Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Partial radio exchange between Iran and British warship

Partial radio exchange between Iran and British warship

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
42 Posts 7 Posters 508 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
    • 24k Posts
    • 1k Reputation
    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by Clevfan4life
    #5

    do u clowns actually think that becsuse the u.k navy isnt as big as it was during the cold war, thst they wouldnt DP Irans white water rafts? They're still the 5th strongest navy in the world

    DieHardBrownsFanD 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • C Clevfan4life

      do u clowns actually think that becsuse the u.k navy isnt as big as it was during the cold war, thst they wouldnt DP Irans white water rafts? They're still the 5th strongest navy in the world

      DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
      • 28k Posts
      • 6k Reputation
      DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
      #6

      @clevfan4life said:

      do u clowns actually think that becsuse the u.k navy isnt as big as it was during the cold war, thst they wouldnt DP Irans white water rafts? They're still the 5th strongest navy in the world

      Hey dipshit, I think I know a hell of alot more than your punk ass knows about the Navy or the military.  So shut your fucking piehole.☕

      "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
      C 1 Reply Last reply
      👍 😂
      Quote Reply
      • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan

        @clevfan4life said:

        do u clowns actually think that becsuse the u.k navy isnt as big as it was during the cold war, thst they wouldnt DP Irans white water rafts? They're still the 5th strongest navy in the world

        Hey dipshit, I think I know a hell of alot more than your punk ass knows about the Navy or the military.  So shut your fucking piehole.☕

        Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
        • 24k Posts
        • 1k Reputation
        C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
        #7

        @diehardbrownsfan said:

        Hey dipshit, I think I know a hell of alot more than your punk ass knows about the Navy or the military.  So shut your fucking piehole.☕

        well go on then  De Ruyter,  tell us how the 5th strongest NUCLEAR POWERED navy in the world wont be able to deal with a flotilla of rubber dinghies coming at them? tits up for this cool story!

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
          • 64k Posts
          • 8k Reputation
          C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
          #8

          do u clowns actually think that becsuse the u.k navy isnt as big as it was during the cold war, thst they wouldnt DP Irans white water rafts? They're still the 5th strongest navy in the world CLEVISgiphy.gif?cid=790b76115d350d02662e524e32

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • C Clevfan4life

            @diehardbrownsfan said:

            Hey dipshit, I think I know a hell of alot more than your punk ass knows about the Navy or the military.  So shut your fucking piehole.☕

            well go on then  De Ruyter,  tell us how the 5th strongest NUCLEAR POWERED navy in the world wont be able to deal with a flotilla of rubber dinghies coming at them? tits up for this cool story!

            Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
            • 24k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
            #9

            @clevfan4life said:

            well go on then  De Ruyter,  tell us how the 5th strongest NUCLEAR POWERED navy in the world wont be able to deal with a flotilla of rubber dinghies coming at them? tits up for this cool story!

            980x.jpg

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
              • 64k Posts
              • 8k Reputation
              C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
              #10

              do u clowns actually think that becsuse the u.k navy isnt as big as it was during the cold war, thst they wouldnt DP Irans white water rafts? They're still the 5th strongest navy in the world

              **************************************************************

                 RUN FORREST, RUN !

              giphy.gif?cid=790b76115d3510ce716f456d45

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                • 24k Posts
                • 1k Reputation
                C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                #11

                still waiting...

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                  • 24k Posts
                  • 1k Reputation
                  C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  https://irannewsupdate.com/news/general/4782-iran-loses-its-biggest-warship-and-is-much-weaker-than-it-claims.html

                  "INU - Iran has lost its biggest warship - the 1,500 ton Damavand – in the Caspian Sea.

                  The ship ran aground on rocks in January, after attempting to enter a harbour during bad weather. Iran initially tried to downplay the incident, but it soon became clear that the wreck was unsalvageable, leaving Iran with only one large surface warship in its enti"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                    • 24k Posts
                    • 1k Reputation
                    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 10k Posts
                      • 2k Reputation
                      LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      Iran’s fleet consists of canoes and guys in water wings.

                      GorkaG 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                        • 11k Posts
                        • 3k Reputation
                        OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        Gulf Tanker Seizure: Senior UK Politician Says Britain Did Not Take Up US Offer of Assets

                        A senior British Conservative Party lawmaker said Sunday he understood that the United States had offered the use of its assets to protect British shipping in the Persian Gulf, but the offer had not been taken up.

                        https://www.cnsnews.com/video/gulf-tanker-seizure-senior-uk-politician-says-britain-did-not-take-us-offer-assets

                        They have had what two tankers now seized by Iran? but guess they didn't want any help from the Trump administration..Oh well.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 10k Posts
                          • 2k Reputation
                          LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          I actually like that they didn’t take us up on it. We have people already beating the drum to go to war with Iran. If an Iranian sent a strongly worded email, we would be destabilizing another Middle Eastern dump.

                          OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

                            I actually like that they didn’t take us up on it. We have people already beating the drum to go to war with Iran. If an Iranian sent a strongly worded email, we would be destabilizing another Middle Eastern dump.

                            OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                            • 11k Posts
                            • 3k Reputation
                            OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            @logicisforsquares said:

                            I actually like that they didn’t take us up on it. We have people already beating the drum to go to war with Iran. If an Iranian sent a strongly worded email, we would be destabilizing another Middle Eastern dump.

                            You have to respond to a bully. Trump showed good restraint in calling off an attack on Iran when he found out the estimated deaths of Iranians would be over 100 and that that was an over reaction response to their shooting down a drone of ours. Instead he went with more sanctions. How England handles the seizures of their tankers by Iran is their business but I doubt if they just sit back and take it. Let's remember too It is Iran that is pushing the envelope and being the aggressor.

                            LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                              @logicisforsquares said:

                              I actually like that they didn’t take us up on it. We have people already beating the drum to go to war with Iran. If an Iranian sent a strongly worded email, we would be destabilizing another Middle Eastern dump.

                              You have to respond to a bully. Trump showed good restraint in calling off an attack on Iran when he found out the estimated deaths of Iranians would be over 100 and that that was an over reaction response to their shooting down a drone of ours. Instead he went with more sanctions. How England handles the seizures of their tankers by Iran is their business but I doubt if they just sit back and take it. Let's remember too It is Iran that is pushing the envelope and being the aggressor.

                              LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 10k Posts
                              • 2k Reputation
                              LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              @oldbrownsfan said:

                              You have to respond to a bully. Trump showed good restraint in calling off an attack on Iran when he found out the estimated deaths of Iranians would be over 100 and that that was an over reaction response to their shooting down a drone of ours. Instead he went with more sanctions. How England handles the seizures of their tankers by Iran is their business but I doubt if they just sit back and take it. Let's remember too It is Iran that is pushing the envelope and being the aggressor.

                              So what acronym are we going to use for the terror org that fills the Tehran power vacuum?

                              OldBrownsFanO 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

                                @oldbrownsfan said:

                                You have to respond to a bully. Trump showed good restraint in calling off an attack on Iran when he found out the estimated deaths of Iranians would be over 100 and that that was an over reaction response to their shooting down a drone of ours. Instead he went with more sanctions. How England handles the seizures of their tankers by Iran is their business but I doubt if they just sit back and take it. Let's remember too It is Iran that is pushing the envelope and being the aggressor.

                                So what acronym are we going to use for the terror org that fills the Tehran power vacuum?

                                OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                                • 11k Posts
                                • 3k Reputation
                                OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                @logicisforsquares said:

                                So what acronym are we going to use for the terror org that fills the Tehran power vacuum?

                                If you want to fight a war and do some nation building like we have tried in Iraq and Afghanistan that might apply but there are other ways to punish Iran and not going for regime change.

                                LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan

                                  @logicisforsquares said:

                                  So what acronym are we going to use for the terror org that fills the Tehran power vacuum?

                                  If you want to fight a war and do some nation building like we have tried in Iraq and Afghanistan that might apply but there are other ways to punish Iran and not going for regime change.

                                  LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 10k Posts
                                  • 2k Reputation
                                  LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  @oldbrownsfan said:

                                  If you want to fight a war and do some nation building like we have tried in Iraq and Afghanistan that might apply but there are other ways to punish Iran and not going for regime change.

                                  We seem to be incapable of not totally botching punishing ME countries. We didn’t put boots on the ground and still found a way to turn Libya into a complete disaster. 

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

                                    @oldbrownsfan said:

                                    If you want to fight a war and do some nation building like we have tried in Iraq and Afghanistan that might apply but there are other ways to punish Iran and not going for regime change.

                                    We seem to be incapable of not totally botching punishing ME countries. We didn’t put boots on the ground and still found a way to turn Libya into a complete disaster. 

                                    calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                                    • 64k Posts
                                    • 8k Reputation
                                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    @logicisforsquares said:

                                    We seem to be incapable of not totally botching punishing ME countries. We didn’t put boots on the ground and still found a way to turn Libya into a complete disaster. 

                                    those middle east countries can be crapholes, and getting rid of the outhouse doesn't make it all clean in the pit. But sometimes, when the outhouse users are terrorists going to kill you..... it's time to drop a big bomb and take out the outhouse and blow the pit out, and let the remaining outhouse users rebuild it.

                                    something like that.

                                    OldBrownsFanO LogicIsForSquaresL 2 Replies Last reply
                                    👍
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • C calfoxwc

                                      @logicisforsquares said:

                                      We seem to be incapable of not totally botching punishing ME countries. We didn’t put boots on the ground and still found a way to turn Libya into a complete disaster. 

                                      those middle east countries can be crapholes, and getting rid of the outhouse doesn't make it all clean in the pit. But sometimes, when the outhouse users are terrorists going to kill you..... it's time to drop a big bomb and take out the outhouse and blow the pit out, and let the remaining outhouse users rebuild it.

                                      something like that.

                                      OldBrownsFan OldBrownsFanO
                                      • 11k Posts
                                      • 3k Reputation
                                      OldBrownsFanO OldBrownsFan wrote on last edited by OldBrownsFan
                                      #22

                                      @calfoxwc said:

                                      those middle east countries can be crapholes, and getting rid of the outhouse doesn't make it all clean in the pit. But sometimes, when the outhouse users are terrorists going to kill you..... it's time to drop a big bomb and take out the outhouse and blow the pit out, and let the remaining outhouse users rebuild it.

                                      something like that.

                                      That is how Israel does it and they have lots of experience dealing with terrorism. In Libya we really didn't have any business getting involved and hindsight being 20/20 Libya was better off with the dictator anyway.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • C calfoxwc

                                        @logicisforsquares said:

                                        We seem to be incapable of not totally botching punishing ME countries. We didn’t put boots on the ground and still found a way to turn Libya into a complete disaster. 

                                        those middle east countries can be crapholes, and getting rid of the outhouse doesn't make it all clean in the pit. But sometimes, when the outhouse users are terrorists going to kill you..... it's time to drop a big bomb and take out the outhouse and blow the pit out, and let the remaining outhouse users rebuild it.

                                        something like that.

                                        LogicIsForSquares LogicIsForSquaresL Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                        • 10k Posts
                                        • 2k Reputation
                                        LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        @calfoxwc said:

                                        those middle east countries can be crapholes, and getting rid of the outhouse doesn't make it all clean in the pit. But sometimes, when the outhouse users are terrorists going to kill you..... it's time to drop a big bomb and take out the outhouse and blow the pit out, and let the remaining outhouse users rebuild it.

                                        something like that.

                                        Overthrowing the dickheads that were in charge didn’t make us any safer. Instead of terrorists focusing on the dictators (i.e. Assad) they were left with lots of territory to control and only the West to think about. I would rather they stay in perpetual conflict in their shitty sandbox.

                                        DieHardBrownsFanD 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • LogicIsForSquaresL LogicIsForSquares

                                          @calfoxwc said:

                                          those middle east countries can be crapholes, and getting rid of the outhouse doesn't make it all clean in the pit. But sometimes, when the outhouse users are terrorists going to kill you..... it's time to drop a big bomb and take out the outhouse and blow the pit out, and let the remaining outhouse users rebuild it.

                                          something like that.

                                          Overthrowing the dickheads that were in charge didn’t make us any safer. Instead of terrorists focusing on the dictators (i.e. Assad) they were left with lots of territory to control and only the West to think about. I would rather they stay in perpetual conflict in their shitty sandbox.

                                          DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                                          • 28k Posts
                                          • 6k Reputation
                                          DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          @logicisforsquares said:

                                          Overthrowing the dickheads that were in charge didn’t make us any safer. Instead of terrorists focusing on the dictators (i.e. Assad) they were left with lots of territory to control and only the West to think about. I would rather they stay in perpetual conflict in their shitty sandbox.

                                          Northern Iran:

                                          Image result for IRAN BEAUTIFUL PLACES PICS

                                          "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                                          LogicIsForSquaresL 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate