Skip to content

What? Epstein was protected by...intelligence service?

Political Discussion
21 5 325 1
  • @jbluhm86 said:

    I'm feeling pretty magnanimous today, so I'll give you a free chance to reread the source article and then reread your comment above and give you the opportunity to correct your obvious mistake.

    šŸ˜‰

    no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

    Dirty Clapper was a top deep state wonk in intel during that time.

    so was Dirty Brennan.

    If I made some mistake, go ahead, I don't see it, I have stuff to do today. lol

    It would be good if you would try to comment on the article instead.

    @calfoxwc said:

    no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

    Well, I tried.

    So, Cal: what year was Obama elected into office?

  • if any of this was true acosta would not have quit....period end of duscussion. This would have been a MASSIVE pr win for trump if he coukd have said the deepstate pulled acosta off epstein. Hyyuuuggeee win....like bigly even. Even i would have started coming around because i do beleive in a "deepstate"....just not the one y'all bought into

  • oh. I thought I wrote "these are all higher higher ups in the obaMao regime".

    sorry. I went and fixed that.

    NOW do you have ANY COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE ?????????

  • "I was told Epstein 'belonged to intelligence' and to leave it alone," Acosta, who resigned as Secretary of Labor on Friday, reportedly claimed."

    "reportedly claimed" yet tucked his sack and ran yesterday despite having the fucking potus behind him if this was true. You are all being spun like a top.Ā 

  • oh. I thought I wrote "these are all higher higher ups in the obaMao regime".

    sorry. I went and fixed that.

    NOW do you have ANY COMMENT ON THE ARTICLE ?????????

    @calfoxwc said:

    oh. I thought I wrote "these are all higher higher ups in the obaMao regime".

    Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

    @calfoxwc said:

    no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

    Dirty Clapper was a top deep state wonk in intel during that time.

    so was Dirty Brennan.

    If I made some mistake, go ahead, I don't see it, I have stuff to do today. lol

    In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

    giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

  • @calfoxwc said:

    oh. I thought I wrote "these are all higher higher ups in the obaMao regime".

    Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

    @calfoxwc said:

    no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

    Dirty Clapper was a top deep state wonk in intel during that time.

    so was Dirty Brennan.

    If I made some mistake, go ahead, I don't see it, I have stuff to do today. lol

    In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

    giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

    @jbluhm86 said:

    Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

    In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

    giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

    Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

    ???

    WSS

  • @jbluhm86 said:

    Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

    In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

    giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

    Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

    ???

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

    ???

    WSS

    If Epstein was smart, he would've just converted to Catholicism. At least then he could've hidden out in Rome under the loving arms of the Church, immune from extradition back to the US.

  • @jbluhm86 said:

    Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

    In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

    giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

    Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

    ???

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

    ???

    WSS

    when u realize ur boy fucked up, again, and u need to hastily slap down some bombastic racial tropes in order to divert the conversation.......ā˜•

  • @westside-steve said:

    Of course Barack and Michelle Obama are both homosexual men so they would actually have no need of 14 year old girls.

    ???

    WSS

    when u realize ur boy fucked up, again, and u need to hastily slap down some bombastic racial tropes in order to divert the conversation.......ā˜•

    @clevfan4life said:

    when u realize ur boy fucked up, again, and u need to hastily slap down some bombastic racial tropes in order to divert the conversation.......ā˜•

    Thank God some idiotĀ played the race card; it never gets old.

    WSS

  • @calfoxwc said:

    oh. I thought I wrote "these are all higher higher ups in the obaMao regime".

    Nah, I'm not in the Alaskan bridge real estate business, so I'm not going to buy that attempted deflection either:

    @calfoxwc said:

    no, I don't see a problem. 2007. That is your ObaMao.

    Dirty Clapper was a top deep state wonk in intel during that time.

    so was Dirty Brennan.

    If I made some mistake, go ahead, I don't see it, I have stuff to do today. lol

    In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

    giphy-2.gif.0d9fe8c569a61641c9280c4cd412c94c.gif

    @jbluhm86 said:

    In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

    clapper and brennan are major parts of the deep state. Try to not be a fool. Clapper and brennan, etc, all worked during the obamao regime. It' who they are - dirty and corrupt. I added the FACT that clapper and brennan worked during obaMao's reign of destruction.

    Why can't you man up and comment on the ARTICLE? You pull a woodpecker all too often. are his nanny?

  • @jbluhm86 said:

    In fact, the Blaze article doesn't mention Obama at any point, so that was your own addition. All they did was dangle the "deep state" phrase to you like a worm, and you immediately:

    clapper and brennan are major parts of the deep state. Try to not be a fool. Clapper and brennan, etc, all worked during the obamao regime. It' who they are - dirty and corrupt. I added the FACT that clapper and brennan worked during obaMao's reign of destruction.

    Why can't you man up and comment on the ARTICLE? You pull a woodpecker all too often. are his nanny?

    @calfoxwc said:

    clapper and brennan are major parts of the deep state. Try to not be a fool. Clapper and brennan, etc, all worked during the obamao regime. It' who they are - dirty and corrupt. I added the FACT that clapper and brennan worked during obaMao's reign of destruction.

    Why can't you man up and comment on the ARTICLE? You pull a woodpecker all too often. are his nanny?

    Reading again, I noticed that - besides not mentioning Obama anywhere - the article never mentioned Clapper or Brennan either. All three are your own additions to the story. All of this went down from 2001-2007 during the Bush administration; the case was settled at least a year before Obama even won the election, much less assumed office. Yet, your first reaction was to blame Obama. For someone who accuses others of TDS, you sure are preoccupied with a man who hasn't held the office of the President in nearly 3 years.

    I should buy stock in Chiquita, because at the rate you're slipping on banana peels trying to backpedal, i'd be a billionaire in a year....

  • ur name is now j-munneh.....fyi.Ā 

  • @calfoxwc said:

    clapper and brennan are major parts of the deep state. Try to not be a fool. Clapper and brennan, etc, all worked during the obamao regime. It' who they are - dirty and corrupt. I added the FACT that clapper and brennan worked during obaMao's reign of destruction.

    Why can't you man up and comment on the ARTICLE? You pull a woodpecker all too often. are his nanny?

    Reading again, I noticed that - besides not mentioning Obama anywhere - the article never mentioned Clapper or Brennan either. All three are your own additions to the story. All of this went down from 2001-2007 during the Bush administration; the case was settled at least a year before Obama even won the election, much less assumed office. Yet, your first reaction was to blame Obama. For someone who accuses others of TDS, you sure are preoccupied with a man who hasn't held the office of the President in nearly 3 years.

    I should buy stock in Chiquita, because at the rate you're slipping on banana peels trying to backpedal, i'd be a billionaire in a year....

    @jbluhm86 said:

    Reading again, I noticed that - besides not mentioning Obama anywhere - the article never mentioned Clapper or Brennan either. All three are your own additions to the story. All of this went down from 2001-2007 during the Bush administration; the case was settled at least a year before Obama even won the election, much less assumed office. Yet, your first reaction was to blame Obama. For someone who accuses others of TDS, you sure are preoccupied with a man who hasn't held the office of the President in nearly 3 years.

    I should buy stock in Chiquita, because at the rate you're slipping on banana peels trying to backpedal, i'd be a billionaire in a year....

    yet, who was a prominent director in 07? go look it up. No, wait, I'll do it for you, Woodpecker's nanny.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Clapper\

    Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence
    In office
    April 15, 2007 – June 5, 2010
    President George W. Bush
    Barack Obama
    Preceded by Stephen Cambone
    Succeeded by Michael Vickers
    Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
    In office
    September 2001 – June 2006
    President George W. Bush
    Preceded by James C. King
    Succeeded by

    Robert Murrett

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_O._Brennan

    5th United States Homeland Security Advisor
    In office
    January 20, 2009 – March 8, 2013
    President Barack Obama
    Preceded by Ken Wainstein
    Succeeded by Lisa Monaco
    Acting Director of the National Counterterrorism Center
    In office
    August 27, 2004 – August 1, 2005
    President George W. Bush
    Preceded by Position established
    Succeeded by John Scott Redd
  • so, whenever the actual using of epstein as some kind of collaboration resource of our intel ...

    I'll rightly name them because they were there.

    Any comment YET on the actual substance of the article, jblu?

  • so, whenever the actual using of epstein as some kind of collaboration resource of our intel ...

    I'll rightly name them because they were there.

    Any comment YET on the actual substance of the article, jblu?

    @calfoxwc said:

    so, whenever the actual using of epstein as some kind of collaboration resource of our intel ...

    I'll rightly name them because they were there.

    Any comment YET on the actual substance of the article, jblu?

    No, for whatever reason he’s unableĀ to dig deeper beyond the ā€œface valueā€ of the article. Unable to read between the lines. He’s constantly referring the what the article specifically states instead of looking beyond that.

    But that’s liberalism in a nutshell.Ā 

  • acosta quit so this line of defense has no merit. Its bullshit. If there was an ounce of truth tonit acosta would still be labor sec. He would have gotten up and said the call was made above my pay grade.....ask them. easy mode