Skip to content

Dem state lawmaker records himself harassing pro-life woman outside Planned Parenthood

Political Discussion
167 14 3.0k
  • @westside-steve said:

    Let's say she carries it to term delivers it and decides not to feed it.

    Then she could send the rapist pictures of it starving to death wouldn't you enjoy that?

    WSS

    Hell yea! Just give birth directly into a woodchipper. 

    Or we could be less hyperbolic and accept that abortion is different than starving a child to death.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Hell yea! Just give birth directly into a woodchipper. 

    Or we could be less hyperbolic and accept that abortion is different than starving a child to death.

    hyper011.gif

  • Let's say she carries it to term delivers it and decides not to feed it.

    Then she could send the rapist pictures of it starving to death wouldn't you enjoy that?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Let's say she carries it to term delivers it and decides not to feed it.

    Then she could send the rapist pictures of it starving to death wouldn't you enjoy that?

    WSS

    dSZyzgH.gif

  • aOYNM93_700bwp.webp

  • See the meme boys are still at it strong.  Guess they want this side to shut down.

  • @chemist said:

    And you would murder an innocent child for the crimes of his father.

    and u would force a woman, or girl in this case, to go through 9 months of despair with an operating table at the end, because of her fathers crime. Ur scum. This not the "procreation" jesus hsd in mind. This is the pure filth of swine. No more no less.

    @clevfan4life said:

    and u would force a woman, or girl in this case, to go through 9 months of despair with an operating table at the end, because of her fathers crime. Ur scum. This not the "procreation" jesus hsd in mind. This is the pure filth of swine. No more no less.

    Ah yes, that time when libs want us to believe that Jesus has their back.  Since you brought up JC,  I'd wager he would have said sorry kiddo, ya can't be killing that baby.

  • I remember seeing a show on television many years ago where they had a number of young people who were born from mothers who had been raped and they didn't abort them. They were now young adults and were in school to be doctors, nurses, lawyers etc...some were excited about marriage and having their own families. They all had dreams and goals in life. They were some amazing young people whose mothers who had been raped  gave them the gift of life. 

  • The question which I posed was never about any Individual poster here, it was never about religion, it was never about the crime or the grim prospect of carrying an unwanted child to birth.

    the question never changed.  

  • I remember seeing a show on television many years ago where they had a number of young people who were born from mothers who had been raped and they didn't abort them. They were now young adults and were in school to be doctors, nurses, lawyers etc...some were excited about marriage and having their own families. They all had dreams and goals in life. They were some amazing young people whose mothers who had been raped  gave them the gift of life. 

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    I remember seeing a show on television many years ago where they had a number of young people who were born from mothers who had been raped and they didn't abort them. They were now young adults and were in school to be doctors, nurses, lawyers etc...some were excited about marriage and having their own families. They all had dreams and goals in life. They were some amazing young people whose mothers who had been raped  gave them the gift of life. 

    Fantastic, success is possible and nobody is doubting that.    My argument is that the mother should still retain the legal right to not have to carry that baby.  She didn't choose to be raped. Bottom line.    Anything else and you're simply saying your God is the state and they should have complete say over your body. 

    Dems = Repubs.    Same coin just a different face. 

  • More from the demonRats:

    Democrats Vote to Fund Infanticide, Support Clinics That Refuse Care for Babies Born Alive

    https://www.lifenews.com/2019/05/08/democrats-vote-to-fund-infanticide-oppose-ending-funding-for-clinics-that-refuse-care-for-babies-born-alive/

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    I remember seeing a show on television many years ago where they had a number of young people who were born from mothers who had been raped and they didn't abort them. They were now young adults and were in school to be doctors, nurses, lawyers etc...some were excited about marriage and having their own families. They all had dreams and goals in life. They were some amazing young people whose mothers who had been raped  gave them the gift of life. 

    Fantastic, success is possible and nobody is doubting that.    My argument is that the mother should still retain the legal right to not have to carry that baby.  She didn't choose to be raped. Bottom line.    Anything else and you're simply saying your God is the state and they should have complete say over your body. 

    Dems = Repubs.    Same coin just a different face. 

    @tiamat63 said:

    Fantastic, success is possible and nobody is doubting that.    My argument is that the mother should still retain the legal right to not have to carry that baby.  She didn't choose to be raped. Bottom line.    Anything else and you're simply saying your God is the state and they should have complete say over your body. 

    Dems = Repubs.    Same coin just a different face. 

    These cases are difficult and fortunately not the norm  but let me ask you about cases that are not so difficult. Should a woman be allowed to have an abortion right up to time of delivery as New York and other states have done? Should a woman be allowed an abortion because the sex of the child is not what she preferred? Should a baby born alive after an attempted abortion be killed? The demonRats who always try to hide from the public what they really believe said at first after Roe they wanted abortions to be safe, legal and rare but they never meant that rare part. 

  • @chemist said:

    And you would murder an innocent child for the crimes of his father.

    and u would force a woman, or girl in this case, to go through 9 months of despair with an operating table at the end, because of her fathers crime. Ur scum. This not the "procreation" jesus hsd in mind. This is the pure filth of swine. No more no less.

    @clevfan4life said:

    and u would force a woman, or girl in this case, to go through 9 months of despair with an operating table at the end, because of her fathers crime. Ur scum. This not the "procreation" jesus hsd in mind. This is the pure filth of swine. No more no less.

    So being pregnant is despair. A woman’s body doing what it was designed to do it despair? 

    Crime is heinous. Victims of crime cannot always be made whole. It’s an unfortunate fact of life. The innocent do not need to be killed because of someone else’s crime. 

    Don’t speak for Jesus. It’s clear you know nothing about his life or teachings. 

  • The question which I posed was never about any Individual poster here, it was never about religion, it was never about the crime or the grim prospect of carrying an unwanted child to birth.

    the question never changed.  

    @hammertime said:

    The question which I posed was never about any Individual poster here, it was never about religion, it was never about the crime or the grim prospect of carrying an unwanted child to birth.

    the question never changed.  

     If the raped kid doesn't want to carry the baby, they shouldn't have to. Simple enough for you to grasp. I don't think the kid will know what it missed. 

  • @clevfan4life said:

    and u would force a woman, or girl in this case, to go through 9 months of despair with an operating table at the end, because of her fathers crime. Ur scum. This not the "procreation" jesus hsd in mind. This is the pure filth of swine. No more no less.

    So being pregnant is despair. A woman’s body doing what it was designed to do it despair? 

    Crime is heinous. Victims of crime cannot always be made whole. It’s an unfortunate fact of life. The innocent do not need to be killed because of someone else’s crime. 

    Don’t speak for Jesus. It’s clear you know nothing about his life or teachings. 

    @chemist said:

    So being pregnant is despair. A woman’s body doing what it was designed to do it despair? 

    Crime is heinous. Victims of crime cannot always be made whole. It’s an unfortunate fact of life. The innocent do not need to be killed because of someone else’s crime. 

    Don’t speak for Jesus. It’s clear you know nothing about his life or teachings. 

    I like telling other people what to do as well.

  • @chemist said:

    So being pregnant is despair. A woman’s body doing what it was designed to do it despair? 

    Crime is heinous. Victims of crime cannot always be made whole. It’s an unfortunate fact of life. The innocent do not need to be killed because of someone else’s crime. 

    Don’t speak for Jesus. It’s clear you know nothing about his life or teachings. 

    I like telling other people what to do as well.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I like telling other people what to do as well.

    Face it, we all do.

    WSS

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    I like telling other people what to do as well.

    Face it, we all do.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Face it, we all do.

    WSS

    Not all of us. I like mocking hypocrisy but hypocrites can live however they wish. I am not implying you are one but that we have a lot of people who complain about having others and the government having too much say in their lives then actively choose to try to exert their social values on everyone else. That is why I think both parties are full of shit including the people who treat politicians like they are heroes.

  • @hammertime said:

    The question which I posed was never about any Individual poster here, it was never about religion, it was never about the crime or the grim prospect of carrying an unwanted child to birth.

    the question never changed.  

     If the raped kid doesn't want to carry the baby, they shouldn't have to. Simple enough for you to grasp. I don't think the kid will know what it missed. 

    @logicisforsquares said:

     If the raped kid doesn't want to carry the baby, they shouldn't have to. Simple enough for you to grasp. I don't think the kid will know what it missed. 

    Then come right out with it and say how it is.

    You feel murder is justified in this case.  Is that true?

  • @logicisforsquares said:

     If the raped kid doesn't want to carry the baby, they shouldn't have to. Simple enough for you to grasp. I don't think the kid will know what it missed. 

    Then come right out with it and say how it is.

    You feel murder is justified in this case.  Is that true?

    @hammertime said:

    Then come right out with it and say how it is.

    You feel murder is justified in this case.  Is that true?

    Murder and abortion are different. You can use whichever terms you wish. Call it super duper holocaust destructo-murder to frame your argument and it still isn't the same.

     If an expecting mother wrecks a car while speeding and miscarries, did she commit manslaughter?

  • @hammertime said:

    Then come right out with it and say how it is.

    You feel murder is justified in this case.  Is that true?

    Murder and abortion are different. You can use whichever terms you wish. Call it super duper holocaust destructo-murder to frame your argument and it still isn't the same.

     If an expecting mother wrecks a car while speeding and miscarries, did she commit manslaughter?

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Murder and abortion are different. You can use whichever terms you wish. Call it super duper holocaust destructo-murder to frame your argument and it still isn't the same.

     If an expecting mother wrecks a car while speeding and miscarries, did she commit manslaughter?

    Different?

    Your killing a baby.  How is that not murder?

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    Murder and abortion are different. You can use whichever terms you wish. Call it super duper holocaust destructo-murder to frame your argument and it still isn't the same.

     If an expecting mother wrecks a car while speeding and miscarries, did she commit manslaughter?

    Different?

    Your killing a baby.  How is that not murder?

    @hammertime said:

    Different?

    Your killing a baby.  How is that not murder?

    Is that mother guilty of manslaughter? That will help you figure out the difference.

  • @hammertime said:

    Different?

    Your killing a baby.  How is that not murder?

    Is that mother guilty of manslaughter? That will help you figure out the difference.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Good luck. 

    Another example of government overreach. 

     https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/against-parents-wishes-judge-rules-that-tampa-boy-with-leukemia-will-resume-chemotherapy-20190508/%3ftemplate=amp

    These parents are Retarded, but it's their right to seek what they feel best for their child.    Whether I would find it as negligence/manslaughter is another topic entirely.   (At worst forced sterilization) 

    Now, I must ask - if you find this to be government over reach like myself, why do you not feel the same about the judge denying an 11 year old her choice to avoid carrying a child of rape?  (Something forced upon her) not because of "inconvenience".  Rape isn't "inconvenient"... 

    (Rhetorical, the bulk of you are hypocrites and the alt profiles are on ignore) 

    .... Like I said, I'm far more consistent in the application of my ideals.