state associated with the number? Very tough for a European.  I would kill that one, I'm pretty good at geography. 🙂 If you notice my interests, one is mountaineering. There's a Highpointers Club, get to the highest point of every state, many folks have done it, and Denali in Alaska is a real challenge by any standard. My count stands at six, though you can ride a bicycle to the high points of Ohio (Campbell Hill) and Indiana (Hoosier Hill- that doesn't even look like a hill). Most definitely can't ride a bike up Gannett Peak in Wyoming. 

    Gipper was being modest- he's been to all 50 states, some of them multiple times. 

    NeroN Nero wrote on last edited by

    @hoorta said:

    Couldn't tell, but the test was to name the state associated with the number?

    With the number of the state? Only US citizens care to learn that. The program asks you for a state then you click on it. 

    @hoorta said:

    Very tough for a European.  I would kill that one, I'm pretty good at geography.

    I'm pretty good a geography too. Fun fact, I'd say that it is easier to learn the countries in Europe because they have a lot of History behind them. French-Spanish wars, Portugal allied with Spain, French always having trouble with the Channel, the isolationist Britain, Rome (the now Italy) being a Mediterranean power, Austorhungarian Empire on WWI, Germany invading Poland... 

    You can mess up with some smaller countries closer to Russia (the steel curtain was not only a metaphor) or the Balkans due to recent wars, but you can make your way around... 

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper

    Elevations of the 50 states, the federal district, and the territories[1][7][8]

    I am highlighting in red the ones I have physically been to.   Others in like Orange I have seen visually but not been to the top

    State
    federal district
    or territory Highest point Highest elevation Rank (High point) Lowest point Lowest elevation Mean elevation Elevation span 23px-Flag_of_Alabama.svg.png Alabama Cheaha Mountain[9] 2,413 ft
    736 m 38 Gulf of Mexico sea level 500 ft
    150 m 2,413 ft
    736 m 21px-Flag_of_Alaska.svg.png Alaska Denali[10] 20,310 ft
    6190.5 m 1 Gulf of Alaska, Bering Sea, and Arctic Ocean sea level 1,900 ft
    580 m 20,310 ft
    6190.5 m 23px-Flag_of_American_Samoa.svg.png American Samoa Lata Mountain on Ta‘ū island[11] 3,163 ft
    964 m 36 Pacific Ocean sea level NA 3,163 ft
    964 m 23px-Flag_of_Arizona.svg.png Arizona Humphreys Peak[12] 12,637 ft
    3852 m 12 Colorado River at Sonora border, San Luis, Arizona 72 ft
    22 m 4,100 ft
    1250 m 12,565 ft
    3830 m 23px-Flag_of_Arkansas.svg.png Arkansas Mount Magazine[13] 2,753 ft
    839 m 37 Ouachita River at Louisiana border 55 ft
    17 m 650 ft
    200 m 2,698 ft
    822 m 23px-Flag_of_California.svg.png California Mount Whitney[14][15] 14,505 ft
    4421.0 m 2 Badwater Basin in Death Valley[1][2][16]−279 ft
    −85 m
    2,900 ft
    880 m 14,783 ft
    4506 m 23px-Flag_of_Colorado.svg.png Colorado Mount Elbert[17][18] 14,440 ft
    4401.2 m 3 Arikaree River at Kansas border[19][20] 3,317 ft
    1011 m 6,800 ft
    2070 m 11,123 ft
    3390 m 20px-Flag_of_Connecticut.svg.png Connecticut Massachusetts border on south side of Mount Frissell[21] 2,379 ft
    725 m 39 Long Island Sound sea level 500 ft
    150 m 2,379 ft
    725 m 23px-Flag_of_Delaware.svg.png Delaware Near the Ebright Azimuth[22][23] 447 ft
    136 m 54 Atlantic Ocean sea level 60 ft
    20 m 447 ft
    136 m 23px-Flag_of_the_District_of_Columbia.sv District of Columbia Fort Reno[24] 409 ft
    125 m 55 Potomac River at eastern Maryland border 1.0 ft
    0.3 m 150 ft
    50 m 408 ft
    124 m 23px-Flag_of_Florida.svg.png Florida Britton Hill 345 ft
    105 m 56 Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico sea level 100 ft
    30 m 345 ft
    105 m Georgia (U.S. state) Georgia Brasstown Bald 4,784 ft
    1458 m 25 Atlantic Ocean sea level 600 ft
    180 m 4,784 ft
    1458 m 23px-Flag_of_Guam.svg.png Guam Mount Lamlam 1,332 ft
    406 m[25] 48 Pacific Ocean sea level NA 1,332 ft
    406 m 23px-Flag_of_Hawaii.svg.png Hawaii Mauna Kea[26][27] on the Island of Hawai'i 13,803 ft
    4207 m 6 Pacific Ocean sea level 3,030 ft
    920 m 13,803 ft
    4207 m 19px-Flag_of_Idaho.svg.png Idaho Borah Peak[28] 12,668 ft
    3861 m 11 Confluence of Snake River and Clearwater River 713 ft
    217 m 5,000 ft
    1520 m 11,954 ft
    3644 m 23px-Flag_of_Illinois.svg.png Illinois Charles Mound[29] 1,235 ft
    376 m 50 Confluence of Mississippi River and Ohio River 280 ft
    85 m 600 ft
    180 m 955 ft
    291 m 23px-Flag_of_Indiana.svg.png Indiana Hoosier Hill 1,257 ft
    383 m 49 Confluence of Wabash River and Ohio River 320 ft
    97 m 700 ft
    210 m 937 ft
    286 m 22px-Flag_of_Iowa.svg.png Iowa Hawkeye Point 1,671 ft
    509 m 45 Confluence of Mississippi River and Des Moines River 480 ft
    146 m 1,100 ft
    340 m 1,191 ft
    363 m 23px-Flag_of_Kansas.svg.png Kansas Mount Sunflower 4,041 ft
    1232 m 29 Verdigris River at Oklahoma border 679 ft
    207 m 2,000 ft
    610 m 3,361 ft
    1025 m 23px-Flag_of_Kentucky.svg.png Kentucky Black Mountain 4,145 ft
    1263 m 28 Mississippi River at Kentucky Bend 257 ft
    78 m 750 ft
    230 m 3,887 ft
    1185 m 23px-Flag_of_Louisiana.svg.png Louisiana Driskill Mountain 535 ft
    163 m 53 New Orleans −8 ft
    −2.4 m
    100 ft
    30 m 543 ft
    165 m 23px-Flag_of_Maine.svg.png Maine Mount Katahdin[30] 5,270 ft
    1606.4 m 22 Atlantic Ocean sea level 600 ft
    180 m 5,270 ft
    1606.4 m 23px-Flag_of_Maryland.svg.png Maryland Hoye-Crest 3,360 ft
    1024 m 33 Atlantic Ocean sea level 350 ft
    110 m 3,360 ft
    1024 m 23px-Flag_of_Massachusetts.svg.png Massachusetts Mount Greylock[31] 3,489 ft
    1063 m 32 Atlantic Ocean sea level 500 ft
    150 m 3,489 ft
    1063 m 23px-Flag_of_Michigan.svg.png Michigan Mount Arvon 1,979 ft
    603 m 41 Lake Erie 571 ft
    174 m 900 ft
    270 m 1,408 ft
    429 m 23px-Flag_of_Minnesota.svg.png Minnesota Eagle Mountain 2,302 ft
    701 m 40 Lake Superior 601 ft
    183 m 1,200 ft
    370 m 1,700 ft
    518 m 23px-Flag_of_Mississippi.svg.png Mississippi Woodall Mountain[32] 807 ft
    246 m 52 Gulf of Mexico sea level 300 ft
    90 m 807 ft
    246 m 23px-Flag_of_Missouri.svg.png Missouri Taum Sauk Mountain 1,772 ft
    540 m 44 Saint Francis River at southern Arkansas border 230 ft
    70 m 800 ft
    240 m 1,542 ft
    470 m 23px-Flag_of_Montana.svg.png Montana Granite Peak[33] 12,807 ft
    3903.5 m 10 Kootenai River at Idaho border 1,804 ft
    550 m 3,400 ft
    1040 m 11,003 ft
    3354 m 23px-Flag_of_Nebraska.svg.png Nebraska Panorama Point 5,427 ft
    1654 m 20 Missouri River at Kansas border 840 ft
    256 m 2,600 ft
    790 m 4,587 ft
    1398 m 23px-Flag_of_Nevada.svg.png Nevada Boundary Peak[34] 13,147 ft
    4007 m 9 Colorado River at California border 481 ft
    147 m 5,500 ft
    1680 m 12,665 ft
    3860 m 23px-Flag_of_New_Hampshire.svg.png New Hampshire Mount Washington[35][36] 6,288 ft
    1917 m 18 Atlantic Ocean sea level 1,000 ft
    300 m 6,288 ft
    1917 m 23px-Flag_of_New_Jersey.svg.png New Jersey High Point 1,803 ft
    550 m 43 Atlantic Ocean sea level 250 ft
    80 m 1,803 ft
    550 m 23px-Flag_of_New_Mexico.svg.png New Mexico Wheeler Peak[37] 13,167 ft
    4013.3 m 8 Red Bluff Reservoir on Texas border 2,844 ft
    867 m 5,700 ft
    1740 m 10,323 ft
    3147 m 23px-Flag_of_New_York.svg.png New York Mount Marcy[38] 5,343 ft
    1628.57 m 21 Atlantic Ocean sea level 1,000 ft
    300 m 5,343 ft
    1628.57 m 23px-Flag_of_North_Carolina.svg.png North Carolina Mount Mitchell[39] 6,684 ft
    2037 m 16 Atlantic Ocean sea level 700 ft
    210 m 6,684 ft
    2037 m 21px-Flag_of_North_Dakota.svg.png  North Dakota White Butte 3,508 ft
    1069 m 31 Red River of the North at Manitoba border 751 ft
    229 m 1,900 ft
    580 m 2,757 ft
    840 m 23px-Flag_of_the_Northern_Mariana_Island Northern Mariana Islands Unnamed point on Agrihan island 3,166 ft
    965 m[40] 35 Pacific Ocean sea level NA 3,166 ft
    965 m 23px-Flag_of_Ohio.svg.png Ohio Campbell Hill 1,549 ft
    472 m 47 Ohio River at Indiana border 455 ft
    139 m 850 ft
    260 m 1,094 ft
    333 m 23px-Flag_of_Oklahoma.svg.png Oklahoma Black Mesa 4,975 ft
    1516 m 23 Little River at Arkansas border 289 ft
    88 m 1,300 ft
    400 m 4,686 ft
    1428 m 23px-Flag_of_Oregon.svg.png Oregon Mount Hood[41] 11,249 ft
    3428.8 m 13 Pacific Ocean sea level 3,300 ft
    1010 m 11,249 ft
    3428.8 m 23px-Flag_of_Pennsylvania.svg.png Pennsylvania Mount Davis 3,213 ft
    979 m 34 Delaware River at Delaware border sea level 1,100 ft
    340 m 3,213 ft
    979 m 23px-Flag_of_Puerto_Rico.svg.png Puerto Rico Cerro de Punta 4,390 ft
    1338 m[42] 27 Atlantic Ocean (Caribbean sea) sea level 856 ft
    261 m 4,390 ft
    1338 m 19px-Flag_of_Rhode_Island.svg.png Rhode Island Jerimoth Hill 811 ft
    247 m 51 Atlantic Ocean sea level 200 ft
    60 m 811 ft
    247 m 23px-Flag_of_South_Carolina.svg.png South Carolina Sassafras Mountain 3,560 ft
    1085 m 30 Atlantic Ocean sea level 350 ft
    110 m 3,560 ft
    1085 m 23px-Flag_of_South_Dakota.svg.png South Dakota Black Elk Peak[43] 7,244 ft
    2208 m 15 Big Stone Lake on Minnesota border 968 ft
    295 m 2,200 ft
    670 m 6,276 ft
    1913 m 23px-Flag_of_Tennessee.svg.png Tennessee Clingmans Dome 6,643 ft
    2025 m 17 Mississippi River at Mississippi border 178 ft
    54 m 900 ft
    270 m 6,466 ft
    1971 m 23px-Flag_of_Texas.svg.png Texas Guadalupe Peak[44] 8,751 ft
    2667 m 14 Gulf of Mexico sea level 1,700 ft
    520 m 8,751 ft
    2667 m United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Unnamed point on Navassa Island 279 ft
    85 m[45] 57 Pacific Ocean (8 islands) and Caribbean Sea(Navassa Island) sea level NA 279 ft
    85 m 23px-Flag_of_Utah.svg.png Utah Kings Peak[46] 13,534 ft
    4125 m 7 Beaver Dam Wash at Arizona border 2,180 ft
    664 m 6,100 ft
    1860 m 11,354 ft
    3461 m 23px-Flag_of_Vermont.svg.png Vermont Mount Mansfield[47] 4,395 ft
    1340 m 26 Lake Champlain 95 ft
    29 m 1,000 ft
    300 m 4,300 ft
    1311 m United States Virgin Islands Virgin Islands (U.S.) Crown Mountain on the island of Saint Thomas 1,555 ft
    474 m[48] 46 Atlantic Ocean (Caribbean Sea) sea level NA 1,555 ft
    474 m 22px-Flag_of_Virginia.svg.png Virginia Mount Rogers 5,729 ft
    1746 m 19 Atlantic Ocean sea level 950 ft
    290 m 5,729 ft
    1746 m Washington (state) Washington Mount Rainier[49] 14,417 ft
    4394 m 4 Pacific Ocean sea level 1,700 ft
    520 m 14,417 ft
    4394 m 23px-Flag_of_West_Virginia.svg.png West Virginia Spruce Knob[50] 4,863 ft
    1482.1 m 24 Potomac River at Virginia border 240 ft
    73 m 1,500 ft
    460 m 4,623 ft
    1409 m 23px-Flag_of_Wisconsin.svg.png Wisconsin Timms Hill 1,951 ft
    595 m 42 Lake Michigan 579 ft
    176 m 1,050 ft
    320 m 1,372 ft
    418 m 22px-Flag_of_Wyoming.svg.png Wyoming Gannett Peak[51] 13,809 ft
    4209.1 m 5 Belle Fourche River at South Dakota border 3,101 ft
    945 m 6,700 ft
    2040 m 10,709 ft
    3264 m United States Denali,[10] Alaska 20,310 ft
    6190.5 m
      Badwater Basin,[16] California