Colin Coward
-
Warriors are fortunate that the Cavs ran out of gas with about 7 healthy players in 2015, the same way the Cubs are lucky that the Indians ran out of gas in the 2016 World Series with roughly 2 healthy starting pitchers.
It’s sports, Next man up. The Cavs got “lucky” when Draymond got suspended and Andrew Bogut was out with injury.
Indians and Cubs WS was great though. I yelled so loud when Rajai Davis hit that game 7 game tying home run.
It’s sports, Next man up. The Cavs got “lucky” when Draymond got suspended and Andrew Bogut was out with injury.
Indians and Cubs WS was great though. I yelled so loud when Rajai Davis hit that game 7 game tying home run.
Warriors "got lucky" when Kyrie and Love were hurt and out for that whole Final series....where it was 4-2.
And I don't want to talk about 2016...or 1997. When was the last time any team ever lost 2 World Series by going to extra innings in game 7 both times? Never...only the Indians give the world that.
-
LBJ may eventually considered the GOAT, but watching all of the Raptors- Golden State series, it's pretty obvious he's currently not the best player in the NBA anymore. Father time is catching up with him. Yup, he'll pass Kobe in points next year, and barring a crippling injury, Kareem is in sight in total points. Getting into the top 10 in assists on top of that puts him in a category of one.
Problem is- it's always been about LBJ. Lotsa luck 'Bron trying to recruit a guy like Davis or Leonard to play with ya with the Fakers. You're not catching Jordan in Championships.
PS- Karma says Durant doesn't play and Thompson is crippled, fair turnaround for Curry and the All-Star crew when the Cavs were minus Love and Kyree when they lucked into a Championship.
I put no credence in the "he has more championships" argument over who is the GOAT. Bill Russell and a 3-4 other Celtics have 11 titles...almost double Jordan's count. Robert Horry had 7. If Magic and Bird hadn't gone at each others throats, they each may have had 6. Michael Jordan and Kobe...who are basic clones of each other....both won all their titles under the tutelage of Phil Jackson, who should get more of the credit. But, yes, I agree, everyone talks about how the Warriors may have lost the 2016 Finals because of injuries and suspensions of their players...but never mention that the Cavs were without both Kyrie and Love the previous year. IMO, the Cavs were the better team those two years. Of course, that changed when Durant went to GS. It looks like they won't get another ring this year....and that it is likely that Durant will be out of there....perhaps, and I am sorry Durant Durant, Steph Curry is the Big Dog on that team...and will be next year even if they lose and you stay.
I put no credence in the "he has more championships" argument over who is the GOAT. Bill Russell and a 3-4 other Celtics have 11 titles...almost double Jordan's count. Robert Horry had 7. If Magic and Bird hadn't gone at each others throats, they each may have had 6. Michael Jordan and Kobe...who are basic clones of each other....both won all their titles under the tutelage of Phil Jackson, who should get more of the credit. But, yes, I agree, everyone talks about how the Warriors may have lost the 2016 Finals because of injuries and suspensions of their players...but never mention that the Cavs were without both Kyrie and Love the previous year. IMO, the Cavs were the better team those two years. Of course, that changed when Durant went to GS. It looks like they won't get another ring this year....and that it is likely that Durant will be out of there....perhaps, and I am sorry Durant Durant, Steph Curry is the Big Dog on that team...and will be next year even if they lose and you stay.
I certainly think that the Warriors benefited from those 2 being out, but I certainly hear more often that they were out over suspension and Bogut. Maybe they were the better team both those years, but I really saw no way to say that. There were obvious questions both years with the 2 things mentioned. And perhaps those could have changed either series, we will never know. But even the decisive game the 2nd time around was decided on 1 shot.
I certainly don't agree with the opinion that I hear more often than either the Cavs injuries or suspension and injury with GS, the "Curry KNEW he couldn't beat James so he had to get the 2nd best player and give him the team." There was nothing I saw that would give me reason to think that a close series like that couldn't occur, and Cavs were minus Kyrie.
The one thing I will say with the Warriors now that doesn't get mentioned much is how the team changed because of KD, which is now showing big time. They have absolutely no bench that can be consistently relied upon. When KD is in there, it masks that problem. They can even compete (maybe not with Raptors), but take another one out, Klay and Curry has to do it all. People (no one here that I seen) can bring up the still has X number of All Stars, but that doesn't tell the story. Cousins is a shell of himself and has actually been a liability last 2 games, Iggy is just too old, and Draymond is really a system player and unreliable on offense. Just the same way James was by himself that 1st finals. I will say that Curry has some more help than James did, even if I hate to admit that. But James is also an easier player for that situation because he relies on isolation, while Curry relies on movement and space. And James is better.
Since I don't like him and hes on my favorite team, I think Lakers need to trade James to Toronto for Kawhi lol
-
Anyway, back to the original topic. I just saw on Twitter Colin still dissing the Browns. Go check it out. Saying this is franchise that fired BB. He continues to argue with people that he couldn't have been fired by the Ravens (it was already announced) because he was never an employee of the Ravens. So his argument is he was fired by the Browns WHO DIDN'T EXIST AT THE TIME.
If you have ever seen his Twitter, once he is proven wrong or called out about something he shuts up. So this tells me he actually believes this HAHA
-
Anyway, back to the original topic. I just saw on Twitter Colin still dissing the Browns. Go check it out. Saying this is franchise that fired BB. He continues to argue with people that he couldn't have been fired by the Ravens (it was already announced) because he was never an employee of the Ravens. So his argument is he was fired by the Browns WHO DIDN'T EXIST AT THE TIME.
If you have ever seen his Twitter, once he is proven wrong or called out about something he shuts up. So this tells me he actually believes this HAHA
Anyway, back to the original topic. I just saw on Twitter Colin still dissing the Browns. Go check it out. Saying this is franchise that fired BB. He continues to argue with people that he couldn't have been fired by the Ravens (it was already announced) because he was never an employee of the Ravens. So his argument is he was fired by the Browns WHO DIDN'T EXIST AT THE TIME.
If you have ever seen his Twitter, once he is proven wrong or called out about something he shuts up. So this tells me he actually believes this HAHA
Well...the Browns certainly DID exist at the time....there has never been a point since 1945 that they did not exist.
But, from what I understand, BB WAS fired after the settlement had been reached that granted Baltimore a franchise, and granted Modell the ownership of that franchise, and granted an assignment of all contracts to the new Baltimore franchise....though it had not yet been named The Ravens. I guess perhaps you would have to look deep into the details and the paperwork....but it is clear that Modell did not want BB as the HC of his new franchise. Maybe Modell refused to assign the BB contract to the new team..which meant that BB was technically still an employee of the Browns....maybe. Though the Browns at that time had been placed on "inactive" status. This all happened in the course of a couple of days, at most. But, the most likely scenario is that he was fired after the ink was dry on the settlement, and maybe BB contract status was in limbo. Whatever it was, he was free to pursue other opportunities.
But hell....even if the "move" had not happened, BB may have deserved firing. He had 4 out of 5 losing seasons, although the last one came with extenuating circumstances.
-
Anyway, back to the original topic. I just saw on Twitter Colin still dissing the Browns. Go check it out. Saying this is franchise that fired BB. He continues to argue with people that he couldn't have been fired by the Ravens (it was already announced) because he was never an employee of the Ravens. So his argument is he was fired by the Browns WHO DIDN'T EXIST AT THE TIME.
If you have ever seen his Twitter, once he is proven wrong or called out about something he shuts up. So this tells me he actually believes this HAHA
Well...the Browns certainly DID exist at the time....there has never been a point since 1945 that they did not exist.
But, from what I understand, BB WAS fired after the settlement had been reached that granted Baltimore a franchise, and granted Modell the ownership of that franchise, and granted an assignment of all contracts to the new Baltimore franchise....though it had not yet been named The Ravens. I guess perhaps you would have to look deep into the details and the paperwork....but it is clear that Modell did not want BB as the HC of his new franchise. Maybe Modell refused to assign the BB contract to the new team..which meant that BB was technically still an employee of the Browns....maybe. Though the Browns at that time had been placed on "inactive" status. This all happened in the course of a couple of days, at most. But, the most likely scenario is that he was fired after the ink was dry on the settlement, and maybe BB contract status was in limbo. Whatever it was, he was free to pursue other opportunities.
But hell....even if the "move" had not happened, BB may have deserved firing. He had 4 out of 5 losing seasons, although the last one came with extenuating circumstances.
Well...the Browns certainly DID exist at the time....there has never been a point since 1945 that they did not exist.
But, from what I understand, BB WAS fired after the settlement had been reached that granted Baltimore a franchise, and granted Modell the ownership of that franchise, and granted an assignment of all contracts to the new Baltimore franchise....though it had not yet been named The Ravens. I guess perhaps you would have to look deep into the details and the paperwork....but it is clear that Modell did not want BB as the HC of his new franchise. Maybe Modell refused to assign the BB contract to the new team..which meant that BB was technically still an employee of the Browns....maybe. Though the Browns at that time had been placed on "inactive" status. This all happened in the course of a couple of days, at most. But, the most likely scenario is that he was fired after the ink was dry on the settlement, and maybe BB contract status was in limbo. Whatever it was, he was free to pursue other opportunities.
But hell....even if the "move" had not happened, BB may have deserved firing. He had 4 out of 5 losing seasons, although the last one came with extenuating circumstances.
You would have to read the posts to understand what I meant. Yes, they always existed, as nothing but employees went with them to Bal, and I don't think they were saying different, but at that time Cleveland had no team per say so the point was that whether he deserved fired or not, Coward is saying that is how bad this Browns franchise is and pointing to that as one reason why, when in fact it was Baltimore by then.
Just think its funny no matter how you slice it that he has a tell when something stupid he says is disproved that he shuts up, and even with proof he digs in. That is how obsessed he is with his stupid Baker take/fued
-
Well...the Browns certainly DID exist at the time....there has never been a point since 1945 that they did not exist.
But, from what I understand, BB WAS fired after the settlement had been reached that granted Baltimore a franchise, and granted Modell the ownership of that franchise, and granted an assignment of all contracts to the new Baltimore franchise....though it had not yet been named The Ravens. I guess perhaps you would have to look deep into the details and the paperwork....but it is clear that Modell did not want BB as the HC of his new franchise. Maybe Modell refused to assign the BB contract to the new team..which meant that BB was technically still an employee of the Browns....maybe. Though the Browns at that time had been placed on "inactive" status. This all happened in the course of a couple of days, at most. But, the most likely scenario is that he was fired after the ink was dry on the settlement, and maybe BB contract status was in limbo. Whatever it was, he was free to pursue other opportunities.
But hell....even if the "move" had not happened, BB may have deserved firing. He had 4 out of 5 losing seasons, although the last one came with extenuating circumstances.
You would have to read the posts to understand what I meant. Yes, they always existed, as nothing but employees went with them to Bal, and I don't think they were saying different, but at that time Cleveland had no team per say so the point was that whether he deserved fired or not, Coward is saying that is how bad this Browns franchise is and pointing to that as one reason why, when in fact it was Baltimore by then.
Just think its funny no matter how you slice it that he has a tell when something stupid he says is disproved that he shuts up, and even with proof he digs in. That is how obsessed he is with his stupid Baker take/fued
You would have to read the posts to understand what I meant. Yes, they always existed, as nothing but employees went with them to Bal, and I don't think they were saying different, but at that time Cleveland had no team per say so the point was that whether he deserved fired or not, Coward is saying that is how bad this Browns franchise is and pointing to that as one reason why, when in fact it was Baltimore by then.
Just think its funny no matter how you slice it that he has a tell when something stupid he says is disproved that he shuts up, and even with proof he digs in. That is how obsessed he is with his stupid Baker take/fued
My simple advice.. "Don't feed the Troll"
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
You would have to read the posts to understand what I meant. Yes, they always existed, as nothing but employees went with them to Bal, and I don't think they were saying different, but at that time Cleveland had no team per say so the point was that whether he deserved fired or not, Coward is saying that is how bad this Browns franchise is and pointing to that as one reason why, when in fact it was Baltimore by then.
Just think its funny no matter how you slice it that he has a tell when something stupid he says is disproved that he shuts up, and even with proof he digs in. That is how obsessed he is with his stupid Baker take/fued
My simple advice.. "Don't feed the Troll"
My simple advice.. "Don't feed the Troll"
Simple & to the point, thank you.
I think many on this Board would LOVE to see Cowherd, Grossi, & MKC go away. The only way that will happen is by ignoring them. PERIOD!
Mike
IN DORSEY I TRUST -
Simple & to the point, thank you.
I think many on this Board would LOVE to see Cowherd, Grossi, & MKC go away. The only way that will happen is by ignoring them. PERIOD!
Mike
Ignoring is one great way... Another?.. WINNING! cures EVERYTHING!
EDIT:. I expect quite a bit of winning this year...
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
Simple & to the point, thank you.
I think many on this Board would LOVE to see Cowherd, Grossi, & MKC go away. The only way that will happen is by ignoring them. PERIOD!
Mike
Cowherd is a hack who only thrives because people like so many on this board get all riled up over his laughably obvious attempts to piss them off.
Regarding the local press, how exactly should have this franchise been covered over the last two decades? They have had TWO winning seasons since coming back in 1999, one playoff appearance (an epic choke job to your biggest rival) and have lost roughly 2/3rds of their games.
Reporting on this franchise in a positive light over all these years would have been ridiculously negligent to their readers. The Browns deserved all the negative press they got. You want someone to shove sunshine up your butt while the Browns flailed along helplessly? Watch Nathan Zegura.
Hopefully that era of futility is over, and the local media can report on the positive future.
-
Simple & to the point, thank you.
I think many on this Board would LOVE to see Cowherd, Grossi, & MKC go away. The only way that will happen is by ignoring them. PERIOD!
Mike
Cowherd is a hack who only thrives because people like so many on this board get all riled up over his laughably obvious attempts to piss them off.
Regarding the local press, how exactly should have this franchise been covered over the last two decades? They have had TWO winning seasons since coming back in 1999, one playoff appearance (an epic choke job to your biggest rival) and have lost roughly 2/3rds of their games.
Reporting on this franchise in a positive light over all these years would have been ridiculously negligent to their readers. The Browns deserved all the negative press they got. You want someone to shove sunshine up your butt while the Browns flailed along helplessly? Watch Nathan Zegura.
Hopefully that era of futility is over, and the local media can report on the positive future.
Cowherd is a hack who only thrives because people like so many on this board get all riled up over his laughably obvious attempts to piss them off.
Regarding the local press, how exactly should have this franchise been covered over the last two decades? They have had TWO winning seasons since coming back in 1999, one playoff appearance (an epic choke job to your biggest rival) and have lost roughly 2/3rds of their games.
Reporting on this franchise in a positive light over all these years would have been ridiculously negligent to their readers. The Browns deserved all the negative press they got. You want someone to shove sunshine up your butt while the Browns flailed along helplessly? Watch Nathan Zegura.
Hopefully that era of futility is over, and the local media can report on the positive future.
Dutch,
The 2 folks I referred to, MKC & Grossi, CONTINUE their negative crap during these new, positive times & you're DEFENDING their continuing with the negative BS because of the past? That's unfortunate as "now" is NOT the last 2 decades. It's a new time & a new culture.
It's time to stop looking back & START looking ahead!
Mike
IN DORSEY I TRUST -
You would have to read the posts to understand what I meant. Yes, they always existed, as nothing but employees went with them to Bal, and I don't think they were saying different, but at that time Cleveland had no team per say so the point was that whether he deserved fired or not, Coward is saying that is how bad this Browns franchise is and pointing to that as one reason why, when in fact it was Baltimore by then.
Just think its funny no matter how you slice it that he has a tell when something stupid he says is disproved that he shuts up, and even with proof he digs in. That is how obsessed he is with his stupid Baker take/fued
My simple advice.. "Don't feed the Troll"
-
Simple & to the point, thank you.
I think many on this Board would LOVE to see Cowherd, Grossi, & MKC go away. The only way that will happen is by ignoring them. PERIOD!
Mike
Ignoring is one great way... Another?.. WINNING! cures EVERYTHING!
EDIT:. I expect quite a bit of winning this year...
Ignoring is one great way... Another?.. WINNING! cures EVERYTHING!
EDIT:. I expect quite a bit of winning this year...
You would think your other way would work (winning), but with these guys like Skip, Cowherd, Smith, etc it doesn't. They find some way to justify their incorrect takes, or find something meaningless to continue it.
Baker as the example with CC, from undraftable to well you didn't celebrate with your team 1 time in 3 years, to childish actions with Hue, to being overrated, to it now being a bad thing having a teammates back and having a different personality than Brady or Luck. He even says INTs don't matter to him, especially when talking about 1 of his boys, Darnold or Luck. After the BALT game, he threw INTs.
And while I dislike him, I really have nothing to really dislike with the actual game of LBJ. Its really how he is talked about, things that appear to happen behind the scenes, and in between whistles for me. But look at how Skip talks about him. He doesn't use the same criteria for his guys.
-
Cowherd is a hack who only thrives because people like so many on this board get all riled up over his laughably obvious attempts to piss them off.
Regarding the local press, how exactly should have this franchise been covered over the last two decades? They have had TWO winning seasons since coming back in 1999, one playoff appearance (an epic choke job to your biggest rival) and have lost roughly 2/3rds of their games.
Reporting on this franchise in a positive light over all these years would have been ridiculously negligent to their readers. The Browns deserved all the negative press they got. You want someone to shove sunshine up your butt while the Browns flailed along helplessly? Watch Nathan Zegura.
Hopefully that era of futility is over, and the local media can report on the positive future.
Dutch,
The 2 folks I referred to, MKC & Grossi, CONTINUE their negative crap during these new, positive times & you're DEFENDING their continuing with the negative BS because of the past? That's unfortunate as "now" is NOT the last 2 decades. It's a new time & a new culture.
It's time to stop looking back & START looking ahead!
Mike
Dutch,
The 2 folks I referred to, MKC & Grossi, CONTINUE their negative crap during these new, positive times & you're DEFENDING their continuing with the negative BS because of the past? Sad.
It's time to stop looking back & START looking ahead!
Mike
I've seen people bitch and moan about those two (and others who dare report how shitty this organization has been) during 2-14 seasons.
I want specific instances of the "sad" negative crap they have written regarding these new and positive Browns that was completely baseless and unwarranted Mike.
Because I've seen Grossi on STO's RedZone for years, and as much as some of you complain about him, he is almost giddy talking about the Browns when they actually win or make smart organizational moves - for someone so many people think loves to shit on the Browns just to shit on the Browns. Hoorta has mentioned this multiple times too.
-
Simple & to the point, thank you.
I think many on this Board would LOVE to see Cowherd, Grossi, & MKC go away. The only way that will happen is by ignoring them. PERIOD!
Mike
Cowherd is a hack who only thrives because people like so many on this board get all riled up over his laughably obvious attempts to piss them off.
Regarding the local press, how exactly should have this franchise been covered over the last two decades? They have had TWO winning seasons since coming back in 1999, one playoff appearance (an epic choke job to your biggest rival) and have lost roughly 2/3rds of their games.
Reporting on this franchise in a positive light over all these years would have been ridiculously negligent to their readers. The Browns deserved all the negative press they got. You want someone to shove sunshine up your butt while the Browns flailed along helplessly? Watch Nathan Zegura.
Hopefully that era of futility is over, and the local media can report on the positive future.
Hopefully that era of futility is over, and the local media can report on the positive future.
Dutch, i'd like to believe this..but go find the one local media presser with Kareem Hunt in Cleveland. I wanted to truly poke MKC square in both eyeballs?.. just to save Hunt from doing it.I get he needed to face the music...But not "1" single positive question about playing football again?.From noOne?.Just the same 25 questions, asked differently, on the same video seen. And the guy's trying his hardest to get past it..I truly hope the media can move on from this ANd I bet Hunt can't wait to play in a meaningless pre-season game..(Than re-called back to cell #8, to hear it all over again) Call it deserved..but at some point, our media needs to take the lead on letting this Go!!
-
Dutch,
The 2 folks I referred to, MKC & Grossi, CONTINUE their negative crap during these new, positive times & you're DEFENDING their continuing with the negative BS because of the past? Sad.
It's time to stop looking back & START looking ahead!
Mike
I've seen people bitch and moan about those two (and others who dare report how shitty this organization has been) during 2-14 seasons.
I want specific instances of the "sad" negative crap they have written regarding these new and positive Browns that was completely baseless and unwarranted Mike.
Because I've seen Grossi on STO's RedZone for years, and as much as some of you complain about him, he is almost giddy talking about the Browns when they actually win or make smart organizational moves - for someone so many people think loves to shit on the Browns just to shit on the Browns. Hoorta has mentioned this multiple times too.
I've seen people bitch and moan about those two (and others who dare report how shitty this organization has been) during 2-14 seasons.
I want specific instances of the "sad" negative crap they have written regarding these new and positive Browns that was completely baseless and unwarranted Mike.
Because I've seen Grossi on STO's RedZone for years, and as much as some of you complain about him, he is almost giddy talking about the Browns when they actually win or make smart organizational moves - for someone so many people think loves to shit on the Browns just to shit on the Browns. Hoorta has mentioned this multiple times too.
What I wrote are my observations & opinions. I'll not defend them to anyone else. You & I obviously see Grossi differently & that's ok.
Have a nice day.
Mike
-
Well...the Browns certainly DID exist at the time....there has never been a point since 1945 that they did not exist.
But, from what I understand, BB WAS fired after the settlement had been reached that granted Baltimore a franchise, and granted Modell the ownership of that franchise, and granted an assignment of all contracts to the new Baltimore franchise....though it had not yet been named The Ravens. I guess perhaps you would have to look deep into the details and the paperwork....but it is clear that Modell did not want BB as the HC of his new franchise. Maybe Modell refused to assign the BB contract to the new team..which meant that BB was technically still an employee of the Browns....maybe. Though the Browns at that time had been placed on "inactive" status. This all happened in the course of a couple of days, at most. But, the most likely scenario is that he was fired after the ink was dry on the settlement, and maybe BB contract status was in limbo. Whatever it was, he was free to pursue other opportunities.
But hell....even if the "move" had not happened, BB may have deserved firing. He had 4 out of 5 losing seasons, although the last one came with extenuating circumstances.
You would have to read the posts to understand what I meant. Yes, they always existed, as nothing but employees went with them to Bal, and I don't think they were saying different, but at that time Cleveland had no team per say so the point was that whether he deserved fired or not, Coward is saying that is how bad this Browns franchise is and pointing to that as one reason why, when in fact it was Baltimore by then.
Just think its funny no matter how you slice it that he has a tell when something stupid he says is disproved that he shuts up, and even with proof he digs in. That is how obsessed he is with his stupid Baker take/fued
You would have to read the posts to understand what I meant. Yes, they always existed, as nothing but employees went with them to Bal, and I don't think they were saying different, but at that time Cleveland had no team per say so the point was that whether he deserved fired or not, Coward is saying that is how bad this Browns franchise is and pointing to that as one reason why, when in fact it was Baltimore by then.
Just think its funny no matter how you slice it that he has a tell when something stupid he says is disproved that he shuts up, and even with proof he digs in. That is how obsessed he is with his stupid Baker take/fued
Right agree it’s asinine the point to the firing of Bill Belichick as part of the reason why this franchise has sucked for so long. They were in active for three years after he was fired. The cause was poor management poor personnel selection not firing the Bill Belichick. like I said he may have been fired even if the team didn’t.
-
You would have to read the posts to understand what I meant. Yes, they always existed, as nothing but employees went with them to Bal, and I don't think they were saying different, but at that time Cleveland had no team per say so the point was that whether he deserved fired or not, Coward is saying that is how bad this Browns franchise is and pointing to that as one reason why, when in fact it was Baltimore by then.
Just think its funny no matter how you slice it that he has a tell when something stupid he says is disproved that he shuts up, and even with proof he digs in. That is how obsessed he is with his stupid Baker take/fued
Right agree it’s asinine the point to the firing of Bill Belichick as part of the reason why this franchise has sucked for so long. They were in active for three years after he was fired. The cause was poor management poor personnel selection not firing the Bill Belichick. like I said he may have been fired even if the team didn’t.
Right agree it’s asinine the point to the firing of Bill Belichick as part of the reason why this franchise has sucked for so long. They were in active for three years after he was fired. The cause was poor management poor personnel selection not firing the Bill Belichick. like I said he may have been fired even if the team didn’t.
Someone brought up a good point the last time I saw that post. By Colin's logic, the Browns have 2 Super Bowl wins lol
-
All I can say is:
“CLEVELANNDD! THIS IS FOR YOUUUUU!”
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login