Trump associate Roger Stone arrested, faces obstruction charge
-
Julian Assange had 'physical proof' Russians didn't hack DNC: Rep ...
Apr 19, 2018 - So I went to see him in London, and he confirmed for me that the Russians did not give him the DNC emails. He had physical proof of that, and -
We should call this place "Denial City" and not "Political Discussion".
There is always an excuse for uncle Donny, everyone not Trump is of poor character if they turn on him, no one wants to logically follow where Mueller is eventually taking this with the unindicted co-conspirator "Individual #1" and if none of that works let's just pretend "process crimes" are legal for everyone, don't count and cannot be used as the springboard to "real crimes". Totally laughable. ?
-
Julian Assange had 'physical proof' Russians didn't hack DNC: Rep ...
Apr 19, 2018 - So I went to see him in London, and he confirmed for me that the Russians did not give him the DNC emails. He had physical proof of that, andJulian Assange had 'physical proof' Russians didn't hack DNC: Rep ...
Apr 19, 2018 - So I went to see him in London, and he confirmed for me that the Russians did not give him the DNC emails. He had physical proof of that, and"Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican, left a meeting with Julian Assange believing the WikiLeakspublisher had “physical proof” Russiadidn’t supply his website with leaked Democratic National Committee emails it released during the 2016 U.S. presidential race. Mr. Rohrabacher made the comment in a interview with Breitbart Radio published online Thursday in which he spoke about his August 2017 visit to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London."
So rohrvacher woild then know who it was. Tbis is all bullshit. People are straight up liars
-
We should call this place "Denial City" and not "Political Discussion".
There is always an excuse for uncle Donny, everyone not Trump is of poor character if they turn on him, no one wants to logically follow where Mueller is eventually taking this with the unindicted co-conspirator "Individual #1" and if none of that works let's just pretend "process crimes" are legal for everyone, don't count and cannot be used as the springboard to "real crimes". Totally laughable. ?
We should call this place "Denial City" and not "Political Discussion".
There is always an excuse for uncle Donny, everyone not Trump is of poor character if they turn on him, no one wants to logically follow where Mueller is eventually taking this with the unindicted co-conspirator "Individual #1" and if none of that works let's just pretend "process crimes" are legal for everyone, don't count and cannot be used as the springboard to "real crimes". Totally laughable. ?
Tex lives in an imaginary scary Pres Trump movie - with scary music - but it's a FAKED MOVIE. It is NOT a real shark.
-
-
Sanders pointing out the apparent double standards.
-
Sanders pointing out the apparent double standards.
Sanders pointing out the apparent double standards.
When you're testifying to Congress under oath and you get caught lying to them, you're going to have a bad time.
This shit isn't rocket science.
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
Sanders pointing out the apparent double standards.
When you're testifying to Congress under oath and you get caught lying to them, you're going to have a bad time.
This shit isn't rocket science.
When you're testifying to Congress under oath and you get caught lying to them, you're going to have a bad time.
This shit isn't rocket science.
No problem with those lying to congress facing consequences. I'm speaking about those who lied to congress without consequences and the selective prosecution:
Sarah Sanders asks the correct question after Stone's indictment:
When will the FBI surround the homes of & arrest, "Hillary Clinton, James Comey, James Clapper? People we know have also made false statements [to the FBI] - will the same standard apply?"
100% correct.THE DOUBLE STANDARDS OF THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION
-
Sanders pointing out the apparent double standards.
When you're testifying to Congress under oath and you get caught lying to them, you're going to have a bad time.
This shit isn't rocket science.
When you're testifying to Congress under oath and you get caught lying to them, you're going to have a bad time.
This shit isn't rocket science.
Yeah...remember when the Attorney General lied under oath to congress?
What happened to Eric Holder?
Oh...that’s right...nothing.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
What I would like to know, is who from the FBI tipped off CNN so they could be there at the time of arrest with cameras rolling?
Someone needs to lose their job for that.
-
What I would like to know, is who from the FBI tipped off CNN so they could be there at the time of arrest with cameras rolling?
Someone needs to lose their job for that.
What I would like to know, is who from the FBI tipped off CNN so they could be there at the time of arrest with cameras rolling?
Someone needs to lose their job for that.
CNN claims it was just a hunch, a journalists intuition that prompted them to be at Stone's residence with cameras ready an hour before the raid. Sure, right. That is about the kind of answer I would expect from CNN.
-
More process crimes created by Mueller.
Roger Stone arrested by FBI on Mueller probe on alleged ‘process crimes’ ; not charged with colluding with Russians
Stone is charged in a seven-count indictment with what are called “process” crimes – that is crimes that have nothing to do with crimes under investigation but were allegedly committed during the process of the investigation.
Stone is charged with witness tampering, obstruction and false statements about his interactions related to the release by WikiLeaks of allegedly hacked emails during the 2016 presidential election. Some of those alleged false statements were made to the House intelligence committee, according to the indictment.
Stone is not charged with colluding or coordinating with the Russian government’s election interference in 2016, the key matter under investigation in the Mueller probe.
In the 19 months he’s been at work, Mueller has not yet indicted any American for collusion with Russians to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.
More process crimes created by Mueller.
Roger Stone arrested by FBI on Mueller probe on alleged ‘process crimes’ ; not charged with colluding with Russians
Stone is charged in a seven-count indictment with what are called “process” crimes – that is crimes that have nothing to do with crimes under investigation but were allegedly committed during the process of the investigation.
Stone is charged with witness tampering, obstruction and false statements about his interactions related to the release by WikiLeaks of allegedly hacked emails during the 2016 presidential election. Some of those alleged false statements were made to the House intelligence committee, according to the indictment.
Stone is not charged with colluding or coordinating with the Russian government’s election interference in 2016, the key matter under investigation in the Mueller probe.
In the 19 months he’s been at work, Mueller has not yet indicted any American for collusion with Russians to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.
Bingo.
He lied about crap that's not even illegal . . . didn't look terribly upset, he'll sell a million books off this.
-
Yeah...remember when the Attorney General lied under oath to congress?
What happened to Eric Holder?
Oh...that’s right...nothing.
Remember how the GOP had the presidency and both houses of Congress for these last two years and could've launched an inquiry into Eric Holder or other Obama administration officials at pretty much anytime?
Oh... that's right...they still did nothing about it. Don't come bitching to me because the GOP didn't have the stones to do anything about it.
"That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence”. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson -
Yeah...remember when the Attorney General lied under oath to congress?
What happened to Eric Holder?
Oh...that’s right...nothing.
Remember how the GOP had the presidency and both houses of Congress for these last two years and could've launched an inquiry into Eric Holder or other Obama administration officials at pretty much anytime?
Oh... that's right...they still did nothing about it. Don't come bitching to me because the GOP didn't have the stones to do anything about it.
Don't come bitching to me because the GOP didn't have the stones to do anything about it.
They didnt do.it cause obviously there isnt shit there and they know it
-
They didnt do.it cause obviously there isnt shit there and they know it
I disagree. Holder did probably lie under oath, and should be made accountable for it. And as corrupt as Trump is, Hillary and Bill Clinton are a league beyond him in corruption and should have been investigated years ago.
However, at the end of the day, the fact remains that Trump and the GOP-majority Congress had the Constitutional power to investigate the above mentioned people, whether by appointment of a special prosecutor akin to Muller or a congressional select committee, etc. Neither one did jack shit about it.
But those on the far right - including several members on this pol board - will continue to gladly eat the horseshit that Trump is feeding them as long as he can keep their dicks hard with the whole "lock her up" and "MAGA" routine that he was never going to act upon in the first place.
-
They didnt do.it cause obviously there isnt shit there and they know it
I disagree. Holder did probably lie under oath, and should be made accountable for it. And as corrupt as Trump is, Hillary and Bill Clinton are a league beyond him in corruption and should have been investigated years ago.
However, at the end of the day, the fact remains that Trump and the GOP-majority Congress had the Constitutional power to investigate the above mentioned people, whether by appointment of a special prosecutor akin to Muller or a congressional select committee, etc. Neither one did jack shit about it.
But those on the far right - including several members on this pol board - will continue to gladly eat the horseshit that Trump is feeding them as long as he can keep their dicks hard with the whole "lock her up" and "MAGA" routine that he was never going to act upon in the first place.
I disagree. Holder did probably lie under oath, and should be made accountable for it.
Well i always operate u der the assumption whats made public is around 15% or less of the whole story and of that 15% or less maybe 5% is actual truth. So as u said, the republicans had both houses and the white house too yet thet didnt pursue someone "who most certainly and surely" lied under oath. Becausr they didnt, i will continue to operste under my original proposition....other people know far more shit than me and they felt it not worth going after. Its probably complicated and involves shit they're not willing to tell us
-
They didnt do.it cause obviously there isnt shit there and they know it
I disagree. Holder did probably lie under oath, and should be made accountable for it. And as corrupt as Trump is, Hillary and Bill Clinton are a league beyond him in corruption and should have been investigated years ago.
However, at the end of the day, the fact remains that Trump and the GOP-majority Congress had the Constitutional power to investigate the above mentioned people, whether by appointment of a special prosecutor akin to Muller or a congressional select committee, etc. Neither one did jack shit about it.
But those on the far right - including several members on this pol board - will continue to gladly eat the horseshit that Trump is feeding them as long as he can keep their dicks hard with the whole "lock her up" and "MAGA" routine that he was never going to act upon in the first place.
But those on the far right - including several members on this pol board - will continue to gladly eat the horseshit that Trump is feeding them as long as he can keep their dicks hard with the whole "lock her up" and "MAGA" routine that he was never going to act upon in the first place.
you mean like he's never going to keep any promises? like the two excellent Constitutionalist Supreme Court judges?
getting us out of the rotten iran deal?
telling the paris accord to pound salt?
shall I keep listing them again and again?
your deep state higgardly deleted 33,ooo emails AFTER THEY WERE SUBPOENAED.
the deep state protected her.
-
Yeah...remember when the Attorney General lied under oath to congress?
What happened to Eric Holder?
Oh...that’s right...nothing.
Remember how the GOP had the presidency and both houses of Congress for these last two years and could've launched an inquiry into Eric Holder or other Obama administration officials at pretty much anytime?
Oh... that's right...they still did nothing about it. Don't come bitching to me because the GOP didn't have the stones to do anything about it.
Remember how the GOP had the presidency and both houses of Congress for these last two years and could've launched an inquiry into Eric Holder or other Obama administration officials at pretty much anytime?
Oh... that's right...they still did nothing about it. Don't come bitching to me because the GOP didn't have the stones to do anything about it.
It all comes down to the attorney general a president has. Obama was wise enough to appoint AG's like Holder and Lynch who acted like they were Obama's personal attorney's and there was no way either of these two were ever going to appoint a special counsel to look into any of the scandals in Obama's 8 years. Trump however gets a special counsel in just a couple of months of being in office. He can thank Jeff Sessions for that. Trump's biggest mistakes were not firing Comey on his first day in office and choosing incompetent Jeff Sessions as his Attorney General. Republican leaders begged Sessions time and time again to appoint another special counsel to look into Clinton and her campaign and he wouldn't do it. Sessions did not have to recuse himself either from the Russian investigation because of conflicts. If being conflicted was the cause for recusal then Rosenstein should have never been the acting AG in the Russian investigation because he had more conflicts than anyone yet he didn't recuse himself.
-
But those on the far right - including several members on this pol board - will continue to gladly eat the horseshit that Trump is feeding them as long as he can keep their dicks hard with the whole "lock her up" and "MAGA" routine that he was never going to act upon in the first place.
you mean like he's never going to keep any promises? like the two excellent Constitutionalist Supreme Court judges?
getting us out of the rotten iran deal?
telling the paris accord to pound salt?
shall I keep listing them again and again?
your deep state higgardly deleted 33,ooo emails AFTER THEY WERE SUBPOENAED.
the deep state protected her.
you mean like he's never going to keep any promises? like the two excellent Constitutionalist Supreme Court judges?
getting us out of the rotten iran deal?
telling the paris accord to pound salt?
shall I keep listing them again and again?
your deep state higgardly deleted 33,ooo emails AFTER THEY WERE SUBPOENAED.
the deep state protected her.
Trump is part of the deep state? Because he certainly could have pushed hard on having Hillary investigated. Likewise, he could have pressed the matter of the wall being built when they had a GOP majority. Both sides play the same game of not doing jack shit until all of a sudden they become quite the idea folks when they no longer have the House and Senate.
-
you mean like he's never going to keep any promises? like the two excellent Constitutionalist Supreme Court judges?
getting us out of the rotten iran deal?
telling the paris accord to pound salt?
shall I keep listing them again and again?
your deep state higgardly deleted 33,ooo emails AFTER THEY WERE SUBPOENAED.
the deep state protected her.
Trump is part of the deep state? Because he certainly could have pushed hard on having Hillary investigated. Likewise, he could have pressed the matter of the wall being built when they had a GOP majority. Both sides play the same game of not doing jack shit until all of a sudden they become quite the idea folks when they no longer have the House and Senate.
Likewise, he could have pressed the matter of the wall being built when they had a GOP majority.
Which means he would’ve needed 60 votes in the Senate (aka needed at least 9 Democrats to break ranks).
We both know that wasn’t going to happen.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login