Skip to content

Stupid Steeler fan jokes/memes

The Browns Board
196 19 10.5k 1
  • @vagitron said:

    I don't need the steelers to be talked about. 

    Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

    nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

    Eggzactly!!😆

  • @vagitron said:

    I don't need the steelers to be talked about. 

    Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

    The mainstream sports media is as bad as the mainstream political media. I get plenty of specific steeler news from a myriad of other places. All I've said in here is the Browns being rated higher than the steelers anywhere is hilarious.

  • @flyingfooldoug said:

    Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

    The mainstream sports media is as bad as the mainstream political media. I get plenty of specific steeler news from a myriad of other places. All I've said in here is the Browns being rated higher than the steelers anywhere is hilarious.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #43

    @vagitron said:

    The mainstream sports media is as bad as the mainstream political media. I get plenty of specific steeler news from a myriad of other places. All I've said in here is the Browns being rated higher than the steelers anywhere is hilarious.

    Is it hilarious to rate a team that has better talent at significantly more positions than another team higher than that other team?  And you say that you get plenty of "steeler specific news".....when what you are getting is a dog sniffing its own butt and then declaring that the lilacs are in bloom. What is hilarious is you thinking that the likes of Nelson, Washington, Barron and a few others you have touted are considered by real NFL people to be better than the players the Browns have at those spots.  They are not, and the national media knows it.  Just you don't.  In other words, you a living in sychophant heaven.

  • One PostO One Post wrote on last edited by
    #44

    The Steelers? Oh I only watch pro football.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #45

    60344643_10156342213475773_6317925067401

    Stupid Steeler Uniform Insects.  

    Builds nests next to River Confluences.  Has hoards of mindless drones.  King bee likes to take advantage of unsuspecting females of the species;

    killer%20bee.jpg

  • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on last edited by flyingfooldoug
    #46

    How does a stool fan change a lightbulb?

      They don’t.  They just talk about how good the old one was. 

  • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on last edited by
    #47

    E7087C8D-388D-4938-AA1C-2EC02F36E60E.jpeg

  • @vagitron said:

    The mainstream sports media is as bad as the mainstream political media. I get plenty of specific steeler news from a myriad of other places. All I've said in here is the Browns being rated higher than the steelers anywhere is hilarious.

    Is it hilarious to rate a team that has better talent at significantly more positions than another team higher than that other team?  And you say that you get plenty of "steeler specific news".....when what you are getting is a dog sniffing its own butt and then declaring that the lilacs are in bloom. What is hilarious is you thinking that the likes of Nelson, Washington, Barron and a few others you have touted are considered by real NFL people to be better than the players the Browns have at those spots.  They are not, and the national media knows it.  Just you don't.  In other words, you a living in sychophant heaven.

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #48

    @the-gipper said:

    Is it hilarious to rate a team that has better talent at significantly more positions than another team higher than that other team?  And you say that you get plenty of "steeler specific news".....when what you are getting is a dog sniffing its own butt and then declaring that the lilacs are in bloom. What is hilarious is you thinking that the likes of Nelson, Washington, Barron and a few others you have touted are considered by real NFL people to be better than the players the Browns have at those spots.  They are not, and the national media knows it.  Just you don't.  In other words, you a living in sychophant heaven.

    We should  know by now that Vag seriously over  rates Steeler talent, under rates the Browns. Is generally living in the past, thinks he knows more than most of the national media who talk Football for a living, some of who played, coached, or had front office jobs in the NFL. Thinks every one of Pittsburgh's draft picks have tremendous talent, and Cleveland drafted bums.

    About sums it up.

  • @vagitron said:

    The mainstream sports media is as bad as the mainstream political media. I get plenty of specific steeler news from a myriad of other places. All I've said in here is the Browns being rated higher than the steelers anywhere is hilarious.

    Is it hilarious to rate a team that has better talent at significantly more positions than another team higher than that other team?  And you say that you get plenty of "steeler specific news".....when what you are getting is a dog sniffing its own butt and then declaring that the lilacs are in bloom. What is hilarious is you thinking that the likes of Nelson, Washington, Barron and a few others you have touted are considered by real NFL people to be better than the players the Browns have at those spots.  They are not, and the national media knows it.  Just you don't.  In other words, you a living in sychophant heaven.

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
    #49

    @the-gipper said:

    Is it hilarious to rate a team that has better talent at significantly more positions than another team higher than that other team?  And you say that you get plenty of "steeler specific news".....when what you are getting is a dog sniffing its own butt and then declaring that the lilacs are in bloom. What is hilarious is you thinking that the likes of Nelson, Washington, Barron and a few others you have touted are considered by real NFL people to be better than the players the Browns have at those spots.  They are not, and the national media knows it.  Just you don't.  In other words, you a living in sychophant heaven.

    Can’t wait for the season.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Is it hilarious to rate a team that has better talent at significantly more positions than another team higher than that other team?  And you say that you get plenty of "steeler specific news".....when what you are getting is a dog sniffing its own butt and then declaring that the lilacs are in bloom. What is hilarious is you thinking that the likes of Nelson, Washington, Barron and a few others you have touted are considered by real NFL people to be better than the players the Browns have at those spots.  They are not, and the national media knows it.  Just you don't.  In other words, you a living in sychophant heaven.

    We should  know by now that Vag seriously over  rates Steeler talent, under rates the Browns. Is generally living in the past, thinks he knows more than most of the national media who talk Football for a living, some of who played, coached, or had front office jobs in the NFL. Thinks every one of Pittsburgh's draft picks have tremendous talent, and Cleveland drafted bums.

    About sums it up.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #50

    @hoorta said:

    We should  know by now that Vag seriously over  rates Steeler talent, under rates the Browns. Is generally living in the past, thinks he knows more than most of the national media who talk Football for a living, some of who played, coached, or had front office jobs in the NFL. Thinks every one of Pittsburgh's draft picks have tremendous talent, and Cleveland drafted bums.

    About sums it up.

    I guess we could make this into a serious topic and look at the starters at each position on both teams and give an opinion on who is the better player at each spot.   Maybe if I get ambitious enough I will do that.   

    But just note that on that other thread on here about QB rankings.....that "national media" person actually gives Baker a higher ranking than BR.  So, at the most important position on the field, the one where the Squibs have clearly had the edge for all this time, is now up for debate.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Is it hilarious to rate a team that has better talent at significantly more positions than another team higher than that other team?  And you say that you get plenty of "steeler specific news".....when what you are getting is a dog sniffing its own butt and then declaring that the lilacs are in bloom. What is hilarious is you thinking that the likes of Nelson, Washington, Barron and a few others you have touted are considered by real NFL people to be better than the players the Browns have at those spots.  They are not, and the national media knows it.  Just you don't.  In other words, you a living in sychophant heaven.

    Can’t wait for the season.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #51

    @vagitron said:

    Can’t wait for the season.

    Maybe you should...because, after all, that will allow you to continue to wallow in the past.

    Especially now that the Browns even have a higher rated QB.  

    (per The Sporting News:  https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/list/ranking-all-32-nfl-quarterbacks-from-best-to-worst/1e800cpni4cjf15fseqi4yrz1k/33

    And are better at each and every other offensive skill positions.

    And are better on the DL and DB. 

    Maybe you have more better OL......or maybe not.   A closer look may need to be had.

    Steelers probably still have better LBs. 

    Kicker...probably Steelers at this point (since Browns did feel the need to draft one)

    Punter....probably Colquitt of Browns.

    Kick and punt returners?  Not certain because not sure who holds these spots.  (didn't AB hold one of those jobs?....he not there)

    So...how are those "lilacs"  smelling?

  • C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #52

    nah, comparing them won't change his feelings for his three rivers scumbags  - it will just make him

    happy they are being talked about here on the BROWNS BOARD.

  • nah, comparing them won't change his feelings for his three rivers scumbags  - it will just make him

    happy they are being talked about here on the BROWNS BOARD.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #53

    @calfoxwc said:

    nah, comparing them won't change his feelings for his three rivers scumbags  - it will just make him

    happy they are being talked about here on the BROWNS BOARD.

    Well then, perhaps we should do this comparison for all the teams in the AFCN.

  • @vagitron said:

    Can’t wait for the season.

    Maybe you should...because, after all, that will allow you to continue to wallow in the past.

    Especially now that the Browns even have a higher rated QB.  

    (per The Sporting News:  https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/list/ranking-all-32-nfl-quarterbacks-from-best-to-worst/1e800cpni4cjf15fseqi4yrz1k/33

    And are better at each and every other offensive skill positions.

    And are better on the DL and DB. 

    Maybe you have more better OL......or maybe not.   A closer look may need to be had.

    Steelers probably still have better LBs. 

    Kicker...probably Steelers at this point (since Browns did feel the need to draft one)

    Punter....probably Colquitt of Browns.

    Kick and punt returners?  Not certain because not sure who holds these spots.  (didn't AB hold one of those jobs?....he not there)

    So...how are those "lilacs"  smelling?

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
    #54

    @the-gipper said:

    Maybe you should...because, after all, that will allow you to continue to wallow in the past.

    Especially now that the Browns even have a higher rated QB.  

    (per The Sporting News:  https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/list/ranking-all-32-nfl-quarterbacks-from-best-to-worst/1e800cpni4cjf15fseqi4yrz1k/33

    And are better at each and every other offensive skill positions.

    And are better on the DL and DB. 

    Maybe you have more better OL......or maybe not.   A closer look may need to be had.

    Steelers probably still have better LBs. 

    Kicker...probably Steelers at this point (since Browns did feel the need to draft one)

    Punter....probably Colquitt of Browns.

    Kick and punt returners?  Not certain because not sure who holds these spots.  (didn't AB hold one of those jobs?....he not there)

    So...how are those "lilacs"  smelling?

    Gipshit you need to be better. Mayfield over Ben at this stage of his career is absolutely brain dead. The sporting news then puts Mahomes first who is very good but hasn’t done shit yet over everyone else AND puts Matt Ryan and rivers over Ben. If you are going to link a power tanking at least make sure it’s jot stupid from top to bottom first.

    The addition of OBJ catapulted the browns over the Steelers and only because the guys after juju are unproven. The browns win no where else so take off your shit colored glasses and at least wait for the browns to fucking do something before you go crowning. The browns haven’t done anything but go 7-8-1.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Maybe you should...because, after all, that will allow you to continue to wallow in the past.

    Especially now that the Browns even have a higher rated QB.  

    (per The Sporting News:  https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/list/ranking-all-32-nfl-quarterbacks-from-best-to-worst/1e800cpni4cjf15fseqi4yrz1k/33

    And are better at each and every other offensive skill positions.

    And are better on the DL and DB. 

    Maybe you have more better OL......or maybe not.   A closer look may need to be had.

    Steelers probably still have better LBs. 

    Kicker...probably Steelers at this point (since Browns did feel the need to draft one)

    Punter....probably Colquitt of Browns.

    Kick and punt returners?  Not certain because not sure who holds these spots.  (didn't AB hold one of those jobs?....he not there)

    So...how are those "lilacs"  smelling?

    Gipshit you need to be better. Mayfield over Ben at this stage of his career is absolutely brain dead. The sporting news then puts Mahomes first who is very good but hasn’t done shit yet over everyone else AND puts Matt Ryan and rivers over Ben. If you are going to link a power tanking at least make sure it’s jot stupid from top to bottom first.

    The addition of OBJ catapulted the browns over the Steelers and only because the guys after juju are unproven. The browns win no where else so take off your shit colored glasses and at least wait for the browns to fucking do something before you go crowning. The browns haven’t done anything but go 7-8-1.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #55

    @vagitron said:

    Gipshit you need to be better. Mayfield over Ben at this stage of his career is absolutely brain dead.

    I didn't put him there...The Sportng News did.  So take your objections to them. 

    The sporting news then puts Mahomes first who is very good but hasn’t done shit yet over everyone else AND puts Matt Ryan and rivers over Ben. If you are going to link a power tanking at least make sure it’s jot stupid from top to bottom first.

    The Sporting News is one of the most objective and respected sports news entities in existence. If you deny that, then you really are a Retarded Kunta Kinte. Again...take your objections to them.

    The addition of OBJ catapulted the browns over the Steelers and only because the guys after juju are unproven.

    That is right...they are completely unproven...yet YOU rate them all as if they had made several Pro Bowls (which...by the way...the Browns top receivers have done).  And juju is unproven in his new role.  He still has to prove he can be a #1 receiver. Maybe he can, maybe he can't.  (or...do you want to argue that he and not AB was your #1 guy last year? Maybe in catches...but not in defensive attention)

    The browns win no where else

    Not sure what you mean by this.  Try explaining this if you are capable.

    so take off your shit colored glasses and at least wait for the browns to fucking do something before you go crowning. The browns haven’t done anything but go 7-8-1.

    I don't know that anyone has "crowned them".  We just anticipate that they will be good...with the addition of a lot of new talent to that 7-8-1 team.   Just like we anticipate that a mediocre team from last year that has lost quite a bit of talent may not be quite so good. 

  • @vagitron said:

    Gipshit you need to be better. Mayfield over Ben at this stage of his career is absolutely brain dead.

    I didn't put him there...The Sportng News did.  So take your objections to them. 

    The sporting news then puts Mahomes first who is very good but hasn’t done shit yet over everyone else AND puts Matt Ryan and rivers over Ben. If you are going to link a power tanking at least make sure it’s jot stupid from top to bottom first.

    The Sporting News is one of the most objective and respected sports news entities in existence. If you deny that, then you really are a Retarded Kunta Kinte. Again...take your objections to them.

    The addition of OBJ catapulted the browns over the Steelers and only because the guys after juju are unproven.

    That is right...they are completely unproven...yet YOU rate them all as if they had made several Pro Bowls (which...by the way...the Browns top receivers have done).  And juju is unproven in his new role.  He still has to prove he can be a #1 receiver. Maybe he can, maybe he can't.  (or...do you want to argue that he and not AB was your #1 guy last year? Maybe in catches...but not in defensive attention)

    The browns win no where else

    Not sure what you mean by this.  Try explaining this if you are capable.

    so take off your shit colored glasses and at least wait for the browns to fucking do something before you go crowning. The browns haven’t done anything but go 7-8-1.

    I don't know that anyone has "crowned them".  We just anticipate that they will be good...with the addition of a lot of new talent to that 7-8-1 team.   Just like we anticipate that a mediocre team from last year that has lost quite a bit of talent may not be quite so good. 

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
    #56

    @the-gipper said:

    The sporting news is NOT one of the most respected institutions in sports writing. They haven’t been for a long ass time too. I don’t feel like responding to the rest.

  • flyingfooldougF flyingfooldoug wrote on last edited by
    #57

    A Thread about stupid stool fans and look what shows up. At least Ghoulie was funny. 

  • A Thread about stupid stool fans and look what shows up. At least Ghoulie was funny. 

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #58

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    A Thread about stupid stool fans and look what shows up. 

    Don't be so hard on yourself, buddy. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    The sporting news is NOT one of the most respected institutions in sports writing. They haven’t been for a long ass time too. I don’t feel like responding to the rest.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #59

    @vagitron said:

    The sporting news is NOT one of the most respected institutions in sports writing. They haven’t been for a long ass time too. I don’t feel like responding to the rest.

    Oh, why?  Just because you say so?   Or Just because they do not support your delusions?  

    Please, tell us what is considered the top respected Sports journalism entities.  Give us links.

    And besides...it was not just The Sporting News....that is just the source that someone posted here. Take any sport journalistic entity...and nearly all of them have the Browns as being a contender.....as much or more so as the Steelers.

    Beyond that, your unconditional surrender is accepted. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    The sporting news is NOT one of the most respected institutions in sports writing. They haven’t been for a long ass time too. I don’t feel like responding to the rest.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
    #60

    @vagitron said:

    The sporting news is NOT one of the most respected institutions in sports writing. They haven’t been for a long ass time too. I don’t feel like responding to the rest.

    ESPN:   Predicts Browns to win  AFCN with an 11-5 record.  Steelers:  9-7

    http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/26540530/2019-nfl-schedule-record-predictions-analysis-all-32-teams

    The Bleacher Report: Browns to win AFCN  10-6.  Steelers 8-8

    https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2831583-2019-nfl-schedule-release-win-loss-predictions-for-every-team#slide3

    CBS Sports: Browns to win division:

    https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2019-nfl-predictions-a-way-too-early-look-at-wholl-be-division-winners-and-playoff-teams/

    NFL.com:

    4) Cleveland Browns: Cleveland is the most talented team in the AFC North -- bar none -- after John Dorsey's splashy offseason, highlighted by the Odell Beckham Jr. heist. Baker Mayfield is going to be in the mix for MVP this season, with all the weapons around him and a season of NFL quarterbacking already under his belt. And the defense features a number of emerging playmakers, most prominently second-team All-ProMyles Garrett.

    Need I go on?