Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. What? Epstein was protected by...intelligence service?

What? Epstein was protected by...intelligence service?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
21 Posts 5 Posters 324 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C calfoxwc

    I wonder if it's clapper and/or brennan.

    they protected him? what the....

    the dirty deep state has deep serious secrets.

    all (intelligence power players, directors) during obaMao's regime.

    https://www.theblaze.com/glenn-radio/acosta-epstein-intelligence

    (fixed, dammit)

    jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 3k Posts
    • 883 Reputation
    jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by jbluhm86
    #2

    @calfoxwc said:

    I wonder if it's clapper and/or brennan.

    they protected him? what the....

    the dirty deep state has deep serious secrets.

    all during obaMao's regime.

    https://www.theblaze.com/glenn-radio/acosta-epstein-intelligence

    I'm feeling pretty magnanimous today, so I'll give you a free chance to reread the source article and then reread your comment above and give you the opportunity to correct your obvious mistake.

    šŸ˜‰

    "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidenceā€. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
    C C 2 Replies Last reply
    šŸ˜‚
    Quote Reply
    • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

      @calfoxwc said:

      I wonder if it's clapper and/or brennan.

      they protected him? what the....

      the dirty deep state has deep serious secrets.

      all during obaMao's regime.

      https://www.theblaze.com/glenn-radio/acosta-epstein-intelligence

      I'm feeling pretty magnanimous today, so I'll give you a free chance to reread the source article and then reread your comment above and give you the opportunity to correct your obvious mistake.

      šŸ˜‰

      Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
      • 24k Posts
      • 1k Reputation
      C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
      #3

      @jbluhm86 said:

      I'm feeling pretty magnanimous today, so I'll give you a free chance to reread the source article and then reread your comment above and give you the opportunity to correct your obvious mistake.

      šŸ˜‰

      "feeling magnaminous" has me dying J.....?????

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

        @calfoxwc said:

        I wonder if it's clapper and/or brennan.

        they protected him? what the....

        the dirty deep state has deep serious secrets.

        all during obaMao's regime.

        https://www.theblaze.com/glenn-radio/acosta-epstein-intelligence

        I'm feeling pretty magnanimous today, so I'll give you a free chance to reread the source article and then reread your comment above and give you the opportunity to correct your obvious mistake.

        šŸ˜‰

        calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
        • 64k Posts
        • 8k Reputation
        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
        #4

        @jbluhm86 said:

        I'm feeling pretty magnanimous today, so I'll give you a free chance to reread the source article and then reread your comment above and give you the opportunity to correct your obvious mistake.

        šŸ˜‰

        no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

        Dirty Clapper was a top deep state wonk in intel during that time.

        so was Dirty Brennan.

        If I made some mistake, go ahead, I don't see it, I have stuff to do today. lol

        It would be good if you would try to comment on the article instead.

        jbluhm86J 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • C calfoxwc

          @jbluhm86 said:

          I'm feeling pretty magnanimous today, so I'll give you a free chance to reread the source article and then reread your comment above and give you the opportunity to correct your obvious mistake.

          šŸ˜‰

          no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

          Dirty Clapper was a top deep state wonk in intel during that time.

          so was Dirty Brennan.

          If I made some mistake, go ahead, I don't see it, I have stuff to do today. lol

          It would be good if you would try to comment on the article instead.

          jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 3k Posts
          • 883 Reputation
          jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
          #5

          @calfoxwc said:

          no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

          Well, I tried.

          So, Cal: what year was Obama elected into office?

          "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidenceā€. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
            • 24k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
            #6

            if any of this was true acosta would not have quit....period end of duscussion. This would have been a MASSIVE pr win for trump if he coukd have said the deepstate pulled acosta off epstein. Hyyuuuggeee win....like bigly even. Even i would have started coming around because i do beleive in a "deepstate"....just not the one y'all bought into

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
              • 64k Posts
              • 8k Reputation
              C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
              #7

              oh. I thought I wrote "these are all higher higher ups in the obaMao regime".

              sorry. I went and fixed that.

              NOW do you have ANY COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE ?????????

              jbluhm86J 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                • 24k Posts
                • 1k Reputation
                C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                #8

                "I was told Epstein 'belonged to intelligence' and to leave it alone," Acosta, who resigned as Secretary of Labor on Friday, reportedly claimed."

                "reportedly claimed" yet tucked his sack and ran yesterday despite having the fucking potus behind him if this was true. You are all being spun like a top.Ā 

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • C calfoxwc

                  oh. I thought I wrote "these are all higher higher ups in the obaMao regime".

                  sorry. I went and fixed that.

                  NOW do you have ANY COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE ?????????

                  jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 3k Posts
                  • 883 Reputation
                  jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @calfoxwc said:

                  oh. I thought I wrote "these are all higher higher ups in the obaMao regime".

                  Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

                  @calfoxwc said:

                  no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

                  Dirty Clapper was a top deep state wonk in intel during that time.

                  so was Dirty Brennan.

                  If I made some mistake, go ahead, I don't see it, I have stuff to do today. lol

                  In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

                  giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

                  "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidenceā€. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                  W C 2 Replies Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                    @calfoxwc said:

                    oh. I thought I wrote "these are all higher higher ups in the obaMao regime".

                    Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

                    @calfoxwc said:

                    no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

                    Dirty Clapper was a top deep state wonk in intel during that time.

                    so was Dirty Brennan.

                    If I made some mistake, go ahead, I don't see it, I have stuff to do today. lol

                    In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

                    giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

                    Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                    • 39k Posts
                    • 9k Reputation
                    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @jbluhm86 said:

                    Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

                    In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

                    giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

                    Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

                    ???

                    WSS

                    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                    jbluhm86J C 2 Replies Last reply
                    šŸ˜‚
                    Quote Reply
                    • W Westside Steve

                      @jbluhm86 said:

                      Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

                      In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

                      giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

                      Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

                      ???

                      WSS

                      jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 3k Posts
                      • 883 Reputation
                      jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      @westside-steve said:

                      Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

                      ???

                      WSS

                      If Epstein was smart, he would've just converted to Catholicism. At least then he could've hidden out in Rome under the loving arms of the Church, immune from extradition back to the US.

                      "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidenceā€. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      šŸ‘
                      Quote Reply
                      • W Westside Steve

                        @jbluhm86 said:

                        Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

                        In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

                        giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

                        Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

                        ???

                        WSS

                        Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                        • 24k Posts
                        • 1k Reputation
                        C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        @westside-steve said:

                        Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

                        ???

                        WSS

                        when u realize ur boy fucked up, again, and u need to hastily slap down some bombastic racial tropes in order to divert the conversation.......ā˜•

                        W 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • C Clevfan4life

                          @westside-steve said:

                          Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

                          ???

                          WSS

                          when u realize ur boy fucked up, again, and u need to hastily slap down some bombastic racial tropes in order to divert the conversation.......ā˜•

                          Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                          • 39k Posts
                          • 9k Reputation
                          W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
                          #13

                          @clevfan4life said:

                          when u realize ur boy fucked up, again, and u need to hastily slap down some bombastic racial tropes in order to divert the conversation.......ā˜•

                          Thank God some idiotĀ played the race card; it never gets old.

                          WSS

                          www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          šŸ‘
                          Quote Reply
                          • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                            @calfoxwc said:

                            oh. I thought I wrote "these are all higher higher ups in the obaMao regime".

                            Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

                            @calfoxwc said:

                            no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

                            Dirty Clapper was a top deep state wonk in intel during that time.

                            so was Dirty Brennan.

                            If I made some mistake, go ahead, I don't see it, I have stuff to do today. lol

                            In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

                            giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

                            calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                            • 64k Posts
                            • 8k Reputation
                            C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @jbluhm86 said:

                            In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

                            clapper and brennan are major parts of the deep state. Try to not be a fool. Clapper and brennan, etc, all worked during the obamao regime. It' who they are - dirty and corrupt. I added the FACT that clapper and brennan worked during obaMao's reign of destruction.

                            Why can't you man up and comment on the ARTICLE? You pull a woodpecker all too often. are his nanny?

                            jbluhm86J 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • C calfoxwc

                              @jbluhm86 said:

                              In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

                              clapper and brennan are major parts of the deep state. Try to not be a fool. Clapper and brennan, etc, all worked during the obamao regime. It' who they are - dirty and corrupt. I added the FACT that clapper and brennan worked during obaMao's reign of destruction.

                              Why can't you man up and comment on the ARTICLE? You pull a woodpecker all too often. are his nanny?

                              jbluhm86 jbluhm86J Reacting Well Very Popular Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 3k Posts
                              • 883 Reputation
                              jbluhm86J jbluhm86 wrote on last edited by jbluhm86
                              #15

                              @calfoxwc said:

                              clapper and brennan are major parts of the deep state. Try to not be a fool. Clapper and brennan, etc, all worked during the obamao regime. It' who they are - dirty and corrupt. I added the FACT that clapper and brennan worked during obaMao's reign of destruction.

                              Why can't you man up and comment on the ARTICLE? You pull a woodpecker all too often. are his nanny?

                              Reading again, I noticed that - besides not mentioning Obama anywhere - the article never mentioned Clapper or Brennan either. All three are your own additions to the story. All of this went down from 2001-2007 during the Bush administration; the case was settled at least a year before Obama even won the election, much less assumed office. Yet, your first reaction was to blame Obama. For someone who accuses others of TDS, you sure are preoccupied with a man who hasn't held the office of the President in nearly 3 years.

                              I should buy stock in Chiquita, because at the rate you're slipping on banana peels trying to backpedal, i'd be a billionaire in a year....

                              "That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidenceā€. - Christopher Hitchens "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you". - Neil deGrasse Tyson
                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              šŸ‘
                              Quote Reply
                              • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                                • 24k Posts
                                • 1k Reputation
                                C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                ur name is now j-munneh.....fyi.Ā 

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • jbluhm86J jbluhm86

                                  @calfoxwc said:

                                  clapper and brennan are major parts of the deep state. Try to not be a fool. Clapper and brennan, etc, all worked during the obamao regime. It' who they are - dirty and corrupt. I added the FACT that clapper and brennan worked during obaMao's reign of destruction.

                                  Why can't you man up and comment on the ARTICLE? You pull a woodpecker all too often. are his nanny?

                                  Reading again, I noticed that - besides not mentioning Obama anywhere - the article never mentioned Clapper or Brennan either. All three are your own additions to the story. All of this went down from 2001-2007 during the Bush administration; the case was settled at least a year before Obama even won the election, much less assumed office. Yet, your first reaction was to blame Obama. For someone who accuses others of TDS, you sure are preoccupied with a man who hasn't held the office of the President in nearly 3 years.

                                  I should buy stock in Chiquita, because at the rate you're slipping on banana peels trying to backpedal, i'd be a billionaire in a year....

                                  calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                                  • 64k Posts
                                  • 8k Reputation
                                  C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @jbluhm86 said:

                                  Reading again, I noticed that - besides not mentioning Obama anywhere - the article never mentioned Clapper or Brennan either. All three are your own additions to the story. All of this went down from 2001-2007 during the Bush administration; the case was settled at least a year before Obama even won the election, much less assumed office. Yet, your first reaction was to blame Obama. For someone who accuses others of TDS, you sure are preoccupied with a man who hasn't held the office of the President in nearly 3 years.

                                  I should buy stock in Chiquita, because at the rate you're slipping on banana peels trying to backpedal, i'd be a billionaire in a year....

                                  yet, who was a prominent director in 07? go look it up. No, wait, I'll do it for you, Woodpecker's nanny.

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Clapper\

                                  Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence
                                  In office
                                  April 15, 2007 – June 5, 2010
                                  President George W. Bush
                                  Barack Obama
                                  Preceded by Stephen Cambone
                                  Succeeded by Michael Vickers
                                  Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
                                  In office
                                  September 2001 – June 2006
                                  President George W. Bush
                                  Preceded by James C. King
                                  Succeeded by

                                  Robert Murrett

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                                    • 64k Posts
                                    • 8k Reputation
                                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_O._Brennan

                                    5th United States Homeland Security Advisor
                                    In office
                                    January 20, 2009 – March 8, 2013
                                    President Barack Obama
                                    Preceded by Ken Wainstein
                                    Succeeded by Lisa Monaco
                                    Acting Director of the National Counterterrorism Center
                                    In office
                                    August 27, 2004 – August 1, 2005
                                    President George W. Bush
                                    Preceded by Position established
                                    Succeeded by John Scott Redd
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                                      • 64k Posts
                                      • 8k Reputation
                                      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      so, whenever the actual using of epstein as some kind of collaboration resource of our intel ...

                                      I'll rightly name them because they were there.

                                      Any comment YET on the actual substance of the article, jblu?

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • C calfoxwc

                                        so, whenever the actual using of epstein as some kind of collaboration resource of our intel ...

                                        I'll rightly name them because they were there.

                                        Any comment YET on the actual substance of the article, jblu?

                                        Chemist C Banned
                                        • 201 Posts
                                        • 57 Reputation
                                        C Chemist wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @calfoxwc said:

                                        so, whenever the actual using of epstein as some kind of collaboration resource of our intel ...

                                        I'll rightly name them because they were there.

                                        Any comment YET on the actual substance of the article, jblu?

                                        No, for whatever reason he’s unableĀ to dig deeper beyond the ā€œface valueā€ of the article. Unable to read between the lines. He’s constantly referring the what the article specifically states instead of looking beyond that.

                                        But that’s liberalism in a nutshell.Ā 

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        ā¤
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                                          • 24k Posts
                                          • 1k Reputation
                                          C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          acosta quit so this line of defense has no merit. Its bullshit. If there was an ounce of truth tonit acosta would still be labor sec. He would have gotten up and said the call was made above my pay grade.....ask them. easy mode

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better šŸ’—

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate