Mueller report
-
yet, by law, he IS OUR PRESIDENT and he CAN FIRE DISHONEST SOMBEITCHES any time he needs to.
starting this fake investigation was to keep him from firing anybody in the deep state, as well as revenge for winning the election.
-
they are accepting muellers findings tho. Its fascinating watching this spin train. Again, Mueller declined to indict a sitting president because thats DOJ policy. U guys are willfully now not acknowledging that. If Trump was leaving office the DOJ would serve him with that indictment days later. He conspired to obstruct justice on what, 10 occassions according to the report? His orders had to be factually ignored by his people cause i guess tgey understood what he was asking of them...
-
I’ve never witnessed this many fuckin’ crybabies in my life...the phony investigation is over.
Except maybe the one heading in the Dems direction. ?
-
they are accepting muellers findings tho. Its fascinating watching this spin train. Again, Mueller declined to indict a sitting president because thats DOJ policy. U guys are willfully now not acknowledging that. If Trump was leaving office the DOJ would serve him with that indictment days later. He conspired to obstruct justice on what, 10 occassions according to the report? His orders had to be factually ignored by his people cause i guess tgey understood what he was asking of them...
they are accepting muellers findings tho. Its fascinating watching this spin train. Again, Mueller declined to indict a sitting president because thats DOJ policy. U guys are willfully now not acknowledging that. If Trump was leaving office the DOJ would serve him with that indictment days later. He conspired to obstruct justice on what, 10 occassions according to the report? His orders had to be factually ignored by his people cause i guess tgey understood what he was asking of them...
-
2020 candidates weigh in on Mueller report — and on Barr
AOL.COM 3 hrs agoWelcome to 2020 Vision, the new Yahoo News column covering the presidential race. Reminder: There are 290 days until the Iowa caucuses, and 563 days until the 2020 presidential election.
[Who’s running for president? Click here for Yahoo News’ 2020 tracker]
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., became the first 2020 Democratic candidate to call for President Trump’s impeachment, breaking with the party’s leadership in the House.
“The severity of this misconduct demands that elected officials in both parties set aside political considerations and do their constitutional duty,” wrote Warren on Twitter late Friday afternoon. “That means the House should initiate impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer have both downplayed the idea of impeachment, with Hoyer calling it “not worthwhile” and Pelosi saying she wouldn’t move forward without a bipartisan consensus.
All the candidates running for the 2020 presidential nomination issued statements responding to special counsel Robert Mueller’s long-awaited report on the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia and President Trump’s repeated attempts to thwart the investigation. Most of them focused on Attorney General William Barr’s press conference 90 minutes before a redacted version of the report was released to the public.
“We can’t trust Trump’s handpicked AG to be transparent about the Mueller report,” Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., tweeted. “Congress needs to see it in full — and the public needs to know whether Trump obstructed justice.”
“The American people deserve the truth,” Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., wrote on Twitter. “Not spin from a Trump appointee.”
“Attorney General Barr has made it clear he is not impartial when it comes to this investigation,” Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., tweeted. “Now that we have the report we should hear from Robert Mueller himself in public hearings. Our democracy demands it.”
Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., said that Barr “must resign.”
“You can represent the people OR you can represent the President,” Swalwell tweeted. “But you can’t do both.”
Their comments, excerpted or in full, are at the bottom of this report
-
pp tape!!!! ??
that essentially confirms "it exists"....whether tge russians used it on him, who knows
pp tape!!!! ??
that essentially confirms "it exists"....whether tge russians used it on him, who knows
Split across two pages :
There was also an Article a few months back with an Interview of one of the Hookers, and she said she made it up to get out of Jail.
How many times do you guys have to be smacked in the face with their lies (MSM) to wake up and realize that's all they've been doing (propandazing) the last several years ?
It was more subtle before POTUS got Elected, but since then they don't even try to hide what they're doing anymore (blatant example at top of page 2).
Come on, I know you're all smarter than that - turn off your Cruise Control and start looking at WTF is going on.
-
Does anyone on the LEFT consider non USA citizens voting in the USA elections to be meddling in the Election?
If 700,000 Russians came into the country illegally or over stayed their visa's and congress tried to give them voting rights would that be OK?
-
I bet Barry wished he could walk this one back. . .
-
listejing right now to some mueller deets......specific examples of trump directing subordinates to draft internal letters/emails that are pure fabrication and those people telling him they were not confortable doing that.
but go on, keep telling us how this is "nothing".....
-
im almost addicted now to ur guys's horseshit. Im fascinated by such people who have had their minds turned off
-
all this bullshit from trump makes really wonder again about the russians.
-
-
??
thst one was just fun...
-
This shit is so bad, even CNN agrees. . .
Mueller's report looks bad for Obama
By Scott Jennings(CNN)The partisan warfare over the Mueller report will rage, but one thing cannot be denied: Former President Barack Obama looks just plain bad. On his watch, the Russians meddled in our democracy while his administration did nothing about it.
The Mueller report flatly states that Russia began interfering in American democracy in 2014. Over the next couple of years, the effort blossomed into a robust attempt to interfere in our 2016 presidential election. The Obama administration knew this was going on and yet did nothing. In 2016, Obama's National Security Adviser Susan Rice told her staff to "stand down" and "knock it off" as they drew up plans to "strike back" against the Russians, according to an account from Michael Isikoff and David Cornin their book "Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald Trump".
Why did Obama go soft on Russia? My opinion is that it was because he was singularly focused on the nuclear deal with Iran. Obama wanted Putin in the deal, and to stand up to him on election interference would have, in Obama's estimation, upset that negotiation. This turned out to be a disastrous policy decision.
Obama's supporters claim he did stand up to Russia by deploying sanctions after the election to punish them for their actions. But, Obama, according to the Washington Post, "approved a modest package... with economic sanctions so narrowly targeted that even those who helped design them describe their impact as largely symbolic." In other words, a toothless response to a serious incursion.
But don't just take my word for it that Obama failed. Congressman Adam Schiff, who disgraced himself in this process by claiming collusion when Mueller found that none exists, once said that "the Obama administration should have done a lot more." The Washington Post reported that a senior Obama administration official said they "sort of choked" in failing to stop the Russian government's brazen activities. And Obama's ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, said, "The punishment did not fit the crime" about the weak sanctions rolled out after the 2016 election.
A legitimate question Republicans are asking is whether the potential "collusion" narrative was invented to cover up the Obama administration's failures. Two years have been spent fomenting the idea that Russia only interfered because it had a willing, colluding partner: Trump. Now that Mueller has popped that balloon, we must ask why this collusion narrative was invented in the first place.
Given Obama's record on Russia, one operating theory is that his people needed a smokescreen to obscure just how wrong they were. They've blamed Trump. They've even blamed Mitch McConnell, in some twisted attempt to deflect blame to another branch of government. Joe Biden once claimed McConnell refused to sign a letter condemning the Russians during the 2016 election. But McConnell's office counters that the White House asked him to sign a letter urging state electors to accept federal help in securing local elections -- and he did. You can read it here.
I guess if I had failed to stop Russia from marching into Crimea, making a mess in Syria, and hacking our democracy I'd be looking to blame someone else, too.
But the Mueller report makes it clear that the Russian interference failure was Obama's alone. He was the commander-in-chief when all of this happened. In 2010, he and Eric Holder, his Attorney General, declined to prosecute Julian Assange, who then went on to help Russia hack the Democratic National Committee's emails in 2016. He arguably chose to prioritize his relationship with Putin vis-à-vis Iran over pushing back against Russian election interference that had been going on for at least two years.
If you consider Russian election interference a crisis for our democracy, then you cannot read the Mueller report, adding it to the available public evidence, and conclude anything other than Barack Obama spectacularly failed America. Subsequent investigations of this matter should explore how and why Obama's White House failed, and whether they invented the collusion narrative to cover up those failures.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/19/opinions/mueller-report-obama-jennings/index.html
-
im almost addicted now to ur guys's horseshit. Im fascinated by such people who have had their minds turned off
im almost addicted now to ur guys's horseshit. Im fascinated by such people who have had their minds turned off
Almost? A dozen hyperventilating comments on this thread itself? Dude I'd say your past addicted.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login