Trump associate Roger Stone arrested, faces obstruction charge
-
these long time dirty scumbags have been around for decades on both sides of the aisle.
dirty scumbag obamao put dirty scumbags in charge of our FBI, CIA, NSA, IRS and DOJ.
-
-
-
Look at these asshes defending witness tampering. Stone obstructed the investigation into collusion, odc tgats a crime if u destroy evidence, bully potential witnesses. Thats more than "process crimes". Some of u are teetering on the edge of becoming non americans. Ur starting to become ok with illegal behavior that our criminal justice system has prosecuted for cebturies now
Look at these asshes defending witness tampering. Stone obstructed the investigation into collusion, odc tgats a crime if u destroy evidence, bully potential witnesses. Thats more than "process crimes". Some of u are teetering on the edge of becoming non americans. Ur starting to become ok with illegal behavior that our criminal justice system has prosecuted for cebturies now
They are process crimes per the definition of a process crime. I'm not defending Stone if he is guilty just saying this is more evidence that there is nothing (yet) behind the reason for the Mueller investigation of Russian collusion but people are getting caught up in process crimes due to the investigation.
-
Look at these asshes defending witness tampering. Stone obstructed the investigation into collusion, odc tgats a crime if u destroy evidence, bully potential witnesses. Thats more than "process crimes". Some of u are teetering on the edge of becoming non americans. Ur starting to become ok with illegal behavior that our criminal justice system has prosecuted for cebturies now
They are process crimes per the definition of a process crime. I'm not defending Stone if he is guilty just saying this is more evidence that there is nothing (yet) behind the reason for the Mueller investigation of Russian collusion but people are getting caught up in process crimes due to the investigation.
They are process crimes per the definition of a process crime. I'm not defending Stone if he is guilty just saying this is more evidence that there is nothing (yet) behind the reason for the Mueller investigation of Russian collusion but people are getting caught up in process crimes due to the investigation.
Dude, go read what he's accused of...
"In an indictment unsealed Friday, the special counsel disclosed evidence that a top campaign official in 2016 dispatched Roger J. Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump, to get information from WikiLeaks about the thousands of hacked Democratic emails. The effort began well after it was widely reported that Russian intelligence operatives were behind the theft, which was part of Moscow’s broad campaign to sabotage the 2016 president election."
Its process alright, the process of collusion.
-
let me guess, one sided hear-say bs rambling nonsense. Am I right?
-
They are process crimes per the definition of a process crime. I'm not defending Stone if he is guilty just saying this is more evidence that there is nothing (yet) behind the reason for the Mueller investigation of Russian collusion but people are getting caught up in process crimes due to the investigation.
Dude, go read what he's accused of...
"In an indictment unsealed Friday, the special counsel disclosed evidence that a top campaign official in 2016 dispatched Roger J. Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump, to get information from WikiLeaks about the thousands of hacked Democratic emails. The effort began well after it was widely reported that Russian intelligence operatives were behind the theft, which was part of Moscow’s broad campaign to sabotage the 2016 president election."
Its process alright, the process of collusion.
Dude, go read what he's accused of...
"In an indictment unsealed Friday, the special counsel disclosed evidence that a top campaign official in 2016 dispatched Roger J. Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump, to get information from WikiLeaks about the thousands of hacked Democratic emails. The effort began well after it was widely reported that Russian intelligence operatives were behind the theft, which was part of Moscow’s broad campaign to sabotage the 2016 president election."
Its process alright, the process of collusion.
Mueller makes a lot of story telling. Everything he's charged with happened after Mueller was put in as Special Prosecutor.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
-
Dude, go read what he's accused of...
"In an indictment unsealed Friday, the special counsel disclosed evidence that a top campaign official in 2016 dispatched Roger J. Stone, a longtime adviser to President Trump, to get information from WikiLeaks about the thousands of hacked Democratic emails. The effort began well after it was widely reported that Russian intelligence operatives were behind the theft, which was part of Moscow’s broad campaign to sabotage the 2016 president election."
Its process alright, the process of collusion.
Mueller makes a lot of story telling. Everything he's charged with happened after Mueller was put in as Special Prosecutor.
Mueller makes a lot of story telling. Everything he's charged with happened after Mueller was put in as Special Prosecutor.
He was dispatched to obtain the emails from wiki leaks. If thats true, thats pretty self exolanatory. And "top official" is likely one of trumps boys
-
Mueller makes a lot of story telling. Everything he's charged with happened after Mueller was put in as Special Prosecutor.
He was dispatched to obtain the emails from wiki leaks. If thats true, thats pretty self exolanatory. And "top official" is likely one of trumps boys
He was dispatched to obtain the emails from wiki leaks. If thats true, thats pretty self exolanatory. And "top official" is likely one of trumps boys
I'm not sure that is even a crime if true. It might be dirty politics but news flash the Clinton campaign was chock full of dirty politics. If Stone was going to wikileaks to get dirt on Clinton how is that any different than the Clinton campaign who were dealing with a foreign spy who gave them fake information on Trump which started this whole investigation as well as being used to get FISA court warrants to spy on an American citizen. This whole thing is so one sided it is beyond belief.
-
He was dispatched to obtain the emails from wiki leaks. If thats true, thats pretty self exolanatory. And "top official" is likely one of trumps boys
I'm not sure that is even a crime if true. It might be dirty politics but news flash the Clinton campaign was chock full of dirty politics. If Stone was going to wikileaks to get dirt on Clinton how is that any different than the Clinton campaign who were dealing with a foreign spy who gave them fake information on Trump which started this whole investigation as well as being used to get FISA court warrants to spy on an American citizen. This whole thing is so one sided it is beyond belief.
I'm not sure that is even a crime if true. It might be dirty politics but news flash the Clinton campaign was chock full of dirty politics. If Stone was going to wikileaks to get dirt on Clinton how is that any different than the Clinton campaign who were dealing with a foreign spy who gave them fake information on Trump which started this whole investigation as well as being used to get FISA court warrants to spy on an American citizen. This whole thing is so one sided it is beyond belief.
Because he cant claim he didnt know it was the russians that gave wikileaks the emails. So in essence he went to the russians. If this happened after the gen election it actually makes this worse. Because then tbey cant deny outright collusion. They feigned ignirance in the beginning, "we're outsiders we didnt know". But during the gen election its documented tbet were explicitly told dont touch this shit. But it appears they did. Mueller is also investigating potential acts of collusion from 17 and 18......inconceivably.
-
Julian Assange had 'physical proof' Russians didn't hack DNC: Rep ...
Apr 19, 2018 - So I went to see him in London, and he confirmed for me that the Russians did not give him the DNC emails. He had physical proof of that, and -
We should call this place "Denial City" and not "Political Discussion".
There is always an excuse for uncle Donny, everyone not Trump is of poor character if they turn on him, no one wants to logically follow where Mueller is eventually taking this with the unindicted co-conspirator "Individual #1" and if none of that works let's just pretend "process crimes" are legal for everyone, don't count and cannot be used as the springboard to "real crimes". Totally laughable. ?
-
Julian Assange had 'physical proof' Russians didn't hack DNC: Rep ...
Apr 19, 2018 - So I went to see him in London, and he confirmed for me that the Russians did not give him the DNC emails. He had physical proof of that, andJulian Assange had 'physical proof' Russians didn't hack DNC: Rep ...
Apr 19, 2018 - So I went to see him in London, and he confirmed for me that the Russians did not give him the DNC emails. He had physical proof of that, and"Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican, left a meeting with Julian Assange believing the WikiLeakspublisher had “physical proof” Russiadidn’t supply his website with leaked Democratic National Committee emails it released during the 2016 U.S. presidential race. Mr. Rohrabacher made the comment in a interview with Breitbart Radio published online Thursday in which he spoke about his August 2017 visit to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London."
So rohrvacher woild then know who it was. Tbis is all bullshit. People are straight up liars
-
We should call this place "Denial City" and not "Political Discussion".
There is always an excuse for uncle Donny, everyone not Trump is of poor character if they turn on him, no one wants to logically follow where Mueller is eventually taking this with the unindicted co-conspirator "Individual #1" and if none of that works let's just pretend "process crimes" are legal for everyone, don't count and cannot be used as the springboard to "real crimes". Totally laughable. ?
We should call this place "Denial City" and not "Political Discussion".
There is always an excuse for uncle Donny, everyone not Trump is of poor character if they turn on him, no one wants to logically follow where Mueller is eventually taking this with the unindicted co-conspirator "Individual #1" and if none of that works let's just pretend "process crimes" are legal for everyone, don't count and cannot be used as the springboard to "real crimes". Totally laughable. ?
Tex lives in an imaginary scary Pres Trump movie - with scary music - but it's a FAKED MOVIE. It is NOT a real shark.
-
-
Sanders pointing out the apparent double standards.
-
Sanders pointing out the apparent double standards.
Sanders pointing out the apparent double standards.
When you're testifying to Congress under oath and you get caught lying to them, you're going to have a bad time.
This shit isn't rocket science.
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
Sanders pointing out the apparent double standards.
When you're testifying to Congress under oath and you get caught lying to them, you're going to have a bad time.
This shit isn't rocket science.
When you're testifying to Congress under oath and you get caught lying to them, you're going to have a bad time.
This shit isn't rocket science.
No problem with those lying to congress facing consequences. I'm speaking about those who lied to congress without consequences and the selective prosecution:
Sarah Sanders asks the correct question after Stone's indictment:
When will the FBI surround the homes of & arrest, "Hillary Clinton, James Comey, James Clapper? People we know have also made false statements [to the FBI] - will the same standard apply?"
100% correct.THE DOUBLE STANDARDS OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION
-
Sanders pointing out the apparent double standards.
When you're testifying to Congress under oath and you get caught lying to them, you're going to have a bad time.
This shit isn't rocket science.
When you're testifying to Congress under oath and you get caught lying to them, you're going to have a bad time.
This shit isn't rocket science.
Yeah...remember when the Attorney General lied under oath to congress?
What happened to Eric Holder?
Oh...that’s right...nothing.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login