China to buy 5 million metric tons of soybeans a day
-
Trump has to apease the middle american farmers asap.
-
Well, Canton...as usual you have to look into things a bit. It literally took me less than 20 seconds to get the deal on this. Now, im not poo'ing on it. It's "something". But "right now"...it's a short termn deal the Chinese have made in "good faith"..trumps own words...to continue trade agreements. China usually buys close to 40m tons. It's something tho. But still, nothing has been "set". But I did find articles from the post, Bloomberg, forbes etc,etc. Not mainstream enough for you monkey boy?
-
oh look, the number one google hit on this story is from CNBC. Canton you are almost a lazier sack of shit then wss is. It's like karpov vs kasparov between you two as for who can make the most assertions with the least amt of substance behind them. True masters in their element, peak of their powers.
-
Canton must think the story can't be mainstream until it's made the main page at Eonline or thumbsNass.com
-
yep, it was only a matter of time until the liberal WHAAAAAAMBULANCE disaster chasers ended up with egg on their faces.
-
Funny how the MSM overlooked this bit of news. . .
https://www.agweb.com/article/breaking-news-china-to-increase-soybean-purchases/
Funny how the MSM overlooked this bit of news. . .
https://www.agweb.com/article/breaking-news-china-to-increase-soybean-purchases/
What is it with righty and not reading their own links?
How much will China buy? That is still open to debate. "The Wall Street Journal" reports China said it would buy 5 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans a day based on comments made by Chinese leaders, but a U.S. administration official told Reuters the exact amount was misinterpreted, and it is not a per day amount, but rather one purchase of 5 million metric tons. - From your high speed article.
MSM really missed out on reporting this. Oh wait this article got the information from the Wall Street Journal and Reuters. How can you not be embarrassed after posting this?
-
Funny how the MSM overlooked this bit of news. . .
https://www.agweb.com/article/breaking-news-china-to-increase-soybean-purchases/
What is it with righty and not reading their own links?
How much will China buy? That is still open to debate. "The Wall Street Journal" reports China said it would buy 5 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans a day based on comments made by Chinese leaders, but a U.S. administration official told Reuters the exact amount was misinterpreted, and it is not a per day amount, but rather one purchase of 5 million metric tons. - From your high speed article.
MSM really missed out on reporting this. Oh wait this article got the information from the Wall Street Journal and Reuters. How can you not be embarrassed after posting this?
How can you not be embarrassed after posting this?
Because perennial ignorance is not the shameful thing it once was. Everyone screws up, posts something too quick or didnt read the whole thing.....but its relentless here. Its almost bordering on willful if i actually thought some of these guys were smart enough to be willfully ignirant.
-
Its really a profound level of intellectual malais here, and aint nobody a rhodes scholar either so when normal people are like holy shit this is relentless ignorance....
-
Funny how the MSM overlooked this bit of news. . .
https://www.agweb.com/article/breaking-news-china-to-increase-soybean-purchases/
What is it with righty and not reading their own links?
How much will China buy? That is still open to debate. "The Wall Street Journal" reports China said it would buy 5 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans a day based on comments made by Chinese leaders, but a U.S. administration official told Reuters the exact amount was misinterpreted, and it is not a per day amount, but rather one purchase of 5 million metric tons. - From your high speed article.
MSM really missed out on reporting this. Oh wait this article got the information from the Wall Street Journal and Reuters. How can you not be embarrassed after posting this?
What is it with righty and not reading their own links?
How much will China buy? That is still open to debate. "The Wall Street Journal" reports China said it would buy 5 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans a day based on comments made by Chinese leaders, but a U.S. administration official told Reuters the exact amount was misinterpreted, and it is not a per day amount, but rather one purchase of 5 million metric tons. - From your high speed article.
MSM really missed out on reporting this. Oh wait this article got the information from the Wall Street Journal and Reuters. How can you not be embarrassed after posting this?
From what I read yesterday, there were some miscommunications between US & China regarding volumes, and some backtracking.
It was reported as "per day" according to the first website I read about it, and its still there (obviously wrong). . .
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
Canton must think the story can't be mainstream until it's made the main page at Eonline or thumbsNass.com
Canton must think the story can't be mainstream until it's made the main page at Eonline or thumbsNass.com
Like your BuzzFeed?
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
What is it with righty and not reading their own links?
How much will China buy? That is still open to debate. "The Wall Street Journal" reports China said it would buy 5 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans a day based on comments made by Chinese leaders, but a U.S. administration official told Reuters the exact amount was misinterpreted, and it is not a per day amount, but rather one purchase of 5 million metric tons. - From your high speed article.
MSM really missed out on reporting this. Oh wait this article got the information from the Wall Street Journal and Reuters. How can you not be embarrassed after posting this?
From what I read yesterday, there were some miscommunications between US & China regarding volumes, and some backtracking.
It was reported as "per day" according to the first website I read about it, and its still there (obviously wrong). . .
From what I read yesterday, there were some miscommunications between US & China regarding volumes, and some backtracking.
It was reported as "per day" according to the first website I read about it, and its still there (obviously wrong). . .
You didn't post a link to first article and apparently didn't read what you posted here. Thanks for taking responsibility posting poor/wrong information, oh wait you didn't take any responsibility for it. nm
-
cccjwh+"m"+"z" translation:
"blabber blabber bs stupid ignorant and antagonistic empty threatening garbage.....whine/bitch/complain..."
am I correct? just a guess....
-
From what I read yesterday, there were some miscommunications between US & China regarding volumes, and some backtracking.
It was reported as "per day" according to the first website I read about it, and its still there (obviously wrong). . .
You didn't post a link to first article and apparently didn't read what you posted here. Thanks for taking responsibility posting poor/wrong information, oh wait you didn't take any responsibility for it. nm
You didn't post a link to first article and apparently didn't read what you posted here. Thanks for taking responsibility posting poor/wrong information, oh wait you didn't take any responsibility for it. nm
Sorry, I don't take the blame for shoddy journalism.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
Sorry, I don't take the blame for shoddy journalism.
Yes shoddy journalism made you post an article and not read it. It also made you choose the sites you read. None of it is your fault of course. <-- this is sarcasm baby cow
-
-
Canton must think the story can't be mainstream until it's made the main page at Eonline or thumbsNass.com
Like your BuzzFeed?
Like your BuzzFeed?
have I ever linked a buzzfeed article that wasn't replicated at every other major news outlet including FOX?
-
Sorry, I don't take the blame for shoddy journalism.
but you should take responsibility for dumbassery. Because you're a dumbass that didn't take less than 20 seconds to do a google run. #uradumbass
-
Sorry, I don't take the blame for shoddy journalism.
but you should take responsibility for dumbassery. Because you're a dumbass that didn't take less than 20 seconds to do a google run. #uradumbass
but you should take responsibility for dumbassery. Because you're a dumbass that didn't take less than 20 seconds to do a google run. #uradumbass
And you shit for brains start a thread “if there’s any truth to this” for a news item that was already being discussed in another thread.
Follow you own advice dumbass.
-
but you should take responsibility for dumbassery. Because you're a dumbass that didn't take less than 20 seconds to do a google run. #uradumbass
And you shit for brains start a thread “if there’s any truth to this” for a news item that was already being discussed in another thread.
Follow you own advice dumbass.
And you shit for brains start a thread “if there’s any truth to this” for a news item that was already being discussed in another thread.
Follow you own advice dumbass.
Ooo, i made a thread about a topic that was being discussed in another thread tgst was started about a different topic, and one that i hadnt read. U got me canton.
Christ you'll grab at anything huh?
-
After the worst Dec. since the Great Depression. So much winning! @ real con man.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login