Stay at #49 or trade down
-
Depends on what teams value Duke Johnson. I think the highest we could possibly trade up is Houston but they would have to be willing to give Duke a high 3rd round value. I think a logical trade would be with Green Bay. They give us late 3rd round value for Duke we give them the 49th and 2 5th.
-
No team in their right or left mind wants to trade out of the top 10 this draft. Missing Game changing talent is the reason they are picking in the top 10, in the first place. A Prime example of "pushing talent down boards" is taking a look at picks 30 (Sony) thru 37(Braden Smith) last season..How would a top NFL LB in Darius Leonard look in brown & orange right now, with still picking Nick Chubb? Sure, thats easy to say now, but yes Dorsey could miss on a few.. I got my eyes on Oakland ?.Pick #24 or #27. They dumped their player scouts, to discuss trade out options imo..Mayock could call Dorsey's bluff at pick #24? Or working on putting a deal in place at pick #27, pending who's there? Sure the cost is going to suck, b'ut who is there, is what matters to JD.. Myself?, trading up in 2nd & 3rd, values higher, imo..but were not the guys, calling those teams needing talent ahead of us begging them either ? Edit- the wife can't wait to meet up with some phone working friends she's never met in Nashville Friday..Dude's, I might be the lucky guy waiting to rounds 4 or 5 to even see a Cleveland Browns pick ? ? ? ?.....
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends -
No team in their right or left mind wants to trade out of the top 10 this draft. Missing Game changing talent is the reason they are picking in the top 10, in the first place. A Prime example of "pushing talent down boards" is taking a look at picks 30 (Sony) thru 37(Braden Smith) last season..How would a top NFL LB in Darius Leonard look in brown & orange right now, with still picking Nick Chubb? Sure, thats easy to say now, but yes Dorsey could miss on a few.. I got my eyes on Oakland ?.Pick #24 or #27. They dumped their player scouts, to discuss trade out options imo..Mayock could call Dorsey's bluff at pick #24? Or working on putting a deal in place at pick #27, pending who's there? Sure the cost is going to suck, b'ut who is there, is what matters to JD.. Myself?, trading up in 2nd & 3rd, values higher, imo..but were not the guys, calling those teams needing talent ahead of us begging them either ? Edit- the wife can't wait to meet up with some phone working friends she's never met in Nashville Friday..Dude's, I might be the lucky guy waiting to rounds 4 or 5 to even see a Cleveland Browns pick ? ? ? ?.....
(b)ut who is there, is what matters to JD.
Ed Zachery.... Trade charts are guides not absolutes. The value of the talent moves the chart values.
You mention Top Ten talent...
- There are at least 15 positional players in the 2019 Draft worthy of going in the top ten.
- Add that I see only one QB whose potential has earned the right to be in that mix, yet as may as three may go that high.
- Throw in a "WTF?" pick no one, other than the picking team, saw going that high.
And suddenly the 2nd ten are flooded with 8 (or more) "top ten" prospects... and the cascading doesn't stop there.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
No team in their right or left mind wants to trade out of the top 10 this draft. Missing Game changing talent is the reason they are picking in the top 10, in the first place. A Prime example of "pushing talent down boards" is taking a look at picks 30 (Sony) thru 37(Braden Smith) last season..How would a top NFL LB in Darius Leonard look in brown & orange right now, with still picking Nick Chubb? Sure, thats easy to say now, but yes Dorsey could miss on a few.. I got my eyes on Oakland ?.Pick #24 or #27. They dumped their player scouts, to discuss trade out options imo..Mayock could call Dorsey's bluff at pick #24? Or working on putting a deal in place at pick #27, pending who's there? Sure the cost is going to suck, b'ut who is there, is what matters to JD.. Myself?, trading up in 2nd & 3rd, values higher, imo..but were not the guys, calling those teams needing talent ahead of us begging them either ? Edit- the wife can't wait to meet up with some phone working friends she's never met in Nashville Friday..Dude's, I might be the lucky guy waiting to rounds 4 or 5 to even see a Cleveland Browns pick ? ? ? ?.....
No team in their right or left mind wants to trade out of the top 10 this draft. Missing Game changing talent is the reason they are picking in the top 10, in the first place.
Well said - but those first 2 sentences remind us there's always teams like Cleveland used to be up in that top 10 just waiting to screw up whether they keep the pick to go Flunkin with Mike Junkin or trade back for whatever Rent-A-Wrecks we landed.
As much as the additions of Vernon and Richardson pump me up - I still think our defense is 1 game changing talent away from being something for opponents to fear. It wasn't that long ago the Ratbirds ran a half marathon with the football on our defense; so we need more than just 2 new starters especially considering how frequently we need to replace injured starters at LB and CB. I know Devin White gets all the love at LB; but there's another LBer named Devin from Missedagain that really plays the pass well. The good part of that is I don't think we'd have to trade up quite as high for him as we would for White. I'm going to share highlights of his soph season in 2017 just to showcase the type of instincts he's born with (aside from his elite combine 40 only 1 hundredth of a second off Devin White's). Dorsey doesn't have to go Mike Ditka and spend the rest of our draft golfing to make this trade IMO. That said, I think it would be worth sending Duke and 2-3 picks elsewhere to make this happen.
-
-
There should be a very valuable player in the middle of the second round. I wouldn't fuckaround trading down unless we are going to gamble on a Callaway, the super Talent with some off-the-field problems.
WSS
-
(b)ut who is there, is what matters to JD.
Ed Zachery.... Trade charts are guides not absolutes. The value of the talent moves the chart values.
You mention Top Ten talent...
- There are at least 15 positional players in the 2019 Draft worthy of going in the top ten.
- Add that I see only one QB whose potential has earned the right to be in that mix, yet as may as three may go that high.
- Throw in a "WTF?" pick no one, other than the picking team, saw going that high.
And suddenly the 2nd ten are flooded with 8 (or more) "top ten" prospects... and the cascading doesn't stop there.
A)Trade charts are guides not absolutes. The value of the talent moves the chart values.
You mention Top Ten talent...
B)There are at least 15 positional players in the 2019 Draft worthy of going in the top ten.
C)Add that I see only one QB whose potential has earned the right to be in that mix, yet as may as three may go that high.
D)Throw in a "WTF?" pick no one, other than the picking team, saw going that high.
A) the last few drafts, The Harvard chart seems more likely to be in favor. B.) Agreed..Than i'd agree with dorsey on 1st rd talent left at pick #17..Them some big words till outcome. Bogus if JD goes back up in 1st? stay tuned.. C) Call this crazy..But I see Ryan Finley growing into best QB value this class. And the Patriots will be the team to know better in round 2 or 3.. D) Happens every draft & mostly to high picked Wide Outs..Color me in, as DK Metcalf being that pick. Got Gordo explosion off line, not much after..
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends -
(b)ut who is there, is what matters to JD.
Ed Zachery.... Trade charts are guides not absolutes. The value of the talent moves the chart values.
You mention Top Ten talent...
- There are at least 15 positional players in the 2019 Draft worthy of going in the top ten.
- Add that I see only one QB whose potential has earned the right to be in that mix, yet as may as three may go that high.
- Throw in a "WTF?" pick no one, other than the picking team, saw going that high.
And suddenly the 2nd ten are flooded with 8 (or more) "top ten" prospects... and the cascading doesn't stop there.
-
That's what's great about having some of the best talent evaluators in our FO.. If we are targeting the right position & Simmons?..Does the trade up ammo used to get to Simmons out last passing on Tillery/Dre'Mont Jones/D.Lawrence or Trysten Hill that very well maybe sitting at #49 or #80? not giving up a thing..a falling LB would grab my attention passing Pitt or Bengals..
-
(b)ut who is there, is what matters to JD.
Ed Zachery.... Trade charts are guides not absolutes. The value of the talent moves the chart values.
You mention Top Ten talent...
- There are at least 15 positional players in the 2019 Draft worthy of going in the top ten.
- Add that I see only one QB whose potential has earned the right to be in that mix, yet as may as three may go that high.
- Throw in a "WTF?" pick no one, other than the picking team, saw going that high.
And suddenly the 2nd ten are flooded with 8 (or more) "top ten" prospects... and the cascading doesn't stop there.
Ed Zachery.... Trade charts are guides not absolutes. The value of the talent moves the chart values.
You mention Top Ten talent...
- There are at least 15 positional players in the 2019 Draft worthy of going in the top ten.
- Add that I see only one QB whose potential has earned the right to be in that mix, yet as may as three may go that high.
- Throw in a "WTF?" pick no one, other than the picking team, saw going that high.
And suddenly the 2nd ten are flooded with 8 (or more) "top ten" prospects... and the cascading doesn't stop there.
QBs will always be somewhat "overdrafted in this day and age.
-
(b)ut who is there, is what matters to JD.
Ed Zachery.... Trade charts are guides not absolutes. The value of the talent moves the chart values.
You mention Top Ten talent...
- There are at least 15 positional players in the 2019 Draft worthy of going in the top ten.
- Add that I see only one QB whose potential has earned the right to be in that mix, yet as may as three may go that high.
- Throw in a "WTF?" pick no one, other than the picking team, saw going that high.
And suddenly the 2nd ten are flooded with 8 (or more) "top ten" prospects... and the cascading doesn't stop there.
Ed Zachery.... Trade charts are guides not absolutes. The value of the talent moves the chart values.
You mention Top Ten talent...
- There are at least 15 positional players in the 2019 Draft worthy of going in the top ten.
- Add that I see only one QB whose potential has earned the right to be in that mix, yet as may as three may go that high.
- Throw in a "WTF?" pick no one, other than the picking team, saw going that high.
And suddenly the 2nd ten are flooded with 8 (or more) "top ten" prospects... and the cascading doesn't stop there.
There ya go, and Dorsey will certainly be looking at those who drop.
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
Mike
-
Ed Zachery.... Trade charts are guides not absolutes. The value of the talent moves the chart values.
You mention Top Ten talent...
- There are at least 15 positional players in the 2019 Draft worthy of going in the top ten.
- Add that I see only one QB whose potential has earned the right to be in that mix, yet as may as three may go that high.
- Throw in a "WTF?" pick no one, other than the picking team, saw going that high.
And suddenly the 2nd ten are flooded with 8 (or more) "top ten" prospects... and the cascading doesn't stop there.
There ya go, and Dorsey will certainly be looking at those who drop.
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
Mike
There ya go, and Dorsey will certainly be looking at those who drop.
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
Mike
If I'm Dorsey with White still on the board and the next team up gives me a call, I have an initial offer and a backup already packaged and tailored to that team's needs.
EDIT: And I agree we got our #1 this year already, so I'm ready to trade off next year's to get White now as part of the deal. Just consider it an early Xmas present under the tree.
-
-
Stay at 49 or move up if the right player / value exists. This team is not in need of collecting lower round draft capitol with a trade down.
-
Stay at 49 or move up if the right player / value exists. This team is not in need of collecting lower round draft capitol with a trade down.
Stay at 49 or move up if the right player / value exists. This team is not in need of collecting lower round draft capitol with a trade down.
...unless, as the draft unfolds, your board is telling you that the players available at 49 aren't much better than those you've got rated in the 60's.
I DO trust JD.....but I just think it's time for the drunken sailor to sober up.
-
There ya go, and Dorsey will certainly be looking at those who drop.
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."
Mike
If I'm Dorsey with White still on the board and the next team up gives me a call, I have an initial offer and a backup already packaged and tailored to that team's needs.
EDIT: And I agree we got our #1 this year already, so I'm ready to trade off next year's to get White now as part of the deal. Just consider it an early Xmas present under the tree.
I have an initial offer and a backup already packaged and tailored to that team's needs.
so I'm ready to trade off next year's to get White now as part of the deal. Just consider it an early Xmas present under the tree.
No debbie downer here, cus White sits on top my board too.1)from what i count, 9 of the top 20 picks have a LB need, starting with Oak/TB at #4/5. 2) It may take a Xmas miracle to get White past 10.Den. 11.Cinn. & 12.GB /yikes imo!.Some help would be if 3 QB's go in top 10 ? 3) Miami would gladly take our 1st round pick next year, loading up at QB crop next season. Sadly Miami sits at #13 tough. 4) The only dirt path left that i see for White, is the Lions sitting at #8 ahead of White's top suitors. For the same QB, load up reasons next draft.Issue is, Matt Patricia may pack his bags, after Day 1 of draft...Come on Detroit---Hear Me Roar!! ?
-
A)Trade charts are guides not absolutes. The value of the talent moves the chart values.
You mention Top Ten talent...
B)There are at least 15 positional players in the 2019 Draft worthy of going in the top ten.
C)Add that I see only one QB whose potential has earned the right to be in that mix, yet as may as three may go that high.
D)Throw in a "WTF?" pick no one, other than the picking team, saw going that high.
A) the last few drafts, The Harvard chart seems more likely to be in favor. B.) Agreed..Than i'd agree with dorsey on 1st rd talent left at pick #17..Them some big words till outcome. Bogus if JD goes back up in 1st? stay tuned.. C) Call this crazy..But I see Ryan Finley growing into best QB value this class. And the Patriots will be the team to know better in round 2 or 3.. D) Happens every draft & mostly to high picked Wide Outs..Color me in, as DK Metcalf being that pick. Got Gordo explosion off line, not much after..
C) Call this crazy..But I see Ryan Finley growing into best QB value this class. And the Patriots will be the team to know better in round 2 or 3..
I posted something very similar about Finley in Tour's thread about his Darkhorse QB; and NE was the team/situation I mentioned as ideal for him.
That said, I could also see the New Jersey Giants or LA Chargers snagging him some time after round 1. Gruden has a lot of picks as well to where he land him in a bargain round. But he's never been patient with young inexperienced QBs which is why he did best with Rich Gannon and Brad Johnson (in their mid 30s).
-
C) Call this crazy..But I see Ryan Finley growing into best QB value this class. And the Patriots will be the team to know better in round 2 or 3..
I posted something very similar about Finley in Tour's thread about his Darkhorse QB; and NE was the team/situation I mentioned as ideal for him.
That said, I could also see the New Jersey Giants or LA Chargers snagging him some time after round 1. Gruden has a lot of picks as well to where he land him in a bargain round. But he's never been patient with young inexperienced QBs which is why he did best with Rich Gannon and Brad Johnson (in their mid 30s).
I posted something very similar about Finley in Tour's thread about his Darkhorse QB.
You might want to review his games against Texas A&M & Clemson. A bit less impressive against decent SEC & ACC defenses. Total of 1 DT and 4 ints for those two games and QB ratings of 93.7 and 88.5 respectively. I wasn't sold watching the A&M game live. His team got routed 52-13 by A&M and 41-7 by Clemson. He was held to 139 yds passing by A&M and 156 by Clemson, his two lows for the season.
-
I posted something very similar about Finley in Tour's thread about his Darkhorse QB.
You might want to review his games against Texas A&M & Clemson. A bit less impressive against decent SEC & ACC defenses. Total of 1 DT and 4 ints for those two games and QB ratings of 93.7 and 88.5 respectively. I wasn't sold watching the A&M game live. His team got routed 52-13 by A&M and 41-7 by Clemson. He was held to 139 yds passing by A&M and 156 by Clemson, his two lows for the season.
You might want to review his games against Texas A&M & Clemson. A bit less impressive against decent SEC & ACC defenses. Total of 1 DT and 4 ints for those two games and QB ratings of 93.7 and 88.5 respectively. I wasn't sold watching the A&M game live. His team got routed 52-13 by A&M and 41-7 by Clemson. He was held to 139 yds passing by A&M and 156 by Clemson, his two lows for the season.
I believe you Aggies and worthy of note. That said, how did Alabama's QB look against Clemson? And not to go hindsight 20/20 on you; but just because Texas Tech didn't always compete against much more talented rosters - that didn't have to mean Patrick Mahomes was a bad idea for the NFL team interested in him. Everybody has a bad day or 2 so it's important to understand whether it's the exception to the rule (and why) or is it the rule? The context of Ryan Finley as it pertains to this discussion isn't among 1st round QBs - it's about the bargain he offers to the right taker with the right situation. The same Coach that drafted Donovan McNabb out of SU's Veer Option Offense (after he was Favre's QB Coach) - traded up alongside John Dorsey to select Mahomes. Right Coach? Right situation? You bet! In his 1st year as a NFL starter, he won with way more frequency than he ever did at Texas Tech... Much better margin of error to work with. Speaking of that, when Tom Brady got injured Matt Cassell stepped in won 10 or 11 games with an ideal margin or error the right situation blessed him with.
Along with what I saw when Finley was keeping NC State in the same game his Defense never showed up to at Syracuse - below is a partial cut and paste of what I posted in the QB Darkhorse thread.
Here's Ryan Finley's stats during the 3 years he started for the Wolfpack:
2016 13 G 243-402 60.4 cmp% 3059 yds 7.6 ypa 18 TD 8 INT
2017 13 G 311-478 65.1 cmp% 3514 yds 7.4 ypa 17 TD 6 INT
2018 13 G 326-482 67.4 cmp% 3928 yds 8.1 ypa 25 TD 11 INT
Gotta have? No. Steady improvement? Absolutely. If this kid goes to the right situation like NE per say, he could learn from another QB who wasn't anyone's dream PRE-draft.
-
You might want to review his games against Texas A&M & Clemson. A bit less impressive against decent SEC & ACC defenses. Total of 1 DT and 4 ints for those two games and QB ratings of 93.7 and 88.5 respectively. I wasn't sold watching the A&M game live. His team got routed 52-13 by A&M and 41-7 by Clemson. He was held to 139 yds passing by A&M and 156 by Clemson, his two lows for the season.
I believe you Aggies and worthy of note. That said, how did Alabama's QB look against Clemson? And not to go hindsight 20/20 on you; but just because Texas Tech didn't always compete against much more talented rosters - that didn't have to mean Patrick Mahomes was a bad idea for the NFL team interested in him. Everybody has a bad day or 2 so it's important to understand whether it's the exception to the rule (and why) or is it the rule? The context of Ryan Finley as it pertains to this discussion isn't among 1st round QBs - it's about the bargain he offers to the right taker with the right situation. The same Coach that drafted Donovan McNabb out of SU's Veer Option Offense (after he was Favre's QB Coach) - traded up alongside John Dorsey to select Mahomes. Right Coach? Right situation? You bet! In his 1st year as a NFL starter, he won with way more frequency than he ever did at Texas Tech... Much better margin of error to work with. Speaking of that, when Tom Brady got injured Matt Cassell stepped in won 10 or 11 games with an ideal margin or error the right situation blessed him with.
Along with what I saw when Finley was keeping NC State in the same game his Defense never showed up to at Syracuse - below is a partial cut and paste of what I posted in the QB Darkhorse thread.
Here's Ryan Finley's stats during the 3 years he started for the Wolfpack:
2016 13 G 243-402 60.4 cmp% 3059 yds 7.6 ypa 18 TD 8 INT
2017 13 G 311-478 65.1 cmp% 3514 yds 7.4 ypa 17 TD 6 INT
2018 13 G 326-482 67.4 cmp% 3928 yds 8.1 ypa 25 TD 11 INT
Gotta have? No. Steady improvement? Absolutely. If this kid goes to the right situation like NE per say, he could learn from another QB who wasn't anyone's dream PRE-draft.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login